Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js

Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs Adm > v.25(3) > 1129538

TOOLS
Kim and Kim: Analysis of Knowledge in Nursing Management Educational Objectives based on Anderson's Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy
Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2019; 25(3): 198-207.

Published online: 30 June 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2019.25.3.198

Analysis of Knowledge in Nursing Management Educational Objectives based on Anderson's Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy

Bok Nam Kim1, Myung Ja Kim2

1Department of Nursing, Daegu Health College, Korea.

2Department of Nursing, Dong-eui University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Kim, Myung Ja. Department of Nursing, Dong-eui University, 176 Eomgwang-no, Busan jin-gu, Busan 47340, Korea. Tel: +82-51-890-1558, Fax: +82-505-182-6876, deukmj@deu.ac.kr

Received 28 December 2018       Revised 4 April 2019       Accepted 15 April 2019

Copyright © 2019 Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

(open-access):

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze the Nursing management educational objectives and nurse duties required to be achieved in the nursing management curriculum in nursing job analysis.

Methods

Nursing management educational objectives and knowledge to be achieved in a nursing management curriculum in nursing job analysis were analyzed using Anderson's Revision of Bloom's taxonomy of Educational Objectives.

Results

The analysis showed that 172 (59.3%) of the 290 educational objectives of the nursing management corresponded to ‘conceptual knowledge’ and 167 (57.6%) of the ‘cognitive process dimension’ were ‘understanding’. In the job analysis, 29 out of 57 (50.9%) were procedural knowledge. The finding indicates that ‘health promotion and maintenance’ duty was excluded from the job analysis, but included in the nursing management curriculum and objectives.

Conclusion

The results of this study contribute to the foundation of nursing management as a practical study by analyzing the goal of nursing management learning in connection with the job analysis required in the field.

Keywords: Nursing management, Educational objectives, Bloom's taxonomy

Figures and Tables

jkana-25-198-g001
Figure 1

Bloom (1956) vs. Anderson (2001) of Taxonomy.

Download Figure

Table 1

Knowledge Dimension of Nursing Management Educational Objectives

jkana-25-198-i001

AA=Knowledge of terminology; AB=Knowledge of specific details and elements; BA=Knowledge of classifications and categories; BB=Knowledge of principles and generalizations; BC=Knowledge of theories, models, and structures; CA=Knowledge of subject-specific skills and algorithms; CB=Knowledge of subject-specific techniques and methods; CC=Knowledge of criteria for determining when to use appropriate procedures; DB=Knowledge about cognitive tasks, including appropriate contextual and conditional knowledge.

Download Table

Table 2

Verb list & Cognitive Process Dimension of Nursing Management Educational Objectives

jkana-25-198-i002

*Alphabetical order.

Download Table

Table 3

Knowledge & Cognitive Process Dimension Analysis of Nursing Management Educational Objectives

jkana-25-198-i003

Download Table

Table 4

Knowledge Dimension of Nurse Job Analysis

jkana-25-198-i004

AA=Knowledge of terminology; AB=Knowledge of specific details and elements; BA=Knowledge of classifications and categories; BB=Knowledge of principles and generalizations; BC=Knowledge of theories, models, and structures; CA=Knowledge of subject-specific skills and algorithms; CB=Knowledge of subject-specific techniques and methods; CC=Knowledge of criteria for determining when to use appropriate procedures; DB=Knowledge about cognitive tasks, including appropriate contextual and conditional knowledge.

Download Table

References

1. Tyler RW. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press;1969.
2. Bloom BS, Engelhart MD. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 1. Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green;1956.
3. Krathwohl DR, Bloom BS, Masia BB. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 2. Affective domain. New York: Longmans, Green;1956.
4. Simpson EJ. The classification of educational objectives: psychomotor domain. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois;1966.
5. Harrow AJ. A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain.: A guide for developing behavioral objectives. New York: David McKay;1972.
6. Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR. HS Kang L Kang DH Kwon YM Park W Lee YN Cho DB Ju HS Choi . A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Seoul: Academy Press;2005.
7. Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. Nursing management educational objectives [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Academy of Nursing Administration;cited January 3, 2017. Available from:http://www.kanad.or.kr/index.php?page=view&pg=&idx=81&hCode=BOARD&bo_idx=1&sfl=&stx=.
8. Park SA, Jung MS, Kim JH, Kim JK, Joo MK, Park SH, et al. Nursing management: nursing business and policy. Paju: Koonja;2010.
9. Park IS. Research report of 2nd job description of nurses. Report, vol RE3-1210-05. Seoul: Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute;2012.
10. Yang JS, Lee GS. Analysis of knowledge and competency for the fourth industrial revolution based on Anderson's revision of Bloom's taxonomy: Focused on achievement standard in the 2015 revised practical arts (Technology · Home Economics). Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association. 2018; 30(3):129–149. DOI: 10.19031/jkheea.2018.09.30.3.129.
11. Yuk KM, Cho HJ. Analysis of the lesson goals in technology-home economics textbooks according to the revised National Curriculum of 2007. Secondary Education Research. 2011; 59(4):913–938.
12. Choi JI, Paik SH. A comparative analysis of achievement standards of the 2007 & 2009 revised elementary science curriculum with next generation science standards in US based on Bloom's revised taxonomy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education. 2015; 35(2):277–288.
13. Lee MJ, Lee GS, Yoo TM. Analysis of home economics textbooks of 2007 revised curriculum based on 'A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives'. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education. 2011; 17(2):149–176. DOI: 10.17055/jpaer.2011.17.2.149.
14. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman;1997.
15. Marzano RJ. Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press;2001.
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Bok Nam Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2294-1023

Myung Ja Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9536-1137

Similar articles