Journal List > Anat Biol Anthropol > v.32(1) > 1127753

Woo and Jung: Biomechanical Analysis of Femoral Diaphyseal Cross-sectional Properties from the Three Kingdoms Period Populations, Korea

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine and report the biomechanical characteristics of the past populations that lived in different environments during the Three Kingdom Period of ancient Korea. In this research, the cross-sectional size of the femoral subtrochanter region and mid-shaft was measured for the human skeletal remains excavated from the Three Kingdoms Period sites: Imdang and Yean-ri site. The results showed that two populations were grouped into the platymeric category. Moreover, female groups were more platymeric than males. The difference in platymeric index between populations was significant only among female groups with the samples of Imdang site more platymeric than those of Yean-ri site. Meanwhile, pilasteric indexes in two populations were similar level. This study is the first report of the mechanical characteristics in the Three Kingdoms Period population. Yet, for more detailed understanding, it is necessary to investigate more individuals of indicators for biomechanical loading in ancient Korean populations.

References

1. Ruff CB, Hayes WC. Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae-a biomechanical investigation: 1. Method and general patterns of variation. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1983; 60:359–81.
2. Ruff CB. Biomechanical analyses of archaeological human skeletons. Katzenberg MA, Saunders SR, editors. editors.Biolog-ical anthropology of the human skeleton. New York: Wiley;2000. p. 71–102.
crossref
3. Fung YC. Biomechanics: mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. New York: Springer-Verlag;1993. p. 500–18.
4. Vuori I, Heinonen A, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Pasanen M, Oja P. Effects of unilateral strength training and detraining on bone mineral density and content in young women. Calcif Tissue Int. 1994; 55:59–67.
5. Püschel TA, Benítez HA. Femoral functional adaptation: a comparison between hunter gatherers and farmers using geometric morphometrics. Int J Morphol. 2014; 32:627–33.
crossref
6. Lovejoy CO, Trinkaus E. Strength and robusticity of the Ne-anderthal tibia. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1980; 53:465–70.
7. Bridges PS, Blitz JH, Solano MC. Changes on long bone diaphyseal strength with horticultural intensification in west-central Illinois. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000; 112:217–38.
8. Woo EJ, Jeong Y, Jung H, Pak S. Biomechanical properties of femoral diaphyseal cross-sectional shape from the Eunpyeong population. J Korean Phys Anthropol. 2014; 27:39–45. Korean.
crossref
9. Kim S. A study on the social organization of the Yean-ni burial site. Yeungnam Archaeology. 2001; 29:43–70. Korean.
10. Seo MS, Lee KS. Genetic analysis of ancient human bones excavated in Sacheon Nuk-do and Gyeongsan Yim-dang-dong, Korea. Conserv Stud. 2004; 25:47–74. Korean.
11. Shin JY, Lee J-J. Tracing-status dietary differences in the Silla period through stable isotope palaeodietary reconstruction from Imdang, Gyeongsan. J Korean Archaeol Soc. 2009; 70:84–109. Korean.
12. Lee J, Ha D, Pak S, Woo EJ, Lee C, Kim D, et al. The relations of the dead: identifying the relationship of individuals buried at Imdang, Gyeongsan, through the analysis of mitochondrial DNA from human skeletal remains interred in large mounded tombs. J Korean Archaeol Soc. 2008; 68:128–55. Korean.
13. Jung S-S, Choi B-I. A study on the average lifespan of the tomb owner from Yimdang site, Gyeongsan and Yeanri stie, Gimhae. Field Archaeol. 2015; 22:27–52. Korean.
14. Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series No. 44. Fayetteville;. 1994.
15. Moore-Jansen PM, Ousley SD, Jantz RL. Data collection procedures for forensic skeletal material. Report of Investigations No. 48. Knoxville: University of Tennessee;1994. p. 79–80.
16. Bass WM. Human osteology. Columbia: Missouri Archaeological Society;2005. p. 225.
17. Ruff CB, Larsen CS, Hayes WC. Structural changes in the femur with the transition to agriculture on the Georgia coast. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1984; 64:125–36.
crossref
18. Tallman SD, Winburn AP. Forensic applicability of femur subtrochanteric shape to ancestry assessment in Thai and White American males. J Forensic Sci. 2015; 60:1283–9.
crossref
19. Wescott DJ. Effect of mobility on femur midshaft external shape and robusticity. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006; 130:201–13.
crossref
20. Kimura T, Takahashi H. Mechanical properties of cross section of lower limb long bones in Jomon man. Anthropol Sci. 1982; 90:105–18.
crossref
21. Wescott DJ. Population variation in femur subtrochanteric shape. J Forensic Sci. 2005; 50:286–93.
crossref
22. Mcllvaine BK, Schepartz LA. Femoral subtrochanteric shape variation in Albania: implications for use in forensic applications. HOMO-J Comp Hum Biol. 2015; 66:79–89.
23. Yeungnam University Museum. 1982, Excavate the Imdang. 2012. p. 43. Korean.

Fig. 1.
Cross sections of femora, adapted from [17,18]
aba-32-23f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Comparison of femoral measurements and indices by site.
aba-32-23f2.tif
Table 1.
Sample analyzed in this stutdy
Site Period Male N Female N Total
Imdang, Gyeongsan 3–7th centuries 29 20 49
Yean-ri, Gimhae 4–7th centuries 15 16 31
Table 2.
Femoral measurements (mm) and indices from the Imdang site
    Side Males Females Total
    N Mean N Mean N Mean
Subtrochanter A-P Right 20 25.3∗∗ 10 22.3∗∗ 30 23.8
Left 20 25.1∗∗ 11 22.3∗∗ 31 23.7
M-L Right 20 31.8 11 30.1 31 30.91
Left 20 31.6 12 30.3 32 30.91
Platymeric Right 20 79.9 10 74.1 30 77
Left 20 80.0 11 73.3 31 76.64
Midshaft A-P Right 10 28.9 9 26.5 19 27.67
Left 18 29.5∗∗ 11 26.3∗∗ 29 27.91
M-L Right 10 28.0∗∗ 10 25.6∗∗ 20 26.77
Left 18 28.8∗∗ 11 26.3∗∗ 29 27.54
Pilasteric Right 10 103.4 9 103.0 19 103.21
Left 18 103.0 11 99.8 29 101.43

∗∗significantly different at P<0.05, P<0.01 respectively

Table 3.
Femoral measurements (mm) and indices from the Yean-ri site
    Side Males Females Total
    N Mean N Mean N Mean
Subtrochanter A-P Right 13 25.8∗∗ 14 23.2∗∗ 27 24.5
Left 10 25.0∗∗ 12 22.6∗∗ 22 23.8
M-L Right 13 31.8 14 30.1 27 30.9
Left 10 32.3 12 30.1 22 31.2
Platymeric Right 13 81.6 14 77.4 27 79.5
Left 10 77.7 12 75.2 22 76.4
Midshaft A-P Right 12 28.4∗∗ 12 25.5∗∗ 24 26.9
Left 10 28.4∗∗ 11 25.0∗∗ 21 26.7
M-L Right 12 27.1 12 25.4 24 26.2
Left 10 27.0 11 25.5 21 26.2
Pilasteric Right 12 104.8 12 100.6 24 102.7
Left 10 105.1 11 98.1 21 101.6

∗∗significantly different at P<0.05, P<0.01 respectively

Table 4.
Comparison of femoral measurements (mm) and indices
Site Side Males Females
Imdang Yean-ri Imdang Yean-ri
N Mean N Mean N Mean N Mean
Subtrochanter
A-P R 20 25.3 13 25.8 10 22.3∗∗ 14 23.2∗∗
L 20 25.1 10 25.0 11 22.3 12 22.6
M-L R 20 31.7 13 31.8 11 30.1 14 30.1
L 20 31.6 10 32.3 12 30.3 12 30.1
Platymeric R 20 79.8 13 81.6 10 74.1 14 77.4
L 20 79.9 10 77.7 11 73.3 12 75.2
Midshaft
A-P R 10 28.9 12 28.4 9 26.5∗∗ 12 25.5∗∗
L 18 29.5 10 28.4 11 26.3∗∗ 11 25.0∗∗
M-L R 10 28.0 12 27.1 10 25.6 12 25.4
L 18 28.8∗∗ 10 27.0∗∗ 11 26.3 11 25.5
Pilasteric R 10 103.4 12 104.8 9 103.0∗∗ 12 100.6∗∗
L 18 103.0 10 105.2 11 99.8∗∗ 11 98.1∗∗

∗∗significantly different at P<0.05, P<0.01 respectively

Table 5.
Comparison with Eunpyeong population (Based on the right side)
Population Period Platymeric Pilasteric
Male Female Male Female
Imdang, Gyeongsan in this study 3–7 th C 79.8 74.1 103.4 100.6
Yean-ri, Gimhae in this study 4–7 th C 81.6 77.4 104.8 100.6
Eunpyeong, Seoul [8] 15–18 th C 78.9 73.2 105.2 92.5
TOOLS
Similar articles