Journal List > J Korean Orthop Assoc > v.54(3) > 1127758

Taewook, Soon, and Si: Biportal Percutaneous Endoscopic Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Abstract

Lumbar decompressive surgery is a standard surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Many surgical techniques have been introduced, ranging from open surgery to percutaneous procedures. Minimally invasive techniques are preferred because of the less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay. Uniportal percutaneous endoscopic decompression has technical difficulties due to the narrow field. Biportal percutaneous endoscopic decompression is a satisfactory technique that can compensate for the shortcomings and provide sufficient decompression.

References

1. Arnoldi CC, Brodsky AE, Cauchoix J. . Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment syndromes. Definition and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976. 115:4–5.
crossref
2. Buckwalter JA. Aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995. 20:1307–14.
crossref
3. Epstein JA, Epstein BS, Lavine LS, Carras R, Rosenthal AD, Sumner P. Lumbar nerve root compression at the intervertebral foramina caused by arthritis of the posterior facets. J Neurosurg. 1973. 39:362–9.
crossref
4. Johnsson KE, Rosén I, Udén A. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992. 279:82–6.
crossref
5. Hu ZJ, Fang XQ, Zhou ZJ, Wang JY, Zhao FD, Fan SW. Effect and possible mechanism of muscle-splitting approach on multifidus muscle injury and atrophy after posterior lumbar spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013. 95:e192(1-9).
crossref
6. Thongtrangan I, Le H, Park J, Kim DH. Minimally invasive spinal surgery: a historical perspective. Neurosurg Focus. 2004. 16:E13.
crossref
7. Eun SS, Eum JH, Lee SH, Sabal LA. Biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression for lumbar disk herniation and spinal canal stenosis: a technical note. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2017. 78:390–6.
8. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleâs F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: a prospective 10-year study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000. 25:1424–35; discussion 1435-6.
9. Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M. . Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A random-ized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. 32:1–8.
10. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD. . Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010. 35:1329–38.
crossref
11. Verbiest H. A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1954. 36:230–7.
crossref
12. Getty CJ. Lumbar spinal stenosis: the clinical spectrum and the results of operation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980. 62:481–5.
crossref
13. Hides JA, Richardson CA, Jull GA. Multifidus muscle recovery is not automatic after resolution of acute, first-episode low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996. 21:2763–9.
crossref
14. Weiner BK, Fraser RD, Peterson M. Spinous process osteotomies to facilitate lumbar decompressive surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999. 24:62–6.
crossref
15. Abumi K, Panjabi MM, Kramer KM, Duranceau J, Oxland T, Crisco JJ. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990. 15:1142–7.
crossref
16. Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD, Johnson JR. Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003. 85:2089–92.
crossref
17. Cassinelli EH, Eubanks J, Vogt M, Furey C, Yoo J, Bohlman HH. Risk factors for the development of perioperative complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression and arthrodesis for spinal stenosis: an analysis of 166 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. 32:230–5.
18. Kambin P, Gellman H. Percutaneous lateral discectomy of the lumbar spine a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983. 174:127–32.
19. Kambin P, Sampson S. Posterolateral percutaneous suction-excision of herniated lumbar intervertebral discs. Report of interim results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986. 207:37–43.
crossref
20. Kambin P. Arthroscopic microdiskectomy. Mt Sinai J Med. 1991. 58:159–64.
21. Ki SC, Choi YS, Kim KS, Kuk WJ. Lumbar discectomy using tubular retractor and microendoscopy. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2008. 15:265–71.
crossref
22. Guiot BH, Khoo LT, Fessler RG. A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002. 27:432–8.
crossref
23. Watanabe K, Hosoya T, Shiraishi T, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y. Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005. 3:405–8.
crossref
24. Aryanpur J, Ducker T. Multilevel lumbar laminotomies: an alternative to laminectomy in the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery. 1990. 26::429-32; discussion 433..
crossref
25. Choi DJ, Choi CM, Jung JT, Lee SJ, Kim YS. Learning curve associated with complications in biportal endoscopic spinal surgery: challenges and strategies. Asian Spine J. 2016. 10:624–9.
crossref
26. Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: Surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002. 27:722–31.
27. Shin KH, Chang HG, Rhee NK, Lim KS. Revisional percutaneous full endoscopic disc surgery for recurrent herniation of previous open lumbar discectomy. Asian Spine J. 2011. 5:1–9.
crossref
28. Maroon JC, Abla A, Bost J. Association between peridural scar and persistent low back pain after lumbar discectomy. Neurol Res. 1999. 21:Suppl 1:S43–6.
crossref
29. Ahn Y. Percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014. 11:605–16.
crossref
30. Lee JH, Choi KC, Shim HK, Shin SH, Lee DC. Percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases. J Minim Invasive Spine Surg Tech. 2017. 2:15–9.
crossref
31. Torudom Y, Dilokhuttakarn T. Two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary study. Asian Spine J. 2016. 10:335–42.
crossref
32. Sairyo K, Sakai T, Higashino K, Inoue M, Yasui N, Dezawa A. Complications of endoscopic lumbar decompression surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2010. 53:175–8.
crossref

Figure 1.
Kambin’s triangle: the exiting root is the hypotenuse, the superior border of the lower vertebral body is the base, and the height is the superior articular facet.
jkoa-54-219f1.tif
Figure 2.
Uniportal endoscopic surgery has restricted vision and technical difficulties because all the instruments use a single portal.
jkoa-54-219f2.tif
Figure 3.
Portal placement of the biportal arthroscopic approach: two separate 1 cm vertical incisions were made obliquely. Arrows: disc protrusion.
jkoa-54-219f3.tif
Figure 4.
One portal is used for arthroscopic viewing and continuous irrigation, and the other is used for the insertion and manipulation of instruments. Saline inflow through cranial viewing portal, and outflow through the caudal working portal allows continuous irrigation.
jkoa-54-219f4.tif
Figure 5.
Intraoperative arthroscopic view: standard arthroscopic instruments and conventional spinal instruments are used, such as Kerrison rongeur, high speed burr, pituitary forceps, and curette.
jkoa-54-219f5.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles