Journal List > J Gynecol Oncol > v.30(3) > 1118916

Onal, Sari, Yildirim, Yavas, Gultekin, Guler, Akyurek, and Yildiz: A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich' adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the outcomes of sequential or sandwich chemotherapy (ChT) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with node-positive endometrial cancer (EC).

Methods

Data from 4 centers were collected retrospectively for 179 patients with stage IIIC EC treated with postoperative RT and ChT (paclitaxel and carboplatin). Patients were either treated with 6 cycles of ChT followed by RT (sequential arm; 96 patients) or with 3 cycles of ChT, RT, and an additional 3 cycles of ChT (sandwich arm; 83 patients). Prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed.

Results

The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 64% and 59%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 5–167 months). The 5-year OS rates were significantly higher in the sandwich than sequential arms (74% vs. 56%; p=0.03) and the difference for 5-year PFS rates was nearly significant (65% vs. 54%; p=0.05). In univariate analysis, treatment strategy, age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, pathology, rate of myometrial invasion, and grade were prognostic factors for OS and PFS. In multivariate analysis, non-endometrioid histology, advanced FIGO stage, and adjuvant sequential ChT and RT were negative predictors for OS, whereas only non-endometrioid histology was a prognostic factor for PFS.

Conclusion

Postoperative adjuvant ChT and RT for stage IIIC EC patients, either given sequentially or sandwiched, offers excellent clinical efficacy and acceptably low toxicity. Our data support the superiority of the sandwich regimen compared to the sequential strategy in stage IIIC EC patients for OS.

