Journal List > J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs > v.29(4) > 1110657

Jeon, Lee, and Yu: Validation of a Path Model of Vietnamese Migrant Workers’ Occupational Stress

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to construct and verify a path model for the influencing factors on occupational stress of Vietnamese migrant workers in Korea.

Methods

Participants were 193 Vietnamese migrant workers recruited from Foreign Workers Support Centers. Data were collected by a self-administered survey with copies of a Questionnaire written in Vietnamese. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficients and path analysis using SPSS/WIN 23.0 and Amos 20.0 program.

Results

Length of residence, homeland friends’ and Korean colleagues’supports, and acculturation have been found to have significant direct effects on occupational stress of Vietnamese migrant workers. Meanwhile, Length of residence, homeland friends’, Korean colleagues’, and their families’ supports showed indirect effects on their occupational stress. What had the greatest direct effect on occupational stress of Vietnamese migrant workers was Korean colleagues’ support.

Conclusion

For reducing occupational stress of Vietnamese migrant workers, it is necessary to strengthen their Korean colleagues’ supports in work places. In addition, community organizations should take strategies to enhance homeland friends’ supports and to improve acculturation of Vietnamese migrant workers.

References

1. Ministry of Justice Republic of Korea. Immigration policy statistics reports [Internet]. Gwacheon: Ministry of Justice Republic of Korea;2017. [cited 2017 March 4]. Available from:. http://www.immigration.go.kr/doc_html/attach/imm/f2017//20170421281813_1_1.hwp.files/Sections1.html.
2. Kwon JW, Kim HC, Sun J, Kim JW. Cross-cultural adjustment of foreign workers in Korea. Journal of International Trade and Industry Studies. 2012; 17(2):161–183.
3. Li JM, Chung DS. The effects of social capital and media use on cultural adaptation and job satisfaction among Chinese workers in Korea. Management Information Systems Review. 2016; 35(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.29214/damis.2016.35.1.001.
4. Ministry of Employment and Labor. Industrial accident [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Employment and Labor;2018. [cited 2018 June 10]. Available from:. http://www.moel.go.kr/english/pas/pasMajor.jsp.
5. Kim NK, Lim CW. The correlation between human capital and labor status of returning Vietnamese migrants: Focusing on the labor migrants in Korea. Korean Association of Southeast Asian Studies. 2015; 25(1):201–234. https://doi.org/10.21652/kaseas.25.1.201502.201.
6. Kim YL. A study on the sociocultural adaptation of immigrant workers in Korea. Discourse 201. 2008; 11(2):103–138. https://doi.org/10.17789/discou.2008.11.2.004.
7. Sauter S, Murphy L, Colligan M, Swanson N, Hurrell J, Scharf F. . Stress at work [Internet]. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health;1999. [cited 2018 May15]. Available from:. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/99-101/default.html.
8. Jo MH, Kim KS, Lee SW, Kim TG, Ryu HW, Lee MY. . The relationship between job stress and musculoskeletal symptoms in migrant workers. Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2009; 21(4):378–387.
crossref
9. Kim JK, Kim JE, Moon DH. Effect of occupational stress and sleep quality on depression among male immigrant workers manufacturing industry, Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2012; 22(3):244–256.
10. Lee SW, Kim KS, Kim TG, Ryu HW, Lee MY, Won YL. . The relationship between job stress and depressive symptoms in migrant workers in Kyung-gi province in Korea. Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2009; 21(1):76–86.
crossref
