Expanding the Spectrum of Dopa-Responsive Dystonia (DRD) and Proposal for New Definition: DRD, DRD-plus, and DRD Look-alike

Woong-Woo Lee; Beomseok Jeon; Ryul Kim

doi:10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e184

Journal List > J Korean Med Sci > v.33(28) > 1107856

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Lee, Jeon, and Kim: Expanding the Spectrum of Dopa-Responsive Dystonia (DRD) and Proposal for New Definition: DRD, DRD-plus, and DRD Look-alike

Review Article

Neurology & Neuroscience

Journal of Korean Medical Science 2018; 33(28): e184.

Published online: 24 May 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e184

Expanding the Spectrum of Dopa-Responsive Dystonia (DRD) and Proposal for New Definition: DRD, DRD-plus, and DRD Look-alike

Woong-Woo Lee¹

, Beomseok Jeon^2,³

, Ryul Kim³

¹Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Seoul, Korea.

²Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

³Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Address for Correspondence: Beomseok Jeon, MD, PhD. Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea. brain@snu.ac.kr

Received 2 January 2018 Accepted 10 March 2018

The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Previously, we defined DRD as a syndrome of selective nigrostriatal dopamine deficiency caused by genetic defects in the dopamine synthetic pathway without nigral cell loss. DRD-plus also has the same etiologic background with DRD, but DRD-plus patients have more severe features that are not seen in DRD because of the severity of the genetic defect. However, there have been many reports of dystonia responsive to dopaminergic drugs that do not fit into DRD or DRD-plus (genetic defects in the dopamine synthetic pathway without nigral cell loss). We reframed the concept of DRD/DRD-plus and proposed the concept of DRD look-alike to include the additional cases described above. Examples of dystonia that is responsive to dopaminergic drugs include the following: transportopathies (dopamine transporter deficiency; vesicular monoamine transporter 2 deficiency); SOX6 mutation resulting in a developmentally decreased number of nigral cells; degenerative disorders with progressive loss of nigral cells (juvenile Parkinson's disease; pallidopyramidal syndrome; spinocerebellar ataxia type 3), and disorders that are not known to affect the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system (DYT1; GLUT1 deficiency; myoclonus-dystonia; ataxia telangiectasia). This classification will help with an etiologic diagnosis as well as planning the work up and guiding the therapy.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords: Dystonia, Dopa-responsive, DRD-plus, DRD Look-alike, Segawa Disease

INTRODUCTION

Medications are generally considered as the first line of treatment in dystonias. Unfortunately, anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, muscle relaxants, anti-dopaminergic drugs, and dopaminergic drugs are not very effective in most dystonias. Therefore, chemo-denervation by botulinum toxin injection or surgical treatments such as myotomy, rhizotomy, and deep brain stimulation are often applied for treatment of dystonia.1 2

However, there is a special group of disorders that show good responses to dopaminergic drugs. Dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD) is a classic example.3 4 Its classic features are summarized as childhood or adolescent onset dystonia associated with marked diurnal fluctuation and improvement by sleep or rest, and a dramatic and sustained response to low doses of dopaminergic drug.4 Typical picture of DRD was first described by Segawa et al.5 with the name of “hereditary progressive basal ganglia disease with marked diurnal fluctuation” and later "hereditary progressive dystonia with marked diurnal fluctuation.”6 7

In 1986, Nygaard and Duvoisin8 collected similar cases and reported that most cases had also parkinsonism as well as dystonia. At that time, idiopathic torsion dystonia was the most common young-onset dystonia and was rather refractory to many medications tried including levodopa. They noted that diurnal fluctuation in DRD is not always present and does not reliably distinguish DRD from idiopathic torsional dystonia. They also noted that DRD can present with a dystonic gait disorder, diplegic cerebral palsy, sporadic spastic paraplegia, ataxic syndromes, and juvenile parkinsonism in children and adolescents. They emphasized that the response to levodopa is so dramatic and occurs so quickly that a therapeutic trial for diagnosis should be undertaken in all patients presenting with these syndromes. Since then, they coined the term the “dopa-responsive dystonia” to emphasize levodopa responsiveness.9 Even though there have been many reports of similar clinical presentations with the different names,10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 the term “dopa-responsive dystonia” introduced by Nygaard et al.9 seems to be most widely used nowadays.

However, many reports have shown atypical or incompatible features under the name of DRD such as infantile onset, psychomotor retardation, convulsion, hypotonia, drowsiness, hyperthermia, ptosis, cerebellar dysfunction, incomplete responsiveness to levodopa, etc.4 18 19 20 On the other hand, mutations in dopamine synthetic enzymes other than GTP cyclohydrolase I (GCH-1) resulted in similar clinical manifestations according to the severity of enzymatic defects.4 These clinical and genetic heterogeneities were enough to confuse clinicians in making the diagnosis.

With this background, we proposed the concepts of DRD and DRD-plus in 1998 and 2014 to embrace the clinical and genetic heterogeneities.4 21 DRD was defined as a syndrome of selective nigrostriatal dopamine deficiency caused by genetic defects in the dopamine synthetic pathway without nigral cell loss; and DRD-plus as a group of disorders caused by genetic defects in the dopamine synthetic pathway without nigral cell loss that have features of DRD ‘plus’ those features that are not seen in DRD. DRD-plus patients have more severe enzymatic defects which result not only in dopamine deficiency, but also in serotonin and/or norepinephrine deficiency. This pathophysiologic feature is also closely linked to the variable responses to dopaminergic medications as well as to the clinical manifestations. DRD patients generally show marked improvements with only small dose of dopaminergic drugs. In contrast, dopaminergic drugs are only partially effective in DRD-plus. Additional supplement of serotonergic and adrenergic medications may be necessary depending on the type and severity of enzymatic defects. The concepts of DRD and DRD-plus make differential diagnosis practical and easy, contribute to guiding therapeutic plan, and help expect responses to medications.4

However, there have been many reports of dystonia responsive to dopaminergic drugs, which do not fit into DRD or DRD-plus. For example, the transportopathies such as dopamine transporter (DAT) deficiency and vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) deficiency have similar characteristics to DRD-plus.22 23 However, they are caused by the defects in dopamine reuptake, not in the dopamine synthesis. Some neurodegenerative disorders which involve nigrostriatal dopaminergic system such as juvenile Parkinson's disease (JPD), pallidopyramidal syndrome (PPS), and spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) also mimicked features of DRD or DRD-plus.24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Moreover, there are reports of cases with DYT1 mutation, GLUT1 mutation, myoclonus-dystonia (MD), and ataxia telangiectasia (AT) under the heading of DRD because of their dopa-responsiveness, however, these disorders do not involve nigrostriatal dopaminergic system.32 33 34 35

Herein, we expand the concept of DRD and DRD-plus to include cases described above and formulate an etiological classification to help make a differential diagnosis and plan treatment.

