Journal List > J Lipid Atheroscler > v.7(1) > 1110537

Jun, Jeong, Cho, Ahn, Kim, Cho, Chae, Kim, Seong, Chae, Kim, and for the KAMIR (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry)-NIH (Korea National Institute of Health) Investigators: Early Valuable Risk Stratification with Hemoglobin Level and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Having an Early Invasive Strategy

Abstract

Objective

The complete blood count is the most widely available laboratory data in the early in-hospital period after acute myocardial infarction. We assessed the clinical utility of the combined use of hemoglobin (Hb) level and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (N/L) for early risk stratification in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods

We analyzed 6,157 consecutive patients with non-STEMI (65±12.4 years, male 69%) were included in the final analysis. Patients were categorized into 3 groups by using the median value of N/L (4.42) and the presence of anemia (Hb <13 mg/dL in men and <12 mg/dL in women): group I, low N/L & no anemia (n=3,170); group II, no group I or III (n=2,168); group III, high N/L & anemia (n=819).

Results

There were significant differences on clinical outcomes during 180-day follow-up among 3 groups. The prognostic discriminatory capacity of the combined use of Hb level and N/L was also significant in high-risk subgroups, such as patients with a renal dysfunction, multivessel coronary disease, low ejection fraction, and even in those having higher mortality risk based on the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score. In a multi-variate logistic regression, after adjusting for multiple covariates, group III had higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 180-day (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–4.0;p≤0.001) compared with group I.

Conclusions

The combined use of Hb level and N/L provides valuable timely information for early risk stratification in patients with non-STEMI.

INTRODUCTION

Early effective risk stratification is essential for the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome.1 Unlike patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), Patients with non-STEMI have a different time limitation in performing intervention.2 So, in a treatment of non-STEMI patients, early prediction of prognosis makes decisions regarding pharmacologic and interventional treatments, allocation of clinical resources, and triage among alternative levels of hospital care.
Blood tests were conducted in all patients including complete blood count (CBC) test on admission. CBC is the most widely, easily, fast available laboratory datum on admission, especially in the first 30 minutes. Even among patients with non-STEMI, for whom initial therapeutic options are well-defined, patient risk assessments have an impact on early therapeutic decision making.3 Furthermore, if primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is done as soon as possible after admission, the CBC may be the only available laboratory data before, or at, the procedure. Previous study reported that high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (N/L)45 and anemia67 are independent prognostic predictors of mortality in patients with STEMI.8 The aim of the present study was to assess the value of early risk stratification using readily available CBC data in patients with non-STEMI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Study population

The study population consisted of 6,191 consecutive non-STEMI patients enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH) between November 2011 and March 2015. Patients with no laboratory data or no vital sign were excluded, and 6,157 patients (65±12.4 years, male 69%) were included in the final analysis (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Flow chart of the study population.

KAMIR-NIH; Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health, STEMI; ST-elevation myocardial infarction, N/L; neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio.
jla-7-50-g001
All patients were categorized into 3 groups by using the median value of N/L (4.42) and the presence of anemia: group I, low N/L & no anemia (n=3,170); group II, no group I or III (n=2,168); group III, high N/L & anemia (n=819).
The KAMIR-NIH was a Korean prospective multicenter data collection registry reflecting real-world treatment practices and outcomes in Asian patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The registry includes data from 20 hospitals with facilities for primary PCI and on-site cardiac surgery. Data were collected by a trained study coordinator using a standardized case report from and protocol. All management decisions were at the discretion of the treating cardiologists. Before the initiation or the KAMIR-NIH study, several investigator meetings were held, and a steering committee was selected to standardize the care given in clinical practice to minimize the differences in medical care among the hospitals. The ethics committee at each participating institution approved the study.
Eligible patients were on admission for and non-STEMI, and had ≥1 of the following: electrocardiographic changes consistent with an non-STEMI (defined as ST-segment depression and T-wave inversion of 0.2 mV in 2 contiguous leads), serial increases in serum biochemical markers of myocardial necrosis, and documentation of coronary artery disease (CAD) by coronary angiogram (CAG).2 Patients with ST-segment elevation or presumed new left bundle branch block were excluded, and ST-segment depression being defined as new horizontal or downsloping depression 0.05 mV in 2 contiguous leads. Cut-off value of cardiac troponin was defined as the lowest concentration with a value of coefficient of variation<10%.