11. Luo H, Yang H, Xu X, Yun L, Chen R, Chen Y. . Relationship between occupational stress and job burnout among rural-to-urban migrant workers in Dongguan, China: A cross-sectional study. British Medical Journal Open. 2016; 6:e012597. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012597.
crossref
12. Hurrell JJ, McLaney MA. Exposure to job stress: A new psychometric instrument. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 1988; 14(suppl 1):27–28.
13. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1988; 52(1):30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.
crossref
14. García-Herrero S, Mariscal MA, Gutiérrez JM, Ritzel DO. Using Bayesian networks to analyze occupational stress caused by work demands: Preventing stress through social support. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2013; 57:114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.009.
crossref
15. Berry JW. Acculturation: living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2005; 29(6):697–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.013.
crossref
16. Reid JA, Romans JS, Koch JM. Job stress and acculturation strategies in african american professionals. Western Journal of Black Studies. 2014; 38(1):24–34.
17. Hovey JD, Maganña C. Acculturative stress, anxiety, and depression among Mexican immigrant farmworkers in the Midwest United States. Journal of Immigrant Health. 2000; 2(3):119–131. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009556802759.
18. Ayers JW, Hofstetter CR, Usita P, Irvin VL, Kang S, Hovell MF. Sorting out the competing effects of acculturation, immigrant stress, and social support on depression: A report on Korean women in California. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2009; 197(10):742–747. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181b96e9e.
19. Kim HK. The influence of social support for migrant workers on cultural adjustment. Korea Industrial Economic Association. 2009; 22(1):385–409.
20. Park GS, Song BK. An analysis of correlation among participation in education programs, social support, and acculturation of migrant workers. The Journal of Soonchunhyang Humanities. 2015; 34(2):319–353.
21. Stevens J. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 3rd ed. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;1996. p. 659 p.
crossref
22. Chang SJ, Koh SB, Kang DM, Kim SA, Kang MG, Lee CG. . Developing an occupational stress scale for Korean employees. Korean Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2005; 17(4):297–317.
crossref
23. Sunin RM, Ahuna C, Khoo G. The Suinn-Lew asian self-identity acculturation scale: Concurrent and factorial validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1992; 52(4):1041–1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004028.
crossref
24. Kim DH. Study of effect on parenting efficacy of immigrant women for marriage: Focusing on the mediating effect of acculturation [dissertation]. [Seoul]: Ewha Womans University;2008. p. 159 p.
25. Li JM, Liu Y, Chung DS. The effects of social capital on cultural adaptation and job satisfaction among Korean-Chinese workers in Korea. Journal of Human Resource Management Research. 2016; 23(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.14396/jhrmr.2016.23.1.1.
crossref
26. Yi GM, Jung HS, Yi YJ, Hyun HJ, Kim HG. The influence of social support on job satisfaction of migrant workers. Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing. 2009; 18(2):165–173.
27. Kim YH, Lim SY. A study on the occupational and labor consciousness' of foreign workers- focused on the type of foreign workers (E9, H2 visa). The Journal of Vocational Education Research. 2014; 33(5):63–83.
28. Chin H, Chang EM, Chung KS. Work satisfaction and turnover intention of foreign workers with the employment permit system. The Journal of Small Business Innovation. 2016; 38(3):1–23.
29. Song JH, Lee TY. A study on the determinant factors of the acculturation of female immigrants by marriage. Social Welfare Policy. 2014; 41(1):241–266. https://doi.org/10.15855/swp.2014.41.1.241.

