PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Purpose
To report a case of recurrent endophthalmitis due to methicillin resistant Staphylococcus hemolyticus after phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
Case summary
A 76-year-old female visited our outpatient clinic with decreased vision 40 days after uncomplicated cataract surgery in her right eye. At the visit, anterior chamber inflammation and cloudy fluid between the posterior capsule and IOL were observed. Uveitis due to residual cortex of lens or capsular block syndrome was suspected, so YAG laser capsulotomy and subconjunctival injection of dexamethasone were performed. Two days later, hypopyon and vitreous opacity were seen. The patient underwent an emergency vitrectomy and intravitreal antibiotic injection with suspicion of bacterial endophthalmitis. The culture was negative. Twenty days after the vitrectomy, anterior chamber inflammation and vitreous opacity developed. The recurrence of endophthalmitis was suspected due to infection by bacteria in the surrounding tissue of the IOL, so the patient underwent an IOL and lens capsule removal with intravitreal antibiotic injection. At this time, the culture revealed methicillin resistant staphylococcus hemolyticus. Systemic and topical vancomycin was then administered, resulting in decreased inflammation. Twenty days after the IOL removal, decreased vision, anterior chamber inflammation, and vitreous opacity developed. Endophthalmitis was decreased by intravitreal antibiotic injection and topical antibiotic treatment.
Figures and Tables
Figure 1
Anterior segment photographs and fundus photographs at the initial presentation. (A) Anterior chamber inflammation and cloudy fluid between the posterior capsule and intraocular lens were seen. (B) Two days after YAG laser posterior capsulotomy, hypopyon developed. (C) The fundus photo after YAG laser posterior capsulotomy and subconjunctival injection of dexamethasone. Fundus photo was hazy due to vitritis. (D) Fundus photo after emergency vitrectomy, anterior chamber irrigation and intravitreal antibiotics injection. There were no lesions, scars, or pigmentary changes in the macula or periphery retina. Mild hazy view was observed because of residual inflammation.
Figure 2
Twenty days after the first vitrectomy, anterior segment photographs and fundus photographs. (A) Slit like hypopyon was observed. (B) Hazy view of the fundus was observed. (C) The fundus photographs - after intraocular lens removal and intravitreal antibiotics injection.
Figure 3
Follow up optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescein angiography (FAG). (A) After the first vitrectomy, OCT of the patient showed normal retinal layers. (B, C) OCT of the patient before (B) and after (C) scleral fixation of intraocular lens (IOL). Epiretinal membrane and hyper-reflective dots were observed on the patient's retinal layers. (D) FAG of the patient before scleral fixation of IOL. Some leakage observed on the late phase of fluorescein angiography.
References
1. Vaziri K, Schwartz SG, Kishor K, Flynn HW Jr. Endophthalmitis: state of the art. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015; 9:95–108.
2. Durand ML. Endophthalmitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013; 19:227–234.
3. Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group. Results of the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study. A randomized trial of immediate vitrectomy and of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113:1479–1496.
4. Ramakrishnan R, Bharathi MJ, Shivkumar C, et al. Microbiological profile of culture-proven cases of exogenous and endogenous endophthalmitis: a 10-year retrospective study. Eye (Lond). 2009; 23:945–956.
5. Cao H, Zhang L, Li L, Lo S. Risk factors for acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e71731.
6. Shirodkar AR, Pathengay A, Flynn HW Jr, et al. Delayed-versus acute-onset endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012; 153:391–398.e2.
7. Königsdörffer E, Augsten R, Oehme A, Strobel J. Prognosis of postoperative endophthalmitis. Ophthalmologe. 2000; 97:121–125.
8. Rogers NK, Fox PD, Noble BA, et al. Aggressive management of an epidemic of chronic pseudophakic endophthalmitis: results and literature survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994; 78:115–119.
9. Schimel AM, Miller D, Flynn HW Jr. Endophthalmitis isolates and antibiotic susceptibilities: a 10-year review of culture-proven cases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013; 156:50–52.e1.
10. Czekaj T, Ciszewski M, Szewczyk EM. Staphylococcus hemolyticus - an emerging threat in the twilight of the antibiotics age. Microbiology. 2015; 161:2061–2068.
11. Wong RW, Rhodes KM. Endophthalmitis caused by Staphylococcus hominis and two different colonies of Staphylococcus hemolyticus after cataract surgery. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2015; 9:181–184.
12. Packer M, Chang DF, Dewey SH, et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and management of acute postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:1699–1714.
13. Han DP, Wisniewski SR, Wilson LA, et al. Spectrum and susceptibilities of microbiologic isolates in the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996; 122:1–17.
14. Callegan MC, Engelbert M, Parke DW 2nd, et al. Bacterial endophthalmitis: epidemiology, therapeutics, and bacterium-host interactions. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002; 15:111–124.
15. Smith RE. Inflammation after cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986; 102:788–790.
16. Ormerod LD, Ho DD, Becker LE, et al. Endophthalmitis caused by the coagulase-negative staphylococcoi. 1 Disease spectrum and outcome. Ophthalmology. 1993; 100:715–723.
XML Download