Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.73(3) > 1119375

Kim: 2018 Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL) Clinical Practice Guidelines of Chronic Hepatitis B: What's Different?

Abstract

The clinical practice guideline for the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) was originally enacted in 2004 by the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver in order to provide medical practitioners with specific medical information regarding CHB to help them facilitate their understanding of the disease and treatment of the infected patients. Other than an update on the treatment of antiviral resistance in 2014, which is a partial revision, the guidelines for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B have been revised entirely three times in 2007, 2011, and 2015. Although several major international liver association have established and revised clinical practice guidelines, since the medical environment in each country is somewhat different depending on race, region, institution, and economic conditions, it is necessary to revise the Korean guidelines to that reflect our medical environment and own research results. In this review, major change and its background will be summarized about 2018 updated clinical practice guidelines for the management of CHB.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Algorithm for management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Patients under special population (e.g., pregnancy, patients receiving cancer chemotherapy) may require treatment even if immune tolerant or inactive phase. See section on special population. HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; anti-HBe, antibody to hepatitis B e antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ULN, upper limit of normal. *Serum HBV DNA ≥107 IU/mL; An upper limit of normal (ULN) for ALT of 34 IU/L for males and 30 IU/L for females; Serum HBV DNA ≥20,000 IU/mL for HBeAg positive patient and HBV DNA ≥2,000 IU/mL for HBeAg negative patient.

kjg-73-132-g001
Fig. 2

On treatment management of patients receiving oral antivirals. HBV, hepatitis B virus; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; LFT, liver function test; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; anti-HBe, antibody to hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; Cr, creatinine; Ca, calcium; P, phosphate; CK, creatin kinase; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; tenofovir DF, tenofovir dipivoxil fumarate. *When using telbivudine or clevudine; Assessed after least 6 months of treatment when using low barrier drug, at least 12 months of treatment when using high barrier drug.

kjg-73-132-g002
Fig. 3

A algorithm of selecting antivirals in bone and renal dysfunction. Tenofovir AF, Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate. *In case of history of antiviral resistance, refer to table 9; Entecavir needs dose adjustments if creatinine clearance <50 mL/min, refer to table 10; Not indicated if creatinine clearance <15 mL/min; §Not indicated if creatinine clearance <50 mL/min.

kjg-73-132-g003
Table 1

Definition of Natural Phases of Chronic Hepatitis B in 2015 and 2018 Guideline

kjg-73-132-i001

CHB, chronic hepatitis B; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid.

aHBV DNA level was defined as “high level” in 2015 guideline, whereas “very high level (≥10,000,000 IU/mL)” in 2018 guideline; bHBV DNA level was defined as “lower level” in 2015 guideline, whereas “high level (≥20,000 IU/mL)” in 2018 guideline.

Table 2

Risk of Hepatitis B Reactivation Associated with Immunosuppressive Therapies

kjg-73-132-i002

HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor alpha; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; anti-HBc, antibody to hepatitis B core antigen.

Notes

Financial support None.

Conflict of interest None.

