Journal List > Perspect Nurs Sci > v.16(1) > 1122127

Chung, Kim, Park, Yeo, and Hwang: An Integrative Review of Family Interventions based on a Philosophy of Family-Centered Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to analyze the characteristics of family interventions based on a philosophy of family-centered care conducted in neonatal intensive care units through an integrative literature review.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, RISS, KISS, and DBpia databases; a total of 20 studies, published between January 2013 and May 2018, was selected according to our criteria.

Results

Mothers accounted for a greater proportion of participants in family interventions than did fathers. Family interventions described in the studies were categorized into four educational and sixteen non-educational interventions. Among non-educational interventions, skin-to-skin-contact interventions, such as kangaroo care, accounted for the highest proportion. Only one paper employed a theoretical framework.

Conclusion

More family interventions based on theoretical frameworksshould be conducted as these frameworks serve as guidelines for nursing research. As the stress patterns experienced by parents in neonatal intensive care units showed gender differences, more programs tailored for fathers are needed. Moreover, further research should be conducted to evaluate feasibility as an outcome variable, and studies of family interventions based on a philosophy of family-centered care should be performed more actively in the neonatal intensive care units in Korea.

References

1. Korean Statistical Information Service [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;c1996. -. [2016 Birth certificate data]; [cited 2017 Aug 30]. Available from:. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/3/index.board?bmode=read&bSeq=&aSeq=362577&pageNo=1&rowNum=10&navCount=10&currPg=&sTarget=title&sTxt.
2. Bolwby J. Child care and the growth of love. Boltimore MD: Penguin Books;1953. p. 256. p.
3. Butler S, Als H. Individualized developmental care improves the lives of infants born preterm. Acta paediatr. 2008 Sep; 97(9):1173–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651–2227.2008.00916.x.
crossref
4. Balakrishnan A, Stephens BE, Burke RT, Yatchmink Y, Alksni-nis BL, Tucker R, et al. Impact of very low birth weight infants on the family at 3 months corrected age. Early Hum Dev. 2011 Jan; 87(1):31–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.09.374.
5. Cooper LG, Gooding JS, Gallagher J, Sternesky L, Ledsky R, Berns SD. Impact of a family-centered care initiative on NICU care, staff and families. J Perinato. 2007 Dec; 27(S2):S32–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211840.
crossref
6. Corlett J, Twycross A. Negotiation of parental roles within family-centred care: a review of the research. J Clin Nurs. 2006 Oct; 15(10):1308–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365–2702.2006.01407.x.
crossref
7. IPFCC [Internet]. Bethesda(MD). What is PFCC?: core concepts of patient-and family-centered care; [cited 2018 Jun 11]; [about 1 screen]. Available from:. http://www.ipfcc.org/about/pfcc.html.
8. Armstrong MI, Birnie-Lefcovitch S, Ungar MT. Pathways between social support, family well being, quality of parenting, and child resilience: what we know. J Child Fam Stud. 2005 June; 14(2):269–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-005–5054–4.
crossref
9. Just AC. Parent participation in care: bridging the gap in the pediatric ICU. Newborn and Infant Nurs Rev. 2005 Dec; 5(4):179–87. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.nainr.2005.08.002.
crossref
10. Kuo DZ, Houtrow AJ, Arango P, Kuhlthau KA, Simmons JM, Neff JM. Family-centered care: current applications and future directions in pediatric health care. Matern Child Health J. 2012 Feb; 16(2):297–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011–0751–7.
crossref
11. Shin YH, IM JH, Kim GE. Effects of maternal empowerment program on stress, anxiety, depression and parenting confidence in mothers of preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Child Health Nurs Res. 2018 Apr; 24(2):252–61. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2018.24.2.252.
crossref
12. Shin HJ, Park IS. Effect of kangaroo care on mental and motor development in premature infant and maternal role confidence. J Korean Soc Matern Child Health. 2013 Jul. 17(2):215–26.
13. Lee EJ, Kim ES, Lee YN, Park SH, Lee KM, Lee YH. Development of the kangaroo care protocol and its effect on premature infants. J Korean Clin Nurs Res. 2014 Dec. 20(3):313–25.
14. Lee JW, Eo YS, Han JH. Effects of kangaroo care on physical development and adaptation of external environment of prematurity, and maternal role confidence who delivered premature infants. J Korea Acad Ind Cooperation Soc. 2016 Dec 31; 17(12):128–37. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.12.128.
crossref
15. Lim JH, Shin JE, Lee SM, Eun HS, Park MS, Park KI, et al. Original articles: efficacy and safety of kangaroo mother care in preterm infants in Korea. Korean J Perinatol. 2015 Dec; 26(4):305–11. https://doi.org/10.14734/KJP.2015.26.4.305.
16. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005 Dec; 52(5):546–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365–2648.2005.03621.x.
crossref
17. Prouhet PM, Gregory MR, Russell CL, Yaeger LH. Fathers' stress in the neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review. Adv Neonatal Care. 2018 Apr; 18(2):105–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000472.
18. Kardaş Özdemir F, Küçük Alemdar D. Supporting of the fathers to visit their infants in neonatal intensive care unit decreases their stress level: a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study. Community Ment Health J. 2017 May; 53(4):490–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-016–0066–7.
crossref
19. Kim MA, Kim SJ, Cho H. Effects of tactile stimulation by fathers on physiological responses and paternal attachment in infants in the NICU: a pilot study. J Child Health Care. 2017 Mar; 21(1):36–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493516666729.
20. Lee TY, Wang MM, Lin KC, Kao CH. The effectiveness of early intervention on paternal stress for fathers of premature infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit. J Adv Nurs. 2013 May; 69(5):1085–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365–2648.2012.06097.x.
crossref
21. Jo GP. Problems involved in the rearing of the children of working parents by grandparents and their suggested solutions. Korea J Child Care and Educ. 2014; 84:283–99.
22. Park SJ, Kim SJ, Kang KA. Integrative review of nursing intervention studies on mother-infant interactions. Child Health Nurs Res. 2014 Apr; 20(2):75–86. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2014.20.2.75.
crossref
23. Jung SY, Tak YR. Family-centered care for hospitalized children: concept analysis. Child Health Nurs Res. 2017 Jan; 23(1):28–36. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2017.23.1.28.
crossref
24. Edéll-Gustafsson U, Angelhoff C, Johnsson E, Karlsson J, Mörelius E. Hindering and buffering factors for parental sleep in neonatal care. a phenomenographic study. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Mar; 24(5–6):717–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12654.
crossref
25. Welch MG, Hofer MA, Stark RI, Andrews HF, Austin J, Glickstein SB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of family nurture intervention in the NICU: assessments of length of stay, feasibility and safety. BMC pediatr. 2013 Sep. 13(1):148. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431–13–148.
crossref
26. Gingell Epstein E, Sherman J, Blackman A, Sinkin RA. Testing the feasibility of skype and facetime updates with parents in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care. 2015 Jul; 24(4):290–6. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2015828.

Fig. 1.
Process of collecting data.
pns-16-35f1.tif
Table 1.
General Characteristics of the Reviewed Research (N=20
Variables Categories   n (%)
Country Domestic   7 (35.0)
Nondomestic   13 (65.0)
Published year 2013   3 (15.0)
2014   2 (10.0)
2015   4 (20.0)
2016   4 (20.0)
2017   6 (30.0)
2018   1 (5.0)
Research design Quantitative study Quasi-experimental study 10 (50.0)
  Randomized controlled trial 2 (10.0)
  One group pre-post test 2 (10.0)
  Historical comparison study 2 (10.0)
  Non- randomized, prospective cohort study 1 (5.0)
Qualitative study   2 (10.0)
Mixed-method study   1 (5.0)
Theoretical frameworks Applied   1 (5.0)
Not applied   19 (95.0)
Research participants Parents   7 (35.0)
Mothers   10 (50.0)
Fathers   3 (15.0)
Type of interventions Educational interventions   4 (20.0)
Non-educational Skin-to-skin-contact interventions 4 (20.0)
interventions Music interventions 2 (10.0)
  Visit interventions 1 (5.0)
  Others 9 (45.0)
Table 2.
The Analysis of Family Interventions in Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Author (year) Research design Participants (n) Type of Interventions (education/non-education) Period Effects
Balbino et al.§ (2016) Quasi-experimental study Parents (132): pre (M 40/F 26) post (M 44/F 22) (Non-education): others Program of the patient and family-centered care model For 5 months ‧ Stress and trauma
Choi et al. (2014) Quasi-experimental study M (22): I (11)/C (11) (Non-education): music Listening to recorded voice of mothers For 5 minutes for 10 days,
4 times a day
‧ Physiological reactions (HR, RR, SpO2)
‧ Behavioral state related to sleep
‧ Bwt
De Bernardo et al. (2017) Non-randomized, prospective cohort study Parents (96): I (M 24/F 24) C (M 24/F 24) (Non-education): visit Open visiting C: for an hour
I: for up to 8 hours
‧ Parental satisfaction
‧ Stress level
‧ Bwt
Dunlop et al. (2016) Quasi-experimental study M (80): I 40/C 40 (Education) Health risks and health education For 45 to 60 minutes,
Composed of 5 sessions
‧ Attendance of the postpartum visit
‧ Daily ingestion of folic acid
‧ Correct and consistent use of a method of contraception
‧ Unintended pregnancy
Edéll-Gustafsson et al. (2015) Qualitative study Parents (12): M 8/F 4 (Non-education): others Single-bay family-rooms For 24 hours a day ‧ Sleep quality
‧ Management tiredness
‧ Loneliness of siblings
Gingell Epstein, E. et al. (2015) Mixed-method study Parents (26): M 17/F 9 (Non-education): others Daily skype or face time updates Once daily for 5 days,
For about 3 to 10 minutes
‧ Feasibility
‧ Parents' understanding
Kadivar et al. (2017) Quasi-experimental study M (70): I 33/C 37 (Non-education): others Narrative writing At least 3 times,
In 10 days of admission
‧ Maternal stress level related to infant behavior and appearance
Kadivar et al. (2017) Quasi-experimental study M (70): I 33/C 37 (Non-education): others Narrative writing At least 3 times,
In 10 days of admission
‧ Maternal satisfaction level
Kardaş et al. (2017) Quasi-experimental study F (47) (Education) First phase: information about the NICU and the condition of babies Second phase: visiting their babies First phase: for 30 minutes
Second phase: for 30 minutes
‧ Paternal stress level
Kim et al. (2017) Quasi-experimental study F (40): I 20/C 20 (Non-education): Skin-to-skin-contact Tactile stimulation For 10minutes each,
For 5 consecutive days
‧ SpO2 level, HR and RR
‧ Paternal attachment scores
Lee et al. (2013) Historical comparison study F (69): I 34/C 35 (Non-education): others Booklet about premature babies that a father must know and nurses' guidance During admission periods ‧ Paternal stress
‧ Fathering ability in the NICU
‧ Perceived nurse's support
Lee et al. (2014) One group pre-post test Parents (24): M 18/F 6 (Non-education): Skin-to-skin-contact Kangaroo care For 60 minutes a session,
Composed of 15 sessions
‧ Physiologic responses
‧ Parents' anxiety
‧ Nurses' perception regarding the kangaroo care
Lee et al. (2016) Quasi-experimental study M (38): I 19/C 19 (Non-education): Skin-to-skin-contact Kangaroo care 3 times a day,
10 times in total,
For 60minutes once
‧ Physical development (Bwt, Ht, HC)
‧ Adaptation to environment (BT, HR, SpO2)
‧ Confidence as a mother
Lim et al. (2015) Historical comparison study Preterm infants (45) and their parents (Non-education): Skin-to-skin-contact Kangaroo care Once daily, For an hour ‧ Normal vital signs (BT, PR, BP, SpO2)
‧ Bwt, sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity
‧ Duration of the hospitalization
‧ Anxiety, maternal attachment
‧ Depression in self-happiness score
Park et al. (2013) Quasi-experimental study Infants (48): I 24/C 24 and their mothers (Non-education): music Using mother's recorded song For 5 days,
For 20 minutes
‧ HR, RR, SpO2
‧ Behavioral state
‧ Neurobehavioral scale
Segre et al. (2016) One group pre-post test M (23) (Non-education): others Depression care For 50 minutes every 2 to 3 days,
Over a month Composed of 6 sessions,
‧ Treatment satisfaction about the providers and intervention
Shin et al. (2018) Quasi-experimental study M (44) (Education) Preterm baby, feeding, maternal attachment relationship For 60 minutes, 7 times in total ‧ Stress level
‧ Depression level,
‧ Anxiety level
‧ Confidence of nurture
Turner et al. (2015) Qualitative research M (9) (Non-education): others NICU parent support group program Weekly ‧ Positive relationships with the midwives and nursing staff on the NICU
‧ Mothers' ability to cope with their experience of the NICU
Verma et al. (2017) Randomized controlled trial Parents (295): I 148/C 147 (Education) Personal hygiene, hand washing, danger signs recognition and feeding of sick neonate For 2 hours each, Composed of 4 session ‧ Nosocomial infections rate
‧ Duration of hospitalization
‧ Mortality
‧ Breastfeeding rate
Welch et al. (2013) Randomized controlled trial M (150): I 78/C 72 (Non-education): others The family nurture intervention: Scent cloth exchange, sustained touch, vocal soothing, eye contact, wrapped or skin-to-skin holding, and engagement of mothers in care For more than 10 days ‧ Length of stay
‧ Safety
BP=Blood pressure; BT=Body temperature; Bwt=Body weight; C=Control group; F=father; HR=Heart rate; I=Intervention group; M=Mother;
NICU=Neonatal intensive care unit; PR=Pulse rate; RR=Respiratory rate; SpO2=Oxygen saturation.

Significant effects;

Nonsignificant effects;

Interventions take place in neonatal intensive care units and neonatal care units;

§ Application of a theoretical framework.

TOOLS
Similar articles