Journal List > Dement Neurocogn Disord > v.12(2) > 1120816

Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2013 Jun;12(2):41-46. Korean.
Published online Jun 30, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2013.12.2.41
© 2013 Korean Dementia Association
Noun-Verb Dissociation in a Confrontation Naming Task for Persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment
Eunjung Choi, M.A.,* Jee Eun Sung, Ph.D.,* Jee Hyang Jeong, M.D., and Eunjung Kwag, M.A.
*Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Korea University Medical Center at Ansan, Ansan, Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.

Address for correspondence: Jee Eun Sung, Ph.D. Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-750, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3277-2208, Fax: +82-2-3277-2120, Email: jeesung@ewha.ac.kr
Received Apr 26, 2013; Revised Jun 25, 2013; Accepted Jun 25, 2013.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Abstract

Background

The concept of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) refers to a transitional period between normal aging and clinically demented state such as Alzheimer's disease. Detection of individuals with MCI is critical for prognosis of the disease progression and treatment of patients at risk. The current study manipulated linguistic complexity in naming nouns and verbs to examine whether the linguistically different entities contribute to differentiating individuals with MCI from normal elderly adults. Specific aims of the study are 1) to investigate the noun-verb dissociation in naming between the MCI and normal control groups and 2) to examine the differential effects between the groups depending on the linguistic subtypes of nouns (animate vs. inanimate) and verbs (the argument structure).

Methods

Twenty normal elderly individuals and 19 individuals with MCI participated in this study. A confrontation naming task was employed. Nouns were divided into the two subtypes (animate vs. inanimate), and verbs were classified into the three subtypes depending on the number of argument (1-place, 2-place, and 3-place).

Results

Results revealed that there were significant differences between the groups, indicating that individuals with MCI showed worse performance on naming in general than the control group. Furthermore, the MCI group presented differentially impaired performance on verbs than nouns compared to the control group.

Conclusions

The results from the current study suggested that performance on a verb confrontation naming task could serve as a sensitive index to differentiate the MCI group from normal aging group.

Keywords: Mild cognitive impairment; Naming; Verb; Noun

Figures


Fig. 1
Accuracy rate on noun and verb naming in two groups.
Click for larger image


Fig. 2
Accuracy rate on subtype of verb in two groups.
Click for larger image

Tables


Table 1
Demographic characteristics of Normal aging group and MCI
Click for larger image


Table 2
Descriptive analyses of accuracy rate on Noun and Verb naming in two groups
Click for larger image


Table 3
Descriptive analyses of accuracy rate on two subtypes of noun
Click for larger image


Table 4
Descriptive analyses of accuracy rate on three subtypes of verb
Click for larger image

Notes

The work was supported by the Ewha Global Top5 Grant 2013 of Ewha Womans University.

