Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs > v.49(3) > 1129523

Park and Kim: Effect of Ghrelin on Memory Impairment in a Rat Model of Vascular Dementia

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify the effect of ghrelin on memory impairment in a rat model of vascular dementia induced by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion.

Methods

Randomized controlled groups and the posttest design were used. We established the representative animal model of vascular dementia caused by bilateral common carotid artery occlusion and administered 80 μg/kg ghrelin intraperitoneally for 4 weeks. First, behavioral studies were performed to evaluate spatial memory. Second, we used molecular biology techniques to determine whether ghrelin ameliorates the damage to the structure and function of the white matter and hippocampus, which are crucial to learning and memory.

Results

Ghrelin improved the spatial memory impairment in the Y-maze and Morris water maze test. In the white matter, demyelination and atrophy of the corpus callosum were significantly decreased in the ghrelin-treated group. In the hippocampus, ghrelin increased the length of hippocampal microvessels and reduced the microvessels pathology. Further, we confirmed angiogenesis enhancement through the fact that ghrelin treatment increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-related protein levels, which are the most powerful mediators of angiogenesis in the hippocampus.

Conclusion

We found that ghrelin affected the damaged myelin sheaths and microvessels by increasing angiogenesis, which then led to neuroprotection and improved memory function. We suggest that further studies continue to accumulate evidence of the effect of ghrelin. Further, we believe that the development of therapeutic interventions that increase ghrelin may contribute to memory improvement in patients with vascular dementia.