CLASSIFICATION OF DYSTONIAS RESPONSIVE TO DOPAMINERGIC DRUGS

We categorized the disorders with dystonias which are responsive to dopaminergic drugs based on 2 criteria: 1) the presence or absence of involvement of dopaminergic system; and 2) the presence or absence of evidence for neurodegeneration (Table 1). If any dystonias are responsive to dopaminergic drugs, the involvement of dopaminergic system is suspect. Actually, the disorders with defects in dopaminergic system account for the majority with dystonias responsive to dopaminergic drugs. However, there are reports of disorders without evidences of involvement of dopaminergic system but still responsive to dopaminergic medications, even though they are rare and difficult to understand.32 33 34 35

Table 1

Classification of dystonias responsive to dopaminergic drugs

Classification	Involvement of dopaminergic system (+)		Involvement of dopaminergic system (−)
Neurodegeneration (−)	1. Enzymatic defects in dopamine synthesis		1. DYT1
	2. Transportopathy		2. GLUT1 deficiency
		1) DAT deficiency	3. Myoclonus-dystonia
		2) VMAT2 deficiency
	3. Developmental disorders affecting dopamine system (SOX6 mutation)
Neurodegeneration (+)	1. Juvenile Parkinson's disease		1. Ataxia telangiectasia
	2. Pallidopyramidal syndrome
	3. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3
Undetermined	Dopa-responsive camptocormia

DAT = dopamine transporter, VMAT2 = vesicular monoamine transporter 2.

Whether the disorders are caused by neurodegenerative change is also important in diagnostic approach. The neurodegenerative disorders are progressive in nature even though the initial presentation may be similar to that of non-neurodegenerative disorders. The cases of dopa-responsive camptocormia are classified as the undetermined group because there are no clues to judge by the above 2 criteria.36 37

NON-NEURODEGERATIVE DISORDER WITH INVOLVEMENT OF DOPAMINERGIC SYSTEM

Enzymatic defects in dopamine synthesis

It was amply discussed in our previous publications on this topic, and will be presented only in brief.4 21 38 The enzymatic defects in dopamine biosynthetic pathway can be divided into 3 sub-parts according to the step: 1) the enzymatic defects in synthesizing tetrahydrobiopterin (BH₄) (GTP cyclohydrolase I [GCH-1], 6-pyruvoyltetrahydropterin synthase [PTPS], sepiapterin reductase [SR], dihydropteridine reductase [DHPR]), 2) the enzymatic defect in synthesizing levodopa (tyrosine hydroxylase [TH]), 3) the enzymatic defect in synthesizing dopamine and serotonin (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase [AADC]) (Fig. 1). Theoretically, BH4 deficiency may cause serotonin deficiency as well as dopamine deficiency. However, in cases with DRD phenotype, symptoms for serotonin deficiency appear infrequently because TH has the higher Km for BH₄ in the Michaelis-Menten kinetics.39 When the degree of BH4 deficiency is more severe, serotoninergic system are also affected.

Fig. 1

Characteristics of enzymatic deficiencies on dopamine synthetic pathway.

GTP = guanosine triphosphate, GCH-1 = GTP cyclohydrolase 1, NH₂P₃ = dihydroneopterin triphosphate, NP = neopterin, PTPS = 6-pyruvoyltetrahydropterin synthase, 6-PPH₄ = 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin, SR = sepiapterin reductase, BH₄ = tetrahydrobiopterin, DHPR = dihydropteridine reductase, qBH₂ = quinonoid dihydrobiopterin, Tyr = tyrosine, Trp = tryptophan, Phe = phenylalanine, TH = tyrosine hydroxylase, TPH = tryptophan hydroxylase, PAH = phenylalanine hydroxylase, L-dopa = levodopa, 5-HTP = 5-hydroxydryptophan, AADC = aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase, NE = norepinephrine, HVA = homovanillic acid, 5-HIAA = 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid.

Among enzyme deficiencies in dopamine synthetic pathway, DRD phenotype was most often reported in autosomal dominant (AD) GCH-1, and rarely in autosomal recessive (AR) SR, and TH deficiencies.38 AD GCH-1 deficiency generally shows less severe deficiency than AR GCH-1 deficiency because only one allele is affected in AD GCH-1 mutation. The enzymatic defect in SR deficiency is also less severe because of the alternative pathway (Fig. 1).

GCH-1 mutation

AD GCH-1 deficiency have one mutated allele so that its enzymatic defect is milder than that of AR GCH-1 deficiency. It presents as childhood-onset dystonia. In general, there is no mental retardation, seizure, myoclonic attack, or autonomic dysfunction.4 38 The response to levodopa is dramatic and long-term complications such as motor fluctuation and dyskinesia are infrequent. Even though there were several cases with levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID), it disappears with time40 or by adding amantadine.41 Most of AD GCH-1 deficient cases showed good response at 100–300 mg/day of levodopa.38 Some patients with AD GCH-1 mutation were reported to have residual symptoms even with levodopa treatment.42

AR GCH-1 deficiency have 2 mutated copies, and are more severe in phenotypes than those of AD GCH-1 deficiency group. Earlier (neonatal or infant) onset, more aggressive motor symptoms (hypotonia, difficulties in swallowing and locomotive movements, etc.), and developmental delay have been reported.18 43 Many patients with AR GCH-1 mutation tend to respond only partially to levodopa.38 However, some cases with homozygous mutations presented as classic DRD with excellent response to levodopa and mild residual symptoms but the earlier age of onset.43 44 It was suggested that the severity of functional impairment, not the number of mutation, determines the phenotype.

PTPS mutation

AR PTPS mutated cases were reported with early onset and very severe phenotypes.45 The recent systematic review noted that motor outcomes of the cases with PTPS mutation were poorer than GCH-1, SR, and TH mutations.38 However, early diagnosis and intervention with replacement therapy led to much better prognosis.46 In addition, Leuzzi et al.45 reported that delayed treatment led to poor outcome with mental retardation, emphasizing the need to be aware of these disorders even though quite rare.

SR mutation

The motor outcome of SR deficiency is as excellent as that of AD GCH-1 deficiency38 because the alternative pathway can alleviate the severity of BH4 deficiency (Fig. 1). Thus the many of SR deficient cases belong to DRD phenotype. However several cases presented as DRD-plus phenotype. Bonafé et al.47 reported 2 cases who showed dystonia, spasticity, oculogyric crisis, tremor, ataxia, and psychomotor/growth retardation with marked diurnal fluctuation. The second patient had permanent structural change in nervous system such as microcephaly. The homozygous (c.1303–1304TC→CT) and compound heterozygous (c.1397A→G, 1397–1401delAGAAC) mutations were found respectively.

