PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Jeongkeun Park
, Jong-Eun Kim, Ji-Man Park, Jeehwan Kim, June-Sung Shim
, Jong-Eun Kim, Ji-Man Park, Jeehwan Kim, June-Sung Shim
Abstract
As implant can be covered by National Health Insurance Service (NHIS), it was increased the interest in the removable partial denture (RPD) with the surveyed fixed prosthesis supported by implant fixture. To achieve predictable result, it needs the prudent implant planning by basic principles of RPD and patient's residual ridge. This 67 years old age male had a few unilateral remaining teeth, and hoped the treatment covered by NHIS. As using CAD software, the position of implant is planned with regarding to occlusal table of provisional denture, basic principles of RPD, and resorbed residual ridge. The definitive prostheses can ensure the stability and retention of removable prosthesis. When planning implant fixed prostheses, the digital technique was utilized to consider basic principle of RPD and resorbed residual ridge. As a result, it provided satisfactory prostheses.
Figures and Tables
Fig. 2
Implant planning. (A) Frontal view, (B) Occlusal view, (C) Frontal view with implant axis, (D) Superimposition with temporary denture, (E, F) #41 area, (G) #42 area, (H) #44 area.
Fig. 3
(A) Master cast of maxilla, (B) Final impression of maxilla, (C) Final impression of mandible, (D) Master cast of mandible.
Fig. 5
Esthetic try-in. (A) Abutment try-in, (B) Implant surveyed crown try-in, (C) Occlusal view of mandible, (D) Frontal view.
References
1. Bolouri A. Removable partial denture design for a few remaining natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 39:346–348.
2. Perel ML. Telescope dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1973; 29:151–156.
3. Sadig W, Fahmi F. The modified swing-lock: a new approach. J Prosthet Dent. 1995; 74:428–431.
4. Swami PR, Sanyal P, Sam SM. Classification of unconventional removable partial denture. Int J Oral Care Res. 2018; 6:77–83.
5. Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 50:399–410.
6. Chikunov I, Doan P, Vahidi F. Implant-retained partial overdenture with resilient attachments. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17:141–148.
7. Kaufmann R, Friedli M, Hug S, Mericske-Stern R. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years. Int J Prosthodont. 2009; 22:233–241.
8. Kuzmanovic DV, Payne AG, Purton DG. Distal implants to modify the Kennedy classification of a removable partial denture: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92:8–11.
9. Ohkubo C, Kurihara D, Shimpo H, Suzuki Y, Kokubo Y, Hosoi T. Effect of implant support on distal extension removable partial dentures: in vitro assessment. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34:52–56.
10. Park JM, Koak JY, Kim SK, Joo JH, Heo SJ. Consideration for the combination treatment of removable partial denture and implant. Implantol. 2015; 19:101–111.
11. Grossmann Y, Nissan J, Levin L. Clinical effectiveness of implant-supported removable partial dentures: a review of the literature and retrospective case evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67:1941–1946.
12. Mijiritsky E. Implants in conjunction with removable partial dentures: a literature review. Implant Dent. 2007; 16:146–154.
13. Shahmiri RA, Atieh MA. Mandibular Kennedy Class I implant-tooth-borne removable partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37:225–234.
14. Gross MD. Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts. Aust Dent J. 2008; 53:S60–S68.
15. Zancopé K, Abrão GM, Karam FK, Neves FD. Placement of a distal implant to convert a mandibular removable Kennedy class I to an implant-supported partial removable Class III dental prosthesis: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113:528–533.
16. Yoda N, Zheng K, Chen J, Li W, Swain M, Sasaki K, Li Q. Bone morphological effects on post-implantation remodeling of maxillary anterior buccal bone: A clinical and biomechanical study. J Prosthodont Res. 2017; 61:393–402.
17. Pihlaja J, Näpänkangas R, Kuoppala R, Raustia A. Veneered zirconia crowns as abutment teeth for partial removable dental prostheses: a clinical 4-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114:633–636.
XML Download