References

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66:7–30.
crossref
2. Jemal A, Ward EM, Johnson CJ, Cronin KA, Ma J, Ryerson B, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2014, featuring survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017; 109:djx030.
crossref
3. Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Koper PC, Lybeert ML, Jobsen JJ, Wárlám-Rodenhuis CC, et al. Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC study group. Post operative radiation therapy in endometrial carcinoma. Lancet. 2000; 355:1404–11.
4. Papanikolaou A, Kalogiannidis I, Goutzioulis M, Misailidou D, Makedos A, Vergote I, et al. Pelvic lymphadenectomy as alternative to postoperative radiotherapy in high risk early stage endometrial cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006; 274:91–6.
crossref
5. Lewin SN, Herzog TJ, Barrena Medel NI, Deutsch I, Burke WM, Sun X, et al. Comparative performance of the 2009 international federation of gynecology and obstetrics' staging system for uterine corpus cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116:1141–9.
crossref
6. McMeekin DS, Lashbrook D, Gold M, Johnson G, Walker JL, Mannel R. Analysis of FIGO stage IIIc endometrial cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2001; 81:273–8.
crossref
7. Randall ME, Filiaci VL, Muss H, Spirtos NM, Mannel RS, Fowler J, et al. Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24:36–44.
crossref
8. Smith RS, Kapp DS, Chen Q, Teng NN. Treatment of high-risk uterine cancer with whole abdominopelvic radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 48:767–78.
crossref
9. Shaikh T, Churilla TM, Mantia-Smaldone GM, Chu C, Rubin SC, Anderson PR. The role of adjuvant radiation in lymph node positive endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 141:434–9.
crossref
10. Mariani A, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Haddock MG, Keeney GL, Lesnick TG, et al. Efficacy of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive endometrial cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 101:200–8.
crossref
11. van Wijk FH, van der Burg ME, Burger CW, Vergote I, van Doorn HC. Management of surgical stage III and IV endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: an overview. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009; 19:431–46.
crossref
12. Boothe D, Orton A, Odei B, Stoddard G, Suneja G, Poppe MM, et al. Chemoradiation versus chemotherapy or radiation alone in stage III endometrial cancer: patterns of care and impact on overall survival. Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 141:421–7.
crossref
13. Hogberg T, Signorelli M, de Oliveira CF, Fossati R, Lissoni AA, Sorbe B, et al. Sequential adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in endometrial cancer–results from two randomised studies. Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46:2422–31.
crossref
14. Geller MA, Ivy J, Dusenbery KE, Ghebre R, Isaksson Vogel R, Argenta PA. A single institution experience using sequential multi-modality adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation in the “sandwich” method for high risk endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 118:19–23.
crossref
15. Secord AA, Havrilesky LJ, O'Malley DM, Bae-Jump V, Fleming ND, Broadwater G, et al. A multicenter evaluation of sequential multimodality therapy and clinical outcome for the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 114:442–7.
crossref
16. Lan C, Huang X, Cao X, Huang H, Feng Y, Huang Y, et al. Adjuvant docetaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy administered alone or with radiotherapy in a “sandwich” protocol in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: a single-institution experience. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013; 14:535–42.
crossref
17. Lu SM, Chang-Halpenny C, Hwang-Graziano J. Sequential versus “sandwich” sequencing of adjuvant chemoradiation for the treatment of stage III uterine endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 137:28–33.
crossref
18. Modh A, Ghanem AI, Burmeister C, Hanna RK, Elshaikh MA. What is the optimal adjuvant treatment sequence for node-positive endometrial cancer? Results of a national cancer database analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018; 28:248–53.
crossref
19. Gao H, Zhang Z. Sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the sandwich method for advanced endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94:e672.
20. Fields AL, Einstein MH, Novetsky AP, Gebb J, Goldberg GL. Pilot phase II trial of radiation “sandwiched” between combination paclitaxel/platinum chemotherapy in patients with uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC). Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 108:201–6.
crossref
21. Lupe K, Kwon J, D'Souza D, Gawlik C, Stitt L, Whiston F, et al. Adjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy with involved field radiation in advanced endometrial cancer: a sequential approach. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 67:110–6.
crossref
22. Geller MA, Ivy JJ, Ghebre R, Downs LS Jr, Judson PL, Carson LF, et al. A phase II trial of carboplatin and docetaxel followed by radiotherapy given in a “sandwich” method for stage III, IV, and recurrent endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 121:112–7.
crossref
23. Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, González-Martín A, Ledermann J, et al. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016; 26:2–30.
crossref
24. Klopp AH, Jhingran A, Ramondetta L, Lu K, Gershenson DM, Eifel PJ. Node-positive adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: outcome and patterns of recurrence with and without external beam irradiation. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 115:6–11.
crossref
25. Gadducci A, Guerrieri ME, Cosio S, Fabrini MG, Laliscia C, Attianese D, et al. Rates, sites and times of recurrence and clinical outcome of endometrial cancer patients with histologically-positive nodes: an Italian two-center retrospective study. Anticancer Res. 2018; 38:1695–703.
26. Brown AP, Gaffney DK, Dodson MK, Soisson AP, Belnap TW, Alleman K, et al. Survival analysis of endometrial cancer patients with positive lymph nodes. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013; 23:861–8.
crossref
27. Maggi R, Lissoni A, Spina F, Melpignano M, Zola P, Favalli G, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy vs radiotherapy in high-risk endometrial carcinoma: results of a randomised trial. Br J Cancer. 2006; 95:266–71.
crossref
28. Susumu N, Sagae S, Udagawa Y, Niwa K, Kuramoto H, Satoh S, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pelvic radiotherapy versus cisplatin-based combined chemotherapy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer: a Japanese gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 108:226–33.
crossref
29. Wolfson AH, Brady MF, Rocereto T, Mannel RS, Lee YC, Futoran RJ, et al. A gynecologic oncology group randomized phase III trial of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. cisplatin-ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) as post-surgical therapy in stage I–IV carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 107:177–85.
crossref
30. Johnson N, Bryant A, Miles T, Hogberg T, Cornes P. Adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial cancer after hysterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; 10:CD003175.
crossref
31. Einstein MH, Frimer M, Kuo DY, Reimers LL, Mehta K, Mutyala S, et al. Phase II trial of adjuvant pelvic radiation “sandwiched” between combination paclitaxel and carboplatin in women with uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 124:21–5.
crossref
32. Greven K, Winter K, Underhill K, Fontenesci J, Cooper J, Burke T. Final analysis of RTOG 9708: adjuvant postoperative irradiation combined with cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy following surgery for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 103:155–9.
crossref
33. Wong AT, Rineer J, Lee YC, Schwartz D, Safdieh J, Weiner J, et al. Utilization of adjuvant therapies and their impact on survival for women with stage IIIC endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 142:514–9.
crossref
34. Lee LJ, Viswanathan AN. Combined chemotherapy and radiation improves survival for node-positive endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 127:32–7.
crossref
35. Huddleston A, Zhen S, Qi L, Rash D, Leiserowitz G, Mayadev J. The impact of a vaginal brachytherapy boost to pelvic radiation in stage III endometrial cancer. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2015; 7:122–7.
crossref
36. Koh WJ, Greer BE, Abu-Rustum NR, Apte SM, Campos SM, Chan J, et al. Uterine neoplasms, version 1.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014; 12:248–80.
crossref
37. Fleming GF, Brunetto VL, Cella D, Look KY, Reid GC, Munkarah AR, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cisplatin with or without paclitaxel plus filgrastim in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22:2159–66.
crossref

