One of the dental fields that has made great progress in the modern era is orthodontics. However, orthodontic treatment involves a lot of time and patient pain. Therefore, various methods have been introduced to accelerate tooth movement with stronger orthodontic force. A corticotomy is one of the representative methods for accelerating tooth movement through invasive surgical treatment.

In order for tooth movement to occur, orthodontic force must be applied to the teeth to evoke the biological action and response of the alveolar bone. If the force is too strong, problems will appear. Many studies have been performed to overcome these issues. Methods for moving teeth through surgical techniques and the attendant biological mechanisms has recently been investigated again in various studies even though it has been studied for 100 years1. In the past, osteotomies around teeth to be moved including periodontal tissue and surrounding alveolar bone were performed, and the osteotomized complex of the teeth and surrounding tissue was transported to the desired position. Corticotomies for rapid tooth movement were introduced in 1959 by Köle in an effort to cut the alveolar bone and move a tooth. He practiced corticotomies and osteotomies on various malocclusion cases. Vertically, the cortical and marrow bone between the teeth were partially removed, and either a subapical horizontal cut with alveolar bone cutting at a distance of 1 cm from the apex or only a cortical osteotomy excluding the marrow bone was performed. Köle2 reported no problems and no pocket formation in pulp vitality testing performed 6 months later. He theorized that tooth movement involved moving the block bone, including the surrounding tissues. However, this method was not very widely used because of its surgical invasiveness. Then, in order to overcome the disadvantages of a complete resection of the alveolar bone, a treatment method was created to reduce resistance to tooth movement by removing only the cortical bone that resisted tooth movement234. Düker5 reported that both the pulp and periodontium of the teeth in beagle dogs were not damaged after corticotomy surgery based on Köle's technique, and suggested a design that leaves at least 2 mm of bone at the level of the alveolar crest. Many papers have been published since then, and all tooth movement after corticotomies was believed to promote tooth movement by eliminating the physical obstruction. However, Wilcko et al.6 in 2001 introduced Frost's regional accelerating phenomenon (RAP) concept. Tooth movement by corticotomy was not caused by the movement of the bone block, but by the demineralization-mineralization process around the corticotomy. Wilcko et al.7 called it “bone matrix transportation”. Recently, interest in corticotomies has increased again, and the development of the skeletal anchorage system has enabled the application of orthodontic forces as strong as desired, which not only moves the teeth physiologically, but also facilitates tooth movement mechanically. Corticision8910, piezocision11,12, micro-osteoperforation1314, and discision15 procedures have been used to perform corticotomies with minimal invasiveness.

Frost16, an orthopedic surgeon, observed sudden reformation around the damaged area of bone and referred to this physiological reaction as a RAP, which resulted in a local transient burst of hard tissue. RAP is a reaction that occurs to heal the damaged area not only in the hard tissue, but also in soft tissues. In the case of hard bone tissue, the reaction increases bone turnover and decreases bone density to promote bone healing. These tissue responses vary depending on the duration, strength, and size of the harmful stimulus. Shih and Norrdin17 showed a regional change in modeling and remodeling of bone defects in beagle dogs. Yaffe et al.18 reported that a cascade of physiologic events occurred only at the corticotomy area and that RAP occurred in the mandible of rats even though only a mucoperiosteal flap was elevated.

Lee et al.19 carried out corticotomies in the mandible of rats and observed demineralization/remineralization changes by micro computed tomography, confirming that RAP occurred at the site of the corticotomy 3 weeks after the operation. When RAP is initiated, the biological response is activated beyond the normal state. Bone metabolism, bone cell differentiation, progenitor cell activity, growth of bone and cartilage, and bone remodeling by bone multicellular units are affected by RAP202122. In addition to trauma, RAP can be caused by several stimuli including vitamin D, thyroxine, and electrical stimuli232425. In the maxilla and mandible, orthopedic tooth movement as well as physical or infectious stimuli such as extractions, fractures, implant placement, and periodontitis may result in RAP26.

