Anatomical Direct Reduction of Bony Mallet Finger Using Modified-Intrafocal Pinning Technique

Sang-Woo Kang; Ji-Kang Park; Ho-Seung Jung; Jung-Kwon Cha; Kook-Jong Kim

doi:10.12790/ahm.2018.23.4.248

Journal List > Arch Hand Microsurg > v.23(4) > 1108223

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Kang, Park, Jung, Cha, and Kim: Anatomical Direct Reduction of Bony Mallet Finger Using Modified-Intrafocal Pinning Technique

Hand

Archives of Hand and Microsurgery 2018; 23(4): 248-253.

Published online: 26 November 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12790/ahm.2018.23.4.248

Anatomical Direct Reduction of Bony Mallet Finger Using Modified-Intrafocal Pinning Technique

Sang-Woo Kang, Ji-Kang Park, Ho-Seung Jung, Jung-Kwon Cha, Kook-Jong Kim

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea.

Corresponding author: Ji-Kang Park. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, 776 1Sunhawn-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 28644, Korea. TEL: +82-43-269-6077, FAX: +82-43-274-8719, carm0916@hanmail.net

Received 4 October 2018 Revised 25 October 2018 Accepted 26 October 2018

Korean Society for Surgery of the Hand, Korean Society for Microsurgery, and Korean Society for Surgery of the Peripheral Nerve

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of anatomic reduction of bony mallet finger using modified-intrafocal pinning technique.

Methods

From March 2014 to October 2017, 18 patients with bony mallet finger were treated with modified-intrafocal pinning technique. Kirschner-wire was used to directly reduction the bony fragment, and extension block pinning and distal interphalangeal joint fixation were additionally performed to minimize the loss of reduction. Postoperative pain, range of motion, and radiological evaluation were performed. Duration of bone healing, functional recovery and complication rate were evaluated and Crawford's criteria was used to determine functional outcome after surgery.

Results

Bone union was achieved in all cases after a postoperative mean of 6 weeks (5–7 weeks). An average of 2.8° (0°–10°) extension loss occurred in all patients. All patients showed satisfactory joint congruency and reformation of the joint surface, the mean flexion angle of the distal interphalangeal joint at the final follow-up was 72.2° (70°–75°). According to Crawford's classification, 12 patients (66.7%) were excellent and 6 patients (33.3%) were good.

Conclusion

Modified-intrafocal pinning technique is a method of obtaining anatomical bone healing by directly reduction and fixation of the bony fragment. Combined with other conventional percutaneous pinning procedures, it is expected that good results can be obtained if applied to appropriate indications.

Keywords: Bony mallet finger, Direct reduction, Anatomical reduction

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Bony mallet finger injury showing 47.1% of articular surface involvement.

Fig. 2

(A) After flexing the DIP joint to secure a space for reduction, it is necessary to reduce the fragments directly using the K-wire. (B) The fragment was fixed using a 0.7 mm K-wire or a 23-gauge needle. (C) Additional extension block pinning was performed. (D) The DIP joint was fixed using a K-wire on the long axis or side of the distal end of the fracture. DIP: distal interphalangeal, K-wire: Kirschner wire.

Fig. 3

Anatomical bone healing was achieved without intraarticular step-off by modified-intrafocal pinning technique. (A) A 22-year-old man has a bony mallet finger injury of left ring finger (joint involve 40%, Wehbé and Schneider's classification 1B). (B) A 23-year-old woman has a bony mallet finger injury of right little finger (joint involve 45%, Wehbé and Schneider's classification 1B). Preop: Preoperation, Postop: Postoperation.

Table 1

Demographic data

Values are presented as number only or mean (range).

Table 2

Wehbé and Schneider classification2

DIP: distal interphalangeal.

Table 3

Crawford's criteria6

Table 4

Clinical results

DIP: distal interphalangeal.

Notes

^{CONFLICTS OF INTEREST} The authors have nothing to disclose.

References

1. Salazar Botero S, Hidalgo Diaz JJ, Benaïda A, Collon S, Facca S, Liverneaux PA. Review of acute traumatic closed mallet finger injuries in adults. Arch Plast Surg. 2016; 43:134–144.

2. Wehbé MA, Schneider LH. Mallet fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66:658–669.

3. Stark HH, Gainor BJ, Ashworth CR, Zemel NP, Rickard TA. Operative treatment of intra-articular fractures of the dorsal aspect of the distal phalanx of digits. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69:892–896.

4. Ishiguro T, Itoh Y, Yabe Y, Hashizume N. Extension block with Kirschner wire for fracture dislocation of the distal interphalangeal joint. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 1997; 1:95–102.

5. Chung DW, Lee JH. Anatomic reduction of mallet fractures using extension block and additional intrafocal pinning techniques. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012; 4:72–76.

6. Crawford GP. The molded polythene splint for mallet finger deformities. J Hand Surg Am. 1984; 9:231–237.

7. Garberman SF, Diao E, Peimer CA. Mallet finger: results of early versus delayed closed treatment. J Hand Surg Am. 1994; 19:850–852.

8. McFarlane RM, Hampole MK. Treatment of extensor tendon injuries of the hand. Can J Surg. 1973; 16:366–375.

9. Warren RA, Norris SH, Ferguson DG. Mallet finger: a trial of two splints. J Hand Surg Br. 1988; 13:151–153.

10. Bendre AA, Hartigan BJ, Kalainov DM. Mallet finger. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005; 13:336–344.

11. Shimura H, Wakabayashi Y, Nimura A. A novel closed reduction with extension block and flexion block using Kirschner wires and microscrew fixation for mallet fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2014; 19:308–312.

12. Toker S, Türkmen F, Pekince O, Korucu I, Karalezli N. Extension block pinning versus hook plate fixation for treatment of mallet fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 40:1591–1596.

13. Handoll HH, Vaghela MV. Interventions for treating mallet finger injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; (3):CD004574.

14. Kim JY, Lee SH. Factors related to distal interphalangeal joint extension loss after extension block pinning of mallet finger fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2016; 41:414–419.

15. Hofmeister EP, Mazurek MT, Shin AY, Bishop AT. Extension block pinning for large mallet fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2003; 28:453–459.

TOOLS

Similar articles