Journal List > Dement Neurocogn Disord > v.11(1) > 1120798

Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2012 Mar;11(1):18-24. Korean.
Published online Mar 31, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2012.11.1.18
Copyright© 2012 Korean Dementia Association
Can We Further Divide Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Based on the Pattern of Memory Deficit?: A Preliminary Study
Eun Hye Jeong, M.D., Hee-Young Kim, M.D. and Jae-Hong Lee, M.D.
Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Address for correspondence: Jae-Hong Lee, M.D. Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-2 dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3010-3446, Fax: +82-2-474-4691, Email: jhlee@amc.seoul.kr
Received Dec 23, 2011; Revised Mar 23, 2012; Accepted Mar 23, 2012.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Abstract

Background

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is considered as a transitional state between normal aging and dementia and can be subdivided into amnestic vs. nonamnestic and single vs. multiple domains types. It is suggested that these clinical subtypes may have different underlying etiologies and outcomes. The amnestic MCI differs in the performance profile on memory testing: retention vs. retrieval deficit. Generally, the retention deficit is attributed to the medial temporal dysfunction and the retrieval deficit to the frontal dysfunction. We tried to determine whether there could be distinctive subtypes available even in the amnestic MCI.

Methods

Sixty-two patients with amnestic MCI-single domain were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into the retention- vs. the retrieval-deficit groups according to the results of Seoul Verbal Learning Test (SVLT). We compared baseline characteristics including vascular risk factors and neuropsychological profiles. We also measured the medial temporal atrophy (MTA) using a visual rating scale and assessed lacunar infarcts and white matter hyperintensities (WMH).

Results

Of 62 patients, 41 had retention deficit and 21 had retrieval deficit on SVLT. Among baseline clinical and demographic variables, only the frequency of hypertension was higher in the retrieval-deficit group (p=0.005). There were no differences in neuropsychological profiles between the two groups other than a lower immediate recall score in the retention-deficit group (p=0.012) and a higher recognition score in the retrieval-deficit group (p=0.001). Severities of WMH and MTA were not different between the two groups, nor was the number of lacunar infarcts and microbleeds.

Conclusions

We could not find any significant difference except for the frequency of hypertension between the two subgroups of amnestic MCI, suggesting that there may be no further gain in subdividing a single domain amnestic MCI.

Keywords: Amnestic mild cognitive impairment; Memory; Retention; Retrieval; Medial temporal atrophy; White matter hyperintensities

Tables


Table 1
Baseline characteristics according to the two amnestic MCI subtypes
Click for larger image


Table 2
Neuropsychological profiles of the two amnestic MCI subtypes
Click for larger image


Table 3
MRI findings of the two amnestic MCI subtypes
Click for larger image

Notes

This study was supported by a grant from the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (A102065) and a grant from Bayer Korea.

