Journal List > J Korean Fract Soc > v.32(1) > 1115460

Lee and Lee: Distal Humerus Fracture: How to Choose the Approach, Implant, Fixation and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Distal humerus fractures require stable fixation and early joint motion, similar to other intra-articular fractures, but are difficult to treat adequately because of the anatomical complexity, severe comminution, and accompanying osteoporosis. In most cases, surgical treatment is performed using two supporting plates. Plate fixation can be divided into right angle plate fixation and parallel plate fixation. In addition, depending on the type of fracture, surgical procedures can be performed differently, and autologous bone grafting can be required in the case of severe bone loss. The elbow joint is vulnerable to stiffness, so it is important to start joint movement early after surgery. Postoperative complications, such as nonunion, ulnar nerve compression, and heterotopic ossification, can occur. Therefore, accurate and rigid fixation and meticulous manipulation of soft tissues are required during surgery.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Tension band wiring with ring pin. (A) Ring pin is inserted to olecranon using snapper. (B) Fracture site is compressed with 8-figure tension band wire.

jkfs-32-72-g001
Fig. 2

Double plating of distal humerus fracture. (A, B) Preoperative X-ray. (C, D) Double plating at medial and lateral column. (E, F) Postoperative X-ray.

jkfs-32-72-g002
Fig. 3

Ulnar nerve anterior transposition. (A, B) Transposed ulnar nerve is stabilized with new tunnel made of medial intermuscular septum.

jkfs-32-72-g003
Fig. 4

Type 1 fracture. (A) Preoperative X-ray showed medial side large fracture fragment. (B, C) Three-dimensional computed tomography. (D) Large fragment was fixed with interfragmentary screw. (E, F) Three years after operation, range of motion is nearly normal.

jkfs-32-72-g004
Fig. 5

Type 2 fracture. (A, B) Preoperative X-ray showed severe metaphyseal comminution. (C, D) Three-dimensional computed tomography. (E) Fracture was fixed by bridging plate. (F, G) Two years after operation, range of motion is nearly normal.

jkfs-32-72-g005
Fig. 6

Type 3 fracture. (A) Multiple comminuted articular bony fragment was reduced and fixed with K-wire. (B) Plate and screw was substituted by K-wire. (C–E) Postoperative X-ray showed stable reduction and normal range of motion.

jkfs-32-72-g006
Fig. 7

Type 4 fracture. (A, B) Preoperative X-ray showed small metaphyseal bony fragment. (C, D) Three-dimensional computed tomography. (E, F) Small bony fragment was fixed with miniplate for simplifying fracture pattern, then reduced other fragment.

jkfs-32-72-g007
Fig. 8

Rehabilitation after operation. (A) Active elbow flexion. (B) Active assisted elbow flexion. (C) Active elbow extension. (D) Active assisted elbow extension.

jkfs-32-72-g008

Notes

Financial support None.

Conflict of interests None.

