Journal List > Arch Hand Microsurg > v.24(1) > 1117298

Hong, Kim, Baek, and Han: Clinical Outcome of Acute Monteggia Fractures after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ulna Alone

초록

Purpose:

Most of the patients who have acute Monteggia fracture require surgical treatment. Open reduction and res-toration of the alignment for the ulna, and early reduction of the radial head are the principles of treatment. The authors performed anatomic reduction and plate fixation of the ulna in acute Monteggia fractures and the aim of this study is to report the radiological and clinical results of the management.

Methods:

Medical records and imaging data of 13 patients who had only internal fixation of the ulna in acute Monteggia fracture were reviewed retrospectively. The mean age was 38.8 years and average follow-up period was 23.9 months. We evaluated the range of motion, Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and complications at the last follow-up. Bone union and reduction of the radial head were reviewed by as-sessing serial radiographs during the follow-up.

Results:

Bone union was obtained in all cases and radial heads were maintained their reduced position on the follow-up radiographs. The mean MEPS was 91.15 and the mean DASH score was 7.9 at the last follow-up. The mean elbow flexion was 136.5°, elbow extension was 1.2°, forearm pronation was 79°, and forearm supination was 71°. There was no specific complication during the follow-up and 3 patients had secondary surgery for plate removal by patients’’ request.

Conclusion:

Anatomical reduction and secure fixation of the ulnar fracture without manipulating radial head dislocation in the acute Monteggia fracture showed satisfactory outcome in this study.

REFERENCES

1.Trillat A., Marsan C., Lapeyre B. [Classification and treatment of Monteggia fractures. Apropos of 36 cases]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1969. 55:639–57. French.
2.Korner J., Hoffmann A., Rudig L, et al. [Monteggia injuries in adults: critical analysis of injury pattern, management, and results]. Unfallchirurg. 2004. 107:1026–40. German.
3.Ring D., Jupiter JB., Simpson NS. Monteggia fractures in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998. 80:1733–44.
crossref
4.Ring D. Monteggia fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013. 44:59–66.
crossref
5.Bado JL. The Monteggia lesion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1967. 50:71–86.
6.Bruce HE., Harvey JP., Wilson JC Jr. Monteggia fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974. 56:1563–76.
crossref
7.Bae DS. Successful strategies for managing Monteggia injuries. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016. 36(Suppl 1):S67–70.
crossref
8.Ozel O., Demircay E. Review of management of unstable elbow fractures. World J Orthop. 2016. 7:50–4.
crossref
9.Stein F., Grabias SL., Deffer PA. Nerve injuries com-plicating Monteggia lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971. 53:1432–6.
crossref
10.Myden C., Hildebrand K. Elbow joint contracture after traumatic injury. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011. 20:39–44.
crossref
11.Shamian B., Capo JT. Isolated radial shaft fracture with unreducable posterior dislocation of the radial head and rupture of the lateral collateral ligament: a case report. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2012. 3:126–9.
crossref
12.Tanner C., Johnson T., Kolahi K., Husak L., Hoekzema N. Irreducible Monteggia fracture: interposed radial nerve and capsule. JSES Open Access. 2017. 1:85–9.
crossref
13.Soubeyrand M., Lafont C., De Georges R., Dumontier C. [Traumatic pathology of antibrachial interosseous mem-brane of forearm]. Chir Main. 2007. 26:255–77. French.
14.Suarez R., Barquet A., Fresco R. Epidemiology and treatment of Monteggia lesion in adults: series of 44 cases. Acta Ortop Bras. 2016. 24:48–51.
crossref
15.Reynders P., De Groote W., Rondia J., Govaerts K., Stoffelen D., Broos PL. Monteggia lesions in adults. A multicenter Bota study. Acta Orthop Belg. 1996. 62(Suppl 1):78–83.
16.Müller ME., Allgöwer M., Schneider R., Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation: techniques recommended by the AO-ASIF Group. 3rd ed.New York: Springer;1991.

Fig. 1.
A 35-year-old female with Bado type I Monteggia fracture of the right forearm after pedestrian traffic accident. (A) Preoperative radiologic finding shows type I Monteggia fracture. X-ray shows anterior dislocation of radial head and angulation of ulnar metaphysical fracture. Postoperative X-ray finding showed good alignment of ulna and radial head reduction. (B) At the final follow-up, and the range of motion was 5° to 140°, and satisfactory results were obtained.
ahm-24-17f1.tif
Fig. 2.
A 30-year-old female with Bado type III Monteggia fracture of the right forearm after slip and fall injury. (A) Preoperative radiologic finding shows type III Monteggia fracture. X-ray shows lateral dislocation of radial head and posterior angulation of ulnar metaphysical fracture. In this case, using olecranon plate ulna and radial head reduction was done. (B) There was no pain at the final follow-up, and the range of motion was 0° to 150° and satisfactory results were obtained.
ahm-24-17f2.tif
Table 1.
Demographic data
Variable Value
Total 13
Sex (male:female) 9:4
Age (yr) 38.8 (12-70)
Time to surgery (d) 3.4 (1-11)
Follow-up (mo) 23.9 (13-71)
Fracture side (Rt:Lt) 3:10
Mechanism of injury  
 Fall-down 3
 Slip-down 9
 MVA 1
Bado classification  
 I 8
 II 2
 III 3
Plates  
 LCP 8
 DCP 3
 Olecranon 1
 Reconstruction 1

Values are presented as number only or average (range).

Rt: right, Lt: left, MVA: motor vehicle accident, LCP: locking compression plate, DCP: dynamic compression plate.

Table 2.
Summary of results
Case No. Age (yr) Sex Follow-up (mo) Bado type Union (mo) ROM (ext/flex) ROM (sup/pro) DASH MEPS Complication
1 45 M 24 II 7 5/130 70/80 1 85 None
2 25 M 71 I 5 0/130 70/80 11 95 None
3 33 M 14 II 5 0/130 70/80 8 90 None
4 33 M 14 I 5 0/130 70/80 1 95 None
5 12 M 36 III 4 0/150 70/80 11 85 None
6 42 M 18 I 8 0/120 65/70 22.5 80 None
7 43 M 16 III 7 5/115 70/80 7.6 95 None
8 35 F 33 I 3 5/140 70/80 10.8 85 None
9 70 F 24 I 5 0/150 60/70 10.5 85 None
10 47 F 15 I 6 0/150 70/90 2.5 95 None
11 31 M 13 I 8 0/150 70/80 3.3 95 None
12 59 M 16 I 7 0/140 80/70 7 100 Tingling & numbness
13 30 F 17 III 6 0/150 90/90 6.5 100 None
Mean or number 38.8 M: 9, F: 4 23.9 I: 8, II: 2, III: 3 5.8 1.2/136.5 71/79 7.9 91.15

ROM: range of motion, ext: extension, flex: flexion, sup: supination, pro: pronation, DASH: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, MEPS: Mayo elbow performance score, M: male, F: female.

TOOLS
Similar articles