Journal List > J Korean Soc Surg Hand > v.21(4) > 1106539

Park, Shin, Lee, and Kim: Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Release of the Trigger Thumb

Abstract

Purpose:

Trigger thumb is a common condition with a prevalence rate up to 3% among the adults. The main pathophysiology is locking of the flexor tendon at the A1 pulley. Treatments include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, steroid injection, and surgical A1 pulley release. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided percutaneous release of trigger thumb.

Methods:

The author prospectively reviewed 37 patients who had undergone ultrasound-guided percutaneous release by the same surgeon from January 2012 to June 2014. The effect of ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release was evaluated by using visual analogue scale (VAS) score, disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, and grip and pinch strengths preoperatively and at 12weeks after the surgery. In addition, complications related with the procedure were evaluated.

Results:

Triggering and locking were resolved in all patients after surgery. VAS and DASH improved from 5.0±1.8 and 45.8±16.9 preoperatively to 0.3±0.6 and 16.2±6.3 at 12 weeks, respectively (p=0.019 and p=0.021). Grip and pinch strengths statistically improved from33.5±8.6 kg and 36.7±8.1 kg, preoperatively 46.2±6.1 kg and 47.1±7.4 kg, respectively (p=0.026 and p=0.041). Complications such as incomplete resection, neurologic symptoms or wound infection were not found throughout the period of the study.

Conclusion:

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release provides complete relief of symptoms with no major complication in trigger thumb.

REFERENCES

1. Guler F, Kose O, Ercan EC, Turan A, Canbora K. Open versus percutaneous release for the treatment of trigger thumb. Orthopedics. 2013; 36:e1290–4.
crossref
2. Patel RM, Chilelli BJ, Ivy AD, Kalainov DM. Hand surface landmarks and measurements in the treatment of trigger thumb. J Hand Surg Am. 2013; 38:1166–71.
crossref
3. Wolfe SW. Tenosynovitis. Wolfe SW, Pederson WC, Hotchkiss MD, Kozin SH, editors. Green's operative hand surgery. 4th ed.Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone;2011. p. 2029–34.
4. Sampson SP, Badalamente MA, Hurst LC, Seidman J. Pathobiology of the human A1 pulley in trigger finger. J Hand Surg Am. 1991; 16:714–21.
crossref
5. Maneerit J, Sriworakun C, Budhraja N, Nagavajara P. Trigger thumb: results of a prospective randomised study of percutaneous release with steroid injection versus steroid injection alone. J Hand Surg Br. 2003; 28:586–9.
crossref
6. Quinnell RC. Conservative management of trigger finger. Practitioner. 1980; 224:187–90.
7. Calleja H, Tanchuling A, Alagar D, Tapia C, Macalalad A. Anatomic outcome of percutaneous release among patients with trigger finger. J Hand Surg Am. 2010; 35:1671–4.
crossref
8. Kim JP, Kim MH, Yoo MJ, Moon SY, Yoon SH. Percutaneous A1 pulley release of locked trigger thumb in children. J Korean Soc Surg Hand. 2010; 15:59–64.
9. Ha KI, Park MJ, Ha CW. Percutaneous release of trigger digits. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83:75–7.
crossref
10. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29:602–8.
11. Crosby CA, Wehbe MA, Mawr B. Hand strength: normative values. J Hand Surg Am. 1994; 19:665–70.
crossref
12. Will R, Lubahn J. Complications of open trigger finger release. J Hand Surg Am. 2010; 35:594–6.
crossref
13. Ryzewicz M, Wolf JM. Trigger digits: principles, management, and complications. J Hand Surg Am. 2006; 31:135–46.
crossref
14. Bamroongshawgasame T. A comparison of open and percutaneous pulley release in trigger digits. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010; 93:199–204.
15. Chao M, Wu S, Yan T. The effect of miniscalpel-needle versus steroid injection for trigger thumb release. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009; 34:522–5.
crossref
16. Wang H, Zeng H, Wu H, Shen Q, Cai C, Chen W. Percutaneous release of trigger finger with L shaped hollow needle knife. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012; 26:14–6.
17. Hirasawa Y, Sakakida K, Tokioka T, Ohta Y. An investigation of the digital nerves of the thumb. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; (198):191–6.
crossref
18. Uras I, Yavuz O. Percutaneous release of trigger thumb: do we really need steroid? Int Orthop. 2007; 31:577.
crossref
19. Gilberts EC, Beekman WH, Stevens HJ, Wereldsma JC. Prospective randomized trial of open versus percutaneous surgery for trigger digits. J Hand Surg Am. 2001; 26:497–500.
crossref
20. Wilhelmi BJ, Mowlavi A, Neumeister MW, Bueno R, Lee WP. Safe treatment of trigger finger with longitudinal and transverse landmarks: an anatomic study of the border fingers for percutaneous release. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 112:993–9.
crossref
21. Kim JP, Seo JB. The effect of steroid injection in percutaneous release of trigger fingers. J Korean Soc Surg Hand. 2007; 12:71–6.
22. Patel MR, Moradia VJ. Percutaneous release of trigger digit with and without cortisone injection. J Hand Surg Am. 1997; 22:150–5.
crossref
23. Lorthioir J Jr. Surgical treatment of trigger-finger by a subcutaneous method. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958; 40:793–5.
crossref
24. Eastwood DM, Gupta KJ, Johnson DP. Percutaneous release of the trigger finger: an office procedure. J Hand Surg Am. 1992; 17:114–7.
crossref
25. Lyu SR. Closed division of the flexor tendon sheath for trigger finger. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74:418–20.
crossref
26. Park MJ, Oh I, Ha KI. A1 pulley release of locked trigger digit by percutaneous technique. J Hand Surg Br. 2004; 29:502–5.
crossref

