Journal List > Dement Neurocogn Disord > v.13(4) > 1120746

Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2014 Dec;13(4):94-100. Korean.
Published online Dec 31, 2014.  https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2014.13.4.94
© 2014 Korean Dementia Association
A Comparison of the Performances on the MMSE, HDS-R, and MoCA According to the CDR Sum of Boxes in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Vascular Mild Cognitive Impairment
Bohye Kim,* and Yeonwook Kang, Ph.D.*,
*Department of Psychology, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.
Department of Neurology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea.

Address for correspondence: Yeonwook Kang, Ph.D. Department of Psychology, Hallym University, 39 Hallymdaehakgil, Chuncheon 200-702, Korea. Tel: +82-33-248-1724, Fax: +82-33-256-3424, Email: ykang@hallym.ac.kr
Received Nov 20, 2014; Revised Dec 23, 2014; Accepted Dec 23, 2014.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Abstract

Background

O'Bryant et al. (2008) argued that the CDR Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) can be used to distinguish MCI from very early dementia in patients with CDR-GS of 0.5. They reported that the optimal CDR-SB cut-off score was 2.5. The present study was conducted to examine whether the subgroups classified with CDR-SB scores showed the corresponding group differences on the cognitive tests.

Methods

The subjects were 45 amnestic multi-domain MCI (amMCI) and 53 vascular MCI (VaMCI) with CDR-GS of 0.5. Each patient group was classified into "mild (0.5-2.0)" and "severe (2.5-4.0)" subgroups based on the CDR-SB. As the result, 4 groups were formed such as mild amMCI (n=23), severe amMCI (n=22), mild VaMCI (n=29), and severe VaMCI (n=24). The subjects were given the MMSE, HDS-R, and MoCA. The MANCOVA was conducted separately for each test with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

Results

Severe groups of both amMCI and VaMCI showed significantly lower performances than two mild groups in MMSE, HDS-R, and MoCA. It was found that "serial 100-7" was a good item to discriminate between the mild and severe groups in both amMCI and VaMCI. Items measuring "orientation" or "naming" showed significant subgroup differences in the amMCI, whereas items related to "memory," "visuospatial construction," or "frontal/executive function" showed significant subgroup differences in the VaMCI.

Conclusion

These results showed that there were significant differences in cognitive functions between the two subgroups with CDR-GS of 0.5. The results about the items discriminating between subgroups in amMCI and VaMCI were consistent with the previous findings about the progression of cognitive impairments in AD and VaD. Therefore, these results support the use of CDR-SB as a guideline for distinguishing MCI from early dementia.

Keywords: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI); Dementia; Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score (CDR-GS); Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB); Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); Revised Hasegawa's Dementia Scale (HDS-R); Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

Tables


Table 1
Demographic characteristics of the subjects
Click for larger image


Table 2
Group differences in the K-MMSE, K-HDS-R, & K-MoCA
Click for larger image

References
1. Summers MJ, Saunders NLJ. Neuropsychological measures predict decline to Alzheimer's dementia from Mild Cognitive Impairment. Neuropsychology 2012;26:498–508.
2. Wilson RS, Leurgans SE, Boyle PA, Bennett DA. Cognitive decline in prodromal Alzheimer's disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Arch Neurol 2011;68:351–356.
3. Petersen RC. Mild Cognitive Impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med 2004;256:183–194.
4. Bowler JV, Steenhuis R, Hachinski V. Conceptual background to Vascular Cognitive Impairment. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1999;13:S30–S37.
5. Alexopoulos P, Grimmer T, Perneczky R, Domes G, Kurz A. Progression to dementia in clinical subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2006;22:27–34.
6. Gorelick PB, Scuteri A, Black SE, DeCarli C, Greenberg SM, Iadecola C, et al. Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011;42:2672–2713.
7. O'Bryant SE, Waring SC, Cullum M, Hall J, Lacritz LH, Massman PJ, et al. Staging dementia using Clinical Dementia Rating scale Sum of Boxes scores. Arch Neurol 2008;65:1091–1094.
8. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 1982;140:566–572.
9. O'Bryant SE, Lacritz LH, Hall J, Waring SC, Chan W, Khodr ZG, et al. Validation of the new interpretive guidelines for the Clinical Dementia Rating scale Sum of Boxes score in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center database. Arch Neurol 2010;67:746–749.
10. Choi SH, Lee BH, Kim S, Hanm DS, Jeong JH, Yoon SJ, et al. Interchanging scores between Clinical Dementia Rating scale and Global Deterioration Scale. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2003;17:98–105.
11. Kang Y, Jahng SM, Na DL. In: Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery. 2nd Edition. Seoul: Human Brain Research & Consulting; 2012.
12. Kang Y. A normative study of the Korean-Mini Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in the elderly. Korean J Psychol 2006;25:1–12.
13. Yang DW, Kim BS, Shim DS, Chung SW, Lee KS, Han SH, et al. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of revised form of Hasegawa Dementia Scale (K-HDS). J Korean Neurol Assoc 2004;22:315–321.
14. Kang Y, Park J, Yu KH, Lee BC. A reliability, validity, and normative study of the Korean-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (K-MoCA) as an instrument for screening of Vascular Cognitive Impairment (VCI). Korean J Clin Psychol 2009;28:549–562.
15. Mf Folstein;SE. Folstein,PR McHugh."MINI-MENTAL STATE": A Practical method for granding the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198.
16. Imai Y, Hasegawa K. The revised Hasegawa's Dementia Scale (HDS-R)-evaluation of its usefulness as a screening test for dementia. J Hong Kong Coll Psychiatr 1994;4:20–24.
17. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bediria V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:695–699.
18. Peterson RC. Mild Cognitive Impairment or questionable dementia? Arch Neurol 2000;57:643–644.
19. Domoto-Reilly K, Sapolsky D, Brickhouse M, Dickerson BC. Naming impairment in Alzheimer's disease is associated with left anterior temporal lobe atrophy. Neuroimage 2012;63:348–355.
20. O'Brien JT, Erkinjuntti T, Reisberg B, Roman G, Sawada T, Pantoni L, et al. Vascular cognitive impairment. Lancet Neurol 2003;2:89–98.
21. Moorhouse P, Rockwood K. Vascular cognitive impairment: Current concepts and clinical developments. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:246–255.
22. Morris JC, Storandt M, Miller JP, McKeel DW, Price JL, Rubin EH, et al. Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer's disease. Arch Neurol 2001;58:397–405.
23. Wentzel C, Rockwood K, MacKnight C, Hachiski V, Hogan DB, Feldman H, et al. Progression of impairment in patients with vascular cognitive impairment without dementia. Neurology 2001;57:714–716.