Journal List > Korean J Adult Nurs > v.30(5) > 1106000

Park, Jang, and Kim: Association of Resilience and Depression with Self-care Competence in Adult Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to examine the relationships between resilience, depression, and self-care competence and identify factors associated with self-care competence in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

This study was a descriptive research. Structured questionnaire on patients'sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, resilience, depression, and self-care competence was used for survey with a convenience sample of 152 patients with diabetes mellitus. Data were collected from July to December 2016. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation co-efficient, and multiple regression with SPSS/WIN 21.0 program.

Results

The mean scores on resilience, depression, and self-care competence were 2.86±0.42, 18.11±10.05, and 4.27±0.78, respectively. Self-care competence showed a statistically significant positive correlation with resilience (r=.47, p<.001), and negative correlation with depression (r=-.29, p<.001). Resilience showed a negative correlation with depression (r=-.53, p<.001). Resilience (β=.38, p<.001) was significantly associated with factors of self-care competence in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Conclusion

The results of the study indicate that factor influencing self-care competence was resilience in patients with diabetes mellitus. Therefore, nursing intervention programs for increasing the self-care competence should include regular assessments and strategies for improving resilience in patients with diabetes mellitus. It is recommended that the studies should be performed to confirm the relationship between resilience and self-care competence by using resilience instrument developed for adults.

REFERENCES

1. Statistics Korea. Statistical database 2016 [Internet]. Seoul: Statistics Korea;2017. [cited 2018 July 26]. Available from:. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/1/index.board?bmode=read&bSeq=&aSeq=363268&pageNo=1&rowNum=10&navCount=10&currPg=&sTarget=title&sTxt=.
2. National Health Insurance Service. 2016 National Health Insurance Statistical Yearbook [Internet]. Seoul: National Health Insurance Service;2017. [cited 2018 July 26]. Available from:. https://www.nhis.or.kr/menu/boardRetriveMenuSet.xx?menuId=F3321. https://www.nhis.or.kr/menu/boardRetriveMenuSet.xx?menuId=F3321.
3. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Sixth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VII-1) [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2016. [cited 2018 July 26]. Available from:. https://knhanes.cdc.go.kr/knhanes/sub03/sub03_02_02.do.
4. Lee S, Kim H. Structural equation modeling on self-care behavior and quality of life in older adults with diabetes using citi-zen health promotion centers. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2017; 47(4):514–25. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2017.47.4.514.
crossref
5. Korean Diabetes Association. Treatment Guideline for Diabetes 2015. Seoul: DesignLeader & BrandSynergy;2015.
6. Orem DE. Nursing: concepts of practice. 3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill Book;1985.
7. Park YS, Ryu SH. Factors influencing quality of life in type II diabetes mellitus patients registered at public health center. Journal of Korean Community Nursing. 2002; 13(4):679–88.
8. Yi-Frazier JP, Smith RE, Vitaliano PP, Yi JC, Mai S, Hillman M, et al. A person-focused analysis of resilience resources and coping in patients with diabetes. Stress and Health. 2010; 26(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMI.1258.
crossref
9. Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development. 2000; 71:543–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164.
crossref
10. Waugh CE, Fredrickson BL, Taylor SF. Adapting to life's slings and arrows: individual differences in resilience when recovering from an anticipated threat. Journal of Research in Person-ality. 2008; 42(4):1031–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.02.005.
crossref
11. Perfect MM, Jaramillo E. Relations between resiliency, diabetes-related quality of life, and disease markers to school-related outcomes in adolescents with diabetes. School Psychology Quarterly. 2012; 27(1):29–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027984.
crossref
12. Choi BS, Kim S, Park SC, Shim SH, Song HR, Chang SH, et al. Survey of depression in the elderly patients with diabetes mellitus. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 2015; 54(4):475–81. https://doi.org/10.4306/jknpa.2015.54.4.475.
crossref
13. Song MS, Choi CH. Effect of self care and depression on the yangsaeng of diabetes mellitus patients. Journal of Physiology & Pathologic Korean Medicine. 2017; 31(5):294–303. https://doi.org/10.15188/kjopp.2017.10.31.5.294.
14. Santos FRM, Bernardo V, Gabbay MAL, Dib SA, Sigulem D. The impact of knowledge about diabetes, resilience and depression on glycemic control: a cross-sectional study among adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome. 2013; 5(55):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-5-55.
crossref
15. Kim SY, Lee JH, Kim HN, Kim DK, Na Y, Kim GS, et al. Depression and self-care behavior in patients with diabetes mellitus. Korean Diabetes Journal. 2009; 33(5):432–38. https://doi.org/10.4093/kdj.2009.33.5.432.
crossref
16. Yoo JH. A study on the relationship of self care behavioral compliance and perceived self-efficacy in type II diabetic patient. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamental Nursing. 2000; 7(3):453–65.
17. Kim MA, Kim EY. The relationship between perceived family support and self-care agency in adults with diabetes. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 1996; 8(2):227–43.
18. Yi JP, Vitaliano PP, Smith RE, Yi JC, Weinger K. The role of resilience on psychological adjustment and physical health in patients with diabetes. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2008; 13(2):311–25. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910707X186994.
crossref
19. Kim Y, Bang KS. The relationships among resilience, family support, and diabetes adaptation in children with diabetes mellitus. Perspectives in Nursing Science. 2017; 14(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.16952/pns.2017.14.1.21.
crossref
20. Myong JP, Kim HR, Choi WS, Jo SE, Lee B, Koo JW, et al. The relation between employees’ lifestyle and their health status in an electronics research and development company. Korean Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2009; 21(1):1–9.
crossref
21. Istek N, Karakurt P. Effect of activities of daily living on self- care agency in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Mellitus. 2016; 6(4):247–62. https://doi.org/10.4236/jdm.2016.64026.
22. Kim DH, Yoo IY. Development of a questionnaire to measure resilience in children with chronic diseases. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2010; 40(2):236–46. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2010.40.2.236.
crossref
23. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychology Mea-surement. 1977; 1(3):385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306.
24. Chon KK, Choi SC, Yang BC. Integrated adaption of CES-D in Korea. Korean Journal of Health Psychology. 2001; 6(1):59–76.
25. Geden E, Taylor S. Construct and empirical validity of the self- as-carer inventory. Nursing Research. 1991; 40(1):47–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199101000-00010.
26. So HS. Testing construct validity of self-as-carer inventory and its predictors. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 1992; 4(2):147–61.
27. Steinhardt MA, Mamerow MM, Brown SA, Jolly CA. A resilience intervention in African American adults with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator. 2009; 35(2):274–84.
crossref
28. Yoo EW, Lee YM. Health literacy and self-care activities of older patients with type 2 diabetes: the mediating effect of resilience. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2018; 30(4):376–84. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2018.30.4.376.
crossref
29. Kim SH, Kang HS. The relationship between depression, self- care activity and HbA1c in clients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2008; 15(2):178–85.
30. Korean Diabetes Association. Diabetes Fact Sheet in Korea 2018 [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Diabetes Association;2018. [Cited 2018 July 26]. Available from:. http://www.diabetes.or.kr/pro/news/admin.php?category=A&code=admin&number=1546&mode=view. http://www.diabetes.or.kr/pro/news/admin.php?category=A&code=admin&number=1546&mode=view.
31. Kim YY, Yoon HY. Case study of community care: policy im-plications from Japan and UK. Journal of Critical Social Policy. 2018. 135–68.
32. Gao J, Wang J, Zheng P, Haardörfe R, Kegler MC, Zhu Y, et al. Effects of self-care, self-efficacy, social support on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. BMC Family Practice. 2013; 14(66):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-66.
crossref
33. Seo S, Han S, Park Y. The impact of diabetes fear of self-injecting (FSI) and fear of self-testing (FST) on glycemic control and diabetes self-management. Korean Journal of Family Medicine. 2008; 29(10):768–80.