Fig. 1.
(A) The OS and (B) PFS of patients treated with postoperative sandwich ChT (solid line) and adjuvant sequential ChT and RT (dashed line) in the entire cohort. ChT, chemotherapy; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; RT, radiotherapy.
jgo-30-e28f1.tif
Fig. 2.
(A) The OS and (B) PFS of patients treated with postoperative sandwich ChT (solid line) and adjuvant sequential ChT and RT (dashed line) for patients with non-endometrioid histology. ChT, chemotherapy; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; RT, radiotherapy.
jgo-30-e28f2.tif
Fig. 3.
(A) The OS and (B) PFS of patients treated with postoperative sandwich ChT (solid line) and adjuvant sequential ChT and RT (dashed line) for patients with endometrioid histology. ChT, chemotherapy; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; RT, radiotherapy.
jgo-30-e28f3.tif
Table 1.
Patient and tumor characteristics according to ChT regimen
Patient characteristics All patients Sequential ChT Sandwich ChT p-value
Patient age       0.02
 <60 yr 89 (50) 55 (31) 34 (23)  
 ≥60 yr 90 (50) 41 (19) 49 (27)  
Stage       0.27
 IIIC1 120 (67) 62 (35) 58 (32)  
 IIIC2 59 (33) 34 (19) 25 (14)  
Pathology       0.12
 Endometrioid 129 (72) 65 (36) 64 (36)  
 Non-endometrioid 50 (28) 31 (17) 19 (11)  
LVSI       0.67
 Present 117 (65) 61 (34) 56 (31)  
 Absent 44 (25) 26 (15) 18 (10)  
 Unknown 18 (10) 9 (5) 9 (5)  
Myometrial invasion       0.07
 <50% 44 (24) 20 (11) 24 (13)  
 ≥50% 123 (69) 66 (37) 57 (32)  
 Unknown 12 (7) 10 (6) 2 (1)  
Grade       0.79
 I 33 (18) 16 (9) 17 (9)  
 II 59 (33) 32 (18) 27 (15)  
 III 87 (49) 48 (27) 39 (22)  
Vaginal BRT       0.07
 Absent 91 (51) 55 (31) 36 (20)  
 Present 88 (49) 41 (23) 47 (26)  

Values are presented as number (%).

BRT, brachytherapy; ChT, chemotherapy; LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion.

Table 2.
Univariate analysis of prognostic factors for OS and PFS
Patient characteristics 5-year OS (%) p-value 5-year PFS (%) p-value
Patient age   0.04   0.04
 <60 yr 72   68  
 ≥60 yr 56   50  
Stage   0.001   0.004
 IIIC1 74   68  
 IIIC2 45   45  
Pathology   <0.001   <0.001
 Endometrioid 72   67  
 Non-endometrioid 43   40  
LVSI   0.1   0.18
 Absent 72   67  
 Present 58   55  
Myometrial invasion   0.03   0.03
 <50% 82   78  
 ≥50% 62   56  
Grade   <0.001   0.003
 I–II 74   67  
 III 53   51  
Vaginal BRT   0.2   0.84
 Absent 67   60  
 Present 60   59  
ChT   0.03   0.05
 Sequential 56   54  
 Sandwich 74   65  

BRT, brachytherapy; ChT, chemotherapy; LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

Table 3.
Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for OS and PFS
Variables Risk factors HR (95% CI) p-value
OS      
 Age (yr) >60 vs. ≤60 1.69 (0.93–3.06) 0.08
 Pathology Non-endometrioid vs. endometrioid 2.16 (1.08–4.32) 0.03
 Stage IIIC2 vs. IIIC1 2.01 (1.15–3.53) 0.02
 Grade III vs. I and II 1.39 (0.67–2.86) 0.36
 Myometrial invasion ≥50% vs <50% 2.19 (0.93–5.18) 0.07
 ChT Sequential vs. sandwich 1.89 (1.04–3.45) 0.04
PFS      
 Age (yr) >60 vs. ≤60 1.67 (0.97–2.89) 0.07
 Pathology Non-endometrioid vs. endometrioid 2.44 (1.28–4.65) 0.007
 Stage IIIC2 vs. IIIC1 1.53 (0.90–2.58) 0.09
 Grade III vs. I and II 1.02 (0.53–1.97) 0.64
 Myometrial invasion ≥50% vs. <50% 2.00 (0.94–4.26) 0.07
 ChT Sequential vs. sandwich 1.57 (0.92–2.69) 0.09

ChT, chemotherapy; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

TOOLS
Similar articles