PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Youngchul Jung
, Junsuk Lee, Seoung-Jin Hong, Kwantae Noh, Hyeong-Seob Kim, Ahran Pae
, Junsuk Lee, Seoung-Jin Hong, Kwantae Noh, Hyeong-Seob Kim, Ahran Pae
Abstract
In edentulous patient, not only mastication and pronunciation but also esthetics are compromised. By restoring an edentulous patient with complete dentures, masticatory function and esthetics can be rehabilitated. The advantages of the dentures using CAD/CAM are that they can be reconstructed ubiquitously with stored data, and the strength and density of CAD/CAM material are clinically acceptable. In this clinical report, interocclusal record was taken in a conventional manner and then two lab processing procedures were performed: conventional method and CAD/CAM method. Two types of processing procedures were compared and evaluated. Fair clinical results were obtained in both ways, satisfying the patient.
Figures and Tables
Fig. 1
Pre-operative extraoral photographs. (A) Frontal view without denture, (B) Frontal view with denture, (C) Lateral view without denture, (D) Lateral view with denture.
Fig. 3
Old denture analysis. (A) Frontal view with denture, (B) Lateral view with denture, (C, D) Comparison of old denture with diagnostic casts.
Fig. 5
Final impression taking (C, D) with individual tray (A, B) and fabrication of definitive cast (E, F).
Fig. 8
Scanning definitive casts (A, B), wax rim (C, D), bite rim (E), and align scanned casts using Exocad Software (F).
Fig. 9
Design of complete denture using Exocad program. (A) Anterior teeth setup using upper wax rim, (B) Whole denture teeth setup, (C) Artificial gum formation.
Fig. 10
Fabricating virtual denture base using Meshmixer program. (A) Upper teeth STL file, (B) give offset to upper teeth, (C) Subtract offset upper teeth from upper denture STL file, (D) Upper denture base having cement gap.
References
1. Bilgin MS, Erdem A, Aglarci OS, Dilber E. Fabricating complete dentures with CAD/CAM and RP technologies. J Prosthodont. 2015; 24:576–579.
2. AlHelal A, AlRumaih HS, Kattadiyil MT, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. Comparison of retention between maxillary milled and conventional denture bases: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117:233–238.
3. Kattadiyil MT, Jekki R, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114:818–825.
4. Fradeani M. Esthetic rehabilitation in fixed prosthodontics. Seoul: DaehanNarae Publishing;2007.
5. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997; 25:284–290.
6. Neill DJ, Nairn RI. Complete denture prosthetics. 1st ed. London: Wright Co.;1968.
7. Fayz F, Eslami A. Determination of occlusal vertical dimension: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 1988; 59:321–323.
8. Lee S, Hong SJ, Paek J, Pae A, Kwon KR, Noh K. Comparing accuracy of denture bases fabricated by injection molding, CAD/CAM milling, and rapid prototyping method. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019; 11:55–64.
XML Download