References
1. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 1999;56:303–308.
2. Luis CA, Loewenstein DA, Acevedo A, Barker WW, Duara R. Mild cognitive impairment: directions for future research. Neurology 2003;61:438–444.
3. Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, Mohs RC, Morris JC, Rabins PV, et al. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1985–1992.
4. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med 2004;256:183–194.
5. Busse A, Hensel A, Gühne U, Angermeyer MC, Riedel-Heller SG. Mild cognitive impairment: long-term course of four clinical subtypes. Neurology 2006;67:2176–2185.
6. Tierney MC, Szalai JP, Snow WG, Fisher RH, Nores A, Nadon G, et al. Prediction of probable Alzheimer's disease in memory-impaired patients: A prospective longitudinal study. Neurology 1996;46:661–665.
7. Lafosse JM, Reed BR, Mungas D, Sterling SB, Wahbeh H, Jagust WJ. Fluency and memory differences between ischemic vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology 1997;11:514–522.
8. Traykov L, Baudic S, Thibaudet MC, Rigaud AS, Smagghe A, Boller F. Neuropsychological deficit in early subcortical vascular dementia: comparison to Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2002;14:26–32.
9. Traykov L, Baudic S, Raoux N, Latour F, Rieu D, Smagghe A, et al. Patterns of memory impairment and perseverative behavior discriminate early Alzheimer's disease from subcortical vascular dementia. J Neurol Sci 2005;229-230:75–79.
10. Stern CE, Corkin S, González RG, Guimaraes AR, Baker JR, Jennings PJ, et al. The hippocampal formation participates in novel picture encoding: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:8660–8665.
11. Buckner RL, Raichle ME, Miezin FM, Petersen SE. Functional anatomic studies of memory retrieval for auditory words and visual pictures. J Neurosci 1996;16:6219–6235.
12. Kang YW, Na DL. In: Seoul verbal learning test (SVLT). Seoul: Human Brain Research & Consulting Co.; 2003.
13. Kang Y, Na DL, Hahn S. A validity study on the Korean mini-mental state examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. J Korean Neurol Assoc 1997;15:300–308.
14. Hachinski VC, Iliff LD, Zilhka E, Du Boulay GH, McAllister VL, Marshall J, et al. Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Arch Neurol 1975;32:632–637.
15. Jung IK, Kwak DI, Shin DK, Lee MS, Kim JY. A reliability and validity study of Geriatric Depression Scale. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1997;36:103–112.
16. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561–571.
17. Reisberg B, Ferris SH, de Leon MJ, Crook T. The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. Am J Psychiatry 1982;139:1136–1139.
18. Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 1993;43:2412–2414.
19. Kang YW, Na DL. In: Seoul neuropsychological screening battery. Incheon: Human Brain Research & Consulting Co.; 2003.
20. Kim H, Na DL. Normative data on the Korean version of the Boston Naming Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1999;21:127–133.
21. Meyers JE, Meyers KR. In: Rey Complex Figure Test and recognition trial: Professional manual. Lutz FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1995.
22. Kang YW, Chin JH, Na DL, Lee J, Park JS. A normative study of the Korean version of Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) in the elderly. Korean J Clin Psychol 2000;19:385–392.
23. Lee JH, Kang YW, Na DL. Efficiencies of Stroop Interference Indexes in Healthy Older Adults and Dementia Patients. Korean J Clin Psychol 2000;19:807–818.
24. Scheltens P, Leys D, Barkhof F, Huglo D, Weinstein HC, Vermersch P, et al. Atrophy of medial temporal lobes on MRI in "probable" Alzheimer's disease and normal ageing: diagnostic value and neuropsychological correlates. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:967–972.
25. Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, Hurtig HI, Zimmerman RA. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:351–356.
26. Scheltens P, Barkhof F, Leys D, Pruvo JP, Nauta JJ, Vermersch P, et al. A semiquantative rating scale for the assessment of signal hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurol Sci 1993;114:7–12.
27. Moon SY, Na DL, Seo SW, Lee JY, Ku BD, Kim SY, et al. Impact of white matter changes on activities of daily living in mild to moderate dementia. Eur Neurol 2011;65:223–230.
28. Seo SW, Im K, Lee JM, Kim YH, Kim ST, Kim SY, et al. Cortical thickness in single- versus multiple-domain amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage 2007;36:289–297.
29. Ganguli M, Dodge HH, Shen C, DeKosky ST. Mild cognitive impairment, amnestic type: an epidemiologic study. Neurology 2004;63:115–121.
30. Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR, Amaral DG, Suzuki WA. Lesions of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment. J Neurosci 1989;9:4355–4370.
31. Squire LR, Zola-Morgan S. The medial temporal lobe memory system. Science 1991;253:1380–1386.
32. Duffy JD, Campbell JJ 3rd. The regional prefrontal syndromes: a theoretical and clinical overview. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1994;6:379–387.
33. Tekin S, Cummings JL. Frontal-subcortical neuronal circuits and clinical neuropsychiatry: an update. J Psychosom Res 2002;53:647–654.
34. Desgranges B, Baron JC, Eustache F. The functional neuroanatomy of episodic memory: the role of the frontal lobes, the hippocampal formation, and other areas. Neuroimage 1998;8:198–213.
35. Daselaar SM, Veltman DJ, Rombouts SA, Raaijmakers JG, Jonker C. Neuroanatomical correlates of episodic encoding and retrieval in young and elderly subjects. Brain 2003;126:43–56.
36. Bernard FA, Desgranges B, Eustache F, Baron JC. Neural correlates of age-related verbal episodic memory decline: a PET study with combined subtraction/correlation analysis. Neurobiol Aging 2007;28:1568–1576.
37. Gabrieli JD, Brewer JB, Desmond JE, Glover GH. Separate neural bases of two fundamental memory processes in the human medial temporal lobe. Science 1997;276:264–266.
38. Fernández G, Weyerts H, Schrader-Bölsche M, Tendolkar I, Smid HG, Tempelmann C, et al. Successful verbal encoding into episodic memory engages the posterior hippocampus: a parametrically analyzed functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 1998;18:1841–1847.
39. Lepage M, Habib R, Tulving E. Hippocampal PET activations of memory encoding and retrieval: the HIPER model. Hippocampus 1998;8:313–322.
40. Nyberg L, McIntosh AR, Houle S, Nilsson LG, Tulving E. Activation of medial temporal structures during episodic memory retrieval. Nature 1996;380:715–717.
41. Schacter DL, Wagner AD. Medial temporal lobe activations in fMRI and PET studies of episodic encoding and retrieval. Hippocampus 1999;9:7–24.
42. Shallice T, Fletcher P, Frith CD, Grasby P, Frackowiak RS, Dolan RJ. Brain regions associated with acquisition and retrieval of verbal episodic memory. Nature 1994;368:633–635.
43. Bernard F, Desgranges B, Platel H, Baron JC, Eustache F. Contributions of frontal and medial temporal regions to verbal episodic memory: a PET study. Neuroreport 2001;12:1737–1741.
44. Tulving E, Kapur S, Craik FI, Moscovitch M, Houle S. Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: positron emission tomography findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994;91:2016–2020.