Journal List > Asian Oncol Nurs > v.18(2) > 1108983

Jeon, Lee, and Kim: Knowledge of and Compliance with Neutropenic Diet in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy undergoing Chemotherapy

초록

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate knowledge of and compliance with the neutropenic diet in hemato-oncology patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Methods

123 hemato-oncology patients who had more than one chemotherapy participated in this study. Data were collected with a self-administered questionnaire from July 21 to September 26, 2014, and analyzed with SPSS 21.0 program using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA and Pearson's correlation.

Results

The average of score for the neutropenic diet was 60.9 out of 100 points and mean compliance score was 69.5 out of 100 percent scale. For preventing infection, patients were found to be stricter in their intake of restricted foods than acceptable foods during neutropenia. There were significant correlations between the knowledge of and compliance with the neutropenic diet in patients receiving chemotherapy (r=.53, p<.001).

Conclusion

It is necessary to nursing assessment and education should include a periodic assessment of nutritional status and risk evaluation of neutropenia and bacterial infections. This study recommended nursing research to establish a recommendation criterion for a restrictive neutropenic diet and less restrictive food safety education programs for cancer patients.

REFERENCES

1. Park HJ, Park EH, Jung KW, Kong HJ, Won YJ, Lee JY, et al. Statistics of hematologic malignancies in Korea: incidence, prevalence and survival rates from 1999 to 2008. Korean J Hematol. 2012; 47:28–38.
crossref
2. Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, Cosler LE, Lyman GH. Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients. Cancer. 2006; 106:2258–66.
crossref
3. Crawford J, Dale DC, Kuderer NM, Culakova E, Poniewierski MS, Wolff D, et al. Risk and timing of neutropenic events in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: the results of a prospective nation-wide study of oncology practice. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008; 6:109–18.
crossref
4. Jubelirer SJ. The benefit of the neutropenic diet: fact or fiction? Oncolo-gist. 2011; 16:704–7.
crossref
5. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52:e56–93.
crossref
6. Barber FD. Management of Fever in neutropenic patients with cancer. Nurs Clin North Am. 2001; 36:631–44. v.
7. Nirenberg A, Parry Bush A, Davis A, Friese CR, Wicklin Gillespie T, Rice RD. Neutropenia: state of the knowledge part II. Oncol Nurs Fo-rum. 2006; 33:1202–8.
crossref
8. Smith LH, Besser SG. Dietary restrictions for patients with neutropenia: a survey of institutional practices. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000; 27:515–20.
9. Lund BM, O'Brien SJ. The occurrence and prevention of foodborne disease in vulnerable people. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011; 8:961–73.
crossref
10. Jeon OK, Yim SE, Jeong IS, Yun EY, Kim MH, Park YS, et al. Survey on dietary restrictions for neutropenic patients. J Korean Oncol Nurs. 2010; 10:210–7.
crossref
11. Moody K, Charlson ME, Finlay J. The neutropenic diet: what's the evidence? J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002; 24:717–21.
crossref
12. Garófolo A. Neutropenic diet and quality of food: a critical analysis. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2013; 35:79–80.
crossref
13. Kubrak C, Jensen L. Critical evaluation of nutrition screening tools recommended for oncology patients. Cancer Nurs. 2007; 30:E1–6.
crossref
14. Leuenberger M, Kurmann S, Stanga Z. Nutritional screening tools in daily clinical practice: the focus on cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2010; 18(Suppl 2):S17–27.
crossref
15. Foster M. Reevaluating the neutropenic diet: time to change. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014; 18:239–41.
crossref
16. van Tiel F, Harbers MM, Terporten PH, van Boxtel RT, Kessels AG, Voss GB, et al. Normal hospital and low-bacterial diet in patients with cytopenia after intensive chemotherapy for hematological malignancy: a study of safety. Ann Oncol. 2007; 18:1080–4.
crossref
17. Gardner A, Mattiuzzi G, Faderl S, Borthakur G, Garcia-Manero G, Pierce S, et al. Randomized comparison of cooked and noncooked di-ets in patients undergoing remission induction therapy for acute my-eloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26:5684–8.
crossref
18. Sonbol MB, Firwana B, Diab M, Zarzour A, Witzig TE. The effect of a neutropenic diet on infection and mortality rates in cancer patients: a metaanalysis. Nutr Cancer. 2015; 67:1230–8.
crossref
19. Mank AP, Davies M. Research subgroup of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Nurses Group (EBMT-NG). Ex-amining low bacterial dietary practice: a survey on low bacterial food. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008; 12:342–8.
crossref
20. Food and Drug Administration (US). Food safety for people with cancer [Internet]. Available from. https://www.fda.gov/food/foodbor-neillnesscontaminants/peopleatrisk/ucm312565.htm. [Accessed March 14, 2018].
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Preventing infections in cancer patients [Internet]. Available from. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/preventinfections. [Accessed March 14, 2018].
22. Carr SE, Halliday V. Investigating the use of the neutropenic diet: a survey of U.K. dietitians. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015; 28:510–5.
crossref
23. Kim MA, Jeong IS. Comparison of perception of the neutropenic diet between nurses and patients. Asian Oncol Nurs. 2012; 12:331–8.
crossref
24. Shelton BK. Evidence-based care for the neutropenic patient with leukemia. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2003; 19:133–41.
crossref
25. Yang YH, Kwon SJ, Kim CI. The nutritional status of the patients with cancer during the chemotherapies. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2001; 31:978–87.
crossref
26. Byun MS, Kim NH. Energy intake and fatigue in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Korean Biol Nurs Sci. 2012; 14:258–67.
crossref
27. The Korean Dietetic Association. Manual of medical nutrition therapy. 3rd ed.Seoul: The Korean Dietetic Association;2008.
28. Lee JY. A study on effectiveness of dietary self-efficacy, dietary knowledge and social support for exercise-diet compliance of patients on hemodialysis [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei Univ.;2007.
29. Na HR. A study of the relationship among dietary knowledge, self-care practice, nutritional status in patients on hemodialysis [dissertation]. Gwangju: Chonnam National Univ.;2009.
30. Moon SH, Lee YW, Ham OK, Kim SH. The effect of the experience of diabetes education on knowledge, self-care behavior and glycosylated hemoglobin in type 2 diabetic patients. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2014; 20:81–92.
crossref

Table 1.
Characteristics of the Subjects (N =123)
Characteristics Categories n (%) M ± SD
Gender Male 70 (56.9)  
  Female 53 (43.1)  
Age (year) 20~39 21 (17.1) 56.2 ± 16.22
  40~59 45 (36.6)  
  ≥60 57 (46.3)  
Educational level ≤ Middle school 40 (32.5)  
  High school 53 (43.1)  
  ≥ College 30 (24.4)  
Religion Yes 84 (68.3)  
  No 39 (31.7)  
Inmate Yes 87 (70.7)  
  No 36 (29.3)  
Employment status Employed 58 (47.1)  
  Unemployed 65 (52.9)  
Monthly income (10,000 won) < 100 44 (35.8)  
  100~<200 20 (16.2)  
  200~<300 31 (25.2)  
  ≥300 28 (22.8)  
Diagnosis Leukemia 44 (35.8)  
  Lymphoma 44 (35.8)  
  Multiple myeloma 25 (20.3)  
  Myelodysplastic syndrome 10 (8.1)  
No. of chemotherapy cycle ≤3rd 45 (36.6) 6.04 ± 5.28
  4~6th 43 (35.0)  
  7~10th 19 (15.4)  
  ≥11th 16 (13.0)  
Serum albumin (g/dl) < 3.5 21 (17.1) 4.19 ± 0.59
  ≥3.5 102 (82.9)  
%IBW (%) 70~ 80 5 (4.1) 112.58 ± 63.65
  70~<80 5 (4.1) 112.58 ± 63.65
  80~<90 13 (10.6)  
  ≥90 105 (85.3)  
Cooking Self 28 (22.8)  
  Spouse 56 (45.5)  
  Children 10 (8.1)  
  Siblings 6 (4.9)  
  Parents 20 (16.3)  
  Others 3 (2.4)  
Number of meals 1 2 (1.6)  
  2 8 (6.5)  
  ≥3 113 (91.9)  
Number of snacks None 20 (16.3)  
  1 27 (22.0)  
  2 27 (22.0)  
  ≥3 11 (8.9)  
Difficulty in eating Nausea/vomiting 27 (22.0)  
Difficulty in eating Nausea/vomiting 27 (22.0)  
  Anorexia 55 (44.7)  
  Abdominal discomfort 16 (13.0)  
  Stomatitis 10 (8.1)  
  None 5 (4.1)  
  Others 3 (2.4)  
  No answer 7 (5.7)  
Change in oral intake Yes 98 (79.7)  
  No 16 (13.0)  
  No answer 9 (7.3)  
Time to increase oral intake No change 15 (12.2)  
  ≥3 days 22 (17.9)  
  ≥1 week 39 (31.7)  
  ≥2 weeks 35 (28.4)  
  ≥3 weeks 7 (5.7)  
  ≥4 weeks 5 (4.1)  
Diet education Yes 64 (52.0)  
  No 59 (48.0)  

%IBW= Percent ideal body weight.