2. Complete blood cell count

CBC values were obtained just after admission, before the patient's transfer to the catheter laboratory. It was possible to collect the data of 99% of all patients. Automated analyzers were used for hematologic measurements. Anemia was defined according to the World Health Organization definition as admission hemoglobin (Hb) level <13 mg/dL in men and <12 mg/dL in women.9

3. Coronary angiographic procedure and post-intervention management

All patients received aspirin ≥100 mg and a loading dose of clopidogrel 300 to 600 mg and unfractionated heparin 50 to 70 U/kg to maintain an activated clotting time of >250 to 300 seconds before or during the procedure. Primary PCI was performed using standard techniques if the coronary anatomy was suitable for angioplasty. Successful PCI was defined as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow with residual stenosis ≤50% in the infarct-related artery. Multivessel coronary disease was defined as >50% diameter stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography in ≥2 coronary arteries or a left main coronary artery lesion. Coronary artery lesion type was determined according to American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) classification.10 Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition was at the discretion of the operator. During the in-hospital period and at discharge, patients received essential medical treatment that included β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, or statins. All patients were prescribed lifelong aspirin and clopidogrel (75 mg/day) for 3 to 12 months, depending on stent type. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was determined by echocardiography. Impaired renal function was defined as an estimate of the glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, as calculated using Cockcroft vault equation, including age, race, gender, and serum creatinine. Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk scores were calculated in all patients.11 Age, initial vital signs (systolic blood pressure [BP] and heart rate [HR]), and Killip classification on admission, ST-segment depression on electrocardiogram, and blood chemistry (baseline serum creatinine) were implemented. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) included death, myocardial infarction, repeat PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting.

4. Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical variables were presented as number of cases and percentage and continuous variables as means±standard deviations. The relation between 2 continuous variables was assessed using bivariate correlation analysis. Comparative analysis was performed using Student's t-test or analysis of variance for continuous variables and Pearson χ2 test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. We used TIMI risk score, which is a well-known useful tool for early risk stratification in patients with non-STEMI undergoing primary PCI,12 to assess the prognostic discriminatory capacity of the combined use of Hb level and N/L in patients having higher mortality risk based on the risk score. Also, we used the GRACE score to estimate risk in individual patients. The risk factors included in the TIMI risk score and GRACE score were considered as covariates on logistic regression analysis.
The independent discriminatory capacity of the combined use of Hb level and N/L on short-term mortality was assessed by logistic regression models. Candidate covariates for logistic regression analysis were chosen based on previous medical knowledge and independent of their p value, namely age, gender, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), previous CAD, systolic BP, HR, Killip class, LVEF, creatinine clearance, multivessel coronary disease, ACC/AHA class. A 2-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.

RESULTS

1. Basal clinical characteristics

Mean and median values of N/L in all patients were 4.42±5.24 and 2.96, respectively. Mean and median values of Hb in all patients were 13.4±2.25 and 13.7 mg/dL, respectively. Of the 6,157 patients, anemia was found in 1,853 patients (30.1%). The correlation between values of N/L and age was positive but weak. Hb level was correlated moderately with age and decreased with increasing age (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Simple correlation analysis between age and (A) N/L (r=0.305; p<0.001) and (B) Hb level (r=−0.356; p<0.001).

