Evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in orthodontic patients using the modified Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) questionnaire

Yong-Tae Nam; Ji-Won Yun; Eun-Joo Jun; Seong-Sik Kim; Jin-Bom Kim; Seung-Hwa Jeong

doi:10.11149/jkaoh.2019.43.2.43

Journal List > J Korean Acad Oral Health > v.43(2) > 1129189

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Nam, Yun, Jun, Kim, Kim, and Jeong: Evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in orthodontic patients using the modified Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) questionnaire

Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health 2019; 43(2): 43-49.

Published online: 28 June 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11149/jkaoh.2019.43.2.43

Evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in orthodontic patients using the modified Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) questionnaire

Yong-Tae Nam¹

, Ji-Won Yun¹

, Eun-Joo Jun¹

, Seong-Sik Kim²

, Jin-Bom Kim¹

, Seung-Hwa Jeong¹

¹Department of Preventive & Community Dentistry, Pusan National University School of Dentistry, Yangsan, Korea.

²Department of Orthodontics, Pusan National University School of Dentistry, Yangsan, Korea.

Corresponding Author: Seung-Hwa Jeong. Department of Preventive & Community Dentistry, Pusan National University School of Dentistry, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Meulgeum-up, Yangsan 50612, Korea Tel: +82-51-510-8222, Fax: +82-51-510-8221, jsh0917@pusan.ac.kr

Received 2 October 2018 Revised 12 March 2019 Accepted 24 March 2019

Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health

(open-access):

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Objectives

This study evaluated oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL) before and after orthodontic treatment (orthodontic-tx) using the modified Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) questionnaire.

Methods

Ninety-six subjects (32 males, 64 females; 48 ranging between 12–17 years, 48 ranging between 18–29 years) who completed orthodontic-tx in two dental clinics in Busan from May to December 2013 participated in this study. The participants self-reported their OHQoL on the Korean translated version of the OIDP before and during orthodontic-tx when the brackets were removed from their teeth. The OHQoL was again measured 1 month later. The visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (never) to 10 (definitely yes) was used to quantify the OHQoL. The physical, psychological, and social effects of the orthodontic-tx on daily performance were analyzed according to age and gender.

Results

The OHQoL score was lower during the orthodontic-tx (7.49±0.19) than before (5.51±0.18), but the final OHQoL score, after orthodontic-tx (9.39±0.07), was higher than the score before treatment. The trend was the same over all sub performances. Before orthodontic-tx, the OHQoL score related to psychological performance (6.98±0.22) was the lowest compared to physical and social performance. During orthodontic-tx, the scores related to physical performance, especially in the older (0.7 times) and female (0.62 times) groups, decreased the most compared to before treatment. Psychological performance, especially in the older (1.81 times) and female (1.66 times) groups, increased the most after orthodontic-tx.

Conclusions

This study confirmed that orthodontic-tx affects the OHQoL according to age and gender. Specific approaches, classified by age and gender, are needed to improve the quality of life of orthodontic dental patients.

Keywords: Oral health, Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP), Orthodontics, Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHQoL)

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Theoretical framework of consequences of oral impacts5).

Fig. 2

Korean Oral Impact on Daily Performanc (OIDP) questionnaires for orthodontic patients before (during, after) orthodontic treatments.

Fig. 3

Comparison of OHQoL scores before, during and after orthodontic treatments (mean±SE).

Table 1

Distribution of subjects by gender and age group

Table 2

Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) assessment items

Table 3

Changes in OHQoL scores before, during and after orthodontic treatments (mean±SE)

P-value was determined by repeated measured ANOVA.

OHQoL, Oral Health related Quality of Life; Tx, treatments.

Table 4

Changes in OHQoL scores during and after orthodontic treatments versus before orthodontic treatments according to age and gender (mean±SE)

P-value was determined by independent sample t-test.

A value greater than 1 means that the quality of life became better. A value less than 1 means that the quality of life became worse.

References

1. World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995; 41:1403–1409.

2. Barbosa TS, Tureli MC, Gavião MB. Validity and reliability of the child perceptions questionnaires in Brazilian children. BMC Oral Health. 2009; 9:13–20.

