Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.60(3) > 1117661

Kang, Kim, and Shin: Comparison of the Outcomes of Two- and Three-muscle Surgery in Exotropia over 45 Prism Diopters

Abstract

Purpose

We report the outcomes of two- or three-muscle surgery on patients with large-angle exotropia exceeding 45 prism diopters (PDs).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data on 45 exotropia patients (> 45 PDs) who underwent two- or three-muscle surgery. We excluded patients with paralytic or restrictive strabismus, A- or V-pattern strabismus, a coexistent oblique dysfunction or nystagmus, and/or a history of prior extraocular muscle surgery. Only patients for whom at least 6 months of follow-up data were available were included. Successful surgery was defined as postoperative esotropia ≤ 5 PD, orthophoria, and exotropia ≤ 10 PD at the last visit.

Results

We included 45 patients, of whom 22 and 23 underwent two- and three-muscle surgery, respectively. The mean postoperative deviations were 9.5 and 2.7 PD in the two- and three-muscle groups, respectively; the overall success rates were 54.55% (12/22) and 91.30% (21/23). Subgroup analyses revealed that the surgical success rate of two-muscle operations was 66.67% (12/18) in 45–55 PD patients and 0% (0/4) in ≥ 55 PD patients; the success rates of three-muscle operations were 100% (7/7) and 87.50% (14/16). The success rate did not differ significantly between those with postoperative deviations of 45–55 PD (p = 0.137), but did between those who underwent two- and three-muscle operations to treat postoperative deviations of ≥ 55 PD (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Satisfactory results can be achieved via two-muscle surgery in patients with exotropia < 55 PD. However, for those with exotropia > 55 PD, three-muscle surgery is superior to two-muscle surgery. Therefore, large-angle exotropia is optimally treated via three-muscle surgery.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

The duration of follow up as measured by the survival analysis (*Kaplan-Meier method). The mean duration of success of the two muscle group and the three muscle group was 86.59 ± 11.94 months and 124.65 ± 5.70 months, respectively.

jkos-60-268-g001
Figure 2

Success case according to the preoperative angle of deviation. The overall success rates were 63.6% (12/22) in two muscle groups and 91.3% (21/23) in three muscle groups. PD = prism diopters.

jkos-60-268-g002
Figure 3

ROC curve. The maximum AUC is 0.84 and the sensitivity and specificity were 95.65% and 63.64% using a cut-off value of 50 prism diopters. ROC = receiver operating characteristics; AUC = area under the curve; CI = confidence interval.

jkos-60-268-g003
Figure 4

The duration of follow up as measured by the survival analysis (*Kaplan-Meier method) in 50–65 prism diopters exotropia. The mean duration of success in the two muscle group and the three muscle group was 48.50 ± 23.15 months and 112.43 ± 9.96 months, respectively.

jkos-60-268-g004
Table 1

Demographics of patients with large angle exotropia

jkos-60-268-i001

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (range) unless otherwise indicated.

PD = prism diopters.

Table 2

Comparison of success rate according to the preoperative angle of deviation

jkos-60-268-i002

Values are presented as number (%) unless otherwise indicated.

*Fisher's exact test.

Table 3

Comparison of 2 and 3 muscle surgery group in 50–65 PD exotropia

jkos-60-268-i003

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (range) or number (%) unless otherwise indicated.

PD = prism diopters.

*Mann-Whitney U test; Fisher's exact test.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

References

1. Choi JW, Lee SG. Surgical outcomes of large-angle exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011; 52:959–963.
crossref
2. Hwang SW, Chang BL. The surgical outcome of bilateral lateral rectus recession in large angle exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2000; 41:973–984.
3. Shin DB, Song YJ, Lee SB, et al. Effect of both lateral rectus recession in large angle exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:1363–1369.
4. Lim HS, Seo SW, Lee JH. Comparison of surgical results between bilateral rectus muscle recession and lateral rectus muscle recession and medial rectus muscle resection in exotropia over 40 prism diopters. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1998; 39:2810–2815.
5. Im SK, Park SW, Park YG. Effects of bilateral lateral rectus recession and unilateral recession-resection in large angle exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:990–994.
6. Li JH, Zhang LJ. Three-muscle surgery for very large-angle constant exotropia. J AAPOS. 2013; 17:578–581.
crossref pmid
7. Lau FH, Fan DS, Yip WW, et al. Surgical outcome of single-staged three horizontal muscles squint muscle surgery for extra-large angle exotropia. Eye (Lond). 2010; 24:1171–1176.
pmid
8. Kim JW, Rah SH, Lee JH. The surgical treatment of exotropias of 60 prism diopters or more. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 38:2200–2206.
9. Yang M, Chen J, Shen T, et al. Single stage surgical outcomes for large angle intermittent exotropia. PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0150508.
crossref
10. Mulberger RD, Mcdornald PR. Surgical management of nonparalytic exotropia. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1954; 52:664–668.
crossref pmid
11. Schwartz RL, Calhoun JH. Surgery of large angle exotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1980; 17:359–363.
crossref pmid
12. Park YG, Min BM. The effects of bilateral recti recessions over 8mm in exotropia over 40 prism diopters. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1994; 35:1123–1126.
13. Jampolsky A. Surgical management of exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1958; 46(5 Part 1):646–648.
crossref pmid
14. Taylor DM. How early is early surgery in management of strabismus. Arch Ophthalmol. 1963; 70:752–756.
pmid
15. Thompson JT, Guyton DL. Ophthalmic prisms. Measurement errors and how to minimize them. Ophthalmology. 1983; 90:204–210.
pmid
16. Wright KW, Strube YN. Color atlas of ophthalmic surgery strabismus. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott company;1991. p. 241–243.
17. Gezer A, Sezen F, Nasri N, Gözüm N. Factors influencing the outcome of strabismus surgery in patient with exotropia. J AAPOS. 2004; 8:56–60.
pmid
18. Scott AB, Marsh AJ, Jampolsky A. Quantitative guidelines for exotropia surgery. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975; 14:428–436.
pmid
19. Guibor G. The surgical treatment of exotropia resulting from anterior internuclear ophthalmoplegia. A practical evaluation of some surgical techniques. Am J Ophthalmol. 1950; 33:1837–1842.
pmid
20. Burke RM. Principle, technique and complications of horizontal nonparalytic nonaccomodative strabismus surgery. In : Haik GM, editor. Strabismus symphosium of the new orleans academy of ophthalmology. 1st ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.;1962. p. 178–189.
21. Chen JH, Morrison DG, Donahue SP. Three and four horizontal muscle surgery for large angle exotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015; 52:305–310.
crossref pmid
22. Burian HM, Spivey BE. The surgical management of exodeviations. Am J ophthalmol. 1965; 59:603–620.
pmid
23. Urist MJ. Exotropia with bilateral elevation in adduction, II. Surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1954; 38:178–190.
24. Berland JE, Wilson ME, Saunders RB. Results of large (8-9 mm) bilateral lateral rectus muscle recessions for exotropia. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 1998; 13:97–104.
pmid
25. Brooks DR, Morrison DG, Donahue SP. The efficacy of superior oblique Z-tenotomy in the treatment of overdepression in adduction (superior oblique overaction). J AAPOS. 2012; 16:342–344.
crossref pmid
26. Livir-Rallatos G, Gunton KB, Calhoun JH. Surgical results in large-angle exotropia. J AAPOS. 2002; 6:77–80.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
Similar articles