N/L; neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, Hb; hemoglobin.
jla-7-50-g002
Baseline characteristics of the patients' groups are listed in Table 1. Group III were older and more frequently female, and had lower body weight, lower body mass index, lower admission blood pressure, more increased HR, higher rates of HTN, lower rates of DM and dyslipidemia, worse LVEF, worse renal function, and more multivessel coronary disease. Group III showed higher GRACE score and Killip class than other groups. Other significant differences included lower rates of history of smoking and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics according to 3 groups based on Hb level and N/L

jla-7-50-i001
Characteristic Group I (n=3,170) Group II (n=2,168) Group III (n=819) p-value (overall) p-value (I vs. III) Linear p-value*
Age (yr) 57±10 71±8 76±8 <0.001 <0.001
Age groups (yr)
<65 2,264 (71) 460 (21) 88 (10) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
65–74 697 (22) 834 (38) 225 (12) <0.001 0.001 <0.001
≥75 209 (6) 874 (40) 506 (61) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Men 2,542 (80) 1,333 (61) 429 (52) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Body weight (kg) 68±11 60±11 58±12 <0.001 <0.001
BMI (kg/m2) 24±3 23±3 22±3 <0.001 <0.001
Systolic BP (mmHg) 142±26 129±24 112±32 <0.001 <0.001
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 85±14 77±14 68±21 <0.001 <0.001
HR (beats/min) 76±14 81±18 91±26 <0.001 <0.001
Dyspnea on admission 522 (16) 654 (30) 483 (59) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Previous angina 986 (31) 625 (28) 219 (26) 0.027 0.015 0.007
Killip class > I 119 (3) 529 (24) 658 (80) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
GRACE score 105±18 153±13 208±21 <0.001 <0.001
GRACE score >180 0 (0) 43 (5) 819 (95) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
GRACE score >200 0 (0) 0 (0) 463 (100) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Previous CAD 775 (24) 380 (17) 119 (14) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Previous HTN 1,737 (54) 1,160 (53) 499 (60) 0.001 0.002 0.034
Previous DM 1,138 (35) 623 (28) 213 (26) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Previous dyslipidemia 460 (14) 206 (9) 52 (6) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Previous heart failure 87 (2) 44 (2) 16 (2) 0.166 0.203 0.080
Family history of CAD 268 (8) 119 (5) 19 (2) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Anemia 0 (0) 1,034 (47) 819 (100) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Current smoker 1,346 (42) 596 (27) 162 (19) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Hb 14.5±1.3 12.7±2.2 10.4±1.6 <0.001 <0.001
LVEF (%) 56±10 51±12 47±13 <0.001 <0.001
Serum glucose (mg/dL) 150±67 164±79 202±120 <0.001 <0.001
Creatinine clearance (mL/min) 95±42 62±36 41±30 <0.001 <0.001
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dL) 116±44 105±41 90±37 <0.001 <0.001
Data presented as mean±standard deviation or number (percentage). Group I, low N/L & no anemia; group II, no group I or III; group III, high N/L & anemia.
Hb; hemoglobin, N/L; neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, BMI; body mass index, BP; blood pressure, HR; heart rate, GRACE; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, CAD; coronary artery disease, HTN; hypertension, DM; diabetes mellitus, LVEF; left ventricular ejection fraction.
*Statistical significance for linear by linear association between categorical variables, calculated using χ2 test for trend.

2. Coronary angiographic and procedural findings

The baseline coronary angiographic characteristics are shown in Table 2. There are more patients with multivessel disease in group III. Patients in group III less underwent CAG and PCI. In lesion type, there are no significant differences between groups.
Table 2

