Effect of glass-infiltration treatments on the shear bond strength between zirconia and ultra low-fusing porcelain veneer

Eun-Kyung Yim; Sang-Won Park

doi:10.4047/jkap.2018.56.4.269

Journal List > J Korean Acad Prosthodont > v.56(4) > 1106318

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Yim and Park: Effect of glass-infiltration treatments on the shear bond strength between zirconia and ultra low-fusing porcelain veneer

Original Article

The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2018; 56(4): 269-277.

Published online: 30 October 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2018.56.4.269

Effect of glass-infiltration treatments on the shear bond strength between zirconia and ultra low-fusing porcelain veneer

Eun-Kyung Yim

, Sang-Won Park

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

Corresponding Author: Sang-Won Park. Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Science Reaearch Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, 33, Yongbong-ro, buk-gu, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea. +82 (0)62 530 5631: psw320@jnu.ac.kr

Received 23 April 2018 Revised 16 July 2018 Accepted 18 July 2018

The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined the effects of glass infiltration treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) between zirconia core and ultra low-fusing porcelain veneer.

Materials and methods

The zirconia specimens were classified into 4 groups (n = 12): Untreated zirconia (group Z), zirconia coated ZirLiner (group ZL), glass-infiltrated zirconia (group ZG), glass-infiltrated and sandblasted zirconia (group ZGS). A cylinder of ultra low-fusing veneer porcelain was build up on each disk (6 mm × 3 mm). SBS was measured using a universal testing machine. Scanning electron microscope and Energy Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were used to evaluate the surface of zirconia and failure pattern after SBS.

Results

SBS value of group ZGS was significantly lower than that of other groups (P < .05). No significant differences were detected among group ZL, group Z and group ZG.

Conclusion

Glass infiltration is not effective to the bond strength between zirconia and ultra low-fusing porcelain veneer. Sandblasting also dramatically decreased the bonding strength.

Keywords: Glass infiltrated zirconia, Ultra low-fusing porcelain, Sandblasting, Shear bond strength, Failure pattern

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Representative SEM image of different surface treatment on zirconia specimen (× 500). (A) Group Z, (B) Group ZL, (C) Group ZG, (D) Group ZGS.

Fig. 2

EDX of different surface treatment on zirconia specimen. (A) Group Z, (B) Group ZL, (C) Group ZG, (D) Group ZGS.

Fig. 3

Representative SEM image of interface between zirconia and veneering porcelain (× 20,000). (A) Group Z, (B) Group ZL, (C) Group ZG, (D) Group ZGS.

Fig. 4

Mean and standard deviation of Shear bond strength (^* significant at P < .05).

Fig. 5

Representative SEM images of fractured zirconia specimen. (A) Group Z, (B) Group ZL, (C) Group ZG, (D) Group ZGS (× 25).

Table 1

Chemical composition and coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of materials used in this study

Notes

This work was supported by National Research Foundation of korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (no. 2015RIA2A2A01008148).

References

1. Bindl A, Lüthy H, Mörmann WH. Thin-wall ceramic CAD/CAM crown copings: strength and fracture pattern. J Oral Rehabil. 2006; 33:520–528.

2. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater. 2004; 20:449–456.

3. Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Fracture toughness and hardness evaluation of three pressable all-ceramic dental materials. J Dent. 2003; 31:181–188.

4. Luthardt RG, Holzhüter M, Sandkuhl O, Herold V, Schnapp JD, Kuhlisch E, Walter M. Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP-zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res. 2002; 81:487–491.

5. Meyenberg KH, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Zirconia posts: a new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. J Esthet Dent. 1995; 7:73–80.

6. Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139:Suppl. 8S–13S.

7. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Daronch M. Influence of time and adhesive system on the extrusion shear strength between feldspathic porcelain and bovine dentin. Dent Mater. 2000; 16:303–310.

8. De Jager N, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ. The influence of design parameters on the FEA-determined stress distribution in CAD-CAM produced all-ceramic dental crowns. Dent Mater. 2005; 21:242–251.

9. Hämmerle CH. Success and failure of fixed bridgework. Periodontol 2000. 1994; 4:41–51.

10. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010; 23:493–502.

11. Kirmali O, Akin H, Ozdemir AK. Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia core after different surface treatments. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013; 31:261–268.

12. Peterson IM, Pajares A, Lawn BR, Thompson VP, Rekow ED. Mechanical characterization of dental ceramics by hertzian contacts. J Dent Res. 1998; 77:589–602.

13. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2005; 21:984–991.

14. Fischer J, Stawarczyk B, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH. Shear bond strength between veneering ceramics and ceria-stabilized zirconia/alumina. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 103:267–274.

15. Kim JW, Bhowmick S, Hermann I, Lawn BR. Transverse fracture of brittle bilayers: relevance to failure of all-ceramic dental crowns. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006; 79:58–65.

16. Yoon HI, Yeo IS, Yi YJ, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS. Effect of surface treatment and liner material on the adhesion between veneering ceramic and zirconia. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014; 40:369–374.

17. Zhang Y. Overview: Damage resistance of graded ceramic restorative materials. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2012; 32:2623–2632.

18. Zhang Y, Kim JW. Graded structures for damage resistant and aesthetic all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2009; 25:781–790.

19. Fischer J, Grohmann P, Stawarczyk B. Effect of zirconia surface treatments on the shear strength of zirconia/veneering ceramic composites. Dent Mater J. 2008; 27:448–454.

20. Fischer J, Stawarczyk B, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH. Shear bond strength between veneering ceramics and ceria-stabilized zirconia/alumina. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 103:267–274.

21. Isgrò G, Pallav P, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90:465–473.

22. Scherrer SS, Kelly JR, Quinn GD, Xu K. Fracture toughness (KIc) of a dental porcelain determined by fractographic analysis. Dent Mater. 1999; 15:342–348.

23. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater. 2006; 22:857–863.

24. Sundh A, Molin M, Sjögren G. Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing. Dent Mater. 2005; 21:476–482.

25. Zhang Y, Kim JW. Graded zirconia glass for resistance to veneer fracture. J Dent Res. 2010; 89:1057–1062.

26. Liu R, Sun T, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Jiang D, Shao L. The effect of graded glass-zirconia structure on the bond between core and veneer in layered zirconia restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015; 46:197–204.

27. Wattanasirmkit K, Srimaneepong V, Kanchanatawewat K, Monmaturapoj N, Thunyakitpisal P, Jinawath S. Improving shear bond strength between feldspathic porcelain and zirconia substructure with lithium disilicate glass-ceramic liner. Dent Mater J. 2015; 34:302–309.

28. Vagkopoulou T, Koutayas SO, Koidis P, Strub JR. Zirconia in dentistry: Part 1. Discovering the nature of an upcoming bioceramic. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2009; 4:130–151.

29. Porter DL, Heuer AH. Mechanisms of Toughening Partially Stabilized Zirconia (PSZ). J Am Ceram Soc. 1977; 60:183–184.

30. Craig RG. Mechanical properties in restorative dental materials. 11th ed. New York: Mosby;2002. p. 551–592.

31. Guess PC, Kulis A, Witkowski S, Wolkewitz M, Zhang Y, Strub JR. Shear bond strengths between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics and their susceptibility to thermocycling. Dent Mater. 2008; 24:1556–1567.

32. Diniz AC, Nascimento RM, Souza JC, Henriques BB, Carreiro AF. Fracture and shear bond strength analyses of different dental veneering ceramics to zirconia. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014; 38:79–84.

33. Choi BK, Han JS, Yang JH, Lee JB, Kim SH. Shear bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia and metal cores. J Adv Prosthodont. 2009; 1:129–135.

TOOLS

ORCID iDs

Eun-Kyung Yim
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5430-8578

Sang-Won Park
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9376-9104

Similar articles

Effect of glass-infiltration treatments on the shear bond strength between zirconia and ultra low-fusing porcelain veneer

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Representative SEM image of different surface treatment on zirconia specimen (× 500). (A) Group Z, (B) Group ZL, (C) Group ZG, (D) Group ZGS.

Fig. 2

EDX of different surface treatment on zirconia specimen. (A) Group Z, (B) Group ZL, (C) Group ZG, (D) Group ZGS.

Fig. 3

Representative SEM image of interface between zirconia and veneering porcelain (× 20,000). (A) Group Z, (B) Group ZL, (C) Group ZG, (D) Group ZGS.

Fig. 4

Mean and standard deviation of Shear bond strength (* significant at P < .05).

Fig. 5

Representative SEM images of fractured zirconia specimen. (A) Group Z, (B) Group ZL, (C) Group ZG, (D) Group ZGS (× 25).

Table 1

Chemical composition and coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of materials used in this study

Notes

References

Mean and standard deviation of Shear bond strength (^* significant at P < .05).