References

1. Iadecola C. The pathobiology of vascular dementia. Neuron. 2013; 80(4):844–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.008.
crossref
2. Kalaria RN. The pathology and pathophysiology of vascular dementia. Neuropharmacology. 2018; 134(B):226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.12.030.
crossref
3. Ma X, Sun Z, Liu Y, Jia Y, Zhang B, Zhang J. Resveratrol improves cognition and reduces oxidative stress in rats with vascular dementia. Neural Regeneration Research. 2013; 8(22):2050–2059. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.22.004.
4. Candelario-Jalil E, Thompson J, Taheri S, Grossetete M, Adair JC, Edmonds E, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases are associated with increased blood–brain barrier opening in vascular cognitive impairment. Stroke. 2011; 42(5):1345–1350. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.600825.
crossref
5. Chen J, Cui X, Zacharek A, Cui Y, Roberts C, Chopp M. White matter damage and the effect of matrix metalloproteinases in type 2 diabetic mice after stroke. Stroke. 2011; 42(2):445–452. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.596486.
crossref
6. Simpson JE, Fernando MS, Clark L, Ince PG, Matthews F, Forster G, et al. White matter lesions in an unselected cohort of the elderly: Astrocytic, microglial and oligodendrocyte precursor cell responses. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiolo- gy. 2007; 33(4):410–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00828.x.
crossref
7. Park HR, Park M, Choi J, Park KY, Chung HY, Lee J. A high-fat diet impairs neurogenesis: Involvement of lipid peroxidation and brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Neuroscience Letters. 2010; 482(3):235–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.07.046.
crossref
8. O’Brien JT, Thomas A. Vascular dementia. The Lancet. 2015; 386(10004):1698–1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00463-8.
crossref
9. Jiwa NS, Garrard P, Hainsworth AH. Experimental models of vascular dementia and vascular cognitive impairment: A systematic review. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2010; 115(4):814–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06958.x.
crossref
10. Baskys A, Hou AC. Vascular dementia: Pharmacological treatment approaches and perspectives. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2007; 2(3):327–335.
11. Olazarán J, Reisberg B, Clare L, Cruz I, Peña-Casanova J, del Ser T, et al. Nonpharmacological therapies in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review of efficacy. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders. 2010; 30(2):161–178. https://doi.org/10.1159/000316119.
crossref
12. Andrews ZB. The extra-hypothalamic actions of ghrelin on neuronal function. Trends in Neurosciences. 2011; 34(1):31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2010.10.001.
crossref
13. Park S. Ghrelin. Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2010; 25(4):258–263. https://doi.org/10.3803/enm.2010.25.4.258.
crossref
14. Kojima M, Hosoda H, Date Y, Nakazato M, Matsuo H, Kanga-wa K. Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature. 1999; 402(6762):656–660. https://doi.org/10.1038/45230.
crossref
15. Moon M, Kim S, Hwang L, Park S. Ghrelin regulates hippocampal neurogenesis in adult mice. Endocrine Journal. 2009; 56(3):525–531. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.K09E-089.
crossref
16. Diano S, Farr SA, Benoit SC, McNay EC, da Silva I, Horvath B, et al. Ghrelin controls hippocampal spine synapse density and memory performance. Nature Neuroscience. 2006; 9(3):381–388. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1656.
crossref
17. Carlini VP, Varas MM, Cragnolini AB, Schiöth HB, Scimonel-li TN, de Barioglio SR. Differential role of the hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal raphe nucleus in regulating feeding, memory, and anxiety-like behavioral responses to ghrelin. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2004; 313(3):635–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.150.
crossref
18. Liu Y, Chen L, Xu X, Vicaut E, Sercombe R. Both ischemic preconditioning and ghrelin administration protect hippocampus from ischemia/reperfusion and upregulate uncoupling protein-2. BMC Physiology. 2009; 9:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6793-9-17.
crossref
19. Miao Y, Xia Q, Hou Z, Zheng Y, Pan H, Zhu S. Ghrelin protects cortical neuron against focal ischemia/reperfusion in rats. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2007; 359(3):795–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.05.192.
crossref
20. Liu Y, Wang PS, Xie D, Liu K, Chen L. Ghrelin reduces injury of hippocampal neurons in a rat model of cerebral ischemia/ reperfusion. Chinese Journal of Physiology. 2006; 49(5):244–250.
21. Wang P, Xie ZH, Guo YJ, Zhao CP, Jiang H, Song Y, et al. VEGF-induced angiogenesis ameliorates the memory impairment in APP transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2011; 411(3):620–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.07.003.
crossref
22. Lopez NE, Krzyzaniak MJ, Blow C, Putnam J, Ortiz-Pomales Y, Hageny AM, et al. Ghrelin prevents disruption of the blood–brain barrier after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2012; 29(2):385–393. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.2053.
crossref
23. Mead R. The design of experiments: Statistical principles for practical applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;1990. p. 7–8.
24. Spence KW, Lippitt R. An experimental test of the sign-gestalt theory of trial and error learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1946; 36(6):491–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062419.
crossref
25. Morris RGM, Garrud P, Rawlins JNP, O’Keefe J. Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature. 1982; 297(5868):681–683. https://doi.org/10.1038/297681a0.
crossref
26. Venkat P, Chopp M, Chen J. Models and mechanisms of vascular dementia. Experimental Neurology. 2015; 272:97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.05.006.
crossref
27. Kim Y, Kim S, Kim C, Sato T, Kojima M, Park S. Ghrelin is required for dietary restriction-induced enhancement of hippocampal neurogenesis: Lessons from ghrelin knockout mice. Endocrine Journal. 2015; 62(3):269–275. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ14-0436.
crossref
28. Hansen TK, Dall R, Hosoda H, Kojima M, Kangawa K, Christiansen JS, et al. Weight loss increases circulating levels of ghrelin in human obesity. Clinical Endocrinology. 2002; 56(2):203–206. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0300-0664.2001.01456.x.
crossref
29. Harvey J. Leptin regulation of neuronal morphology and hippocampal synaptic function. Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience. 2013; 5:3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2013.00003.
crossref
30. Irving AJ, Harvey J. Leptin regulation of hippocampal synaptic function in health and disease. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2014; 369(1633):20130155. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0155.
crossref
31. Li E, Kim Y, Kim S, Park S. Ghrelin-induced hippocampal neurogenesis and enhancement of cognitive function are mediated independently of GH/IGF-1 axis: Lessons from the spontaneous dwarf rats. Endocrine Journal. 2013; 60(9):1065–1075. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.ej13-0045.
crossref
32. Chen L, Xing T, Wang M, Miao Y, Tang M, Chen J, et al. Local infusion of ghrelin enhanced hippocampal synaptic plasticity and spatial memory through activation of phosphoinositide 3‐ kinase in the dentate gyrus of adult rats. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2011; 33(2):266–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07491.x.
33. Innocenti GM. General organization of callosal connections in the cerebral cortex. Jones EG, Peters A, editors. Sensory-Motor Areas and Aspects of Cortical Connectivity. Boston (MA): Springer US;1986. p. 291–353.
crossref
34. Wu XP, Gao YJ, Yang JL, Xu M, Sun DH. Quantitative measurement to evaluate morphological changes of the corpus callosum in patients with subcortical ischemic vascular dementia. Acta Radiologica. 2015; 56(2):214–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185114520863.
crossref
35. Lee JY, Oh TH, Yune TY. Ghrelin inhibits hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptotic cell death of oligodendrocytes via ERK and p38MAPK signaling. Endocrinology. 2011; 152(6):2377–2386. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2011-0090.
crossref
36. Neto CJBF, Paganelli RA, Benetoli A, Lima KCM, Milani H. Permanent, 3-stage, 4-vessel occlusion as a model of chronic and progressive brain hypoperfusion in rats: A neurohisto-logical and behavioral analysis. Behavioural Brain Research. 2005; 160(2):312–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2004.12.016.
crossref
37. Jantaratnotai N, Ryu JK, Schwab C, McGeer PL, McLarnon JG. Comparison of vascular perturbations in an Aβ-injected animal model and in AD brain. International Journal of Alzhei- mer’s Disease. 2011; 2011:918280. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/918280.
crossref
38. Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 2000; 407(6801):249–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/35025220.
crossref
39. Plate KH. Mechanisms of angiogenesis in the brain. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology. 1999; 58(4):313–320. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005072-199904000-00001.
crossref
40. Fan Y, Yang GY. Therapeutic angiogenesis for brain ischemia: A brief review. Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology. 2007; 2(3):284–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-007-9073-3.
crossref
41. Pillai A, Mahadik SP. Differential effects of haloperidol and olanzapine on levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis in rat hippocampus. Schizophrenia Research. 2006; 87(1-3):48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2006.06.017.
crossref
42. Shiojima I, Walsh K. Role of Akt signaling in vascular homeostasis and angiogenesis. Circulation Research. 2002; 90(12):1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.0000022200.71892.9f.
crossref
43. Wang L, Chen Q, Li G, Ke D. Ghrelin stimulates angiogenesis via GHSR1a-dependent MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt signal pathways in rat cardiac microvascular endothelial cells. Peptides. 2012; 33(1):92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2011.11.001.
crossref
44. Chen X, Chen Q, Wang L, Li G. Ghrelin induces cell migration through GHSR1a-mediated PI3K/Akt/eNOS/NO signaling pathway in endothelial progenitor cells. Metabolism. 2013; 62(5):743–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2012.09.014.
crossref
45. Rossi F, Castelli A, Bianco MJ, Bertone C, Brama M, San-tiemma V. Ghrelin induces proliferation in human aortic endothelial cells via ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt activation. Peptides. 2008; 29(11):2046–2051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2008.07.002.
crossref