Table 2.
Knowledge and Compliance of Neutropenic Diet (N =123)
Variables Categories n Knowleedge
Compliaance
M ± SD Correct answers (%) M ± SD Percent scale
Permitted Fruits and vegetables 5 3.54 ± 1.22 70.7 12.72 ± 3.71 63.6
  Meat and fish 5 2.52 ± 1.44 50.4 9.62 ± 3.16 48.1
  Dairy products 3 2.46 ± 0.72 82.1 7.96 ± 2.35 66.3
  Beverages, snacks and cereals 6 2.80 ± 1.51 46.6 10.63 ± 3.59 44.3
  Subtotal 19 11.32 ± 3.59 59.6 40.93 ± 10.05 53.9
Not permitted Fruits and vegetables 6 3.78 ± 2.00 63.0 20.52 ± 4.53 85.5
  Meat, Fish and shellfish 4 2.84 ± 1.12 70.9 14.09 ± 2.43 88.1
  Dairy products 5 2.91 ± 1.71 58.2 16.82 ± 3.37 84.1
  Beverages, snacks and cereals 3 1.67 ± 1.14 55.8 10.46 ± 1.88 87.1
  Subtotal 18 11.20 ± 5.18 62.2 61.89 ± 10.42 86.0
Total   37 22.52 ± 6.02 60.9 102.81 ± 9.99 69.5
Table 3.
Knowledge and Compliance of Questionnaire Items about Neutropenic Diet (N =123)
Variables Categories Permitted Not permitted
Knowledge Compliance Knowledge Compliance
Correct answer (%) Percent scale Correct answer (%) Percent scale
Fruits and vegetables Fresh fruits with skin removed or peeled off 75.6 65.7    
  Sterilized canned juice, canned fruits and vegetables 71.5 57.5    
  Cooked seaweed or laver 89.4 74.5    
  Uncooked oil, olive oil 60.2 60.5    
  Add sesame seeds, sesame oil or herbs 56.9 59.5    
  Washed fresh fruits     64.2 80.0
  Uncooked sherbet     64.2 93.7
  Uncooked dried fruits (ex. raisins)     59.3 89.7
  Washed fresh vegetables     61.8 77.7
  Uncooked Kimchi     70.7 86.5
  Pickle vegetables such as pickle, radish.     57.7 85.7
Meat and fish Cooked deli meat (ham) 45.5 42.0    
  Cooked intestine or liver 28.5 34.2    
  Pizza with meat 36.6 39.2    
  Cooked frozen instant foods 47.2 45.7    
  Cooked fish 94.3 79.2    
  Steamed dried meat such as jerky, prawns     61.0 89.7
  Raw fish or fresh meat     92.7 95.2
  Raw eggs     88.6 95.0
  Cooked shellfish (ex. cuttlefish, octopus, shrimp, abalone)     41.5 72.2
Dairy Sterilized milk or pasteurized milk products 87.0 66.0    
  Cooked pudding 66.7 55.0    
  Cooked soybean soup or miso soup Soybean noodle 92.7 78.0 43.1 76.0
  Packaged raw tofu     53.7 85.7
  Miso paste or bean paste     55.3 75.5
  Fresh cream cake, cheese, butter, margarine, mayonnaise     72.4 92.0
  Soft ice cream, milkshake     66.7 91.0
Beverages, snacks and cereals Boiled tea or coffee 82.1 60.7    
  Drinks packed in bottles or cans 65.0 53.2    
  Jam, jelly, syrup 22.0 33.7    
  Chocolate, candy, gum 42.3 41.7    
  Instant food (ex. cup noodles, retort) 25.2 35.7    
  Powdered cereals Fresh honey 43.1 40.7 54.5 87.5
  Nuts including peanuts Ice     41.5 81.5
  Ice cream bar     71.5 92.2
Table 4.