Baseline coronary angiographic variables according to 3 groups based on Hb level and N/L

jla-7-50-i002
Characteristic Group I (n=3,170) Group II (n=2,168) Group III (n=819) p-value (overall) p-value (I vs. III) Linear p-value*
Pre-PCI aspirin 3,150 (99) 2,161 (99) 807 (98) 0.002 0.017 0.118
Pre-PCI clopidogrel 2,558 (80) 1,841 (84) 727 (88) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
CAG 3,139 (99) 2,101 (96) 755 (92) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Thrombosis 0 (0) 3 (0.1) 0 (0) 0.063 0.351
Lesion type 0.083 0.014 0.094
A 61 (2) 35 (2) 7 (1)
B1 387 (14) 241 (13) 62 (10)
B2 1,058 (39) 719 (40) 259 (43)
C 1,197 (44) 767 (43) 271 (45)
Multivessel coronary disease 1,558 (49) 1,115 (53) 458 (60) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
PCI 2,721 (85) 1,780 (82) 598 (73) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Data presented as number (percentage). Group I, low N/L & no anemia; group II, no group I or III; group III, high N/L & anemia.
Hb; hemoglobin, N/L; neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, PCI; percutaneous coronary intervention, CAG; coronary angiogram.
*Statistical significance for linear by linear association between categorical variables, calculated using χ2 test for trend.

3. Clinical outcomes

During 180-day follow-up, there were 124 in-hospital cardiac death (2.0%), 40 in-hospital non-cardiac death (0.6%) and 87 cardiac deaths (1.4%), 52 non-cardiac death (0.8%) at 180-day. Table 3 showed clinical outcomes in-hospital and 180-day after PCI according to either the presence of anemia or N/L. Patients with anemia or high N/L had worse clinical outcomes for MACEs and deaths in-hospital or at 180-day. When patients were stratified by Hb level and N/L, there was a stepwise association with 180-day mortality (Fig. 3A) and MACEs (Fig. 3B).
Table 3

Clinical outcomes in the hospital period and follow-up at 180-day according to either the presence of anemia or N/L

jla-7-50-i003
Variable No anemia(n=4,304) Anemia(n=1,853) p-value Low N/L(n=4,204) High N/L(n=1,953) p-value
In-hospital outcomes
Success rate of PCI 3,630 (99) 1,398 (98) 0.194 3,495 (99) 1,533 (98) 0.803
In-hospital death 57 (1.3) 107 (5.8) <0.001 70 (1.7) 94 (4.8) <0.001
In-hospital cardiac death 48 (1.1) 76 (4.1) <0.001 56 (1.3) 68 (3.5) <0.001
In-hospital non-cardiac death 9 (0.2) 31 (1.7) <0.001 14 (0.3) 26 (1.3) <0.001
180-day outcomes
All-cause mortality 101 (2.3) 201 (10.8) <0.001 121 (2.9) 181 (9.3) <0.001
Cardiac death 31 (0.7) 56 (3) <0.001 32 (0.8) 55 (2.8) <0.001
Non-cardiac death 13 (0.3) 39 (2.1) <0.001 19 (0.5) 33 (1.7) <0.001
Myocardial infarction 34 (0.8) 31 (1.7) 0.002 36 (0.9) 29 (1.5) 0.025
Re-PCI 43 (1.0) 33 (1.8) 0.011 55 (1.3) 21 (1.1) 0.441
CABG 8 (0.2) 9 (0.5) 0.040 10 (0.2) 7 (0.4) 0.401
Stent thrombosis 2 (0.0) 7 (0.4) 0.002 2 (0.0) 7 (0.4) 0.003
Composite major cardiac events 187 (4.3) 285 (15.4) <0.001 224 (5.3) 248 (12.7) <0.001
Data presented as number (percentage).
N/L; neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, PCI; percutaneous coronary intervention, CABG; coronary artery bypass surgery.
Fig. 3

(A) The 180-day mortality and (B) MACEs stratified by Hb level and N/L: no anemia & low N/L (n=3,170); no anemia & high N/L (n=1,134); anemia & low N/L (n=1,034); and anemia & high N/L (n=819).