Table 1.
Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients (N=152)
Characteristics Categories n (%)
Gender Men 74 (48.7)
Women 78 (51.3)
Age (year) 40 17 (11.2)
40~64 83 (54.6)
≥65 52 (34.2)
Religion Yes 67 (44.1)
No 85 (55.9)
Education Below elementary school 25 (16.5)
Middle school 25 (16.5)
High school 65 (42.7)
Above college 37 (24.3)
Living status With family 125 (82.2)
Alone 27 (17.8)
Alcohol consumption Never 94 (61.8)
1~3/week 46 (30.3)
≥4/week 12 (7.9)
Smoking Never 111 (73.0)
Quit 7 (4.6)
Smoking 34 (22.4)
Duration of diagnosis (year) 5 57 (37.5)
5~<10 62 (40.8)
10~<20 19 (12.5)
≥20 14 (9.2)
Experience of hospitalization with DM Yes 39 (25.7)
No 113 (74.3)
Experience of DM education Yes 74 (48.7)
No 78 (51.3)
DM management Diet 68 (26.4)
Exercise 83 (32.2)
Oral medication 72 (27.9)
Insulin 12 (4.7)
Oral medication & insulin 23 (8.9)
Complication of DM Yes 37 (24.3)
No 115 (75.7)
Experience of hypoglycemia Yes 38 (25.0)
No 114 (75.0)
Self monitoring of blood glucose Regular 33 (21.7)
Sometimes 85 (55.9)
Never 34 (22.4)

DM=diabetes mellitus;

Multiple responses.