References

1. Kim NH, Cho YK, Kim BI, Kim HJ. Effect of metabolic syndrome on the clinical outcomes of chronic hepatitis B patients with nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment. Dig Dis Sci. 2018; 63:2792–2799.
crossref pmid
2. Shim JJ, Kim JW, Oh CH, et al. Serum alanine aminotransferase level and liver-related mortality in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a large national cohort study. Liver Int. 2018; 38:1751–1759.
crossref pmid
3. Kim GA, Lim YS, Han S, et al. High risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and death in patients with immune-tolerant-phase chronic hepatitis B. Gut. 2018; 67:945–952.
crossref pmid
4. Sinn DH, Lee JH, Kim K, et al. A novel model for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients with chronic hepatitis B and normal alanine aminotransferase levels. Gut Liver. 2017; 11:528–534.
crossref pmid
5. Kim MN, Kim SU, Kim BK, et al. Increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients with transient elastography-defined subclinical cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2015; 61:1851–1859.
crossref
6. Chan HL, Chen YC, Gane EJ, et al. Randomized clinical trial: efficacy and safety of telbivudine and lamivudine in treatment-naïve patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis. J Viral Hepat. 2012; 19:732–743.
crossref pmid
7. Chang Y, Choe WH, Sinn DH, et al. Nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) e antigen-positive chronic HBV genotype C infection: a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective study. J Infect Dis. 2017; 216:1407–1414.
crossref pmid
8. Kim HS, Kim HJ, Shin WG, et al. Predictive factors for early HBeAg seroconversion in acute exacerbation of patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2009; 136:505–512.
crossref pmid
9. Song BC, Cho YK, Jwa H, et al. Is it necessary to delay antiviral therapy for 3-6 months to anticipate HBeAg seroconversion in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B in endemic areas of HBV genotype C? Clin Mol Hepatol. 2014; 20:355–360.
crossref pmid pmc
10. de Niet A, Jansen L, Stelma F, et al. Peg-interferon plus nucleotide analogue treatment versus no treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B with a low viral load: a randomised controlled, open-label trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 2:576–584.
crossref pmid
11. Cho YY, Lee JH, Chang Y, et al. Comparison of overall survival between antiviral-induced viral suppression and inactive phase chronic hepatitis B patients. J Viral Hepat. 2018; 25:1161–1171.
crossref pmid
12. Agarwal K, Brunetto M, Seto WK, et al. 96 weeks treatment of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2018; 68:672–681.
pmid
13. Ahn SH, Kim W, Yim HJ, et al. Continuing besifovir dipivoxil maleate versus switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for treatment of chronic hepatitis B: 96 weeks results of phase 3 trial. J Hepatol. 2018; 68:Suppl 1. S87–S88.
crossref
14. Heo J, Park JY, Lee HJ, et al. A 96-week randomized trial of switching to entecavir in chronic hepatitis B patients with a partial virological response to lamivudine. Antivir Ther. 2012; 17:1563–1570.
pmid
15. Yim HJ, Kim IH, Suh SJ, et al. Switching to tenofovir vs continuing entecavir for hepatitis B virus with partial virologic response to entecavir: a randomized controlled trial. J Viral Hepat. 2018; 25:1321–1330.
crossref pmid
16. Chen J, Zhao SS, Liu XX, Huang ZB, Huang Y. Comparison of the efficacy of tenofovir versus tenofovir plus entecavir in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in patients with poor efficacy of entecavir: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2017; 39:1870–1880.
crossref
17. Kim GA, Lim YS, An J, et al. HBsAg seroclearance after nucleoside analogue therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B: clinical outcomes and durability. Gut. 2014; 63:1325–1332.
crossref pmid
18. Kim JH, Lee YS, Lee HJ, et al. HBsAg seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B: implications for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011; 45:64–68.
pmid
19. Yip TC, Chan HL, Wong VW, Tse YK, Lam KL, Wong GL. Impact of age and gender on risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance. J Hepatol. 2017; 67:902–908.
crossref pmid
20. Amini-Bavil-Olyaee S, Herbers U, Sheldon J, Luedde T, Trautwein C, Tacke F. The rtA194T polymerase mutation impacts viral replication and susceptibility to tenofovir in hepatitis B e antigen-positive and hepatitis B e antigen-negative hepatitis B virus strains. Hepatology. 2009; 49:1158–1165.
crossref pmid
21. Delaney WE 4th, Ray AS, Yang H, et al. Intracellular metabolism and in vitro activity of tenofovir against hepatitis B virus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006; 50:2471–2477.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Sheldon J, Camino N, Rodés B, et al. Selection of hepatitis B virus polymerase mutations in HIV-coinfected patients treated with tenofovir. Antivir Ther. 2005; 10:727–734.
pmid
23. Lee JH, Lee YB, Cho H, et al. Identification of a triple mutation that confers tenofovir resistance in chronic hepatitis B patients. Hepatology. 2017; 66:Suppl 1. 69A–70A.
pmid
24. Huang L, Li J, Yan J, et al. Antiviral therapy decreases viral reactivation in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Viral Hepat. 2013; 20:336–342.
crossref pmid
25. Dan JQ, Zhang YJ, Huang JT, et al. Hepatitis B virus reactivation after radiofrequency ablation or hepatic resection for HBV-related small hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013; 39:865–872.
crossref pmid
26. Jang JW, Choi JY, Bae SH, et al. A randomized controlled study of preemptive lamivudine in patients receiving transarterial chemo-lipiodolization. Hepatology. 2006; 43:233–240.
crossref pmid
27. Kim JH, Park JW, Kim TH, Koh DW, Lee WJ, Kim CM. Hepatitis B virus reactivation after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 69:813–819.
crossref pmid
28. Loomba R, Liang TJ. Hepatitis B reactivation associated with immune suppressive and biological modifier therapies: current concepts, management strategies, and future directions. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152:1297–1309.
crossref pmid pmc
29. Liu WP, Wang XP, Zheng W, et al. Hepatitis B virus reactivation after withdrawal of prophylactic antiviral therapy in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016; 57:1355–1362.
crossref
30. Cerva C, Colagrossi L, Maffongelli G, et al. Persistent risk of HBV reactivation despite extensive lamivudine prophylaxis in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients who are anti-HBc-positive or HBV-negative recipients with an anti-HBc-positive donor. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016; 22:946.e1–946.e8.
crossref
31. Huprikar S, Danziger-Isakov L, Ahn J, et al. Solid organ transplantation from hepatitis B virus-positive donors: consensus guidelines for recipient management. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15:1162–1172.
crossref pmid
32. Yoo JJ, Cho EJ, Cho YY, et al. Efficacy of antiviral prophylaxis in HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc positive patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Liver Int. 2015; 35:2530–2536.
crossref pmid
33. Kim JH, Lee YS, Lee HS, et al. The role of tenofovir for prevention of vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus: systematic review with meta-analysis. The Editorial Office of Gut and Liver. Gut and liver: Korea digestive disease week 2018. Seoul: MEDrang Inc.;2018. p. 109.
34. Pan CQ, Duan Z, Dai E, et al. Tenofovir to prevent hepatitis B transmission in mothers with high viral load. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374:2324–2334.
crossref pmid
35. Benaboud S, Pruvost A, Coffie PA, et al. Concentrations of tenofovir and emtricitabine in breast milk of HIV-1-infected women in Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire, in the ANRS 12109 TEmAA study, step 2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011; 55:1315–1317.
pmid
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Ji Hoon Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3924-0434

Similar articles