MACE; major adverse cardiac event, Hb; hemoglobin, N/L; neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio.
jla-7-50-g003
Clinical outcomes in-hospital and 180-day after PCI according to 3 groups based on Hb level and N/L are listed in Table 4. There were significant differences on clinical outcomes among 3 groups. The 180-day mortality rate and MACEs were respectively 10-fold, 6-fold higher in group III compared with group I.
Table 4

Clinical outcomes in the hospital period and follow-up at 180-day according to 3 groups based on Hb level and N/L

jla-7-50-i004
Variable Group I (n=3,170) Group II (n=2,168) Group III (n=819) p-value (overall) p-value (I vs. III) Linear p-value*
In-hospital outcomes
Success rate of PCI 2,687 (99.1) 1,751 (98.8) 590 (98.8) 0.491 0.510 0.313
In-hospital death 30 (0.9) 67 (3.1) 67 (8.2) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
In-hospital cardiac death 26 (0.8) 52 (2.4) 46 (5.6) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
In-hospital non-cardiac death 4 (0.1) 15 (0.7) 21 (2.6) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
180-day outcomes
All-cause mortality 49 (1.5) 124 (5.7) 129 (15.8) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Cardiac death 15 (0.5) 33 (1.5) 39 (4.8) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Non-cardic death 4 (0.1) 24 (1.1) 24 (2.9) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Myocardial infarction 18 (0.6) 34 (1.6) 13 (1.6) 0.001 0.003 <0.001
Re-PCI 30 (0.9) 38 (1.8) 8 (1) 0.025 0.936 0.253
CABG 5 (0.2) 8 (0.4) 4 (0.5) 0.163 0.075 0.060
Stent thrombosis 0 (0) 4 (0.2) 5 (0.6) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Composite major cardiac events 100 (3.2) 211 (9.7) 161 (19.7) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Data presented as number (percentage). Group I, low N/L & no anemia; group II, no group I or III; group III, high N/L & anemia.
Hb; hemoglobin, N/L; neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, PCI; percutaneous coronary intervention, CABG; coronary artery bypass surgery.
*Statistical significance for linear by linear association between categorical variables, calculated using χ2 test for trend.
The 180-day mortality rates according to 3 groups in patients having higher mortality risk based on TIMI risk score and GRACE score are presented in Fig. 4. The TIMI risk score showed peak mortality in patients with TIMI score 3, 4 (Fig. 4A). GRACE score showed a strong association with mortality in all patients except score 201–220 (Fig. 4B). In MACEs, similar pattern was observed (Fig. 5). The TIMI risk score showed peak MACEs in patients with TIMI score 3, 4 (Fig. 5A). GRACE score showed a strong association with MACEs in all patients except score 141–160, 201–220 (Fig. 5B).
Fig. 4

The 180-day mortality according to (A) TIMI risk score and (B) GRACE score for non-STEMI in all patients (n=6,157).

TIMI; thrombolysis in myocardial infarction, GRACE; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, STEMI; ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
jla-7-50-g004
Fig. 5

The 180-day MACEs according to (A) TIMI risk score and (B) GRACE score for non-STEMI in all patients (n=6,157).

MACE; major adverse cardiac event, TIMI; thrombolysis in myocardial infarction, GRACE; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, STEMI; ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
jla-7-50-g005

4. Multivariate analysis of predictors of 180-day mortality

Logistic regression analysis showed the independent prognostic value of the combined use of Hb level and N/L for MACEs (Table 5) and 180-day mortality (Table 6). After adjusting for multiple covariates, the coexistence of pre-procedural anemia and high N/L was still a significant predictor of MACEs after PCI in patients with non-STEMI. In 180-day mortality, after adjustment of age and sex, the coexistence of pre-procedural anemia and high N/L was still a significant predictor of mortality. But, after adjusting for multiple covariates, there was no significant difference among groups to predict mortality in patients with non-STMI undergoing PCI.
Table 5