DHPR mutation

DHPR is a recycling enzyme of BH4 (Fig. 1). Most patients with DHPR mutation had near complete deficiencies of enzyme activity and showed DRD-plus phenotypes. Ponzone et al.48 reported the characteristics: 4 to 6 months of median onset age; low birth weight; microcephaly; hypotonia; drowsiness; swallowing difficulties; abnormal movements; oculogyric crises; convulsions; and recurrent episodes of hyperthermia. The clinical outcomes of DHPR deficient cases were relatively poor like those of PTPS deficient cases.38

TH mutation

There is no serotonin deficiency in patients with TH mutation (Fig. 1), but the symptoms caused by NE deficiency such as ptosis, miosis, and postural hypotension can occur depending on its severity.4 Its clinical spectrum includes typical DRD,49 dopa-responsive infantile parkinsonism,50 and progressive infantile encephalopathy.51 52 Progressive infantile encephalopathy and dopa-responsive infantile parkinsonism clinically belong to DRD-plus category. Mental retardation, ocular dysfunction, parkinsonism, myoclonic jerk, and ptosis were reported. The responsiveness to levodopa or phenylephrine was also restricted.4 38

AADC mutation

AADC is a critical enzyme at the last step in producing dopamine and serotonin (Fig. 1). The AADC mutated cases generally showed DRD-plus presentation. Brun et al.53 summarized common symptoms and signs of 78 AADC deficient cases. The onset of age was infancy in 38 patients (48.7%) of them. Hypotonia were most common symptoms (74 of 78 patients, 95%) rather than dystonia (41 patients, 53%) throughout all age group. Oculogyric crisis, developmental retardation, ptosis, etc. were also frequently reported.

Levodopa and 5-hydroxydryptophan, precursors of dopamine and serotonin, did not improve the clinical symptoms in this disorder. Dopamine agonists and monoamine oxidase inhibitors could be applied but with insufficient effects.38 The results for treatments seem to be most unfavorable among enzymatic deficiencies in dopamine synthetic pathway. Even with medical treatments, most patients inevitably face non-ambulatory, non-verbal, and tube-fed outcome.54

Transportopathy

The transporters are vital in recycling monoamines. Thus, the defects of transporters lead to monoamine deficiency. Two transportopathies have been reported and the clinical characteristics were nearly compatible with DRD-plus.22 23

DAT deficiency

DAT recycles released dopamine into presynaptic nerve terminals, and its defect leads to dopamine depletion in dopaminergic nerve terminals. Kurian et al.22 55 reported a series of patients who had infantile onset parkinsonism-dystonia. During childhood, patients developed severe parkinsonism-dystonia accompanied with an eye movement disorder, pyramidal tract features, and motor developmental delay. Parkinsonism, dystonia, developmental delay developed before 3 years of age. All patients showed an increased ratio of homovanillic acid (HVA) to 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in CSF analysis. Urine HVA level was also slightly increased in 6 of 7 patients evaluated. DAT scan showed virtual absence of DAT in the striatum. Levodopa in small dose was effective only in 2 patients among 9, but dyskinesia developed in higher doses, which improved with dopamine agonists. The others did not get any beneficial effects from levodopa. Dopamine agonists provided partial improvement in a few patients. Thus, main clinical features were similar between DAT deficiency and severe dopamine synthetic enzyme defects. But ocular flutter and saccadic initiation defect were characteristics of DAT deficiency, whereas microcephaly, seizure, and oculogyric crisis were more common in dopamine synthetic enzyme disorders.22

VMAT2 deficiency

VMAT2 transports monoamines from cytosol into synaptic vesicle, and its defect results in depletion of monoamines in the nerve terminals.56 Rilstone et al.23 reported 8 children with SLC18A2 mutation, which encodes VMAT2, from a consanguineous Saudi Arabian family inherited in an AR fashion. The index patient had hypotonia at 4 months of age. When she visited clinic at 16 years of age, she had developmental delay, oculogyric crisis, excessive diaphoresis, profuse nasal secretion, hypotonia, dysarthria, and ataxia. There was no diurnal fluctuation. At neurological examination, she showed ptosis, limited upward gaze, parkinsonism, hypotonia, and dystonia. The treatment with levodopa was not helpful, but dopamine agonists improved the symptoms with minimal side effects. Clinical symptoms and responsiveness to treatments of VMAT2 deficiency are very similar to those of AADC deficiency because both disorders significantly affect the generation of serotonin as well as of dopamine. However, lack of improvement with the Vitamin B6 (a cofactor of AADC) and absence of diurnal fluctuation of VMAT2 deficiency are different from AADC deficiency.23

Developmental disorder affecting dopamine system: SOX6 mutation

SOX6 gene has a critical role in regulating the differentiation of nigral dopaminergic neurons, cortical interneurons, and oligodendrocytes.57 58 59 Its mutation results in dysfunctions of diffuse cortical and basal ganglia areas. There is no evidence of neurodegeneration.

Ebrahimi-Fakhari et al.60 reported a 15-year-old male presented with acute-onset and rapid progressive generalized dystonia, athetoid movement, tremor, and dysarthria. The patient had development delay and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. There was no diurnal fluctuation. Physical exam was significant for dysmorphism, splenomegaly, sternal deformity, and slow horizontal/vertical saccades as well as dystonia, athetoid movement, and resting/action tremor. The work-up showed de novo deletion including SOX6 gene. The effect of 300 mg/day of levodopa was rapid and remarkable, which was sustained until last follow-up of age 20 years. Although DAT imaging was not done in SOX6 mutation, the experimental study showed that SOX6 gene is linked to development and survival of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra.57

NEURODEGENERATIVE DISORDER WITH INVOLVEMENT OF DOPAMINERGIC SYSTEM

Several neurodegenerative disorders affecting dopamine system can present with dystonias responsive to dopaminergic drugs. JPD (including SYNJ1 mutation),24 25 26 27 28 PPS,29 30 and SCA331 are good examples. They have frequent parkinsonism, relatively late onset, and progressive disease course with drug-related complications compared to non-neurodegenerative disorders in the dopaminergic system.

Juvenile Parkinson's disease

JPD is a well-known disorder which can present as dystonia in the leg with diurnal fluctuation and initial excellent response to dopaminergic drugs.24 25 26 27 Thus, JPD is an important differential diagnosis from DRD.4 However, progressive degenerative cell loss in JPD leads to long-term motor complications and requiring higher levodopa dose with time. DAT imaging can make an easy differential diagnosis.

SYNJ1 mutation could cause a severe form of JPD. It is associated with parkinsonism, dystonia, hypotonia, resting/action tremor, postural instability, seizure and cognitive impairment.28 61 The age at onset is around 20 years and the symptoms are progressive. The presynaptic nigrostriatal dopaminergic deficits in DAT scan and levodopa responsiveness for parkinsonism were reported in several cases.62 63 64

Rauschendorf et al.28 reported two siblings with generalized dystonia. They had the histories of seizure in the childhood. They showed dramatic response to a small dose of levodopa, and one of them developed dyskinesia with the increase of dose. DAT scan showed presynaptic nigrostriatal dopaminergic deficits in both cases. Although the gene studies for TH, GCH-1, and SR were performed with suspicion of DRD, those were negative. The final diagnosis was made as SYNJ1 mutations by next-generation sequencing.

