Journal List > Arch Hand Microsurg > v.24(2) > 1125379

Oh: Dorsal Bilobed Rectangular Flap and Volar Triangular Flap with Back-Cuts in the Correction of Hand Syndactyly

초록

Purpose:

Syndactyly is a one of the most common congenital anomalies of the hand. Each patient requires a thorough assessment of the soft-tissue and bony components within the syndactylized region. The aim of this article is to describe the exact design of the surgical procedure to prevent postoperative web creep using two volar back-cuts in syndactyly correction.

Methods:

A retrospective data review of a series of twenty-two consecutive patients who were treated with correction of congenital syndactyly of the hand was conducted. Total patients number was 22. Web separation was performed in 44 webs among a total of 55 webs. This surgical technique was inserting small bilobed rectangular flaps into the volar back-cut defects on both sides, and longer dorsal rectangular flap than the previous surgical technique. Follow-up patients assessed the occurrence of patients that required secondary surgery due to web creep and patients of other sequels.

Results:

Total separations of syndactyly of 22 patients who were corrected primarily (40 webs) and secondarily (4 webs) after treatment at other hospitals. There was no postoperative web creep during follow-up. Sequels with different color matches of full-thickness skin graft, angulations (3 patients), and ankylosis (1 patient) were due to the underlying bone and joint structure. Vascular and nerve injuries were absent.

Conclusion:

Reconstructing a hand with syndactyly can be complicated and is fraught with potential pitfalls. Careful planning and meticulous surgical techniques with this surgical technique can minimize potential errors and allow satisfac-tory separation of syndactylized digits.

REFERENCES

1.Percival NJ., Sykes PJ. Syndactyly: a review of the fac-tors which influence surgical treatment. J Hand Surg Br. 1989. 14:196–200.
crossref
2.Kim D., Park SK., Kim DC., Oh SJ., Yoo KY. Nationwide estimation for incidence at birth of congenital polydactyly and syndactyly in Korean. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003. 30:24–32.
3.Cronin TD. Syndactylism: results of zig-zag incision to prevent postoperative contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946). 1956. 18:460–8.
4.Bauer TB., Tondra JM., Trusler HM. Technical modification in repair of syndactylism. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946). 1956. 17:385–92.
crossref
5.Moss AL., Foucher G. Syndactyly: can web creep be avoided? J Hand Surg Br. 1990. 15:193–200.
crossref
6.Upton J. Congenital anomalies of the hand and forearm. McCarthy JG, May JW, Littler J, editors. Plastic surgery: the hand part 2. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders;1990. p. 5213–398.
7.Malik S. Syndactyly: phenotypes, genetics and current classification. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012. 20:817–24.
crossref
8.Withey SJ., Kangesu T., Carver N., Sommerlad BC. The open finger technique for the release of syndactyly. J Hand Surg Br. 2001. 26:4–7.
crossref
9.Greuse M., Coessens BC. Congenital syndactyly: defatting facilitates closure without skin graft. J Hand Surg Am. 2001. 26:589–94.
crossref
10.Sherif MM. V-Y dorsal metacarpal flap: a new technique for the correction of syndactyly without skin graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998. 101:1861–6.
crossref
11.Wafa AM. Hourglass dorsal metacarpal island flap: a new design for syndactylized web reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am. 2008. 33:905–8.
12.Hsu VM., Smartt JM Jr., Chang B. The modified V-Y dor-sal metacarpal flap for repair of syndactyly without skin graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010. 125:225–32.
crossref
13.Goldfarb CA. Congenital hand surgery: what's new and what's coming. Hand Clin. 2009. 25:293–9.
crossref
14.Dobyns JH. Syndactyly. Green DP, editor. Operative hand surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone;1982. p. 281–93.
15.Toledo LC., Ger E. Evaluation of the operative treatment of syndactyly. J Hand Surg Am. 1979. 4:556–64.
crossref
16.Brown PM. Syndactyly--a review and long term results. Hand. 1977. 9:16–27.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Design of dorsal rectangular flap and volar triangular flap with back-cut. (A) Rectangular flap (a-b-c-d) and distal halving line (e-f) of the dorsal side, and (B) triangular flap with back-cut (b-e-f-e-c) of the volar side of syndactyly were designed. Length of each of the lines (c’-d’, e’-e’, e’-f’, c’-e’) measured from adjacent webs of the normal side of the hand. MPJs: meta-carpophalangeal joints.
ahm-24-189f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Black dotted line of the normal web area is the suture line of flaps and black line shows palmar web line across three flaps of dorsal bilobed rectangular flaps and a volar triangular flap.
ahm-24-189f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Black line shows palmar web line across three flaps in early postoperative volar view after correction of the 3rd web of brachysyndactyly hand.
ahm-24-189f3.tif
Fig. 4.
A syndactyly of the right 1st web in bilateral cleft hands of a case 11. (A) Preoperative volar view. (B) Preoperative dorsal view. (C) Preoperative X-ray finding. (D) Preoperative angiogram of the right hand with disturbed palmar arch of the artery. (E) Postoperative volar view after two staged corrections of the syndactyly and cleft hand. (F) Postoperative dorsal view.
ahm-24-189f4.tif
Fig. 5.
A complicated syndactyly of the right 3rd web of a case 19. (A) Preoperative dorsal view. (B) Preoperative X-ray finding. (C) Intraoperative view after division of fused proximal, middle phalangeal bones, and soft-tissue. Exposed proximal phalangeal joints covered with flaps, and pulleys restored with divided pulley of middle and ring fingers. (D) Postoperative dorsal view 22 years after surgery. (E) Postoperative X-ray finding of undergrowth and malrotation of middle and ring fingers. PIPJs: proximal interphalangeal joints.
ahm-24-189f5.tif
Table 1.
Summary of patients
Case No. Sex Age (mo) Syndactyly webs Types of syndactyly Associated anomaly Operation of webs Results (FU, mo)
Right Left Incomplete Complete Right Left
1 M 12 1, 2, 3, 4 Complex BD 2, 4, 1, 3 Excellent (12)
2 F 180 4 4 Simple Both HP 4 4 Excellent (9)
3 M 12 3, 4 4 Simple Both HP 4, 3 4 Excellent (12)
4 M 348 3 3 Secondary, Simple 3 3 Excellent (12)
5 M 24 4 4 Simple Both HP 4 4 Fair (6)
6 M 36 3 3 Secondary, Simple 3 3 Excellent (12)
7 M 72 3 3 Simple 3 3 Excellent (8)
8 M 12 4 4 Simple Both HP Fair (6)
9 M 48 2, 4 Complex CBS 2, 4 Fair (48)
10 F 192 2 Complex HP, 4th MF 2 Fair (6)
11 M 48 1 1 Complex Both CH, Rt 4th, Lt 2nd MF 1 1 Good (10)
12 M 24 3 3 Simple 3 3 Excellent (7)
13 M 24 1, 2, 3 1, 2, 3, 4 Complex Both BD 2 1, 4 Good (12)
14 F 176 3 3 Secondary, Simple Both BD 3 Excellent (12)
15 F 7 2, 3 2, 3 Simple (Rt 2nd web & Lt 3rd web) Complicate (Rt 3rd web, Lt 2nd web) Both BD 3 Excellent (8)
16 F 36 2, 3, 4 Simple BD 2, 4 Excellent (6)
17 M 4 1, 2 Simple 1, 2 Excellent (9)
18 M 36 2, 3 Simple BD, PS 2, 3 Excellent (12)
19 M 24 3 Complicate CH, symphalngism 3 Fair (264)
20 M 12 2 Complex CBS 2 Fair (3)
21 F 3 2, 3, 4 2, 3, 4 Complex Both CBS 2, 4 2, 3 Fair (12)
22 M 2 3 Simple 3 Excellent (12)

M: male, F: female, FU: follow-up, BD: brachydactyly, HP: hypoplasia, CBS: constriction band syndrome, MF: missing finger, CH: cleft hand, Rt: right, Lt: left, PS: Poland syndrome.

TOOLS
Similar articles