Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to identify parental coping strategies in the face of early infant and toddler injury, and to provide basic data for a parental education program and the most desirable directions it should take.
Methods
A Q-methodology to analyze the subjectivity of each item was used. Thirty-four Q-statements were derived from a literature review and interviews. Forty-seven parents were classified into a shape of normal distribution using a 9-point scale. Collected data were analyzed by the pc-QUANL program.
Results
Five types of parental coping in early infant and toddler injury were identified. Type I was “hospital treatment focused”, type II was “Improving the safety of the child's environment”, type III was “expression of negative emotion”, type IV was “taking the lead in problem solving”, and type V was “Interrogating the person in charge of the situation in which the injury occurred”.
References
1. de Sousa Petersburgo D, Keyes CE, Wright DW, Click LA, Macleod JB, Sasser SM. The epidemiology of childhood injury in Maputo, Mozambique. International Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2010; 3(3):157–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12245-010-0182-z.
2. Statistics Korea. Division of vital statistics [Internet]. Daejeon: Ministry of Health and Welfare, National Statistical Office;c2013. [cited 2017 Sep 3]. Available from:. http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=2711.
3. Son MJ. Child safety accident patterns report. CISS-Consumer injury surveillance system. Eumseong: Korea Consumer Agency (Korea);2015. p. 2–3.
4. Yoon SH. The risk factors affecting the injuries of young children at home. Journal of Early Childhood Education & Educare Welfare. 2012; 16(2):101–122.
5. Uzych L. Book reviews: Well-being: Positive development across the life course. Edited by Marc H. Bornstein, Lucy Davidson, Corey L. M. Keyes, Kristin A. Moore, and The Center for Child Well-Being. Activities, Adaptation & Aging. 2004; 28(2):82–84.
6. Choi HS, Yang EH, Kim GJ, Lee MH. Infant safety education. Seoul: ShinJung;2013. p. 15–21.
7. Lee SL. The effects of traumatic event type on posttraumatic growth and wisdom: The mediating effects of social support and coping. Korean Journal of Psychology. 2013; 19(3):319–341.
8. Lazarus RS, Launier R. Stress-related transactions between person and environment. New York: Plenum Press;1978. p. 287–327.
9. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. 3rd ed. New York: Springer;1984. p. 445.
10. Igoe JB, Giordano BP. Health promotion and disease prevention: secrets of success. Pediatric Nursing. 1992; 18(1):61–62. 66.
11. Shin SH, Oh PJ. Development of a first-aid education program and its effectiveness: A care of mothers of infant, toddler and preschool children. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2003; 9(2):234–243.
12. Chang SS. Infants’ safety accidents for their teachers and parents. Korean Society for Early Childhood Physical Education. 2014; 15(2):7–24.
13. Yoon SH, Jung YK. The effectiveness of the safety education program for parents with infant and young children. Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis. 2012; 8(3):187–204.
14. Bang KS. Effect of safety education for mothers with infants. Child Health Nursing Research. 2005; 11(2):221–228.
15. Kim IO, Shin SH. A survey on the experience of accident of infant, toddler and preschooler, and the education about emergency care for parents. Child Health Nursing Research. 2002; 8(2):174–182.
16. Shin HS, Yoo IY, Park HY. Safety perception and behaviors of mothers with school age children. Journal of East-West Nursing Research. 2007; 13(2):130–137.
17. Hong MH, Chong YS, Jang HJ. The status of parents' education and their perception for young children’s safety. The Journal of Society of Living Environment System. 2004; 13(5):741–749.
18. Ha SH, Seo HA. Infants’ and children’s safety accident experience based on parental safety practice. The Journal of Eco-Early Childhood Education. 2014; 13(1):31–55.
19. Kim IJ. A study on parents’ knowledge and practice about children’s safety, and needs for parents education [master’s thesis]. Seoul: Sung Shin Women’s University;2006. p. 1–83.
20. Kim JW, Kim YJ. The relationships between mothers’ safety related behaviors and their children’s knowledge of safety. Korean Journal of Child Education and Care. 2005; 5(2):21–41.
21. Kim HK. Agreement between the Q block and the Q tool. Journal of Korean Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity. 2008; 16:5–16.
22. Yun OB, Kang HS. Characteristics of children admitted to a pediatric emergency department following an accident. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 2009; 15(1):79–91.
23. Oh JN. Perception of uncertainty and satisfaction for nursing service of children’s parents visiting to pediatrics outpatient department and emergency room. Korean Parent Child Health Journal. 2010; 13(1):35–43.
24. Kim MY. Factors influencing posttraumatic growth in fathers of chronically ill children. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2015; 45(6):890–899. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2015.45.6.890.
25. Davies B, Gudmundsdottir M, Worden B, Orloff S, Sumner L, Brenner P. “Living in the dragon’s shadow” fathers’ experiences of a child’s life-limiting illness. Death Studies. 2004; 28(2):111–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180490254501.
26. Lee EK, An HJ. Relationship between early childhood teachers’ knowledge and protective practice on safety. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association. 2006; 44(6):15–22.
27. Kim HG. The study of compensation and prevention about safety accidents through an analysis of safety conditions, legal basis of liability of reparation, and precedents about safety accidents in child-care center. Journal of Early Childhood Education. 2008; 17(2):109–126.
28. Fehring RJ, Miller JF, Shaw C. Spiritual well-being, religiosity, hope, depression, and other mood states in elderly people coping with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1997; 24(4):663–671.
Table 1.
Variables | Type I | Type II | Type III | Type IV | Type V |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eigen value | 20.45 | 3.60 | 2.93 | 1.70 | 1.26 |
Variance (%) | 43.52 | 7.67 | 6.24 | 3.63 | 2.70 |
Cumulative | 43.52 | 51.19 | 57.43 | 61.06 | 63.76 |