Sometimes, a special consideration is necessary in co-existing cases of DRD and JPD as Hjermind et al. 65 reported. At age 28, the patient presented as DRD phenotype. Mutation in GCH-1 gene was found with decreased enzyme activity. At age 35, dyskinesia developed which is infrequent in classic GCH-1 mutation. DAT imaging showed decreased DAT binding which is compatible with PD. Therefore, this degenerative portion will determine his ultimate prognosis. However, further discussions are required to determine whether it was just co-incidence or GCH-1 mutation acted as a risk factor for PD, because it is recently reported that GCH-1 mutations are associated to an increased risk for PD.66

Pallidopyramidal syndrome

PPS includes several genetic disorders.67 Kara et al.68 redefined PPS which are presented as Davison's triad (parkinsonism, dystonia, and spasticity) with or without iron accumulation on MRI. For the treatment of dystonia, symptomatic approach with medications is main strategy in PPS.69 Although anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, and muscle relaxants have been used frequently, some cases showed good response to levodopa. Sina et al.29 reported two families with PLA2G6 point mutation presenting as dystonia-parkinsonism responding to levodopa. Paisán-Ruiz et al.30 reported that not only PLA2G6 but also ATP13A2, FBX07, and SPG11 mutations presented with some dystonia with partial levodopa response. The age of onset mainly ranged from childhood to adolescence. In addition, there were developmental delay, neuro-psychiatric symptoms, pyramidal signs and partial responsiveness to levodopa like in DRD-plus phenotype.

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3

Although SCA3 is a genetic ataxic syndrome, it can also have parkinsonism, dystonia, spasticity, peripheral neuropathy, and neuro-psychiatric symptoms.70 71 72 Wilder-Smith et al.31 reported a case of adult onset leg dystonia with marked diurnal fluctuation. The age of onset was 37 years and her symptoms gradually progressed for 3 years. Brain MRI and CSF profile did not reveal any remarkable findings. A small dose of levodopa (100 mg daily) showed marked improvement, lasting for 3–5 hours. The initial assessment was DRD. However, there was a family history over 5 generations with ataxia, peripheral neuropathy and SCA3 was confirmed later.

DISORDER WITHOUT INVOLVEMENT OF DOPAMINERGIC SYSTEM

As noted above, it is poorly understood why the disorders in this category show dopa-responsiveness. There have been only a few case reports.32 33 34 73

Non-neurodegenerative disorder

DYT1 mutation

Dystonia associated with DYT1 mutation generally begins at around age 13.74 About 60% of DYT1-mutated patients tend to progress into generalized form. Dystonia with DYT1 mutation typically does not respond to levodopa. However, there was a report with dystonia in upper extremities responding to levodopa and trihexyphenidyl.33 Postural and action dystonia of both upper extremities began in right hand at age 7 and in left upper extremity at age 9. Levodopa and trihexyphenidyl improved postural dystonia in the right hand. With further dose escalation of levodopa, both types of dystonia in the right and left arms were well ameliorated. At age 11, GAG deletion in the DYT1 gene was confirmed

GLUT1 mutation

Glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) deficiency results in impaired glucose transport into the brain.75 The classic cases are characterized by seizures, developmental delay, microcephaly, hypotonia, spasticity, ataxia, and dystonia. However, in some, main manifestation of GLUT1 mutations presents with paroxysmal exercise-induced dyskinesia.76 Ketogenic diet is a key treatment, and several medications such as valproate and acetazolamide might be helpful in symptom relief.

Baschieri et al.32 reported a case of paroxysmal exercise-induced dystonia due to GLUT1 mutation, which was responsive to levodopa. The patient (47 year-old male) visited the clinic with paroxysmal dystonic attacks since childhood. The symptoms lasted for 20 to 165 minutes and occurred daily on average. CSF to blood ratio of glucose was consistent with GLUT1 deficiency, and the mutation (p.R333Q) in the SLC2A1 gene was confirmed. Patient refused ketogenic diet. Trials with oxazepam, diazepam, carbamazepine, clonazepam, valproate, and acetazolamide were completely unhelpful. When levodopa reached a dose of 800 mg daily, there was a reduction of both frequency and intensity of the attacks. But, with reduction of the levodopa to 200 mg daily, his condition was much worsened.

Myoclonus-dystonia

Myoclonus-dystonia (MD) syndrome is a disorder characterized by myoclonus and dystonia.77 The symptoms can often improve with alcohol ingestion. Although many trials of medications were unsatisfactory, there were some reports showing beneficial effects of anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, levetiracetam, piracetam, and zonisamide.

Two cases of myoclonus-dystonia with SGCE mutation responsive to levodopa were also reported.34 The first case developed myoclonus and dystonia on his trunk and extremities since age 12. Although he had mild developmental delay as well as macrocephaly, low set ears, and low birth weight/height, he caught up quickly with his psychomotor milestones. The information about alcohol responsiveness was not known. Valproate improved symptoms, but induced hyper-ammonemia. Clonazepam and trihexyphenidyl slightly improved symptoms. Levodopa (800 mg daily) was added to clonazepam and trihexyphenidyl with significant improvement. The second case showed irregular distal tremor in both hands, which spread into arms and legs. There were also writer's cramp, mild head tilt, and action myoclonus which were improved by levodopa. SCGE deletions were confirmed in these 2 cases. The mechanism of levodopa responsiveness is unclear, although there was a report that epsilon-sarcoglycan is expressed in midbrain monoaminergic neurons.78

Neurodegenerative disorder

Ataxia telangiectasia

Schneider et al.35 reported familial dopa-responsive cervical dystonia. There were 4 patients with torticollis as initial manifestation. Among them, 3 patients were included in a single family. The age of onset ranged from 9 to 15 years. All of them showed dramatic responses to levodopa. Most probable diagnosis was classic DRD. The genetic tests for GCH-1, TH, and SPR were negative. Several years later, they reported ATM gene as the causative gene in this family by whole exome sequencing.79 But of note is that levodopa was not effective in 3 patients with dystonic AT in another report.73 Therefore, it is not quite clear whether dopa-responsiveness in the former cases by Schneider et al.35 79 is related to AT.

UNDETERMINED DISORDER

Dopa-responsive camptocormia

Van Gerpen36 described a case of dopa-responsive camptocormia with diurnal fluctuation. The initial complaint was tightness and twist in his paraspinal muscles at age 48. On neurologic examination at age 49, he showed camptocormia without parkinsonism, ataxia, and pyramidal tract signs. Walking backward amazingly improved the symptom. Camptocormia dramatically responded to levodopa (600 mg daily) for at least 6 years without motor complications. Genetic screening for classic DRD was not performed.

The second report of dopa-responsive camptocormia was recently described.37 Gradual onset of truncal flexion on standing begun since his age of 50. The symptoms worsened in the evening compared to in the morning. Levodopa (375 mg daily) was steadily helpful in improving dystonic camptocormia for 2 years. The DAT scan was normal. There were no mutations in GCH-1, TH, and THAP1 gene. As etiologies have not been found in these reports of dopa-responsive camptocormia so far, they are grouped into undertermined disorder. However they could be moved to one of the above categories in the future.

DISCUSSION

DRD, DRD-plus, and DRD look-alike

We reviewed the disorders with dystonias responsive to dopaminergic drugs. All of those showed DRD or DRD-plus ‘phenotype.’ However, many disorders do not meet our previous criteria of DRD or DRD-plus.4 21 38 Therefore, we would like to propose DRD as a group of non-neurodegenerative disorders by genetic defects involving nigrostriatal dopaminergic system with cardinal manifestations (namely, DRD phenotype) (Table 2). DRD-plus is also re-defined as a group of non-neurodegenerative disorders by genetic defects involving nigrostriatal dopaminergic system with dopa-responsiveness ‘plus’ additional features (namely, DRD-plus phenotype) that are not seen in DRD. Those additional features include infantile onset, developmental delay, psychomotor retardation, seizure, hypotonia, drowsiness, recurrent hyperthermia, ptosis, cerebellar dysfunction, poor responsiveness to levodopa or other dopaminergic drugs, etc. This new definition will include transportopathies and developmental defect such as SOX6. In summary, DRD and DRD-plus share commonalities in etiologies in that they are not neurodegenerative and involve nigrostriatal dopaminergic system, and the clinical severity of each disorder varies according to the degree of genetic defect.