Prognostic value of the combined use of Hb level and N/L for major cardiac adverse events(logistic regression)

jla-7-50-i005
Group Hazard ratio (96% confidence interval)
No adjustment p-value Model 1* p-value Model 2 p-value
I
II 3.310 (2.59–4.22) <0.001 2.549 (1.92–3.37) <0.001 2.196 (1.56–3.08) <0.001
III 7.512 (5.77–9.77) <0.001 5.298 (3.84–7.30) <0.001 2.473 (1.50–4.07) <0.001
Group I, low N/L & no anemia; group II, no group I or III; group III, high N/L & anemia.
Hb; hemoglobin, N/L; neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio.
*Adjusted for age and gender; Adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, previous coronary artery disease, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, Killip classification, left ventricular ejection fraction, creatinine clearance, multivessel disease, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class; Reference group.
Table 6

Prognostic value of the combined use of Hb level and N/L for 180-day mortality (logistic regression)

jla-7-50-i006
Group Hazard ratio (96% confidence interval)
No adjustment p-value Model 1* p-value Model 2 p-value
I
II 3.864 (2.76–5.40) <0.001 2.455 (1.68–3.57) <0.001 1.084 (0.59–1.96) 0.790
III 11.908 (8.48–16.71) <0.001 6.501 (4.32–9.77) <0.001 0.809 (0.35–1.85) 0.610
Group I, low N/L & no anemia; group II, no group I or III; group III, high N/L & anemia.
Hb; hemoglobin, N/L; neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio.
*Adjusted for age and gender; Adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, previous coronary artery disease, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, Killip classification, left ventricular ejection fraction, creatinine clearance, multivessel disease, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class; Reference group.

