Abstract
Purpose:
We evaluated the change of the ulnar variance (UV) as forearm rotation in patients with ulnocarpal impaction syndrome (UIS).
Methods:
Twenty patients who suffered from ulnar side pain of the wrist and had abnormal lesions at ulno-basal side of the lunate in the radiologic examinations were included in this study. Their UVs in six wrist position (neutral, supination, pronation, neutral and grip, supination and grip, pronation and grip) were measured by the method of perpendiculars. UVs and the maximum change of UV in patients with UIS were compared with those of control group statistically.
Results:
There were statistically significant differences in UVs of all forearm rotation and grip status. The maximum change of UV was in supination position to pronation and grip status for all cases. The mean maximum change of UV in patients with UIS was 2.03±1.03 mm, and that of control group was 1.86±0.86 mm. But there was no significant difference between them. The ulnar shortening osteotomy was performed for thirteen UIS patients, and one patient with osteoarthritis at distal radio-ulnar joint was operated with Darrach procedure. Six patients underwent conservative treatment.
REFERENCES
1. Palmer AK, Werner FW. Biomechanics of the distal radioulnar joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; (187):26–35.
2. Palmer AK, Werner FW. The triangular fibrocartilage complex of the wrist: anatomy and function. J Hand Surg Am. 1981; 6:153–62.
3. Palmer AK, Glisson RR, Werner FW. Relationship between ulnar variance and triangular fibrocartilage complex thickness. J Hand Surg Am. 1984; 9:681–2.
4. Jung JM, Baek GH, Kim JH, Lee YH, Chung MS. Changes in ulnar variance in relation to forearm rotation and grip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83:1029–33.
5. Tomaino MM. The importance of the pronated grip X-ray view in evaluating ulnar variance. J Hand Surg Am. 2000; 25:352–7.
6. Yeh GL, Beredjiklian PK, Katz MA, Steinberg DR, Bozentka DJ. Effects of forearm rotation on the clinical evaluation of ulnar variance. J Hand Surg Am. 2001; 26:1042–6.
7. Steyers CM, Blair WF. Measuring ulnar variance: a comparison of techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 1989; 14:607–12.
8. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86:420–8.
9. Park JC, Sur YJ, Rhee SK, Song SW, Lee SM, Han SH. Ulnar shortening osteotomy for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome. J Korean Soc Surg Hand. 2009; 14:172–8.
10. Friedman SL, Palmer AK, Short WH, Levinsohn EM, Halperin LS. The change in ulnar variance with grip. J Hand Surg Am. 1993; 18:713–6.
11. Makita A, Nakamura T, Takayama S, Toyama Y. The shape of the triangular fibrocartilage during pronation-supination. J Hand Surg Br. 2003; 28:537–45.
12. Nishiwaki M, Nakamura T, Nakao Y, Nagura T, Toyama Y. Ulnar shortening effect on distal radioulnar joint stability: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 2005; 30:719–26.
13. Lee JS, Park MJ. Diagnostic usefulness of ulnocarpal stress for triangular fibrocartilage lesions. J Korean Soc Hand Surg. 2006; 11:1–6.
Table 1.
Demographic findings | UIS group | Control group | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Age (yr) | 49 | 45.4 | 0.398* |
Sex (M:F) | 11:09 | 13:07 | 0.519† |
Dominant hand | 13/20 | 16/20 | 0.288† |
Supination | 79.50±6.30 | 80.25±4.60 | 0.659* |
Pronation | 77.50±4.33 | 75.30±4.33 | 0.121* |
Table 2.
UV of forearm rotation and grip status | UIS group | Control group |
---|---|---|
Neutral | 2.87±1.39 | 0.48±1.35 |
Neutral and grip | 3.73±1.53 | 1.02±1.22 |
Pronation | 3.48±1.55 | 0.99±1.28 |
Pronation and grip | 3.95±1.45 | 1.56±1.53 |
Supination | 2.4±1.47 | -0.30±1.74 |
Supination and grip | 2.53±1.45 | 0.17±1.60 |
p-value* | <0.001 | <0.001 |
p-value† | 0.654 |