In 2001, Wilcko et al.6 published the accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (AOO) technique and then renamed it the periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO) technique. It became known as “Wilckodontics” and was patented27. The Wilcko brothers introduced accelerated osteogenic orthodontics tooth movement (AOOTM) as a method to accelerate tooth movement by selectively decorticating the labial or lingual cortex67. They found that demineralization/remineralization of bone occurred ideally in younger adolescents during tooth movement. However, in adult cases, remineralization did not occur sufficiently28, so bone grafting was performed at the site where the tooth would move to provide alveolar housing during tooth movement729. Brugnami et al.30 also extended the scope of conventional orthodontic treatment by corticotomy in combination with bone grafting, overcoming the limitations of traditional orthodontic treatment.

von Böhl et al.31 found that in the beagle dog experiment, small focal hyalinization occurred in the pressure side where orthodontic force was applied, and this phenomenon was caused by a difference in tooth movement speed. Verna and Melsen32 noted that the rate of tooth movement was affected by bone remodeling, bone density, and the hyalinized periodontal ligament. Iino et al.33 reported decreased periodontal ligament hyalinization in dogs who underwent corticotomies. The root resorption process continued until hyaline tissue disappeared34.

Verna et al.35 used finite element analysis (FEA) and stated that tooth movement after corticotomies decreased compressive stresses in the periodontal ligament and increased tensile stresses. Ouejiaraphan et al.36 also reported that the center of resistance was apically repositioned in the FEA of decorticated bone.

Medeiros et al.37 performed decortication to upright second molars in adults and studied the bone acquired from the decorticated area using a trephine bur after 0 and 9 days. He reported that corticotomy surgeries inflicted reversible and transient bone injury.

The ossification created by surrounding osteoblasts and the jaw periosteum are main sources of osteogenic precursor cells for osteogenesis38.

Different terms may be used depending on the concept when moving teeth using surgical procedures such as a corticotomy.

There are many terms for corticotomies for orthodontic treatment such as corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment (CAOT)3940, AOO67274142, PAOO672741424344454647, selective alveolar decortication (SAD), surgically facilitated orthodontic therapy (SFOT), and corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics (CFO) known as speedy orthodontics. The only difference is that SFOT, AOO, and PAOO involve bone grafting in addition to a corticotomy. In SFOT, both the corticotomy and bone grafting procedures were performed in the direction of tooth movement rather than on both the buccal and lingual/palatal surfaces48.

Speedy orthodontics is defined as corticotomy-facilitated orthodontic treatment that combines a corticotomy and orthopedic heavy force application on the anterior segment495051. It was demonstrated that a perisegmental corticotomy around the anterior segment could decrease the rigidity of the cortical bone with bone-bending effects through heavy force application on the corticotomized segment.

Corticotomy in the alveolar bone refers to a method of thinning the cortical bone without penetrating the marrow bone, while an osteotomy of alveolar bone involves cutting through the marrow bone from the cortex52. The corticotomy procedure initially used handpieces and surgical burs, but various devices such as a piezoelectric apparatus111253545556, laser57, hard blade and hammer891058, perforator145960, and disc have gradually become more involved in order to reduce damage to the patient. In the case of corticotomy design, vertical corticotomies between roots were carried out initially and the formation of grooves around the root using only a small round bur was used later61.

Local anesthesia is sufficient for corticotomies, but intravenous sedation may be used for patient comfort. One-stage techniques are generally used, but two stages are used on occasion. In the two-stage technique, alveolar bone is divided into palatal and labial/buccal sections and corticotomized at two weeks intervals62.

Köle2 performed active orthodontic treatment for 6 to 12 weeks after corticotomies and a retention appliance was worn for 6 to 8 months to consolidate bone to prevent relapse after removal of the orthodontic appliance. The rate of tooth movement after corticotomies exhibited an average monthly rate that was twice as fast as that of the control side during the first 2 months in the orthodontic patient with a decrease in speed during the next two months37. Aboul-Ela et al.65 reported that canine retraction after a corticotomy was 2-times faster in the first 2 months, 1.6 times in the 3rd month, and 1.06 times in the 4th month. When Alfawal et al.54 performed piezocisions and laser-assisted flapless corticotomies, they found that RAP was at its peak in the first month and dramatically decreased in the second month due to the less invasive technique compared to conventional corticotomies. Abbas et al.56 reported that corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics exhibited 1.5 to 2 times faster tooth movement compared to conventional orthodontics. Gil et al.66 reported that corticotomyfacilitated orthodontic cases required a shorter treatment period with an average of 8.85 months than conventional orthodontic treatment, which took an average of 16.4 months.

Orthodontic forces were applied to the teeth and were divided into two groups. Many studies1365676869 had forces applied to the teeth immediately after corticotomies. The other group70717274 was studied within 2 weeks after corticotomy. Kraiwattanapong and Samruajbenjakun75 reported that the group with heavy force (50 g) application after corticotomy in rats experienced rapid tooth movement with no difference in alveolar bone change or root resorption compared to the group with light force (10 g).

Tooth movement using corticotomy can be applied in many fields. Noh et al.76 reported good results in patients with severe bimaxillary protrusion by performing a wide-linear corticotomy with a palatal bone-borne type retractor and anterior segmental osteotomy instead of orthognathic surgery. However, cases where the bimaxillary protrusion is accompanied with a gummy smile may benefit more from a segmental osteotomy77.

Kim et al.78 reported that the tooth was moved to the desired position by performing a corticotomy and surgery to expose multiple impacted maxillary teeth. Karthikeyan et al.79 treated a Class I malocclusion and open bite patient by removing the bulky anterior cortical bone and intruding the anterior teeth. Corticotomies can also be used for canine retraction5480, anterior teeth retraction, decrowding5381, molar uprighting37, correction of a scissor bite82, and rapid maxillary expansion. Lines83 introduced a method for the correction of a maxillary constriction that applied incisions on the lateral walls of the maxillary sinus and mid-palatal sutures. Echchadi et al.84 used piezo-bone perforations on the buccal alveolar bone in young patients for maxillary expansion. Le et al.85 showed that adjunctive buccal and palatal corticotomies on the maxilla enhanced the outcomes of maxillary expansion in adults by two and three folds. Ahn et al.86 performed orthognathic surgery on the mandible to correct upper incisors after unilateral molar intrusion and occlusal plane canting correction. In addition, alveolar augmentation after corticotomies can increase the maxillary and/or mandibular bone-volume to secure airway dimensions and prevent sleep disorders48.

Wilcko and Wilcko42 reported that ankylosed tooth or vitality loss of the alveolar bone limited tooth movement. In case of the PAOO, they suggested that patients who take corticosteroids which suppress inflammatory reactions were at a disadvantage because the periodontal ligament that mediates the sterile inflammatory process is suppressed. In addition, it is known that a corticotomy is not appropriate for patients with active periodontal disease43, individuals with inadequately treated endodontic problems, and people who are taking any medications such as bisphosphonates and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs6. Those who have been treated with radiation therapy are unable to undergo a corticotomy because of their reduced blood supply and less than ideal condition of the surrounding soft tissue87.

The side effects are controversial. Although interdental bone loss, periodontal defects, and reduced attached gingiva were reported, Aboul-Ela et al.65 suggested that a flap design leaving two 2 mm of attached gingiva and relieving incisions reduced the periodontal issue by providing vertical orientation without blocking blood flow. In the case of pain or discomfort, Al-Naoum et al.67 stated that the ingestion of food was painful for the first 2 days, but gradually decreased.

Root resorption occurrence is known to be similar for both corticotomy and noncorticotomy cases88. However, Chan et al.89 performed micro-perforations on the mesial and distal aspects, provided a tipping force to the patient and extracted premolars after four weeks. Forty-two percent more root resorption was observed compared to conventional orthodontic tooth movement.

Murphy et al.58 reported that there was no difference in the volume of root resorption when light (10 g) or heavy forces (100 g) were applied after corticision.

Corticotomy was not selected by patients because of their fear of surgery due to its invasiveness90.

Although corticotomy is an invasive procedure, RAP appears to reduce the resistance of bone during tooth movement, thereby shortening the period of orthodontic treatment and minimizing adverse effects on teeth. It is believed that there will be a number of ways to speed up tooth movement without side effects while minimizing surgical invasiveness.