Figure 1.
Flow of the study.
jkan-49-317f1.tif
Figure 2.
Results of the immunohistochemistry analysis. (A) Staining by NeuN in the hippocampus. (B) Staining by RECA-1 in the hippocampus. (C) Photomicrographs of callosal thickness in the corpus callosum. (D) Staining by MBP in the corpus callosum. (E) Double immunofluorescence staining for VEGF and RECA-1 demonstrates their localization in the hippocampus. Scale bar represents 100 μm. * means p<.05 when compared to the VaD group.
jkan-49-317f2.tif
Figure 3.
Result of western blot analysis. (A) Western blot analysis of VEGF, VEGFR2, and pAKT. (B) Expression level of VEGF in the hippocampus. (C) Expression level of VEGFR2 in the hippocampus. (D) Expression level of pAKT in the hippocampus. * means p<.05 when compared to the VaD group.
jkan-49-317f3.tif
Table 1.
Results of the Behavior Test
Variable Sham (n=7)
VaD (n=6)
VaD+ghrelin (n=7)
F p Scheffe
M±SEM M±SEM M±SEM
Y-maze (% of alternation) 70.57±1.51 57.17±2.40 72.14±2.25 15.01 <.001 a,c>b
MWM (number of visits) 4.00±0.15 1.96±0.18 2.93±0.24 26.21 <.001 a>c>b

VaD=vascular dementia; M=mean; SEM=Standard error of mean; MWM=Morris water maze test.

TOOLS
Similar articles