Knowledge and Co ompliance of Neutropenic Diet by Subjects Characteristics (N =123)
Characteristics Categories Knowledge Compliance
M ± SD t or F (p) Scheffé M ± SD t or F (p) Scheffé
Gender Male 21.73 ± 6.22 −1.69 102.30 ± 9.34 −0.65
  Female 23.57 ± 5.62 (.094) 103.49 ± 10.84 (.515)
Age (year) 20~39a 25.33 ± 6.37 3.04 108.62 ± 13.17 4.53
  40~59b 22.33 ± 5.10 (.052) 101.67 ± 9.67 (.013)
  ≥ 60 c 21.63 ± 6.34   101.58 ± 8.17 b, c< a
Education level ≤ Middle schoola 20.58 ± 6.66 4.32 100.78 ± 8.12 2.06
  High schoolb 22.75 ± 5.62 (.015) 102.75 ± 10.49 (.131)
  ≥ Collegec 24.70 ± 5.10 a< b, c 105.63 ± 10.95  
Religion Yes 22.64 ± 5.75 0.33 102.57 ± 9.82 −0.39
  No 22.26 ± 6.63 (.742) 103.33 ± 10.46 (.696)
Inmate Yes 25.00 ± 6.96 1.91 108.06 ± 12.72 2.46
  No 22.10 ± 5.77 (.058) 101.91 ± 9.22 (.015)
Employment status Employed 22.29 ± 7.03 −0.39 104.88 ± 11.09 2.20
  Unemployed 22.72 ± 4.99 (.694) 100.97 ± 8.57 (.030)
Monthly income <100a 20.00 ± 5.84 4.51 99.95 ± 7.07 2.03
(10,000 won) 100~<200b 24.65 ± 6.41 (.005) 105.20 ± 11.87 (.114)
  200~<300c 23.84 ± 5.87 a< c, d< b 103.65 ± 10.86  
  ≥ 300d 23.50 ± 5.04   104.68 ± 10.92  
Diagnosis Leukemiaa 18.80 ± 8.50 3.48 100.50 ± 10.78 1.05
  Lymphomab 22.28 ± 5.00 (.018) 101.24 ± 8.20 (.375)
  Multiple Myelomac 24.50 ± 6.04 a< b, c, d 104.84 ± 10.77  
  Myelodysplastic syndromed   21.52 ± 5.38 102.20 ± 9.90  
No. of chemotherapy cycle ≤ 3rd 22.84 ± 6.15 1.03 103.87 ± 9.74 0.68
  4~6th 22.67 ± 5.96 (.384) 102.74 ± 9.46 (.565)
  7~10th 20.42 ± 6.01   100.00 ± 10.91  
  ≥ 11th 23.69 ± 5.79   103.38 ± 11.25  
Serum albumin (g/dL) <3.5 23.00 ± 6.37 0.32 105.90 ± 9.75 1.46
  ≥ 3.5 22.53 ± 5.91 (.749) 102.37 ± 9.89 (.146)
%IBW (%) 70~<80 22.60 ± 8.85 0.13 111.60 ± 13.90 2.60
  80~<90 23.55 ± 3.08 (.875) 105.18 ± 11.52 (.079)
  ≥ 90 22.57 ± 6.00   102.23 ± 9.11  
Cooking Self a 21.54 ± 6.01 2.98 99.89 ± 6.85 2.57
  Spouseb 21.21 ± 5.81 (.010) 102.02 ± 9.23 (.023)
  Childc 22.80 ± 5.92   103.10 ± 7.98 a< b, c, d< e
  Siblingsd 24.67 ± 2.25   105.17 ± 10.87  
  Otherse 19.00 ± 1.41   99.50 ± 19.09  
Time increased the oral intake ≥ 3 daysa 22.82 ± 4.37 1.50 99.27 ± 8.02 3.26
  ≥ 1 weekb 23.83 ± 5.76 (.209) 102.44 ± 9.42 (.015)
  ≥ 2 weeksc 22.81 ± 6.47   106.72 ± 11.00 a< b, c, d< e
  ≥ 3 weeksd 18.67 ± 8.50   108.67 ± 10.50  
  ≥ 4 weekse 28.00 ± 4.06   113.40 ± 15.85  
Change in oral intake Yes 23.33 ± 5.80 2.21 103.88 ± 10.53 −2.48
  No 19.94 ± 4.85 (.029) 99.13 ± 6.37 (.019)
Diet education Yes 24.94 ± 4.96 5.09 104.95 ± 10.86 2.53
  No 19.90 ± 6.00 (<.001) 100.49 ± 8.44 (.013)

%IBW= Percent ideal body weigh ht.

Table 5.
Correlation between Knowledge and Compliance of Neutropenic Diet (N =123)
Knowledge Total
r (p)
Compliance .53 (<.001)
TOOLS
Similar articles