DISCUSSION

This study aimed at stratification of risk and prognosis with non-STEMI patients by simple Lab data, such as CBC. We investigated the clinical utility of the combined use of Hb level and N/L, which are readily available CBC data in the early in-hospital period, for predicting risk in patients with non-STEMI. We found that the combined use of Hb level and N/L had a significant discriminatory capacity for predicting short-term clinical outcome in non-STEMI patients. The combined use of Hb level and N/L were independent predictors of MACEs after adjusting for multiple covariates.
Cho et al.8 reported that the combined use of Hb level and N/L had a significant discriminatory capacity for predicting short-term clinical outcome in STEMI patients. They showed that patients who had high N/L and anemia had higher mortality at 180-day compared to patients who had low N/L and no anemia. Cho et al.8 suggested that combined use of Hb level and N/L provides valuable timely information for early risk stratification in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.
Unlike previous study by Cho et al.8, this study have 2 differences. First, whereas previous study showed TIMI risk score had a strong association with mortality in all patients, the TIMI risk score showed peak mortality in patients with TIMI 3, 4 in this study. Second, Cho et al.8 reported that combined use of Hb and N/L was a predictor of 180-day mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Although we found that combined use of Hb and N/L was not a predictor of 180-day mortality in patients with non-STEMI undergoing primary PCI, we showed that combined use of Hb and N/L was a predictor of MACEs in patients with non-STEMI undergoing primary PCI.
Our study revealed that patients with versus without anemia had higher incidence of MACEs at 180-day. Many patients with AMI usually have an anemia. And anemia increased adverse outcomes in patients with AMI.71314 Some studies reported that there are older and more frequently have co-morbidities that can affect mortality, including DM and renal insufficiency in patients with anemia,1516 and they are less likely to receive life saving medications such as β-blockers.17 Nonetheless, anemia showed discriminatory prognostic capacity of MACEs after adjusting for these variables. As described previously,8 several mechanisms have been suggested to be associated with risk of anemia on clinical outcome in patients with AMI undergoing PCI. In patients with AMI, anemia can directly exacerbate ischemia and provoke arrhythmia by decreasing blood oxygen carrying capacity and inadequate tissue-oxygen delivery.18 Also, myocardium demands more oxygen in anemia by stimulating greater cardiac output.19 Recently, relationship cardiovascular disease and anemia is considered to develop due to a complex interaction of iron deficiency, cytokine production and impaired renal function, although other factors such as blood loss may also contribute.20 This results in ventricular remodeling and ventricular hypertrophy long-term.21 Therefore, anemia may represent worse health status, larger extent of ischemic myocardium, and cardiac remodeling long-term.
Patients with high N/L showed higher incidence of MACEs at 180-day compared to those with low N/L in our study. There are major roles of white blood cells (WBC) in the inflammatory processes of atherogenesis.22 Moreover, previous studies demonstrated that an elevated leukocyte increase risk for ischemic events and death in patients with AMI.23 A study showed that, among WBC counts and its subtypes, increased N/L can predict cardiovascular risk in patients with CAD or at high-risk for CAD.4 Moreover, Duffy et al.24 reported that a positive and independent association between N/L and long-term mortality in patients undergoing PCI. Other study showed that there are increased neutrophil aggregation and oxidase activity in the coronary sinus of patients with CAD.25 And, Madjid et al.26 suggested that, during reperfusion of ischemic myocardium, neutrophil can plug capillaries in the coronary microcirculation, aggravating ischemia and extending the infarct area. Stress response can make lymphopenia27 and lymphopenia has a good discriminatory ability for diagnosis of AMI.28 Therefore, N/L can represent a combined assessment of the severity of an acute ischemic event and extent of myocardium at risk.
Taken together, combined use of Hb level and N/L may represent a biochemical integrated assessment of health status, severity and extent of myocardial ischemia, and cardiac remodeling long-term. The present study demonstrated that combined use of Hb level and N/L had a significant discriminatory capacity for predicting short-term clinical outcome in patients with non-STEMI, including high-risk subgroups. Prognostic discriminatory capacity remained significant after adjusting for multiple covariates including age, sex, comorbidities, renal function, and surrogates of the extension of myocardial ischemia including systolic BP, HR, LVEF, and Killip classification. Our study suggests that combined use of Hb level and N/L, which are readily available CBC data in the early in-hospital period, provides valuable timely information for early risk stratification in patients with non-STEMI.
There are several limitations to this study. First, our study was retrospective and nonrandomized and thus subject to selection bias. Second, our study lacked different causes of anemia that likely had different prognostic effects in patients with non-STEMI. We focused on clinical utility of combined use of Hb level and N/L for early risk stratification in patients with non-STEMI in the real-world. Third, the possibility of residual confounding from unmeasured or unselected covariates cannot be excluded, although we have adjusted 12 risk factors.

Notes

Funding This study was supported by a fund (2013-E63005-02) by Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and a grant of the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project (A084869), Ministry for Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea.

