PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of the study was to explore the experience of patients with facial burn injuries regarding their interpersonal relationships.
Methods
The phenomenological research method was used. Participants of the study consisted of five males and three females. Data were collected through individual in-depth interviews from November, 2014 to February, 2015 and analyzed using Colaizzi's method.
Results
Five theme clusters were extracted that described patients’ experiences. They are “being a lonely foreigner,” “closing my mind toward the world,” “hiding hurt feelings,” “companion of my face,” and “communicating with the world”.
Conclusion
The results of this study provide a deep understanding and insight into the experience of interpersonal relationships among facial burn patients. The development of a comprehensive program including physical, psychological, and social aspects is recommended to address the problems facial burn patients encounter in interpersonal relationships and to facilitate interaction.
References
1. Oh W, Yoon H, Choi S, Kim H, Park S, Jang H, et al. A study on the quality of life of burn patients: Focused on the need of medical social work service. Journal of Korean Burn Society. 2003; 6(2):99–110.
2. Oh JO. Effects of skin rehabilitation massage therapy on burn scars and stress. Journal of Korean Burn Society. 2007; 10(1):55–59.
3. Choi JH, Lee JW, Ko JH, Seo DK, Jang YC, Oh SJ. An analysis of facial burns. Journal of Korean Burn Society. 2006; 9(1):33–35.
4. National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). 2016 National health insurance statistical yearbook [Internet]. Wonju: NHIS;c2017. [cited 2018 Jun 24]. Available from:. https://www.nhis.or.kr/menu/boardRetriveMenuSet.xx?menuId=F3321.
5. National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). 2015 National health insurance statistical yearbook [Internet]. Wonju: NHIS;c2016. [cited 2018 Jun 24]. Available from:. https://www.nhis.or.kr/menu/boardRetriveMenuSet.xx?menuId=F3321.
6. Zatriqi V, Arifi H, Zatriqi S, Duci S, Rrecaj SH, Marti-naj M. Facial burns—our experience. Materia Socio Medica. 2013; 25(1):26–27. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2013.25.26-27.
7. Shepherd L, Tattersall H, Buchanan H. Looking in the mirror for the first time after facial burns: A retrospective mixed methods study. Burns. 2014; 40(8):1624–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2014.03.011.
8. Kim DH. A study on social support by the characteristics of the burned facial disorder. Journal of Social Welfare Development. 2007; 13(1):1–30.
9. Pallua N, Künsebeck HW, Noah EM. Psychosocial adjustments 5 years after burn injury. Burns. 2003; 29(2):143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4179(02)00238-3.
10. Hoogewerf CJ, van Baar ME, Hop MJ, Bloemen MCT, Mid-delkoop E, Nieuwenhuis MK. Burns to the head and neck: Epidemiology and predictors of surgery. Burns. 2013; 39(6):1184–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.03.006.
11. Ye EM. Psychological morbidity in patients with facial and neck burns. Burns. 1998; 24(7):646–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4179(98)00081-3.
12. Partridge J. Changing faces: The challenge of facial disfigurement. 3rd ed. London: Changing Faces;1997. p. 1–131.
13. Yang HT. A study on the influencing factors of a discrimination degree among disabled people with severe burns - focus on disability, psychological, use social welfare service. Social Science Research Review. 2011; 27(1):375–399.
14. Kong BH. Phenomenology in nursing research. Research in Philosophy and Phenomenology. 2004; 23:151–178.
15. Colaizzi PF. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. Valle RS, King M, editors. Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York (NY): Oxford University Press;1978. p. 48–71.
16. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass Publishers;1981. p. 103–127.
17. Oh WH, Park SY, Jang HJ. Effectiveness of the group counseling program to improve social adjustment of burn patients: Focusing on MBTI growth group program. Journal of Korean Burn Society. 2002; 5(2):91–101.
18. Kim KH, Lee HK. The effect of positive emotion on interpersonal competence: The exploration of path model among experiential avoidance, self-compassion, and cognitive empathy. Korea Journal of Counseling. 2015; 16(6):83–107.
19. Lee JM. Phenomenological study on post-discharge life experiences of burn patients [master’s thesis]. Seoul: Chung-Ang University;2010. p. 1–94.
20. Wei Y, Li-Tsang CWP. Rehabilitation of patients with facial burn injury: Principles and practice experiences [Internet]. Handerson (NV): JSM Burns and Trauma;c2017. [cited 2019 Jan 11]. Available from:. https://www.jscimedcentral.org/Burns/burns-2-1023.pdf.
21. Cho HJ, Kwon JH. Interpersonal approach in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Korea. 2002; 2(1):51–68.
22. Moi AL, Gjengedal E. Life after burn injury: Striving for regained freedom. Qualitative Health Research. 2008; 18(12):1621–1630. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308326652.
23. Williams NR, Davey M, Klock-Powell K. Rising from the ashes: Stories of recovery, adaptation and resiliency in burn survivors. Social Work in Health Care. 2003; 36(4):53–77. https://doi.org/10.1300/J010v36n04_04.
24. Moi AL, Gjengedal E. The lived experience of relationships after major burn injury. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2014; 23(15-16):2323–2331. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12514.
25. Dahl O, Wickman M, Wengström Y. Adapting to life after burn injury—reflections on care. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 2012; 33(5):595–605. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e31823d0a11.
26. Connell KM, Phillips M, Coates R, Doherty-Poirier M, Wood FM. Sexuality, body image and relationships following burns: Analysis of BSHS-B outcome measures. Burns. 2014; 40(7):1329–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2014.01.006.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the Participants
Table 2.
Theme Clusters and Themes on Interpersonal Relationship of Patients with Facial Burn Injuries
XML Download