Fig. 1.
A specially designed knife (HAKI knife, BK Meditech Inc., Seoul, Korea)8.
jkssh-21-218f1.tif
Fig. 2.
A photograph of percutaneous release assisted ultrasound (ACUSON S1000, Siemens Medical Solutions Inc.). Holding the thumb at 30° abduction and 15° flexion, a HAKI knife was inserted distally to the metacarphophalangeal flexion crease.
jkssh-21-218f2.tif
Fig. 3.
(A) A axial view of the A1 pulley in the right thumb. Arrow indicates tip of HAKI knife which was located in A1 pulley layer, not tendon; yellow territory, radial digital nerve; red territory, radial digital artery. (B) A axial view of the A1 pulley in the right thumb using Doppler. MCP, metacarpophalangeal; FPL, flexor pollicis longus.
jkssh-21-218f3.tif
Fig. 4.
A sagittal view of the A1 pulley in the right thumb. Yellow arrow indicate A1 pulley at MCP joint. MCP, metacarpophalangeal; FPL, flexor pollicis longus.
jkssh-21-218f4.tif
Fig. 5.
A sagittal view of the A1 pulley in the right thumb. Arrow indicates tip of HAKI knife which was located in proximal A1 pulley margin, not tendon; yellow arrow, A1 pulley. MCP, metacarpophalangeal; FPL, flexor pollicis longus.
jkssh-21-218f5.tif
Table 1.
Demographic and baseline characteristics of the population
Variable Value
Age (yr) 55.0 (41-74)
Sex (female:male) 18:6
Duration of symptoms (mo) 15
Dominant involvement, n (%) 17 (71)
Quinnell classification (no. of II/III/IV) 4/14/6
Table 2.
Clinical outcomes after ultra-sound guided percutaneous release
Outcome Mean±SD (range) p-value
VAS score 0.012
Preoperative 5.0±1.8 (2–10)
12 Weeks 0.2±0.7 (0–2)
DASH score 0.031
Preoperative 45.8±16.9 (10–74)
12 Weeks 8.2±4.7 (0–15)
Pinch strength (% of contralateral side) (kg) 0.011
Preoperative 36.7±8.1 (7–51)
12 Weeks 47.1 ±7.4 (39–68)
Grip strength (% of contralateral side) (kg) 0.035
Preoperative 33.5±8.6 (9–54)
12 Weeks 46.2±6.1 (31–72)

SD, standard deviation; VAS, visual analogue scale; DASH, disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand.

TOOLS
Similar articles