References
1. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 1999;56:303–308.
2. Kim SY. Clinical diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dementia. Hanyang Med Rev 2006;26:14–25.
3. Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, Mohs RC, Morris JC, Rabins PV, Ritchi K, Rossor M, Thal L, Winblad B. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1985–1992.
4. Appell J, Kertesz A, Fisman MA. Study of language functioning in Alzheimer patients. Brain Lang 1982;17:73–91.
5. Bowles NL, Obler K, Albert ML. Naming errors in healthy aging and dementia of Alzheimer type. Cortex 1987;23:519–534.
6. Kim HH, Na DL. In: Korean version-Boston Naming Test. Seoul: Hakjisa; 1997.
7. Park KA, Choi JW, Jun JM, Kim GS, Park KW. Different Performances on a Confrontational Naming Test in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Korean Geriatr Soc 2011;15:135–143.
8. Testa JA, Ivnik RJ, Boeve B, Petersen RC, Pankratz VS, Knopman D, Tangalos E, Smith GE. Confrontation naming does not incremental diagnostic utility in MCI and Alzheimer's disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2004;10:504–512.
9. Shapiro K, Caramazza A. The representation of grammatical categories in the brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2003;7:201–206.
10. Marshell J. Noun-Verb dissociations-evidence from acquisition and developmental and acquired impairments. J Neurolinguistics 2003;16:67–84.
11. Bi Y, Han Z, Shu H, Caramazza A. Nouns, Verbs, objects, actions and the animate/inanimate effect. Cogn Neuropsychol 2007;24:485–504.
12. Oh HG, Choi HJ, Kim SJ. Difference of language impairment related to semantic memory in patients with Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia. J Speech Hear Disord 2010;19:73–84.
13. Choi HJ. A comparison of the performances of confrontation naming test and verbal fluency task in patients with prodromal Alzheimer’s disease and mild Alzheimer's disease. J Korean Soc Speech Sci 2008;15:111–118.
14. Choi HJ. Category-specific impairment of patients with dementia of Alzheimer's type in category fluency tasks. Korean J Commun Disord 2010;15:572–580.
15. Nam SH. In: The structure of argument and thematic roles in Korean verbs. Seoul: Seoul university Press; 2007.
16. Almor A, Aronoff JM, MacDonald MC, Gonnerman LM, Kempler D, Hintiryan H, Hayes UL, Aruachlam S, Anderson ES. A common mechanism in verb and noun naming deficits in Alzheimer's patients. Brain Lang 2009;111:8–19.
17. Druks J, Masterson J, Kopelman M, Clare L, Rose A, Rai G. Is action naming better preserved (than object naming) in Alzheimer's disease and why should we ask? Brain Lang 2006;98:332–340.
18. Robinson KM, Grossman M, White-Devine T, D'Esposito M. Category-specific difficulty naming with verbs in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1996;47:178–182.
19. Masterson J, Druks J, Kopelmen M, Clare L, Garley C, Hayes M. Selective naming (and comprehention) deficits in Alzheimer's disease? Cortex 2007;43:921–934.
20. Cappa SF, Binetti G, Pezzini A, Padovani A, Rozzini L, Trabucchi M. Object and action anming in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 1998;50:351–355.
21. Kielar A, Orange JB. Processing of nouns and verbs by individuals with dementia of Alzheimer's type; Canadian Institute of Health Research Symposium; 2007.
22. Bak TH, Hodges JR. Kissing and dancing - a test to distinguish the lexical and conceptual contributions to noun/verb and action/object dissociation. Preliminary results in patients with frontotemporal dementia. J Neurolinguistics 2003;16:169–181.
23. Parris B, Weekes B. Action Naming in Dementia. Neurocase 2001;7:459–471.
24. Williamson DJG, Adair JC, Raymer AM, Heilman KM. Object and action naming in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex 1998;34:601–610.
25. Kang Y, Na DL, Hahn SH. A validity study on the Korean mini-mental state examination(K-MMSE) in dementia patients. J Korean Neurol Assoc 1997;15:300–308.
26. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med 2004;256:183–194.
27. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 1982;140:566–572.
28. Morris J, McKeel D, Stprandt M, Rubin E. Very mild Alzheimer's disease: Informant-based clinical, psychometric, and pathologic distinction from normal aging. Neurology 1991;41:469–478.
29. Sun JE, Kim JK. Differential performance on generative naming and typicality rating between young and older adults: A preliminary study to develop a semantic complexity based naming treatment for persons with neurogenic communication disorders. J Speech Hear Disord 2011;20:31–50.
30. Whatmough D, Chertkow H, Murtha S, Templeman D, Babins L, Kelner N. The semantic category effect increases with worsening anomia in Alzheimer's type dementia. Brain Lang 2003;84:134–147.
31. Bird H, Howard D, Franklin S. Why is a Verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits. Brain Lang 2000;72:246–309.
32. Harley TA, Grant F. The role of functional and perceptual attributes: Evidence from picture naming in dementia. Brain Lang 2004;91:223–234.
33. Almor A, Aronoff JM, MacDonald MC, Gonnerman Lm, Kempler D, Hintiryan H, Hayes UL, Aruachlam S, Andersen ES. A common mechanism in verb and noun naming deficits in Alzheimer's patients. Brain Lang 2009;111:8–19.
34. Jo NH. In: Investigate the frequency of use by using analysis of modern Korean words. Seoul: The national Institute of the Korean Language; 2002.
35. Su SK. In: Frequency of modern Korean words. Seoul: Yonsei University Institute of Language and Information Studies; 1998.
36. Kim KY. In: Verb production and argument structures in aphasia. Yonsei University; 2005.
Master's thesis.