This article has been
cited by other articles in ScienceCentral.
Dear Editor:
A 70-year-old healthy female presented with a 2-week history of erythema and pruritus of both eyelids. She had been diagnosed with blepharitis and treated with topical hydrocortisone and 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution by an ophthalmologist, but there was no improvement. Examination of the eyelids showed erythematous patches and numerous black granules, which seemed to be particles of mascara (
Fig. 1A). Dermoscopy revealed crab lice (circles) and ovoid nits on the eyelashes and red-brown feces on the eyelids, not discernible by the naked eye (
Fig. 1B, C). There was no other lesion of body area including scalp, axilla, and pubis through meticulous examination. She denied a history of sexually transmitted disease and tests were negative. The family history was also non-contributory. A diagnosis of isolated phthiriasis palpebrarum was made; she was successfully treated with mechanical removal of the lice and nits with fine forceps under high-magnification videodermoscopy and topical application of 5% permethrin cream. There was no recurrence after 4 weeks of follow-up (
Fig. 1D). We received the patient's consent form about publishing all photographic materials.
Public louse infestation caused by a blood-sucking parasite,
Pthirus pubis, is a worldwide public health problem that affects about 2% of the human population
1. It is primarily spread by sexual contact, but is occasionally transmitted by close non-sexual contact with fomites, clothing, or bedding
12. Although
P. pubis typically infests pubic hair, it is also found on terminal hair elsewhere on the body including the axilla, chest, limbs, eyebrows, and eyelashes
12. Although eyelashes are a common site of
P. pubis infestation in children because of the lack of terminal hairs in other body areas, isolated phthiriasis palpebrarum,
P. pubis infestation of eyelashes and eyelids without pubic hair involvement, is very rare in adults
23. It can present with nonspecific pruritus of the eyelid margin with conjunctival hyperemia and is often misdiagnosed as other common dermatological or ophthalmological conditions, including allergic contact dermatitis, seborrheic dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, and blepharoconjunctivitis
3. Diagnosis can be made by detection of lice or nits with close observation; however, it is sometimes difficult to identify or differentiate the causative parasite from scale or cosmetic products using only naked eye examination because of its small size, semitransparency, and deep burrowing in the eyelid. Simple, noninvasive dermoscopy can be used as an easy and safe diagnostic tool in louse infestations without physical risk, and can rapidly confirm the diagnosis in uncertain cases
45. Various therapeutic modalities have been used, including mechanical removal, trimming/plucking of eyelashes, 1% gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane lotion, petroleum jelly, yellow mercuric oxide cream, 5% permethrin cream, and oral ivermectin
12. Among these, mechanical removal of lice and nits is still regarded as standard treatment
2. In present case, dermoscopy enabled rapid identification and meticulous mechanical removal of crab lice and nits without any adverse effect.
In conclusion, isolated phthiriasis palpebrarum in adults is very rare and underrecognized. A higher index of suspicion and close examination is critical to avoid misdiagnosis. In addition, dermoscopy can be useful in facilitating accurate diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring.