Journal List > Dement Neurocogn Disord > v.11(3) > 1120808

Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2012 Sep;11(3):95-103. Korean.
Published online Sep 30, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2012.11.3.95
Copyright© 2012 Korean Dementia Association
A Comparison of the Prospective Memory among College Students, Normal Elderly, and Parkinson's Disease Patients
Jiyoung Pyun, M.A.,* Yeonwook Kang, Ph.D.,, Jaeseol Park, M.A.,, Yun Joong Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Kunseok Park, Ph.D.,§ and Il-Woo Han, M.D.*
*Hyoja Geriatric Hospital, Yongin, Korea.
Department of Psychology, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.
Department of Neurology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
§Hallym University Institute of Aging, Chuncheon, Korea.

Address for correspondence: Yeonwook Kang, Ph.D. Department of Psychology, Hallym University, 39 Hallymdaehakgil, Chuncheon 200-702, Korea. Tel: +82-33-248-1724, Fax: +82-33-256-3424, Email: ykang@hallym.ac.kr
Received May 22, 2012; Revised Jul 25, 2012; Accepted Jul 25, 2012.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Abstract

Background

This study was conducted to examine the effects of normal aging and cerebral pathology on the prospective memory and the relationships between the prospective memory and frontal lobe functions.

Methods

The subjects were 30 college students, 30 normal elderly, and 30 Parkinson's disease patients. There was no significant difference in the mean age or education level between the normal elderly and Parkinson's disease patients. The Cambridge Prospective Memory Test and the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire were administered to evaluate the prospective memory. The Seoul Verbal Learning Test and Rey Complex Figure Test were given to assess the verbal and visual episodic memories. The subjects also took the Sorting Test, the Korean-Color Word Stroop Test, and the Iowa Gambling Task to assess the frontal lobe functions.

Results

The results showed that the prospective memory declines with aging and pathological process. The normal elderly showed significantly lower scores on the time-based prospective memory than the event-based prospective memory, although the college students and Parkinson's disease patients did not show any differences between them. Many significant correlations were found between the prospective memory tests and frontal lobe tests in the normal elderly and Parkinson's disease patients, although only a few correlations were found in the college students.

Conclusions

These quantitative and qualitative changes in the prospective memory by aging and frontal lobe dysfunction would support the de-differentiation hypothesis of aging.

Keywords: Prospective memory; Aging; Frontal lobe function; Parkinson's disease; Dedifferentiation hypothesis

Tables


Table 1
Demographic characteristics and the K-MMSE score of the college students, normal elderly, and PD patients
Click for larger image


Table 2
Prospective memory and retrospective (episodic) memory test results of the college students, normal elderly, and PD patients
Click for larger image


Table 3
Correlations between prospective and retrospective (episodic) memory tests among the college students, normal elderly, and PD patients
Click for larger image


Table 4
The results of frontal lobe function tests in the college students, normal elderly, and PD patients
Click for larger image


Table 5
Correlations between prospective memory and frontal lobe function tests among the college students, normal elderly, and PD patients
Click for larger image

References
1. Cohen G. In: Memory in the Real World. 2nd ed. Hove UK: Psychology Press; 1996.
2. Craik FM. A functional account of age differences in memory. In: Klix F, Hagendorf H, editors. Human Memory and Cognitive Capabilities: Mechanisms and Performances. North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1986. pp. 409-422.
3. Cockburn J, Smith PT. Effects of age and intelligence on everyday memory tasks. In: Gruneberg MM, Morris E, Sykes RN, editors. Pratical Aspects of Memory: Current research and issue. Chichester: Wiley; 1988. pp. 132-136.
4. Cockburn J, Smith PT. The relative influence of intelligence and age on everyday memory. J Gerontol 1991;46:P31–P36.
5. Maylor EA, Smith G, Della Sala S, Logie RH. Prospective and retrospective memory in normal aging and dementia: An experimental study. Mem Cognit 2002;30:871–884.
6. McDaniel MA, Enistein GO, Jacoby LL. New consideration in aging and memory. In: Craik FIM, Salthouse TA, editors. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition. New York: psychology press; 2008. pp. 251-310.
7. Scullin MK, Bugg JM, McDaniel MA, Einstein GO. Prospective memory and aging: Preserved spontaneous retrieval, but impaired deactivation, in older adults. Mem Cognit 2011;39:1232–1240.
8. Cherry KE, LeCompte DC. Age and individual differences influence prospective memory. Psychol Aging 1999;14:60–76.
9. Einstein GO, McDaniel MA. Normal aging and prospective memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1990;16:717–726.
10. Kliegel M, McDaniel MA, Einstein GO. Plan formation, retention, and execution in prospective memory: A new approach and age-related effects. Mem Cognit 2000;28:1041–1049.
11. Shallice T, Burgess PW. Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain 1991;114:727–741.
12. Kerns KA, Price KJ. An investigation of prospective memory in children with ADHD. Child Neuropsychol 2001;7:162–171.
13. Martin MA, Kliegel M, McDaniel MA. The involvement of executive functions in prospective memory performance of adults. Int J Psychol 2003;38:195–206.
14. Einstein GO, McDaniel MA, Richardson SL, Guynn MJ, Cunfer AR. Aging and prospective memory: Examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1995;21:996–1007.
15. Park DC, Morrell R, Hertzog C, Kidder D, Mayhor C. Effects of age on event-based and time-based prospective memory. Psychol Aging 1997;12:314–327.
16. Palmer HM, McDonald S. The role of frontal and temporal lobe processes in prospective remembering. Brain Cognit 2000;44:103–107.
17. Okuda J, Fujii T, Yamadori A, Kawashima R, Tsukiura T. Participation of the prefrontal cortices in prospective memory: Evidence from a PET study in humans. Neurosci Lett 1998;253:127–130.
18. Okuda J, Fujii T, Ohtake H, Tsukiura T, Yamadori A, Frith CD, et al. Differential involvement of regions of rostral prefrontal (Brodman area 10) in time- and event-based prospective memory. Int J Psychophysiol 2007;64:233–246.
19. Burgess PW, Quayle A, Frith CD. Brain regions involved in prospective memory as determined by positron emission tomography. Neuropsychologia 2001;39:545–555.
20. Burgess PW, Scott SK, Frith CD. The role of the rostral frontal cortex (area 10) in prospective memory: A lateral versus medial dissociation. Neuropsychologia 2003;41:906–918.
21. Simons JS, Scholvinck ML, Gilbert SJ, Frith CD, Burgess PW. Differential components of prospective memory? Evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia 2006;44:1388–1397.
22. Yoo GH, Seo CW, Kim CB. The effect of event-based prospective memory on the performance of ongoing tasks: an fMRI study. Korean J Exp Psychol 2005;17:35–49.
23. Fuster JM. In: The Prefrontal Cortex. New York: Raven; 1989.
24. Luria AR. In: Higher Cortical Functions in Man. New York: Basic Book; 1966.
25. Moscovitch M, Winocur G. The Neuropsychology of memory and aging. In: Craik FIM, Salihouse TA, editors. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition. Hillsdale NJ: Erbaum; 1992. pp. 315-372.
26. Weinberger NM, Javid R, Lepan B. Long-term retention of learning-induced receptive-field plasticity in the auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:2394–2398.
27. Cools R, Baker RA, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW. Enhanced or impaired cognitive function in Parkinson's disease as a function of dopaminergic medication and task demands. Cereb Cortex 2001;11:1136–1143.
28. Taylor AE, Saint-Cyr JA, Lang AE. Frontal lobe dysfunction in Parkinson's disease. The cortical focus of neostriatal outflow. Brain 1986;109:845–883.