References

1. Mighell MA, Stephens B, Stone GP, Cottrell BJ. Distal humerus fractures: open reduction internal fixation. Hand Clin. 2015; 31:591–604.
pmid
2. Nauth A, McKee MD, Ristevski B, Hall J, Schemitsch EH. Distal humeral fractures in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93:686–700.
crossref pmid
3. Robinson CM, Hill RM, Jacobs N, Dall G, Court-Brown CM. Adult distal humeral metaphyseal fractures: epidemiology and results of treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 2003; 17:38–47.
crossref pmid
4. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007; 21:S1–S133.
5. Jupiter JB, Mehne DK. Fractures of the distal humerus. Orthopedics. 1992; 15:825–833.
crossref pmid
6. Srinivasan K, Agarwal M, Matthews SJ, Giannoudis PV. Fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly: is internal fixation the treatment of choice? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (434):222–230.
7. Desloges W, Faber KJ, King GJ, Athwal GS. Functional outcomes of distal humeral fractures managed nonoperatively in medically unwell and lower-demand elderly patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24:1187–1196.
crossref
8. Rajaee SS, Lin CA, Moon CN. Primary total elbow arthroplasty for distal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a nationwide analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25:1854–1860.
crossref pmid
9. Prasad N, Ali A, Stanley D. Total elbow arthroplasty for non-rheumatoid patients with a fracture of the distal humerus: a minimum ten-year follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B:381–386.
pmid
10. Ring D, Gulotta L, Chin K, Jupiter JB. Olecranon osteotomy for exposure of fractures and nonunions of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma. 2004; 18:446–449.
crossref pmid
11. Coles CP, Barei DP, Nork SE, Taitsman LA, Hanel DP, Bradford Henley M. The olecranon osteotomy: a six-year experience in the treatment of intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20:164–171.
crossref pmid
12. Elmadag M, Erdil M, Bilsel K, Acar MA, Tuncer N, Tuncay I. The olecranon osteotomy provides better outcome than the triceps-lifting approach for the treatment of distal humerus fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014; 24:43–50.
crossref pmid
13. Zhang C, Zhong B, Luo CF. Comparing approaches to expose type C fractures of the distal humerus for ORIF in elderly patients: six years clinical experience with both the triceps-sparing approach and olecranon osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014; 134:803–811.
crossref pmid
14. Kim JY, Lee YH, Gong HS, Lee SL, Lee SK, Baek GH. Use of Kirschner wires with eyelets for tension band wiring of olecranon fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2013; 38:1762–1767.
crossref pmid
15. Chen G, Liao Q, Luo W, Li K, Zhao Y, Zhong D. Tricepssparing versus olecranon osteotomy for ORIF: analysis of 67 cases of intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus. Injury. 2011; 42:366–370.
crossref pmid
16. Campbell WC. Incision for exposure of the elbow joint. Am J Surg. 1932; 15:65–67.
crossref
17. McKee MD, Wilson TL, Winston L, Schemitsch EH, Richards RR. Functional outcome following surgical treatment of intra-articular distal humeral fractures through a posterior approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82-A:1701–1707.
crossref
18. O'Driscoll SW. The triceps-reflecting anconeus pedicle (TRAP) approach for distal humeral fractures and nonunions. Orthop Clin North Am. 2000; 31:91–101.
pmid
19. Schildhauer TA, Nork SE, Mills WJ, Henley MB. Extensor mechanism-sparing paratricipital posterior approach to the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma. 2003; 17:374–378.
crossref pmid
20. Worden A, Ilyas AM. Ulnar neuropathy following distal humerus fracture fixation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012; 43:509–514.
crossref
21. Chen RC, Harris DJ, Leduc S, Borrelli JJ Jr, Tornetta P 3rd, Ricci WM. Is ulnar nerve transposition beneficial during open reduction internal fixation of distal humerus fractures? J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24:391–394.
crossref pmid
22. Wiggers JK, Brouwer KM, Helmerhorst GT, Ring D. Predictors of diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy after surgically treated distal humerus fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37:1168–1172.
crossref pmid
23. Vazquez O, Rutgers M, Ring DC, Walsh M, Egol KA. Fate of the ulnar nerve after operative fixation of distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24:395–399.
crossref pmid
24. Helfet DL, Hotchkiss RN. Internal fixation of the distal humerus: a biomechanical comparison of methods. J Orthop Trauma. 1990; 4:260–264.
crossref pmid
25. Schuster I, Korner J, Arzdorf M, Schwieger K, Diederichs G, Linke B. Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22:113–120.
crossref pmid
26. Hungerer S, Wipf F, von Oldenburg G, Augat P, Penzkofer R. Complex distal humerus fractures-comparison of polyaxial locking and nonlocking screw configurations: a preliminary biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28:130–136.
crossref pmid
27. Jupiter JB, Neff U, Holzach P, Allgöwer M. Intercondylar fractures of the humerus. An operative approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985; 67:226–239.
crossref pmid
28. Helfet DL, Schmeling GJ. Bicondylar intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus in adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; (292):26–36.
crossref
29. O'Driscoll SW. Optimizing stability in distal humeral fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14:186S–194S.
pmid
30. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Torchia ME, O'Driscoll SW. Complex distal humeral fractures: internal fixation with a principle-based parallel-plate technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89:961–969.
crossref pmid
31. Stoffel K, Cunneen S, Morgan R, Nicholls R, Stachowiak G. Comparative stability of perpendicular versus parallel double-locking plating systems in osteoporotic comminuted distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Res. 2008; 26:778–784.
crossref pmid
32. Zalavras CG, Vercillo MT, Jun BJ, Otarodifard K, Itamura JM, Lee TQ. Biomechanical evaluation of parallel versus orthogonal plate fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20:12–20.
crossref pmid
33. Zalavras CG, McAllister ET, Singh A, Itamura JM. Operative treatment of intra-articular distal humerus fractures. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007; 36:12 Suppl 2. 8–12.
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Min Ho Lee
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8974-0571

Young Ho Lee
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2544-6183

Similar articles