Figure 1.
Path diagram of occupational stress.
jkachn-29-404f1.tif
Table 1.
General Characteristics of Subjects (N=193)
Characteristics Categories n (%) or M±SD
Gender Male 152 (78.8)
Female 41 (21.2)
Age (year) 30.35±5.21
≤29 94 (48.7)
30~39 91 (47.2)
≥40 8 (4.1)
Education (year) 11.83±2.00
≤12 155 (80.3)
≥13 38 (19.7)
Marital status Not married 90 (46.6)
Married 103 (53.4)
Length of residence (month) 59.56±35.17
≤12 24 (12.4)
13~60 78 (40.4)
≥61 91 (47.2)
Living status Alone 44 (22.8)
Family 34 (17.6)
Vietnamese 97 (50.3)
Foreigners 14 (7.3)
Korean 4 (2.0)
Religion Have 153 (79.3)
None 40 (20.7)
Subjective health status Bad 12 (6.2)
Moderate 136 (70.5)
Good 45 (23.3)
Resident state Illegal 77 (39.9)
Legal 116 (60.1)
Type of shift Day 109 (56.5)
Shift 84 (43.5)
Employment period (months) 29.08±28.52
≤12 70 (36.3)
13~36 68 (35.2)
≥37 55 (28.5)
Monthly income (10,000 won) 203.92±44.65
≤150 20 (10.3)
151~200 104 (53.9)
≥201 69 (35.8)
Working hours/week 60.23±12.33
≤60 115 (59.6)
≥61 78 (40.4)
Table 2.
Correlation Coefficients and Mean of Variables (N=193)
Variables 1
2
3
4
5
M±SD Kurtosis Skewness
r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p)
1. Length of residence 1.00         59.56±35.17 −0.45 0.34
2. Homeland friend support −.19 (.649) 1.00   14.77±2.60 1.42 −0.84
3. Family support .08 (.027) .23 (<.001) 1.00   14.96±2.77 −0.26 −0.14
4. Korean colleague support −.03 (.256) .07 (.315) .04 (.654) 1.00 12.75±2.22 −0.46 0.05
5. Acculturation .03 (.707) .22 (<.001) .13 (.034) .24 (<.001) 1.00 42.16±5.08 −0.39 −0.14
6. Occupational stress −.16 (.007) −.18 (.010) −.07 (.315) −.32 (<.001) −.19 (.009) 44.94±6.94 0.75 −0.10
Table 3.
Parameter and Significance in Path Model (N=193)
Path effect Hypothetical path model
Modified path model
B SE CR p β B SE CR p β
Homeland friend support ← Length of −0.01 .01 −2.74 .006 −.19 −0.01 .01 −2.74 .006 −.19
residence
Family support ← Length of 0.01 .01 1.14 .253 .08
residence
Korean colleague support ← Length of 0.00 .01 −0.46 .647 −.03
residence
Acculturation ← Length of 0.01 .01 1.01 .315 .07
residence
Acculturation ← Homeland friend 0.40 .13 3.19 .001 .21 0.37 .12 3.02 .003 .20
support
Acculturation ← Family support 0.31 .12 2.66 .008 .17 0.33 .12 2.81 .005 .18
Acculturation ← Korean colleague 0.80 .14 5.57 <.001 .36 0.80 .15 5.52 <.001 .36
support
Occupational stress ← Length of −0.04 .01 −2.90 .004 −.20 −0.04 .01 −2.94 .003 −.20
residence
Occupational stress ← Homeland friend −0.42 .18 −2.32 .020 −.16 −0.43 .18 −2.37 .018 −.16
support
Occupational stress ← Family support −0.03 .17 −0.20 .842 −.01
Occupational stress ← Korean colleague −0.79 .22 −3.64 <.001 −.26 −0.79 .22 −3.66 <.001 −.26
support
Occupational stress ← Acculturation −0.23 .10 −2.27 .023 −.17 −0.23 .10 −2.36 .018 −.17
Table 4.
Direct Effect, Indirect Effect, and Total Effect in Path Model (N=193)
Variables Categories Direct effect (p) Indirect effect (p) Total effect (p) R2
Homeland friend support Length of residence −0.19 (.006)   −0.19 (.006) .04
Acculturation Length of residence   −0.04 (.029) −0.04 (.029) .20
Homeland friend support 0.20 (.003)   0.20 (.003)  
Family support 0.18 (.005)   0.18 (.005)  
Korean colleague support 0.36 (<.001)   0.36 (<.001)
Occupational stress Length of residence −0.20 (.003) 0.04 (.019) −0.16 (.042) .18
Homeland friend support −0.16 (.018) −0.03 (.039) −0.19 (.003)  
Family support −0.03 (.043) −0.03 (.043)  
Korean colleague support −0.26 (<.001) −0.06 (.021) −0.33 (<.001)  
Acculturation −0.17 (.018)   −0.17 (.018)
TOOLS
Similar articles