Journal List > J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg > v.44(6) > 1110956

This article has been corrected. See "Corrigendum: Successful surgical missions for cleft" in Volume 45 on page 378.
Park: Successful surgical missions for cleft
Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is the most common oro-facial anomaly in the world, and constitutes a significant global disease burden. It is well known that infants with CLP have increased risk of dying in the first year of life compared to normal controls, probably due to malnutrition and infection1. Surviving babies with CLP are destined to live with problems of speech, hearing, facial esthetics, and psychosocial wellbeing. In addition, many babies with CLP lack access to basic care due to parental poverty and lack of knowledge. Therefore, comprehensive cleft care including well-timed surgery is needed to reduce the risk of dying and for subsequent quality of life.
Fortunately, humanitarian surgical missions for patients with CLP in developing countries have a long history. Non-governmental, mission-based organizations such as Smile Train, Operation Smile, and Interplast2 as well as smaller scale, charitable groups345 have conducted global missions for CLP care in low-income countries. The World Health Organization recognized more than 55 countries as in danger of “health workforce crisis” and in need of education and development of a novel CLP training program6.
A successful mission needs to be based on some certain principles. The mission model from Global Standards of Care, which were developed by Operation Smile, emphasizes safe CLP surgery, patient-centered care, and mission programs in local health systems7. A study reported that the fistula rate after palatoplasty is 20-fold higher during mission operations than in craniofacial centers of a high-income country8. Volunteer workers have to reconstruct the CLP, maximizing patient and wound safety with minimal complications. Components of health system integration must act in accordance with national regulations, respect local facility practices and customs; and partner with locally based entities. Also, patient centeredness is important for ensuring that missions provide high-value care to patients based on their social and cultural expectations. Surgical methods and protocols also might need to be modified to fit the patient's condition.
Surgery is considered an integral component of global health care. CLP surgery is recognized to be very cost-effective compared to other global health issues9. International CLP care could be carried out in two ways, through surgical missions and by establishing comprehensive care centers (CCCs). A CCC for CLP is a permanent institute that provides not only surgical interventions, but nutritional care, speech therapy, psychological consultation, and dental treatments. A CCC provides CLP care at a higher cost-effectiveness compared to the mission strategy10. However, surgical missions still have an important role as an initial step toward more sustainable local health care, like a CCC. Furthermore, through international missions, the deficiency of human resources, i.e., properly trained cleft surgeons and anesthesiologists, can be reduced.
Korean oral and maxillofacial surgeons have engaged in global surgical missions for patients with CLP and related facial deformities since the early 1990s. I have taken part in many surgical missions, and several Korean oral and maxillofacial surgeons have delivered high-quality surgeries via short-term international mission trips. Additionally, we trained in-country doctors on cleft surgical techniques and concepts of CLP care. Although our missions benefit many poor patients in the short term, most patients fail to receive long-term treatments, and data on sustained outcomes are rare.
In conclusion, a responsible CLP mission must provide safe and effective surgical care for patients. Especially, CLP care requires long-term treatments, including well-timed surgical interventions and longer follow-ups. The ultimate goal for a global mission is to establish a treatment center providing long-term care. A CCC may be established de novo or within existing local infrastructure. Korea has a current per capita income of US$30,000. Thus, fundraising efforts are needed to establish a CCC.

Notes

Conflict of Interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Carlson L, Hatcher KW, Vander Burg R. Elevated infant mortality rates among oral cleft and isolated oral cleft cases: a meta-analysis of studies from 1943 to 2010. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013; 50:2–12.
crossref
2. Calis M, Aral AM, Sencan A, Kanbak M, Vargel İ, Ozgur F, et al. Hummanitarian activities of interplast Turkiye: 6 years of experience in Uzbekistan for surgical treatment of cleft patients and related secondary deformities. Ann Plast Surg. 2016; 77:494–498.
3. Moses JJ, Rochelle WJ. Cleft and craniofacial mission care: management of facial clefts: international missions. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2016; 28:203–220.
4. Bello SA, Osodin T, Oketade I, Ibikari AB, Ighile N, Enebong DJ, et al. Pattern of maxillofacial surgical conditions in North Central Nigeria: a 5-year experience of an indigenous surgical mission. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017; 20:1283–1288.
crossref
5. Goto T, Nishihara K, Kataoka K, Goto S, Maruyama T, Sunakawa H, et al. Outcomes of an international volunteer surgical project for patients with cleft lip and/or cleft palate: a mission in developing Laos. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2018; 58:112–116.
crossref
6. McCullough M, Campbell A, Siu A, Durnwald L, Kumar S, Magee WP 3rd, et al. Competency-based education in low resource settings: development of a novel surgical training program. World J Surg. 2018; 42:646–651.
crossref
7. Carlson LC, Hatcher KW, Vanderburg R, Ayala RE, Mbugua Kabetu CE, Magee WP 3rd, et al. A health systems perspective on the mission model for cleft lip and palate surgery: a matter of sustainability or responsibility? J Craniofac Surg. 2015; 26:1079–1083.
crossref
8. Maine RG, Hoffman WY, Palacios-Martinez JH, Corlew DS, Gregory GA. Comparison of fistula rates after palatoplasty for international and local surgeons on surgical missions in Ecuador with rates at a craniofacial center in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129:319e–326e.
crossref
9. Hackenberg B, Ramos MS, Campbell A, Resch S, Finlayson SR, Sarma H, et al. Measuring and comparing the cost-effectiveness of surgical care delivery in low-resource settings: cleft lip and palate as a model. J Craniofac Surg. 2015; 26:1121–1125.
crossref
10. Persing S, Patel A, Clune JE, Steinbacher DM, Persing JA. The repair of international clefts in the current surgical landscape. J Craniofac Surg. 2015; 26:1126–1128.
crossref
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Young-Wook Park
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5881-7257

Similar articles