Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to assess socio-demographic, disaster-related, physical health-related, psychological, and social factors that may adversely affect disaster victims’ QoL (Quality of Life).
Methods
A cross sectional study was designed by using the secondary data. From the 3rd Disaster Victims Panel Survey (2012~2017), a total of 1,659 data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics including frequency, percentage, t-test, ANOVA, and multivariate linear regression.
Results
Older people with lower health status lacking financial resources prior to a disaster were more at risk of low levels of QoL. Lower levels of perceived health status, resilience, and QoL were reported by disaster exposed individuals, while their depression was higher than the depression in the control group of disaster unexposed ones. Resilience, social and material supports were positively associated with QoL whereas depression and PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders) were negatively associated.
Conclusion
These findings suggest that psychological symptoms and loss due to disasters can have adverse impacts on the QoL of disaster victims in accordance with their prior socio-demographic background. They also indicate that targeted post-disaster community nursing intervention should be considered a means of increased social support as well as physical and mental health care for disaster victims.
References
1. Ministry of Government Legislation. Framework act on the management of disasters and safety [Internet]. Sejong: National Law Information Center;2018. [cited 2018 December 5]. Available from. http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=191169&efYd=20180118#0000.
2. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. 2018 Statistical yearbook [Internet]. Sejong: Deputy Minister for Planning & Coordination;2018. [cited 2018 December 5]. Available from. https://www.mois.go.kr/frt/bbs/type001/commonSelectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000013&nttId=65186.
3. National Disaster Management Research Institute. Research of the factors of life change in disaster victims and development of technology for relief services [Internet]. Ulsan: National Disaster Management Research Institute;2016. [cited 2018 November 29]. Available from. http://www.ndmi.go.kr/research/research/view.jsp?DOC_ID=D0000014773.
4. Kim TH, Lee KS, Lim JO, Lee SY, Kim GJ. An analysis of psychological disaster relief systems: Problems and resolutions. Crisisonomy. 2017; 13(4):81–93.
5. Ministry of Government Legislation. Disaster relief act [Internet]. Sejong: National Law Information Center;2018. [cited 2018 December 5]. Available from. http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=179011&efYd=20160708#0000.
6. Khachadourian V, Armenian HK, Demirchyan A, Goenjian A. Loss and psychosocial factors as determinants of quality of life in a cohort of earthquake survivors. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2015; 13(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0209-5.
7. ICN/WHO/WPRO ICN Framework of Disaster Nursing Competencies [Internet]. Manila: International Council of Nurses (ICN) and WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific;2009. [cited 2018 December 5]. Available from. http://www.wpro.who.int/hrh/documents/icn_framework.pdf.
8. Ceyhan E, Ceyhan AA. Earthquake survivors' quality of life and academic achievement six years after the earthquakes in Marmara, Turkey. Disasters. 2007; 31(4):516–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01023.x.
9. Abramson D, Stehling-Ariza T, Garfield R, Redlener I. Prevalence and predictors of mental health distress post-katrina: Findings from the gulf coast child and family health study. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2008. 2(2):p. 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e318173a8e7.
10. Wen J, Shi Y, Li Y, Yuan P, Wang F. Quality of life, physical diseases, and psychological impairment among survivors 3 years after Wenchuan earthquake: A population based survey. PloS One. 2012; 7(8):e43081. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043081.
11. Cao X, Chen L, Tian L, Jiang X. Psychological distress and health-related quality of life in relocated and nonrelocated older survivors after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. Asian Nursing Research. 2015; 9(4):271–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.04.008.
12. Wu H, Chou P, Huang-Chih Chou F, Su C, Tsai K, Ou-Yang W. . Survey of quality of life and related risk factors for a Taiwanese village population 3 years post-earthquake. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2006; 40(4):355–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01802.x.
13. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association;2013. p. 947 p.
14. Pietrzak RH, Tracy M, Galea S, Kilpatrick DG, Ruggiero KJ, Hamblen JL. . Resilience in the face of disaster: Prevalence and longitudinal course of mental disorders following hurricane ike. PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e38964. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038964.
15. Chen A, Keith VM, Leong KJ, Airriess C, Li W, Chung K. . Hurricane Katrina: Prior trauma, poverty and health among Vietnamese American survivors. International Nursing Review. 2007; 54(4):324–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00597.x.
16. Neria Y, Olfson M, Gameroff MJ, DiGrande L, Wickramaratne P, Gross R. . Long term course of probable PTSD after the 9/11 attacks: A study in urban primary care. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2010; 23(4):474–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20544.
17. Cheng S, Cheng C, Hsieh W, Chi M, Lin S, Liao Y. Effects of individual resilience intervention on indigenous people who experienced Typhoon Morkot in Taiwan. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012; 28(2):105–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2011.10.015.
18. Ni C, Chow MCM, Jiang X, Li S, Pang SMC. Factors associated with resilience of adult survivors five years after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake in china. PloS One. 2015; 10(3):e0121033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121033.
19. Yoon SH, Kim MO, Ju SJ. Factors associated with quality of life of parents who lost children in the Sewol ferry disaster. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2018; 27(2):179–188. https://doi.org/10.12934/jkpmhn.2018.27.2.179.
20. Lee SH. A study on impact of flood disaster and quality of life among the flood victims. Journal of Korean Community Nursing. 2004; 15(1):145–154.
21. Ji JG, Hwang KR. A Study on the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder of the bereaved families of subway conflagration in Daegu. Korean Journal of East West Mind Science. 2008; 11(1):97–112.
22. Lee OC. Trends of nursing research on disasters in Korea. Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing. 2014; 28(3):432–444. https://doi.org/10.5932/JKPHN.2014.28.3.432.
23. National Disaster Management Research Institute. Long-term investigation of disaster victims and development of life-friendly relief policy technology [Internet]. Ulsan: National Disaster Management Research Institute;2017. [cited 2018 November 29]. Available from. http://www.ndmi.go.kr/research/research/view.jsp?DOC_ID=D0000015429.
24. An J, Seo E, Lim K, Shin J, Kim J. Standardization of the Korean version of screening tool for depression (patient health questionnaire-9, PHQ-9). Journal of the Korean Society of Biological Therapies in Psychiatry. 2013; 19(1):47–56.
25. Eun HJ, Kwon TW, Lee SM, Kim TH, Choi MR, Cho SJ. A study on reliability and validity of the Korean version of impact of event scale-revised. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 2005; 44(3):303–310.
26. Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2008; 15(3):194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972.
27. Min SK, Kim GI, Seo SY, Kim DK. Development of Korean version of WHO Quality of Life Scale Abbreviated version (WHOQOL-BREF). Journal Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 2000; 39(1):78–88.
28. Chou FH, Chou P, Su TT, Ou-Yang W, Chien I, Lu M. . Quality of life and related risk factors in a Taiwanese village population 21 months after an earthquake. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2004; 38(5):358–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01364.x.
Table 1.
Variables | Characteristics | n (%) | M±SD |
Quality of life |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M±SD | t or F (p) | ||||
Gender | Male | 820 (49.4) | 21.94±4.54 | 4.15 (<.001) | |
Female | 839 (50.6) | 21.01±4.58 | |||
Age (year)† | ≤39a | 185 (11.2) | 60.87±16.83 | 23.02±5.21 | 21.41 (<.001) |
40~49b | 144 (8.7) | 22.26±4.14 | a, b, c>d | ||
50~59c | 351 (21.2) | 22.34±4.67 | |||
≥60d | 978 (59.0) | 20.75±4.34 | |||
Marital status† | Singlea | 176 (10.6) | 22.70±5.44 | 22.01 (<.001) | |
Marriedb | 1,262 (76.1) | 21.60±4.37 | a>b>c | ||
Divorced, Widow/erc | 221 (13.3) | 19.80±4.59 | |||
Education | ≤Elementary schoola | 655 (39.5) | 20.21±4.24 | 43.18 (<.001) | |
<High schoolb | 356 (21.5) | 22.38±4.57 | a<b, c | ||
≥High schoolc | 647 (39.0) | 22.25±4.64 | |||
Average monthly income† (millions won) | <2a | 857 (51.7) | 2.87±1.75 | 19.63±4.21 | 186.56 (<.001) |
2~4b | 548 (33.0) | 22.96±4.02 | a<b<c | ||
>4c | 254 (15.3) | 24.47±4.16 | |||
Type of disaster | Typhoon | 1,382 (83.3) | 21.61±4.58 | 2.70 (.044) | |
Heavy rain | 251 (15.2) | 20.72±4.55 | |||
Fire | 12 (0.7) | 21.20±4.89 | |||
Earthquake | 14 (0.8) | 21.44±4.09 | |||
Perceived losses† | Minimuma | 79 (4.8) | 21.85±5.06 | 24.21 (<.001) | |
Moderateb | 363 (21.9) | 20.02±4.82 | a, b<c | ||
Severec | 1,217 (73.3) | 21.88±4.38 | |||
Support received post-earthquake† | Lowa | 745 (44.9) | 20.85±4.61 | 24.0 (<.001) | |
Averageb | 637 (38.4) | 21.52±4.41 | a, b<c | ||
Highc | 276 (16.6) | 23.05±4.51 | |||
Perceived health status† | Lowa | 478 (28.8) | 18.88±3.77 | 191.30 (<.001) | |
Averageb | 496 (29.9) | 21.00±3.41 | a<b<c | ||
Highc | 685 (41.3) | 23.63±4.79 | |||
Depression | Normal (<8) | 1,432 (86.3) | 22.05±4.34 | 12.28 (<.001) | |
High risk (≥9) | 227 (13.7) | 17.25±4.11 | |||
PTSD | Normal (<24) | 1,461 (88.1) | 22.00±4.48 | 14.7 (<.001) | |
High risk (≥25) | 198 (11.9) | 18.16±3.73 | |||
Resilience | Low (≤19) | 896 (54.0) | 19.39±4.13 | -23.07 (<.001) | |
High (≥20) | 763 (46.0) | 23.92±3.81 | |||
Social support | Low (≤41) | 731 (44.1) | 19.59±4.41 | -15.96 (<.001) | |
High (≥42) | 928 (55.9) | 22.96±4.15 |