3. Atchison KA, Adulyanon S, Sheiham A. The general oral health assessment index (The Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index). In : Slade GD, editor. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina;1997. p. 71–80.

4. Slade GD. The oral health impact profile. In : Slade GD, editor. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina;1997. p. 93–104.

5. Adulyanon S, Sheiham A. Oral impacts on daily performances. In : Slade GD, editor. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina;1997. p. 151–160.

6. Locker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health. 1988; 5:3–18.

7. Jung SH, Ryu JI, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. A Korean version of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP) scale in elderly populations: validity, reliability and prevalence. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008; 6:17.

8. Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. Quality of life and its importance in orthodontics. J Orthod. 2001; 28:152–158.

9. Kiyak HA. Does orthodontic treatment affect patients' quality of life? J Dent Educ. 2008; 72:886–894.

10. Adulyanon S, Vourapukjaru J, Sheiham A. Oral impacts affecting daily performance in a low dental disease Thai population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996; 24:385–389.

11. Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. Developing and evaluating an oral health-related quality of life index for children; the CHILD-OIDP. Community Dent Health. 2004; 21:161–169.

12. Usha GV, Thippeswamy HM, Nagesh L. Validity and reliability of Oral Impacts on Daily Performances frequency scale: a cross-sectional survey among adolescents. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012; 36:251–256.

13. Astrøm AN, Okullo I. Validity and reliability of the Oral Impacts on Daily performance (OIDP) frequency scale: a cross-sectional study of adolescents in Uganda. BMC Oral Health. 2003; 3:5–13.

14. Usha GV, Thippeswamy HM, Nagesh L. Comparative assessment of validity and reliability of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) frequency scale: a cross-sectional survey among adolescents in Davanagere city, Karnataka, India. Int J Dent Hyg. 2013; 11:28–34.

15. Purohit BM, Singh A, Acharya S, Bhat M, Priya H. Assessment and validation of the Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) instrument among adults in Karnataka, South India. Community Dent Health. 2012; 29:203–208.

16. Astrøm AN, Haugejorden O, Skaret E, Trovik TA, Klock KS. Oral Impacts on Daily Performance in Norwegian adults: validity, reliability and prevalence estimates. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005; 113:289–296.

17. Srisilapanan P, Sheiham A. The prevalence of dental impacts on daily performances in older people in Northern Thailand. Gerodontology. 2001; 18:102–108.

18. Tuominen ML, Tuominen RJ. Factors associated with subjective need for orthodontic treatment among Finnish university applicants. Acta Odontol Scand. 1994; 52:106–110.

19. Zhang M, McGrath C, Hägg U. Patients' expectations and experiences of fixed orthodontic appliances therapy. Impact on quality of life. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77:318–322.

20. de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. Orthodontic treatment and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian adolescents. J Orthod. 2004; 31:20–27.

21. Zachrisson BU. Cause and prevention of injuries to teeth and supporting structures during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1976; 69:285–300.

22. Feu D, Miguel JA, Celeste RK, Oliveira BH. Effect of orthodontic treatment on oral health-related quality of life. Angle Orthod. 2013; 83:892–898.

23. Chen M, Wang DW, Wu LP. Fixed orthodontic appliance therapy and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Chinese patients. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80:49–53.

24. Bos A, Hoogstraten J, Prahl-Andersen B. Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with dentofacial appearance in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123:127–132.

25. Tung AW, Kiyak HA. Psychological influences on the timing of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 113:29–39.

26. Kiyak HA. Patients’ and parents’ expectations from early treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129:Suppl 4. S50–S54.

27. Petersen AC, Tobin-Richards M, Boxer A. Puberty: Its measurement and its meaning. J Early Adolesc. 1983; 3:47–62.

28. Klima RJ, Wittemann JK, McIver JE. Body image, self-concept, and the orthodontic patient. Am J Orthod. 1979; 75:507–516.

TOOLS

ORCID iDs

Yong-Tae Nam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2377-4151

Ji-Won Yun
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2092-7850

Eun-Joo Jun
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1604-8618

Seong-Sik Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1988-6043

Jin-Bom Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8619-2741

Seung-Hwa Jeong
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5173-2859

Similar articles