Table 2

New definitions of DRD, DRD-plus, and DRD look-alike

Previous name	Previous definition4,21	New definition
DRD	A syndrome of selective nigrostriatal dopamine deficiency caused by genetic defects in the dopamine synthetic^a pathway without nigral cell loss^a	A group of non-neurodegenerative disorders by genetic defects involving nigrostriatal dopaminergic system with cardinal manifestations^b (namely, DRD phenotype)
DRD-plus	A group of disorders caused by genetic defects in the dopamine synthetic^a pathway without nigral cell loss^a that have features of DRD ‘plus’ those features that are not seen in DRD	A group of non-neurodegenerative disorders by genetic defects involving nigrostriatal dopaminergic system with dopa-responsiveness plus additional features^c (namely, DRD-plus phenotype) that are not seen in DRD
DRD look-alike	-	A group of 1) neurodegenerative or non-neurodegenerative disorders without involving the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system or 2) neurodegenerative disorders with involving nigrostriatal dopaminergic system, that could present with dystonia responsive to dopaminergic drugs

DRD = dopa-responsive dystonia.

^aWhich are deleted in the new proposal to include additional disorders; ^bThose include dystonia and/or parkinsonism, and dramatic response to levodopa without long-term motor complications; ^cThose include infantile onset, developmental delay, psychomotor retardation, seizure, hypotonia, drowsiness, recurrent hyperthermia, ptosis, cerebellar dysfunction, poor responsiveness to levodopa or other dopaminergic drugs.

Then, we would like to propose “DRD look-alike” as a group of 1) neurodegenerative or non-neurodegenerative disorders without involving the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system or 2) neurodegenerative disorders with involving nigrostriatal dopaminergic system, that could present with dystonia responsive to dopaminergic drugs (Table 2). The disorders listed in DRD look-alike could also present with DRD or DRD-plus phenotype. Levodopa-responsive camptocormia will be left as undetermined as of now. These terminologies will help to make an etiological thinking and to guide the laboratory investigation (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Disorders in DRD, DRD-plus, and DRD look-alike.

DRD = dopa-responsive dystonia, DAT = dopamine transporter, VMAT2 = vesicular monoamine transporter 2, GLUT1 = glucose transporter 1.

Diagnostic approach to DRD, DRD-plus, and DRD look-alike

The diagnostic approach should start from the clinical characteristics. According to whether the patient present as DRD or DRD-plus phenotype, the probable etiologies could be determined (Fig. 3 and Table 3). One important consideration is the frequencies of diseases. Most of diseases showing dystonia with dopa-responsiveness belong to disorders that involve nigrostriatal dopaminergic system. The rest are just several case reports with small number of subjects (Fig. 3 and Table 3).

Fig. 3

Diagnostic flow for DRD and DRD-plus phenotypes.

The disorders in the gray boxes are relatively common etiologies in each category. The DAT abnormality in the cases of SOX6 mutation has not been proven yet, but is very likely. Based on the experimental research, SOX6 gene is linked to development and survival of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra.

DRD = dopa-responsive dystonia, [D] = DRD, [D+] = DRD-plus.

Table 3

Clinical and laboratory features of dystonias that are responsive to dopaminergic drugs

Categories			# of cases	Clinical features				Laboratory features
Categories			# of cases	Response to L-dopa	Usual age of onset	Main phenotype	Additional features	DAT imaging	Genetic diagnosis
Involving dopaminergic system, Non-neurodegenerative
	Enzymatic defects in dopamine synthetic pathway
		1) DRD phenotype	Large	++++	Child-adole	DRD	Diurnal fluctuation, rare levodopa-related motor complications	NL	GCH-1, SR, TH
		2) DRD-plus phenotype	Large	++	Infancy	DRD-plus	Diurnal fluctuation, hypotonia, levodopa-related motor complications, parkinsonism, oculogyric crises, convulsions, developmental delay, myoclonus	Pro-NL^a	GCH-1, PTPS, SR, DHPR, TH, AADC
	Transportopathy
		1) DAT deficiency	Small	+	Infancy	DRD-plus	Parkinsonism, hypotonia, levodopa-related motor complications, developmental delay, pyramidal tract signs, ocular flutter, saccadic initiation defect	AbNL	SLC6A3
		2) VMAT2 deficiency	Small	+	Infancy	DRD-plus	Parkinsonism, developmental delay, oculogyric crisis, excessive diaphoresis, ptosis, hypotonia, ataxia, limited upward gaze	Pro-NL^a	SLC18A2
	Developmental disorders affecting dopamine system
		1) SOX6 mutation	Small	++	Child-adole	DRD-plus	Development delay, dysmorphism, splenomegaly, sternal deformity, slow saccades, athetoid movement, resting/action tremor	Pro-AbNL^a	SOX6
Involving dopaminergic system, neurodegenerative
	Juvenile Parkinson's disease		Large	++++	Child-adole	DRD	Parkinsonism, long-term levodopa-related motor complications	AbNL	PARKIN, DJ1, PINK1
	Juvenile Parkinson's disease by SYNJ1 mutation		Small	+++	Adole-adult	DRD-plus	Parkinsonism, dystonia, hypotonia, tremor, postural instability, seizure, cognitive impairment	AbNL	SYNJ1
	Pallidopyramidal syndrome		Large	++	Child-adole	DRD-plus	Parkinsonism, pyramidal tract signs, developmental delay, neuro-psychiatric symptoms	AbNL	PLA2G6, FBX07, ATP13A2, SPG11, WDR45, C19orf12
	Pallidopyramidal syndrome		Large	++	Child-adole	DRD-plus	Special findings on brain MRI according to subtypes	AbNL	PLA2G6, FBX07, ATP13A2, SPG11, WDR45, C19orf12
	Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3^b		Small	+++	Adult	DRD	diurnal fluctuation	Pro-AbNL^a	ATXN3
Others, non-neurodegenerative
	DYT1 ^b		Small	++	Child-adole	DRD	-	Pro-NL^a	TOR1A
	GLUT1 deficiency syndrome^b		Small	++	Child	DRD	Paroxysmal exercise-induced dystonia, short lasting	NL	SLC2A1
	Myoclonus-dystonia^b		Small	++	Child	DRD-plus	Myoclonus, alcohol response, psychiatric symptoms	Pro-NL^a	SGCE
Others, neurodegenerative
	Ataxia telangiectasia^b		Small	++	Child-adole	DRD	Torticollis, laryngeal dystonia, postural hand tremor	Pro-NL^a	ATM
Others, undetermined
	Dopa-responsive camptocormia^b		Small	+++	Adult	DRD	Diurnal fluctuation, no motor complications	NL	unknown

L-dopa = levodopa, DAT = dopamine transporter, DRD = dopa-responsive dystonia, Child = childhood, Adole = adolescence, NL = normal, Pro-NL = probably normal, AbNL = abnormal, VMAT2 = vesicular monoamine transporter 2, Pro-AbNL = probably abnormal, GLUT1 = glucose transporter 1.

