Journal List > Arch Hand Microsurg > v.24(2) > 1125369

Sun, Lee, Kim, Jung, and An: Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Performed by OIrthopedic Surgeon for Distal Radius Fracture Surgery

초록

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block performed by orthopedic surgeon as an anesthetic method for distal radius fracture surgery.

Methods:

From October 2017 to October 2018, an ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block was performed on 161 cases of distal radius fracture requiring surgery. The procedure was performed by orthopedic surgeons using solution (20 mL of lidocaine HCl in 2%, 20 mL of ropivacaine in 0.75%, and 10 mL of normal saline in 0.9%). The success rate of the anesthetic procedure, the duration of analgesic effect, and the complications were investigated. If the anesthesia induction failed, additional local anesthetic methods were performed stepwise and reassessment about whether the operation could proceed was made.

Results:

Anesthesia was successful in 155 patients and the success rate was 96.3%. The duration of analgesic effect was 6 hours (3-10 hours). In 6 failed cases of anesthesia, local anesthesia was applied to the pain site in the operating room. In 5 cases, the operation was completed without discomfort. In 1 case complaining of pain around fracture site after the local anesthesia, ultrasound-guided radial nerve block was effective in controlling the pain.

Conclusion:

In open surgery of distal radius fractures, an ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block performed by orthopedic surgeon allows anesthesia with high success rates. Even if the surgical anesthesia is incomplete, it is expected that the surgery cab be completed safely if the nerve is identified and the stepwise additional local anesthesia method is performed.

REFERENCES

1.Choi IG., Choi YS., Kim YH, et al. The effects of postoperative brachial plexus block using MgSO(4) on the postoperative pain after upper extremity surgery. Korean J Pain. 2011. 24:158–63.
crossref
2.Sultan SF., Iohom G., Saunders J., Shorten G. A clinical assessment tool for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012. 56:616–23.
crossref
3.Kim CU., Lee CH., Yoon JY., Rhee SK. Ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block, performed by orthopedic surgeons. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2018. 53:513–21.
crossref
4.Van de Pol GJ., Koudstaal MJ., Schuurman AH., Bleys RL. Innervation of the wrist joint and surgical perspectives of denervation. J Hand Surg Am. 2006. 31:28–34.
crossref
5.Kang C., Hwang DS., Kim YM, et al. Ultrasound-guided femorosciatic nerve block by orthopaedist for ankle fracture operation. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 2010. 14:90–6.
6.Rah JH., Kwon SM., Cha JH., Lee JP., Kim JH. The efficacy of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block in trauma patients. J Korean Soc Surg Hand. 2014. 19:13–8.
crossref
7.Aysel I., Topçu I., Kurt FF. Ultrasound guided brachial plexus block can be advantageous in patients with avulsion type upper extremity injuries. Agri. 2013. 25:145–6.
crossref
8.Danelli G., Fanelli A., Ghisi D, et al. Ultrasound vs nerve stimulation multiple injection technique for posterior pop-liteal sciatic nerve block. Anaesthesia. 2009. 64:638–42.
crossref
9.Walker KJ., McGrattan K., Aas-Eng K., Smith AF. Ultrasound guidance for peripheral nerve blockade. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. 7:CD006459.
crossref
10.Marhofer P., Willschke H., Kettner SC. Ultrasound-guided upper extremity blocks - tips and tricks to improve the clinical practice. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012. 22:65–71.
crossref
11.Jupiter JB., Fernandez DL., Toh CL., Fellman T., Ring D. Operative treatment of volar intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996. 78:1817–28.
crossref
12.Hohenberger GM., Maier MJ., Dolcet C., Weiglein AH., Schwarz A., Matzi V. Sensory nerve supply of the distal radioulnar joint with regard to wrist denervation. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017. 42:586–91.
crossref
13.Frenkel O., Herring AA., Fischer J., Carnell J., Nagdev A. Supracondylar radial nerve block for treatment of distal radius fractures in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2011. 41:386–8.
crossref
14.Bernucci F., Gonzalez AP., Finlayson RJ., Tran DQ. A prospective, randomized comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012. 37:473–7.
crossref
15.Kang C., Kim YM., Hwang DS., Kim JH., Park JY., Lee WY. Ultrasound-guided femorosciatic nerve block. J Korean Orthop US Soc. 2010. 2:74–8.
16.McClure JH. Ropivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 1996. 76:300–7.
crossref
17.Stan TC., Krantz MA., Solomon DL., Poulos JG., Chaouki K. The incidence of neurovascular complications follow-ing axillary brachial plexus block using a transarterial ap-proach. A prospective study of 1,000 consecutive patients. Reg Anesth. 1995. 20:486–92.
18.Andersson A., Akeson J., Dahlin LB. Efficacy and safety of axillary brachial plexus block for operations on the hand. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006. 40:225–9.
crossref
19.Ecoffey C., Oger E., Marchand-Maillet F., Cimino Y., Ran-nou JJ., Beloeil H. SOS French Regional Anaesthesia Hotline. Complications associated with 27031 ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks: a web-based survey of 36 French centres. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014. 31:606–10.
20.Tetzlaff JE., Walsh M., Yoon HJ. PH adjustment of mepi-vacaine decreases the incidence of tourniquet pain dur-ing axillary brachial plexus anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 1993. 40:133–6.
crossref
21.Tetzlaff JE., Yoon HJ., Walsh M. Regional anaesthetic technique and the incidence of tourniquet pain. Can J Anaesth. 1993. 40:591–5.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Anesthetic preparation composed of lidocaine HCl 2% 20 mL, ropivacaine 0.75% 20 mL, 0.9% normal saline 10 mL, 50 mL syringe, 23-guage spinal needle, and intravenous extension line.
ahm-24-152f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Patient position and the location of the probe for performing axillary brachial plexus block.
ahm-24-152f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Ultrasound anatomy of the axilla. AA: axillary artery, CBM: coracobrachialis muscle, M: median nerve, MC: musculocutaneous nerve, R: radial nerve, U: ulnar nerve.
ahm-24-152f3.tif
Fig. 4.
(A) In-plane needle approaching (arrowheads). (B) Complete block of the four nerves was performed. Hypoechoic areas surrounding each nerve was seen. CBM: coracobrachialis muscle, MC: musculocutaneous nerve, AA: axillary artery, M: median nerve, R: radial nerve, U: ulnar nerve.
ahm-24-152f4.tif
Fig. 5.
Patient position (90 degree abduction and slightly internal rotation of the arm) and the location of the probe using aseptic cover and needle for performing radial nerve block.
ahm-24-152f5.tif
Fig. 6.
The location of the ultrasound device and the position of the physician for performing radial nerve block.
ahm-24-152f6.tif
Fig. 7.
(A) In-plane needle approaching (arrowheads) for performing radial nerve block. Radial nerve and humerus were seen. (B) The hypoechoic area of the local anesthetics was seen around the radial nerve after performing radial nerve block. R: radial nerve, LA: local anesthetics.
ahm-24-152f7.tif
Fig. 8.
Flowchart of the supplemental local anesthesia for the distal radius fracture surgery. US-ABPB: ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block, SA: surgical anesthesia, LA: local anesthesia, PFSI: peri-fracture site injection, US-RNB: ultra-sound-guided radial nerve block.
ahm-24-152f8.tif
Table 1.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients (October 2017 to October 2018)
Variable Value
No. of patient 161
Sex (male:female) 37:124
Age (yr) 63.4 (23-78)
Fracture type (A:B:C) 27:52:82
Injured side (dominant:non-dominant) 112:49