Conflict of Interest The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

1. Maseri A, Rebuzzi AG, Cianflone D. Need for a composite risk stratification of patients with unstable coronary syndromes tailored to clinical practice. Circulation. 1997; 96:4141–4142.
2. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014; 130:2354–2394.
crossref
3. Becker RC, Burns M, Gore JM, Spencer FA, Ball SP, French W, et al. Early assessment and in-hospital management of patients with acute myocardial infarction at increased risk for adverse outcomes: a nationwide perspective of current clinical practice. Am Heart J. 1998; 135:786–796.
crossref
4. Horne BD, Anderson JL, John JM, Weaver A, Bair TL, Jensen KR, et al. Which white blood cell subtypes predict increased cardiovascular risk? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45:1638–1643.
crossref
5. Núñez J, Núñez E, Bodí V, Sanchis J, Miñana G, Mainar L, et al. Usefulness of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in predicting long-term mortality in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 101:747–752.
crossref
6. Lee PC, Kini AS, Ahsan C, Fisher E, Sharma SK. Anemia is an independent predictor of mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44:541–546.
crossref
7. Nikolsky E, Aymong ED, Halkin A, Grines CL, Cox DA, Garcia E, et al. Impact of anemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44:547–553.
crossref
8. Cho KH, Jeong MH, Ahmed K, Hachinohe D, Choi HS, Chang SY, et al. Value of early risk stratification using hemoglobin level and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2011; 107:849–856.
crossref
9. Nutritional anaemias. Report of a WHO scientific group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1968; 405:5–37.
10. Gibson CM, Schömig A. Coronary and myocardial angiography: angiographic assessment of both epicardial and myocardial perfusion. Circulation. 2004; 109:3096–3105.
11. Eagle KA, Lim MJ, Dabbous OH, Pieper KS, Goldberg RJ, Van de Werf F, et al. A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome: estimating the risk of 6-month postdischarge death in an international registry. JAMA. 2004; 291:2727–2733.
crossref
12. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, McCabe CH, Horacek T, Papuchis G, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA. 2000; 284:835–842.
crossref
13. Wu WC, Rathore SS, Wang Y, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. Blood transfusion in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345:1230–1236.
crossref
14. Al Falluji N, Lawrence-Nelson J, Kostis JB, Lacy CR, Ranjan R, Wilson AC, et al. Effect of anemia on 1-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2002; 144:636–641.
crossref
15. Anderson RD, White HD, Ohman EM, Wagner GS, Krucoff MW, Armstrong PW, et al. Predicting outcome after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction according to ST-segment resolution at 90 minutes: a substudy of the GUSTO-III trial. Am Heart J. 2002; 144:81–88.
crossref
16. Best PJ, Lennon R, Ting HH, Bell MR, Rihal CS, Holmes DR Jr, et al. The impact of renal insufficiency on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39:1113–1119.
crossref
17. Gottlieb SS, McCarter RJ, Vogel RA. Effect of beta-blockade on mortality among high-risk and low-risk patients after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339:489–497.
crossref
18. Wahr JA. Myocardial ischaemia in anaemic patients. Br J Anaesth. 1998; 81:Suppl 1. 10–15.
19. Most AS, Ruocco NA Jr, Gewirtz H. Effect of a reduction in blood viscosity on maximal myocardial oxygen delivery distal to a moderate coronary stenosis. Circulation. 1986; 74:1085–1092.
crossref
20. Kaiafa G, Kanellos I, Savopoulos C, Kakaletsis N, Giannakoulas G, Hatzitolios AI. Is anemia a new cardiovascular risk factor? Int J Cardiol. 2015; 186:117–124.
crossref
21. Yoshikawa H, Powell WJ Jr, Bland JH, Lowenstein E. Effect of acute anemia on experimental myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol. 1973; 32:670–678.
crossref
22. Hoffman M, Blum A, Baruch R, Kaplan E, Benjamin M. Leukocytes and coronary heart disease. Atherosclerosis. 2004; 172:1–6.
crossref
23. Barron HV, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, Braunwald E, Gibson CM. Association between white blood cell count, epicardial blood flow, myocardial perfusion, and clinical outcomes in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 10 substudy. Circulation. 2000; 102:2329–2334.
crossref
24. Duffy BK, Gurm HS, Rajagopal V, Gupta R, Ellis SG, Bhatt DL. Usefulness of an elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in predicting long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97:993–996.
crossref
25. Ricevuti G, Mazzone A, De Servi S, Specchia G, Fratino P. New trends in coronary artery disease: the role of granulocyte activation. Atherosclerosis. 1989; 78:261–265.
crossref
26. Madjid M, Awan I, Willerson JT, Casscells SW. Leukocyte count and coronary heart disease: implications for risk assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44:1945–1956.
27. Onsrud M, Thorsby E. Influence of in vivo hydrocortisone on some human blood lymphocyte subpopulations. I. Effect on natural killer cell activity. Scand J Immunol. 1981; 13:573–579.
crossref
28. Thomson SP, Gibbons RJ, Smars PA, Suman VJ, Pierre RV, Santrach PJ, et al. Incremental value of the leukocyte differential and the rapid creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme for the early diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 122:335–341.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles