Journal List > Dement Neurocogn Disord > v.12(4) > 1120826

Han, Lee, and Park: The Association of Gait Disturbance and Cognitive Impairment

Abstract

Background

The incidence and prevalence of gait disturbance increases as age increases. The importance of cognitive aspects of gait disturbances has been studied in various types of dementia and MCI. This study was performed to identify relationship between cognitive impairment and change in gait, and investigate specific domains of cognitive function that may have affects in gait disturbance.

Methods

Three hundred eighty three participants over 60 years old volunteered for the study. Three stages evaluation were performed, dementia screening and timed up and go test (TUG), work up for cognitive impairment and dementia, and classifying cognitive impairment and dementia into subcategories by evaluating cause of the disease. To evaluate cognitive impairment, MMSE-KC (MMSE in the Korean version of the CERAD assessment packet) and Korean version of Consortium to Establish a Registry of Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD-K) assessment were used. One hundred forty one people were excluded from study and 242 people were analyzed. Timed Up and Go test (TUG) was performed for evaluation of gait disturbance. Relationship in every subcategory of CERAD-K and TUG was studied by correlation and multiple logistic analysis.

Results

Of the 242 participants, 122 were without cognitive impairment, 51 had mild cognitive impairment, 56 had Alzheimer's disease and 13 had vascular dementia. These four groups showed different results in TUG. Normal group had the lowest values in TUG compare to other groups significantly. MMSE score also correlated with the value of TUG (r=-0.528, p<0.001). Every subcategory of CERAD-K score had significant correlation with the value of TUG. But there were no specific subcategory that had predominant effect in TUG. Only age was an independently significant factor influencing TUG (p<0.05).

Conclusions

This study shows that increase in age and impairment in cognitive function has an association with gait disturbance. Therefore clinician should be concerned about cognitive factors for evaluation of a patient who has gait disturbance.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
The value of 'timed up and go test' (seconds) according to groups.
*p value<0.01; **p value<0.05.
TUG, Timed Up & Go test; MCI, Mild Cognitive Impairment; AD, Alzheimer's Disease; VD, Vascular Dementia.
dnd-12-94-g001
Fig. 2
The correlation of the value of 'timed up and go test' and the score of MMSE. r=-0.528, p<0.001.
dnd-12-94-g002
Table 1
Participants' characteristics
dnd-12-94-i001

MCI, Mild Cognitive Impairment; AD, Alzheimer's Disease; VD, Vascular Dementia; SD, Standard deviation.

Table 2
Correlation analysis of CERAD-K subcategories and TUG results
dnd-12-94-i002

*p value<0.05.

TUG, Timed Up & Go test.

Table 3
Multiple regression analysis of CERAD-K subcategories, age, and years of educational history and TUG
dnd-12-94-i003

*p value<0.05.

TUG, Timed Up & Go test.

References

1. Snijders AH, Van De Warrenburg BP, Giladi N, Bloem BR. Neurological gait disorders in elderly people: clinical approach and classification. Lancet Neurol. 2007; 6:63–74.
crossref
2. Sudarsky L. Gait disorders: prevalence, morbidity, and etiology. Adv Neurol. 2001; 87:111–117.
crossref
3. Verghese J, Lipton RB, Hall CB, Kuslansky G, Katz MJ, Buschke H. Abnormality of gait as a predictor of non-Alzheimer's dementia. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1761–1768.
crossref
4. Bloem B, Gussekloo J, Lagaay A, Remarque E, Haan J, Westendorp R. Idiopathic senile gait disorders are signs of subclinical disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48:1098–1101.
crossref
5. Marquis S, Moore MM, Howieson DB, Sexton G, Payami H, Kaye JA, et al. Independent predictors of cognitive decline in healthy elderly persons. Arch Neurol. 2002; 59:601.
crossref
6. Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. The role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov Disord. 2008; 23:329–342.
crossref
7. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture. 2002; 16:1–14.
crossref
8. Bland BH, Oddie SD. Theta band oscillation and synchrony in the hippocampal formation and associated structures: the case for its role in sensorimotor integration. Behav Brain Res. 2001; 127:119–136.
crossref
9. Nutt J, Marsden C, Thompson P. Human walking and higher-level gait disorders, particularly in the elderly. Neurology. 1993; 43:268.
crossref
10. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39:142.
crossref
11. Herman T, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. Properties of the 'timed up and go' test: more than meets the eye. Gerontology. 2010; 57:203–210.
crossref
12. Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys Ther. 2000; 80:896–903.
crossref
13. Ku BD, Kim SG, Lee JY, Park KH, Shin JH, Kim KK, et al. Clinical practice guideline for dementia by Clinical Research Center for Dementia of South Korea. J Korean Med Assoc. 2011; 54:861–875.
crossref
14. Woo JI. The Korean Version of CERAD neuropsychological assessment. 1st ed. Seoul: Seoul National University Press;2010. p. 3–46.
crossref
15. Jang JS, Kim SK. A Study on The Difference of Memory by the Types of Dementia and Utility of CERAD- K to Vascular Dementia Patients. J Soc Occup Ther Aged Dement. 2012; 6:31–38.
crossref
16. Jørstad EC, Hauer K, Becker C, Lamb SE. ProFaNE Group. Measuring the psychological outcomes of falling: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53:501–510.
crossref
17. Pahapill PA, Lozano AM. The pedunculopontine nucleus and Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2000; 123:1767–1783.
crossref
18. Nielsen JB. How we walk: central control of muscle activity during human walking. Neuroscientist. 2003; 9:195–204.
crossref
19. Morton SM, Bastian AJ. Cerebellar control of balance and locomotion. The Neuroscientist. 2004; 10:247–259.
crossref
20. Gunning-Dixon FM, Raz N. The cognitive correlates of white matter abnormalities in normal aging: a quantitative review. Neuropsychology. 2000; 14:224.
crossref
21. Giladi N, Herman T, Reider-Groswasser II, Gurevich T, Hausdorff JM. Clinical characteristics of elderly patients with a cautious gait of unknown origin. J Neurol. 2005; 252:300–306.
crossref
22. Malouin F, Richards CL, Jackson PL, Dumas F, Doyon J. Brain activations during motor imagery of locomotor-related tasks: A PET study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2003; 19:47–62.
crossref
23. Wiener SI, Berthoz A, Zugaro MB. Multisensory processing in the elaboration of place and head direction responses by limbic system neurons. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002; 14:75–90.
crossref
24. Scherder E, Eggermont L, Swaab D, van Heuvelen M, Kamsma Y, de Greef M, et al. Gait in ageing and associated dementias; its relationship with cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007; 31:485–497.
crossref
25. Erickson C, Barnes C. The neurobiology of memory changes in normal aging. Exp Gerontol. 2003; 38:61–69.
crossref
26. Pugh KG, Lipsitz LA. The microvascular frontal-subcortical syndrome of aging. Neurobiol Aging. 2002; 23:421–431.
crossref
27. Mungas D, Harvey D, Reed BR, Jagust WJ, DeCarli C, Beckett L, et al. Longitudinal volumetric MRI change and rate of cognitive decline. Neurology. 2005; 65:565–571.
crossref
28. Pettersson A, Olsson E, Wahlund L-O. Motor function in subjects with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005; 19:299–304.
crossref
29. Shin JH. Diagnosis of dementia: neuropsychological test. Korean J Fam Med. 2010; 31:253–266.
crossref
30. Lemke MR, Wendorff T, Mieth B, Buhl K, Linnemann M. Spatiotemporal gait patterns during over ground locomotion in major depression compared with healthy controls. J Psychiatr Res. 2000; 34:227–283.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles