The Effect of Emotional Experiences on Biological Aging

Seo Chae Paik; Jong Sung Kim

doi:10.15384/kjhp.2018.18.4.147

Journal List > Korean J Health Promot > v.18(4) > 1115976

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Paik and Kim: The Effect of Emotional Experiences on Biological Aging

Original Article

Korean J Health Promot 2018;18(4):147-158.

Published online: 10 January 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15384/kjhp.2018.18.4.147

The Effect of Emotional Experiences on Biological Aging

Seo Chae Paik, Jong Sung Kim

Department of Family Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea

￭ Corresponding author: Jong Sung Kim, MD, PhD Department of Family Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 35015, Korea Tel: +82-42-280-7548, Fax: +82-42-280-7879 E-mail: jskim@cnuh.co.kr

Received 29 August 2018 Revised 20 December 2018 Accepted 21 December 2018

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to investigate the effects of usual negative emotional experiences on biological aging progression of human.

Methods

A total of 237 subjects who visited the Health Promotion Center at Chungnam National University Hospital from May 2013 through September 2013 was enrolled. Each subject had been drawn up a structured questionnaire about usual experiences of depression, anxiety, anger, and anger expression. The degree of biological aging progression of each subject was computed by a specific formula which consisted of chronological age and biological age reflecting obesity and aging of main organs.

Results

Trait anger and low education level showed the significant correlations with biological aging (r=0.160, P=0.014, and r=-0.189, P=0.024, respectively). Trait anger and low education level solely displayed the significant R²s for biological aging in consequence of multivariate analyses; R²=0.044, P=0.020, and R²=0.022, P=0.038, respectively.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the significant relationship between usual anger experience (i.e., trait anger) and biological aging would be present. In addition, lower education level may be related with biological aging.

Keywords: Aging, Anger, Education

References

1. Cannon WB. The wisdom of the body. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.;1932. p. 218–42.

2. Romero ML, Butler LK. Endocrinology of stress. Int J Comp Psychol. 2007; 20(2):89–95.

3. al'Absi M, Bongard S. Neuroendocrine and behavioral mechanisms mediating the relationship between anger expression and cardiovascular risk: assessment considerations and improvements. J Behav Med. 2006; 29(6):573–91.

4. Cohen BE, Panguluri P, Na B, Whooley MA. Psychological risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in patients with coronary heart disease: findings from the heart and soul study. Psychiatry Res. 2010; 175(1–2):133–7.

5. Schrag A, Jahanshahi M, Quinn N. What contributes to quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000; 69(3):308–12.

6. Kathol RG, Mutgi A, Williams J, Clamon G, Noyes R Jr. Diagnosis of major depression in cancer patients according to four sets of criteria. Am J Psychiatry. 1990; 147(8):1021–4.

7. Räikkönen K, Matthews KA, Kuller LH. The relationship between psychological risk attributes and the metabolic syndrome in healthy women: antecedent or consequence? Metabolism. 2002; 51(12):1573–7.

8. Chignon JM, Lepine JP, Ades J. Panic disorder in cardiac outpatients. Am J Psychiatry. 1993; 150(5):780–5.

9. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961; 4(6):561–71.

10. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988; 56(6):893–7.

11. Zung WW. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965; 12(1):63–70.

12. Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics. 1971; 12(6):371–9.

13. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960; 23(1):56–62.

14. Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959; 32(1):50–5.

15. Spielberger CD, Reheiser EC. Assessment of emotions: anxiety, anger, depression, and curiosity. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2009; 1(3):271–302.

16. Lee CH, Chon KK, Hahn DW, Kim KH. The Korean adaptation of the State-Trait Depression Inventory: STDI-K. Korean J Health Psychol. 1999; 4(1):1–14.

17. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press;1970. p. 1–2.

18. Kim JT. The relationship of the trait anxiety and sociality [dissertation]. Seoul: Korea University;1978. Korean.

19. Lee YJ, Bhang SY, Choi S, Lee HK, Kim BW, Kim W, et al. Korean state-trait anxiety inventory application study in middle and high school students. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2008; 47(5):471–80.

20. Spielberger CD, Sydeman SJ. State-trait anxiety inventory and state-trait anger expression inventory. Maruish ME, editor. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment: 1st edition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;1994. p. 292–321.

21. Hahn DW, Lee CH, Chon KK. Korean adaptation of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI-K): the case of college students. Korean J Health Psychol. 1998; 3(1):18–32.

22. Bae CY, Kang YG, Kim S, Cho C, Kang HC, Yu BY, et al. Development of models for predicting biological age (BA) with physical, biochemical, and hormonal parameters. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2008; 47(2):253–65.

23. Park JH, Cho BL, Kwon HT, Lee CM. Developing a biological age assessment equation using principal component analysis and clinical biomarkers of aging in Korean men. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009; 49(1):7–12.

24. Hahn DW, Park JH, Kim KH. Effects of self-disclosure and rumination about stressful life event and emotional experiences on physical health. Korean J Health Psychol. 2004; 9(1):99–130.

25. Menendez JA, Joven J. Energy metabolism and metabolic sensors in stem cells: the metabostem crossroads of aging and cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014; 824:117–40.

26. Arun CP. Fight or flight, forbearance and fortitude: the spectrum of actions of the catecholamines and their cousins. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004; 1018:137–40.

27. Baltrusch HJ, Stangel W, Titze I. Stress, cancer and immunity. New developments in biopsychosocial and psychoneur-oimmunologic research. Acta Neurol (Napoli). 1991; 13(4):315–27.

28. Dannehl K, Rief W, Schwarz MJ, Hennings A, Riemer S, Selberdinger V, et al. The predictive value of somatic and cognitive depressive symptoms for cytokine changes in patients with major depression. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014; 28(10):1191–7.

29. Logan JG, Barksdale DJ, Carlson J, Carlson BW, Rowsey PJ. Psychological stress and arterial stiffness in Korean Americans. J Psychosom Res. 2012; 73(1):53–8.

30. Janković S, Stojisavljević D, Janković J, Erić M, Marinković J. Association of socioeconomic status measured by education, and cardiovascular health: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(7):e005222.

Table 1.

General characteristics and emotional experiences

Characteristic	Value
Sex
Male	126 (53.2)
Female	111 (46.8)
Age, y	52.8±10.8
BMI	24.0±3.3
Education level
<Elementary school	3 (1.3)
Elementary school	26 (11.0)
Middle school	36 (15.2)
High school	58 (24.5)
≥College or university	114 (48.1)
Monthly household gross income (10⁶ won)
<1	27 (11.4)
1≤ N <3	63 (26.6)
3≤ N <5	69 (29.1)
≥5	78 (32.9)
Faith level
No or little	88 (37.1)
A little	72 (30.4)
Moderate	25 (10.5)
A lot	24 (10.1)
Smoking
Non-smoker	146 (61.6)
Past smoker	46 (19.4)
Present smoker	45 (19.0)
Weekly exercise, min	92.9±138.4
Weekly alcohol use (standard drink^a)	5.3±11.0
Family function index	6.4±2.4
Trait depression	20.7±5.2
Trait anxiety	41.3±9.5
Trait anger	19.9±5.3
Anger expression	48.1±7.1

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index. Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

^a A standard drink=alcohol 14 g.

Table 2.

The relationships among general characteristics, emotional experiences, and biological aging^a

Variable	r	P
Age	–0.054	0.404
Education level^b	–0.189	0.024
Monthly household gross income^b	–0.123	0.424
Faith level^b	0.018	0.612
Weekly exercise	–0.110	0.066
Weekly alcohol use	–0.005	0.944
Family function index	0.024	0.711
Trait depression	–0.026	0.689
Trait anxiety	0.053	0.414
Trait anger	0.160	0.014
Anger expression	0.015	0.816

All variables were calculated by Pearson correlation analyses.

^a Biological aging (%)={(biological age-chronological age)/chrono-logical age}×100.

^b Converted into dummy variables.

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis on relationships among general characteristics, emotional experiences and biological aging^a

Variable	r	P
Education level^b	–0.189	0.024
Sex
Male	–0.152	0.101
Female	–0.143	0.120
Age		0.072
30's	–0.121	0.470
40's	0.014	0.929
50's	–0.290	0.010
60's	0.089	0.468
70's	–	–
Trait anger^b	0.160	0.014
Sex
Male	0.152	0.101
Female	0.133	0.146
Age
30's	0.383	0.018
40's	0.128	0.409
50's	0.174	0.130
60's	–0.067	0.583
70's	0.404	0.281

^a Biological aging (%)={(biological age-chronological age)/chrono-logical age}×100.

^b Calculated by Pearson correlation analyses.

Table 4.

Coefficients of determination of general characteristics and emotional experiences for the biological aging^a

Predictor	R²	ΔR²	Adjusted R²	β	Standard error	Beta	P
Model^b	0.206^c	0.043^c	0.034^c
Trait anger	0.044^d	– ^d	0.017^d	0.168^e	0.075^e	0.198^e	0.020^e
Education level	0.066^d	0.022^d	0.028^d	–0.588^e	0.277^e	–0.164^e	0.038^e

^a Biological aging (%)={(biological age-chronological age)/chronological age}×100.

^b Model was adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, monthly household gross income, faith level, smoking, weekly exercise, and weekly alcohol use.

^c R², ΔR², and adjusted R² were calculated using multiple stepwise linear regression analysis.

^d R², ΔR², and adjusted R² were calculated using simple linear regression analysis.

^e Data were calculated using multiple stepwise linear regression analysis.

TOOLS

Similar articles