29. Katai S, Maruyama T, Hashimoto T, Ikeda S. Event based and time based prospective memory in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:704–709.
30. Costa A, Peppe A, Caltagirone C, Carlesimo GA. Prospective memory impairment in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychology 2008;22:283–292.
31. Raskin SA, Woods SP, Poquette AJ, McTaggart AB, Sethna J, Williams RC, et al. A differential deficits time-versus event-based prospective memory in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychology 2011;25:201–209.
32. Foster ER, McDaniel MA, Repovs G, Hershey T. Prospective memory in Parkinson's disease across laboratory and self-reported everyday performance. Neuropsychology 2009;23:347–358.
33. Smith SJ, Souchay C, Moulin CJ. Metamemory and prospective memory in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychology 2011;25:734–740.
34. Wilson B, Emslie H, Foley J, Shiel A, Watson P, Hawkins K, et al. In: The Cambridge Prospective Memory Test (CAMPROMPT). London: Harcourt Assessment; 2005.
35. Christensen KJ, Multhaup KS, Nordstrom S, Voss K. A cognitive battery for dementia: Development and measurement characteristics. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;3:168–174.
36. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: A clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:181–184.
37. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 1967;17:427–480.
38. Choi SH, Na DL, Lee BH, Hahm DS, Jeong JH, Yoon SJ, et al. Estimating the validity of the Korean Version of Expanded Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale. J Korean Neurol Assoc 2001;19:585–591.
39. Smith JR, Maylor EA, Della Sala S, Logie RH. The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Memory 2003;11:261–275.
40. Kang Y, Na DL. In: Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB). Incheon: Human Brain Research & Consulting; 2003.
41. Meyers JE, Meyers KR. In: Rey Complex Figure Test and recognition trial: Professional manual. Lutz FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1995.
42. Delis DC, Kaplan E, Kramer JH. In: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Technical Manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 2001.
43. Lee JH, Kang Y, Na DL. Efficiencies of stroop interference indexes in healthy older adults and dementia patients. Korean J Clin Psychol 2000;19:807–818.
44. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. In: Neuropsychological Assessment. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
45. Bechara A. In: Iowa Gambling Task Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 2004.
46. Kang Y, Na DL, Hahn SH. A validity study on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. J Korean Neurol Assoc 1997;15:300–308.
47. Harrington DL, Haaland KY, Knight RT. Cortical networks underlying mechanisms of time perception. J Neurosci 1998;18:1085–1095.
48. den Ouden HE, Frith U, Blakemore SJ. Thinking about intentions. NeuroImage 2005;28:787–796.
49. Lie CH, Specht K, Marshall JC, Fink GR. Using fMRI to decompose the neural processes underlying the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. NeuroImage 2006;30:1038–1049.
50. Matsui H, Nishinaka K, Oda M, Hara N, Komatsu K, Kubori T, et al. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and brain perfusion imaging in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2006;12:273–278.
51. Khateb A, Michel CM, Pegna AJ, Landis T, Annoni J. New insight in to the stroop effect: A patiotemporal analysis of electric brain activity. NeuroReport 2000;11:1849–1855.
52. Bush G, Whalen PJ, Rosen BR, Jenike MA, Mclnerney SC, Rauch SL. The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging-Validation study with functional MPI. Hum Brain Mapp 1998;6:270–282.
53. Lin CH, Chiu YC, Cheng CM, Hsieh JC. Brain maps of Iowa gambling task. BMC Neurosci 2008;9:72.
54. Li SC, Lindenberger U. Cross-level unification: A computational exploration of the link between deterioration of neurotransmitter systems dedifferentiation of cognitive abilities in old age. In: Nilsson LG, Markowitsch HJ, editors. Cogntive Neuroscience of Memory. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber; 1999. pp. 103-146.
55. Babcock RL, Laguna KD, Roesch SC. A comparison of the factor structure of progressing speed for younger and older adults: Testing the assumption of measurement equivalence across age groups. Psychol Aging 1997;12:268–276.
56. Baltes PB, Lindenberger U. Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognition functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging? Psychol Aging 1997;12:12–21.