Values are presented as number only or mean (range).

This type was based on the AO/OTA classification.

Table 2.
Summary of the patients who failed the musculocutaneous nerve block
Age (yr)/ sex Anatomical variation of MCN Injection of supplemental LA at incision site (mL) VAS (before injection/ after injection)
57/male None 4 4/0
62/female None 5 5/0

MCN: musculocutaneous nerve, LA: local anesthetics, VAS: visual analogue scale.

Table 3.
Summary of the patients who failed the radial nerve block
Age (yr)/sex Method of the RNB First supplemental LA (PFSI) (mL) VAS (before PFSI/ after PFSI) Second supplemental LA (US-RNB) (mL) VAS (before US-RNB/ after US-RNB)
63/female PVB 10 5/1 - -
70/male PVB 10 7/1 - -
47/female PVB 10 7/2 - -
66/female PVB 10 7/5 4 5/1

RNB: radial nerve block, LA: local anesthetics, PFSI: peri-fracture site injection, VAS: visual analogue scale, US-RNB: ultrasound-guided radial nerve block, PVB: perivascular block.

Table 4.
Results of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block and tourniquet time (n=161)
Variable Value
Successful surgical anesthesia without supplementation 155 (96.3)
Needling time (min) 5.7 (3-10)
Time of analgesia (hr) 6 (3-10)
Complications 5 (3.1)
 Dizziness 2
 Nausea 3
Supplementation 6 (3.7)
 Incision site injection 2
 PFSI only 3
 US-RNB after PFSI 1
Tourniquet time (min) 55.3 (46-70)

Values are presented as number (%), mean (range), or number only.

PFSI: peri-fracture site injection, US-RNB: ultrasound-guided radial nerve block.

TOOLS
Similar articles