Table 2.
Level of Resilience, Depression, and Self-care Competence of Patients (N=152)
Variables M±SD Min Max
Resilience 2.86±0.42 1.81 4.00
 Interpersonal characteristics 2.94±0.52 1.70 4.00
 Characteristics of coping 2.81±0.45 1.67 4.00
 Intrapersonal characteristics 2.84±0.46 1.80 4.00
Depression 18.11±10.05 1.00 51.00
 Depressed group (>16) 25.13±7.15 16.00 51.00
 None-depressed group (≤16) 8.71±3.62 1.00 15.00
Self-care competence 4.27±0.78 2.00 5.88
 Cognitive aspects of self-care 4.24±0.82 2.08 5.92
 Physical skills 4.16±0.89 2.00 5.89
 Judgement & dicisional making process 4.15±0.88 1.80 5.80
 Information-seeking behaviors 4.33±0.87 2.00 6.00
 Perception of self-monitoring 4.41±1.19 1.00 6.00
 Attention to self-management 4.27±0.78 1.67 6.00

Cut-off point.

Table 3.
Differences in Self-care Competence according to Patients' Characteristics (N=152)
Characteristics Categories M± SD t or F p
Gender Men 4.39±0.63 1.92 .057
Women 4.15±0.88
Age (year) 40 4.56±0.81 1.75 .178
40~64 4.28±0.70
≥65 4.16±0.86
Religion Yes 4.29±0.80 0.23 .817
No 4.26±0.76
Education Below elementary school a 3.92±0.61 3.20 .025
Middle school b 4.22±0.92 a, b, c< d
High school c d 4.27±0.81
Above college d 4.53±0.62
Living status With family 4.31±0.76 1.53 .127
Alone 4.06±0.80
Alcohol consumption Never a 4.50±0.75 4.09 .019
1~3/week b 4.49±0.80 a, b> c
≥4/week c 4.13±0.66
Smoking Never 4.25±0.84 1.34 .265
Quit 4.74±0.47
Smoking 4.23±0.57
Duration of diagnosis (year) 5 a 4.41±0.68 3.96 .009
5~<10 b 4.22±0.78 a, c> b, d
10~<20 c 4.44±0.66
≥20 d 3.68±1.03
Experience of hospitalization with DM Yes 4.08±0.69 1.78 .077
No 4.33±0.79
Experience of DM education Yes 4.21±0.85 0.96 .337
No 4.33±0.69
DM management Diet Yes 4.41±0.74 -2.08 .039
No 4.15±0.78
Exercise Yes 4.31±0.77 -0.75 .453
No 4.22±0.79
Oral medication Yes 4.21±0.79 0.96 .339
No 4.33±0.76
Insulin Yes 3.95±0.61 1.48 .140
No 4.30±0.78
Oral medication Yes 4.50±0.71 -1.55 .123
& insulin No 4.23±0.78
Complication of DM Yes 4.04±0.89 2.11 .037
No 4.34±0.72
Experience of hypoglycemia Yes 4.30±0.71 -0.24 .814
No 4.26±0.80
Self monitoring of blood glucose Regular a 4.64±0.48 7.24 .001
Sometimes b 4.24±0.77 a> b, c
Never c 3.98±0.78

DM=diabetes mellitus,

Scheffé test.

Table 4.
Correlation among Resilience, Depression, and Self-care Competence of Patients (N=152)
Variables Resilience Depression
r (p) r (p)
Depression -.53 (<.001)
Self-care competence .47 (<.001) -.29 (<.001)
Table 5.
Factors Influencing Self-care Competence of Patients (N=152)
Variables B SE β t (p) 95% CI
(Constant) 2.50 .56 4.49 (<.001) 1.40~3.60
Resilience 0.69 .16 .38 4.24 (<.001) 0.37~1.02
Depression -0.03 .01 -.04 -0.42 (.677) -0.02~0.01
Education (1=Above college) 0.08 .14 .05 0.58 (.560) -0.19~0.35
Duration of diagnosis (1=≥20) -0.36 .20 -.14 -1.80 (.074) -0.76~0.04
Self monitoring of blood glucose (1=Regular) 0.23 .14 .12 1.61 (.111) -0.05~0.51
Alcohol consumption (1=≥4/week) -0.15 .12 -.10 -1.25 (.212) -0.39~0.09
DM management (Diet) (1=Yes) 0.05 .12 .03 0.42 (.676) -0.29~0.19
Complication of DM (1=Yes) -0.05 .14 -.03 -0.33 (.743) -0.32~0.23
R2=.28, Adj. R2=.24, F=7.03, p<.001

DM=diabetes mellitus; SE=stand error; CI=confidence interval.

TOOLS
Similar articles