^aPro-NL and Pro-AbNL are presumptive descriptions based on patho-mechanism; ^bDystonia with dopa-responsiveness is only an infrequent manifestation in that disease.

If the patient presents as DRD phenotype, enzymatic deficiencies (due to GCH-1, TH, and SR mutations) in dopamine synthetic pathway and JPD should be initially considered (Fig. 3). DRD phenotype in SCA3, DYT1, GLUT1 deficiency, or AT is rare.31 32 33 There were also 2 cases of dopa-responsive camptocormia presenting with DRD phenotype.36 37

If the patient has DRD-plus phenotype, all enzymatic deficiencies in dopamine synthetic pathway, PPS, and JPD by SYNJ1 mutation can be considered in the differential diagnosis. Although transportopathies, SOX6 mutation, and MD can also present with DRD-plus phenotype,22 23 34 60 these are also infrequent. The age of onset and DAT scan would be very helpful in differential diagnosis (Fig. 3 and Table 3). Then, biochemical analysis and gene study will make a confirmative diagnosis.

DRD and Segawa disease

Name should reflect the characteristics of the disease. For example, clinical symptoms (e.g., myasthenia gravis), localizations (e.g., corticobasal syndrome), pathologic findings (e.g., dementia with Lewy body), and genetic backgrounds (e.g., DYT1 dystonia) contributes to making their names in neurological disorders. Eponyms tend to be changed into the new names which can cover the features of the diseases. For example, progressive supranuclear palsy is widely used nowadays instead of Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome.

However, there are some exceptions. Parkinson80 reported PD as ‘shaking palsy.’ However, Charcot recognized that there are many PD cases without ‘shaking’ or ‘palsy,’ and used the name “Parkinson's disease,” which now includes not only motor but also non-motor features.

In his first report, Segawa et al.5 used the name ‘hereditary progressive dystonia with marked diurnal fluctuation’ which contains the important features of the disease. In 1994, Nygaard et al.9 used the term of “dopa-responsive dystonia” which also reflects the key features of dopa-responsiveness. However, as described in this review, many disorders were reported under the title of DRD when dopa-responsiveness was only partial and really did not resemble the classic DRD, thus confusing the picture of this unique disorder. Therefore, we would like to propose the new names: “Segawa disease” instead of “DRD”; “Segawa-plus” instead of “DRD-plus”; and “Segawa look-alike” instead of “DRD look-alike.” This nomenclature is clearer in giving accurate picture of the classic case of “DRD” and helps in logical thinking of etiology and diagnostic approach.

In conclusion, the updated definitions of DRD, DRD-plus, and DRD look-alike are more clinically oriented. At the same time, we believe that they can provide benefits in guiding the final diagnosis because the most cases of dystonia with dopa-responsiveness had genetic mutations (Table 3). Further studies with detailed clinical descriptions and genetic confirmations should be performed to clarify the boundaries between DRD, DRD-plus, and DRD look-alike and to understand the physiology of levodopa effectiveness to them.

Notes

^Disclosure The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

^{Author Contributions}

Conceptualization: Lee WW, Jeon B.
Data curation: Lee WW, Kim R.
Methodology: Lee WW, Jeon B.
Writing - original draft: Lee WW, Jeon B.
Writing - review & editing: Lee WW, Jeon B, Kim R.

References

1. Balint B, Bhatia KP. Dystonia: an update on phenomenology, classification, pathogenesis and treatment. Curr Opin Neurol. 2014; 27(4):468–476.

2. Jankovic J. Medical treatment of dystonia. Mov Disord. 2013; 28(7):1001–1012.

3. Wijemanne S, Jankovic J. Dopa-responsive dystonia--clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015; 11(7):414–424.

4. Lee WW, Jeon BS. Clinical spectrum of dopa-responsive dystonia and related disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2014; 14(7):461.

5. Segawa M, Ohmi K, Itoh S, Aoyama M, Hayakawa H. Childhood basal ganglia disease with marked response to L-Dopa, "Hereditary progressive basal ganglia disease with marked diurnal fluctuation. Shinryo (Tokyo). 1971; 24:667–672.

6. Segawa M, Hosaka A, Miyagawa F, Nomura Y, Imai H. Hereditary progressive dystonia with marked diurnal fluctuation. Adv Neurol. 1976; 14:215–233.

7. Segawa M. Hereditary progressive dystonia with marked diurnal fluctuation. Brain Dev. 2000; 22:Suppl 1. S65–S80.

8. Nygaard TG, Duvoisin RC. Hereditary dystonia-parkinsonism syndrome of juvenile onset. Neurology. 1986; 36(11):1424–1428.

9. Nygaard TG, Waran SP, Levine RA, Naini AB, Chutorian AM. Dopa-responsive dystonia simulating cerebral palsy. Pediatr Neurol. 1994; 11(3):236–240.

10. de Yebenes JG, Moskowitz C, Fahn S, Saint-Hilaire MH. Long-term treatment with levodopa in a family with autosomal dominant torsion dystonia. Adv Neurol. 1988; 50:101–111.

11. Deonna T. DOPA-sensitive progressive dystonia of childhood with fluctuations of symptoms—Segawa's syndrome and possible variants. Results of a collaborative study of the European Federation of Child Neurology Societies (EFCNS). Neuropediatrics. 1986; 17(2):81–85.

12. Gordon N. Fluctuating dystonia and allied syndromes. Neuropediatrics. 1982; 13(3):152–154.

13. Kim JW, Cho GS, Myung HJ. Two families of diunally fluctuating hereditary progressive dystonia. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 1990; 8(2):389–392.

14. Kumammoto I, Nomoto M, Yoshodome M, Osame M, Igata A. Five cases of dystonia with marked diurnal flucluation and special reference to homovanillic acid in CSF. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 1984; 24(7):697–702.

15. Ouvrier RA. Progressive dystonia with marked diurnal fluctuation. Ann Neurol. 1978; 4(5):412–417.

16. Rajput AH. Levodopa in dystonia musculorum deformans. Lancet. 1973; 1(7800):432.

17. Sunohara N, Mano Y, Ando K, Satoyoshi E. Idiopathic dystonia-parkinsonism with marked diurnal fluctuation of symptoms. Ann Neurol. 1985; 17(1):39–45.

18. Furukawa Y, Kish SJ, Bebin EM, Jacobson RD, Fryburg JS, Wilson WG, et al. Dystonia with motor delay in compound heterozygotes for GTP-cyclohydrolase I gene mutations. Ann Neurol. 1998; 44(1):10–16.

19. Tassin J, Dürr A, Bonnet AM, Gil R, Vidailhet M, Lücking CB, et al. Levodopa-responsive dystonia. GTP cyclohydrolase I or parkin mutations? Brain. 2000; 123(Pt 6):1112–1121.

20. Chaila EC, McCabe DJ, Delanty N, Costello DJ, Murphy RP. Broadening the phenotype of childhood-onset dopa-responsive dystonia. Arch Neurol. 2006; 63(8):1185–1188.

21. Jeon BS, Jeong JM, Park SS, Lee MC. Dopa-responsive dystonia: a syndrome of selective nigrostriatal dopamine deficiency. Adv Neurol. 1998; 78:309–317.

22. Kurian MA, Li Y, Zhen J, Meyer E, Hai N, Christen HJ, et al. Clinical and molecular characterisation of hereditary dopamine transporter deficiency syndrome: an observational cohort and experimental study. Lancet Neurol. 2011; 10(1):54–62.

23. Rilstone JJ, Alkhater RA, Minassian BA. Brain dopamine-serotonin vesicular transport disease and its treatment. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(6):543–550.

24. Turjanski N, Bhatia K, Burn DJ, Sawle GV, Marsden CD, Brooks DJ. Comparison of striatal 18F-dopa uptake in adult-onset dystonia-parkinsonism, Parkinson's disease, and dopa-responsive dystonia. Neurology. 1993; 43(8):1563–1568.

25. Nygaard TG, Marsden CD, Fahn S. Dopa-responsive dystonia: long-term treatment response and prognosis. Neurology. 1991; 41(2 Pt 1):174–181.

26. Nygaard TG. Dopa-responsive dystonia. Delineation of the clinical syndrome and clues to pathogenesis. Adv Neurol. 1993; 60:577–585.

27. Chung SJ, Park HK, Ki CS, Kim MJ, Lee MC. Marked diurnal fluctuation and rest benefit in a patient with parkin mutation. Mov Disord. 2008; 23(4):624–626.

28. Rauschendorf MA, Jost M, Stock F, Zimmer A, Rösler B, Rijntjes M, et al. Novel compound heterozygous synaptojanin-1 mutation causes l-dopa-responsive dystonia-parkinsonism syndrome. Mov Disord. 2017; 32(3):478–480.

29. Sina F, Shojaee S, Elahi E, Paisán-Ruiz C. R632W mutation in PLA2G6 segregates with dystonia-parkinsonism in a consanguineous Iranian family. Eur J Neurol. 2009; 16(1):101–104.

30. Paisán-Ruiz C, Guevara R, Federoff M, Hanagasi H, Sina F, Elahi E, et al. Early-onset L-dopa-responsive parkinsonism with pyramidal signs due to ATP13A2, PLA2G6, FBXO7 and spatacsin mutations. Mov Disord. 2010; 25(12):1791–1800.

31. Wilder-Smith E, Tan EK, Law HY, Zhao Y, Ng I, Wong MC. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 presenting as an L-DOPA responsive dystonia phenotype in a Chinese family. J Neurol Sci. 2003; 213(1-2):25–28.

32. Baschieri F, Batla A, Erro R, Ganos C, Cordivari C, Bhatia KP. Paroxysmal exercise-induced dystonia due to GLUT1 mutation can be responsive to levodopa: a case report. J Neurol. 2014; 261(3):615–616.

33. Hayashi M, Nagao Y, Kimura K, Hachimori K, Nomura Y, Segawa M. Case of DYT1 dystonia (early-onset torsion dystonia) showing long-term focal dystonia in the arm. No To Hattatsu. 2008; 40(6):483–486.

34. Luciano MS, Ozelius L, Sims K, Raymond D, Liu L, Saunders-Pullman R. Responsiveness to levodopa in epsilon-sarcoglycan deletions. Mov Disord. 2009; 24(3):425–428.

35. Schneider SA, Mohire MD, Trender-Gerhard I, Asmus F, Sweeney M, Davis M, et al. Familial dopa-responsive cervical dystonia. Neurology. 2006; 66(4):599–601.

36. Van Gerpen JA. Dopa-responsive dystonic camptocormia. Neurology. 2006; 66(11):1779.

37. Oravivattanakul S, Abboud H, Fernandez H, Itin I. Unusual case of levodopa-responsive camptocormia in a patient with negative dopamine transporter scan and normal DYT 5 gene. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2014; 37(2):63–64.

38. Kim R, Jeon B, Lee WW. A Systematic Review of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Dopa-responsive Dystonia (DRD) and DRD-Plus. Mov Disord Clin Pract (Hoboken). 2016; 3(5):435–442.

39. Davis MD, Ribeiro P, Tipper J, Kaufman S. “7-tetrahydrobiopterin,” a naturally occurring analogue of tetrahydrobiopterin, is a cofactor for and a potential inhibitor of the aromatic amino acid hydroxylases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992; 89(21):10109–10113.

40. Lee JY, Yang HJ, Kim JM, Jeon BS. Novel GCH-1 mutations and unusual long-lasting dyskinesias in Korean families with dopa-responsive dystonia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013; 19(12):1156–1159.

41. Furukawa Y, Filiano JJ, Kish SJ. Amantadine for levodopa-induced choreic dyskinesia in compound heterozygotes for GCH1 mutations. Mov Disord. 2004; 19(10):1256–1258.

42. Tadic V, Kasten M, Brüggemann N, Stiller S, Hagenah J, Klein C. Dopa-responsive dystonia revisited: diagnostic delay, residual signs, and nonmotor signs. Arch Neurol. 2012; 69(12):1558–1562.

43. Nardocci N, Zorzi G, Blau N, Fernandez Alvarez E, Sesta M, Angelini L, et al. Neonatal dopa-responsive extrapyramidal syndrome in twins with recessive GTPCH deficiency. Neurology. 2003; 60(2):335–337.

44. Hwu WL, Wang PJ, Hsiao KJ, Wang TR, Chiou YW, Lee YM. Dopa-responsive dystonia induced by a recessive GTP cyclohydrolase I mutation. Hum Genet. 1999; 105(3):226–230.

45. Leuzzi V, Carducci CA, Carducci CL, Pozzessere S, Burlina A, Cerone R, et al. Phenotypic variability, neurological outcome and genetics background of 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin synthase deficiency. Clin Genet. 2010; 77(3):249–257.

46. Liu KM, Liu TT, Lee NC, Cheng LY, Hsiao KJ, Niu DM. Long-term follow-up of Taiwanese Chinese patients treated early for 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin synthase deficiency. Arch Neurol. 2008; 65(3):387–392.

47. Bonafé L, Thöny B, Penzien JM, Czarnecki B, Blau N. Mutations in the sepiapterin reductase gene cause a novel tetrahydrobiopterin-dependent monoamine-neurotransmitter deficiency without hyperphenylalaninemia. Am J Hum Genet. 2001; 69(2):269–277.

48. Ponzone A, Spada M, Ferraris S, Dianzani I, de Sanctis L. Dihydropteridine reductase deficiency in man: from biology to treatment. Med Res Rev. 2004; 24(2):127–150.

49. Schiller A, Wevers RA, Steenbergen GC, Blau N, Jung HH. Long-term course of L-dopa-responsive dystonia caused by tyrosine hydroxylase deficiency. Neurology. 2004; 63(8):1524–1526.

50. Lüdecke B, Knappskog PM, Clayton PT, Surtees RA, Clelland JD, Heales SJ, et al. Recessively inherited L-DOPA-responsive parkinsonism in infancy caused by a point mutation (L205P) in the tyrosine hydroxylase gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1996; 5(7):1023–1028.

51. Ribasés M, Serrano M, Fernández-Alvarez E, Pahisa S, Ormazabal A, García-Cazorla A, et al. A homozygous tyrosine hydroxylase gene promoter mutation in a patient with dopa-responsive encephalopathy: clinical, biochemical and genetic analysis. Mol Genet Metab. 2007; 92(3):274–277.

52. Hoffmann GF, Assmann B, Bräutigam C, Dionisi-Vici C, Häussler M, de Klerk JB, et al. Tyrosine hydroxylase deficiency causes progressive encephalopathy and dopa-nonresponsive dystonia. Ann Neurol. 2003; 54:Suppl 6. S56–S65.

53. Brun L, Ngu LH, Keng WT, Ch'ng GS, Choy YS, Hwu WL, et al. Clinical and biochemical features of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency. Neurology. 2010; 75(1):64–71.

54. Helman G, Pappa MB, Pearl PL. Widening phenotypic spectrum of AADC deficiency, a disorder of dopamine and serotonin synthesis. JIMD Rep. 2014; 17:23–27.

55. Kurian MA, Zhen J, Cheng SY, Li Y, Mordekar SR, Jardine P, et al. Homozygous loss-of-function mutations in the gene encoding the dopamine transporter are associated with infantile parkinsonism-dystonia. J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(6):1595–1603.

56. Peter D, Finn JP, Klisak I, Liu Y, Kojis T, Heinzmann C, et al. Chromosomal localization of the human vesicular amine transporter genes. Genomics. 1993; 18(3):720–723.

57. Panman L, Papathanou M, Laguna A, Oosterveen T, Volakakis N, Acampora D, et al. Sox6 and Otx2 control the specification of substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons. Cell Reports. 2014; 8(4):1018–1025.

58. Stolt CC, Schlierf A, Lommes P, Hillgärtner S, Werner T, Kosian T, et al. SoxD proteins influence multiple stages of oligodendrocyte development and modulate SoxE protein function. Dev Cell. 2006; 11(5):697–709.

59. Ma T, Wang C, Wang L, Zhou X, Tian M, Zhang Q, et al. Subcortical origins of human and monkey neocortical interneurons. Nat Neurosci. 2013; 16(11):1588–1597.

60. Ebrahimi-Fakhari D, Maas B, Haneke C, Niehues T, Hinderhofer K, Assmann BE, et al. Disruption of SOX6 is associated with a rapid-onset dopa-responsive movement disorder, delayed development, and dysmorphic features. Pediatr Neurol. 2015; 52(1):115–118.

61. Dyment DA, Smith AC, Humphreys P, Schwartzentruber J, Beaulieu CL, Bulman DE, et al. Homozygous nonsense mutation in SYNJ1 associated with intractable epilepsy and tau pathology. Neurobiol Aging. 2015; 36(2):1222.e1–1222.e5.

62. Quadri M, Fang M, Picillo M, Olgiati S, Breedveld GJ, Graafland J, et al. Mutation in the SYNJ1 gene associated with autosomal recessive, early-onset parkinsonism. Hum Mutat. 2013; 34(9):1208–1215.

63. Olgiati S, De Rosa A, Quadri M, Criscuolo C, Breedveld GJ, Picillo M, et al. PARK20 caused by SYNJ1 homozygous Arg258Gln mutation in a new Italian family. Neurogenetics. 2014; 15(3):183–188.

64. Krebs CE, Karkheiran S, Powell JC, Cao M, Makarov V, Darvish H, et al. The Sac1 domain of SYNJ1 identified mutated in a family with early-onset progressive parkinsonism with generalized seizures. Hum Mutat. 2013; 34(9):1200–1207.

65. Hjermind LE, Johannsen LG, Blau N, Wevers RA, Lucking CB, Hertz JM, et al. Dopa-responsive dystonia and early-onset Parkinson's disease in a patient with GTP cyclohydrolase I deficiency? Mov Disord. 2006; 21(5):679–682.

66. Mencacci NE, Isaias IU, Reich MM, Ganos C, Plagnol V, Polke JM, et al. Parkinson's disease in GTP cyclohydrolase 1 mutation carriers. Brain. 2014; 137(Pt 9):2480–2492.

67. Davison C. Pallido-pyramidal disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1954; 13(1):50–59.

68. Kara E, Hardy J, Houlden H. The pallidopyramidal syndromes: nosology, aetiology and pathogenesis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2013; 26(4):381–394.

69. Hogarth P. Neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation: diagnosis and management. J Mov Disord. 2015; 8(1):1–13.

70. Park H, Kim HJ, Jeon BS. Parkinsonism in spinocerebellar ataxia. BioMed Res Int. 2015; 2015:125273.

71. Pedroso JL, França MC Jr, Braga-Neto P, D'Abreu A, Saraiva-Pereira ML, Saute JA, et al. Nonmotor and extracerebellar features in Machado-Joseph disease: a review. Mov Disord. 2013; 28(9):1200–1208.

72. Sequeiros J, Coutinho P. Epidemiology and clinical aspects of Machado-Joseph disease. Adv Neurol. 1993; 61:139–153.

73. Saunders-Pullman R, Raymond D, Stoessl AJ, Hobson D, Nakamura K, Pullman S, et al. Variant ataxia-telangiectasia presenting as primary-appearing dystonia in Canadian Mennonites. Neurology. 2012; 78(9):649–657.

74. Klein C. Genetics in dystonia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014; 20:Suppl 1. S137–S142.

75. De Giorgis V, Veggiotti P. GLUT1 deficiency syndrome 2013: current state of the art. Seizure. 2013; 22(10):803–811.

76. Schneider SA, Paisan-Ruiz C, Garcia-Gorostiaga I, Quinn NP, Weber YG, Lerche H, et al. GLUT1 gene mutations cause sporadic paroxysmal exercise-induced dyskinesias. Mov Disord. 2009; 24(11):1684–1688.

77. Kinugawa K, Vidailhet M, Clot F, Apartis E, Grabli D, Roze E. Myoclonus-dystonia: an update. Mov Disord. 2009; 24(4):479–489.

78. Esapa CT, Waite A, Locke M, Benson MA, Kraus M, McIlhinney RA, et al. SGCE missense mutations that cause myoclonus-dystonia syndrome impair epsilon-sarcoglycan trafficking to the plasma membrane: modulation by ubiquitination and torsinA. Hum Mol Genet. 2007; 16(3):327–342.

79. Charlesworth G, Mohire MD, Schneider SA, Stamelou M, Wood NW, Bhatia KP. Ataxia telangiectasia presenting as dopa-responsive cervical dystonia. Neurology. 2013; 81(13):1148–1151.

80. Parkinson J. An Essay on the Shaking Palsy. London: Sherwood, Neely, and Jones;1817.

TOOLS

ORCID iDs

Woong-Woo Lee
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8767-7967

Beomseok Jeon
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2491-3544

Ryul Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8754-9180

Similar articles