Journal List > Allergy Asthma Respir Dis > v.6(5) > 1102177

Lee, Kim, Yang, Kim, Chun, Yoon, Kim, Kim, and Lee: Diagnostic value of serum IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in polymerase chain reaction-positive Mycoplasma pneumonia in children

Abstract

Purpose

Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children. MP serum IgM and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are the methods that enable early diagnosis in patients with MP pneumonia. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical value of serum MP-specific IgM antibodies in PCR-positive MP pneumonia for the early diagnosis of MP pneumonia in children with CAP.

Methods

Out of 129 patients with lower respiratory tract infection aged over 3 years, 90 CAP children were enrolled in the study. Throat swab MP realtime PCR and serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) IgM antibodies were performed. A positive rate of MP PCR and serum IgM, the level of IgM index, clinical features, and laboratory findings were analyzed.

Results

MP PCR was positive in 57 cases. Longer fever duration before admission (P<0.001), higher rates of lobar or segmental pneumonia (P=0.048), unilateral infiltration (P=0.038), and extrapulmonary symptoms (P=0.049) were associated with MP PCR-positive pneumonia. Serum IgM index was significantly higher in MP PCR-positive pneumonia them in MP PCR-negative pneumonia (3.9±3.0 vs. 0.8±1.3, P<0.001). Using MP PCR as a gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of serum IgM were 85.5%, 82.1%, 91.4%, and 71.9%, respectively. The area under the curves for serum IgM index was 0.892, and the ROC analysis indicated that an optimal cutoff value of 1.05 for serum IgM provided the highest sensitivity and specificity interestingly (83.9% vs. 85.7%, P<0.001).

Conclusion

Serum IgM ELISA has useful diagnostic value in PCR-positive MP pneumonia. Applying an IgM index cutoff of 1.05 improves diagnostic accuracy.

REFERENCES

1. Liu WK, Liu Q, Chen DH, Liang HX, Chen XK, Chen MX, et al. Epidemiology of acute respiratory infections in children in Guangzhou: a three- year study. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e96674.
2. He XY, Wang XB, Zhang R, Yuan ZJ, Tan JJ, Peng B, et al. Investigation of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in pediatric population from 12,025 cases with respiratory infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013; 75:22–7.
crossref
3. Yang EA, Gang MH, You SY, Kim JH, Lee JH. Clinical characteristics of children with lobar pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Pediatr Allergy Respir Dis. 2012; 22:256–64.
4. Park GY, Lee YI, Shin M, Park JO, Kim CH. Clinical differences according to radiological patterns in childhood Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Allergy Asthma Respir Dis. 2013; 1:362–9.
5. Kim KW, Kim KE. Mycoplasma and chlamydia infection in Korea. Korean J Pediatr. 2009; 52:277–82.
crossref
6. Izumikawa K, Izumikawa K, Takazono T, Kosai K, Morinaga Y, Nakamura S, et al. Clinical features, risk factors and treatment of fulminant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: a review of the Japanese literature. J Infect Chemother. 2014; 20:181–5.
7. Pellan M, Bastian C, Gaudelus J, Delacourt C, de Pontual L. Pulmonary necrotizing cavity caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Arch Pediatr. 2013; 20:1158–9.
8. Mishra R, Cano E, Venkatram S, Diaz-Fuentes G. An interesting case of mycoplasma pneumonia associated multisystem involvement and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. Respir Med Case Rep. 2017; 21:78–81.
crossref
9. Izumikawa K. Clinical features of severe or fatal Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia. Front Microbiol. 2016; 7:800.
crossref
10. Narita M. Classification of extrapulmonary manifestations due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infection on the basis of possible pathogenesis. Front Microbiol. 2016; 7:23.
crossref
11. Topcu Y, Bayram E, Karaoglu P, Yis U, Guleryuz H, Kurul SH. Coexis-tence of myositis, transverse myelitis, and Guillain Barré syndrome following Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in an adolescent. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2013; 8:59–63.
crossref
12. Khoury T, Sviri S, Rmeileh AA, Nubani A, Abutbul A, Hoss S, et al. Increased rates of intensive care unit admission in patients with Mycoplasma pneumoniae: a retrospective study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016; 22:711–4.
13. Hon KL, Leung AS, Cheung KL, Fu AC, Chu WC, Ip M, et al. Typical or atypical pneumonia and severe acute respiratory symptoms in PICU. Clin Respir J. 2015; 9:366–71.
crossref
14. Morozumi M, Takahashi T, Ubukata K. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae: characteristics of isolates and clinical aspects of communi-ty-acquired pneumonia. J Infect Chemother. 2010; 16:78–86.
crossref
15. Lee E, Cho HJ, Hong SJ, Lee J, Sung H, Yu J. Prevalence and clinical manifestations of macrolide resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in Korean children. Korean J Pediatr. 2017; 60:151–7.
crossref
16. Youn YS, Lee SC, Rhim JW, Shin MS, Kang JH, Lee KY. Early additional immune-modulators for Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: an observation study. Infect Chemother. 2014; 46:239–47.
17. Tamura A, Matsubara K, Tanaka T, Nigami H, Yura K, Fukaya T. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy for refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. J Infect. 2008; 57:223–8.
crossref
18. Yan Y, Wei Y, Jiang W, Hao C. The clinical characteristics of corticosteroid-resistant refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:39929.
crossref
19. Qasem JA, Khan ZU, Shiji G, Mustafa AS. Polymerase chain reaction as a sensitive and rapid method for specific detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in clinical samples. Microbiol Res. 2002; 157:77–82.
crossref
20. Miyashita N, Kawai Y, Kato T, Tanaka T, Akaike H, Teranishi H, et al. Rapid diagnostic method for the identification of Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory tract infection. J Infect Chemother. 2016; 22:327–30.
crossref
21. Yin YD, Zhao F, Ren LL, Song SF, Liu YM, Zhang JZ, et al. Evaluation of the Japanese Respiratory Society guidelines for the identification of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Respirology. 2012; 17:1131–6.
22. McIntosh K. Community-acquired pneumonia in children. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346:429–37.
crossref
23. Lee K, Kim WJ, Kim DL, Kim JH, Chong MS. Seroprevalences of Mycoplasma pneumoniae IgM antibodies among children living in Jeju island, Korea. Lab Med Online. 2014; 4:146–51.
24. Miyashita N, Kawai Y, Tanaka T, Akaike H, Teranishi H, Wakabayashi T, et al. Diagnostic sensitivity of a rapid antigen test for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae: comparison with realtime PCR. J Infect Chemother. 2015; 21:473–5.
25. Ferwerda A, Moll HA, de Groot R. Respiratory tract infections by Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children: a review of diagnostic and therapeutic measures. Eur J Pediatr. 2001; 160:483–91.
crossref
26. Liu FC, Chen PY, Huang FL, Tsai CR, Lee CY, Lin CF. Do serological tests provide adequate rapid diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection? Jpn J Infect Dis. 2008; 61:397–9.
27. Sillis M. The limitations of IgM assays in the serological diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. J Med Microbiol. 1990; 33:253–8.
crossref
28. Talkington DF, Shott S, Fallon MT, Schwartz SB, Thacker WL. Analysis of eight commercial enzyme immunoassay tests for detection of antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in human serum. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004; 11:862–7.
29. Waites KB, Talkington DF. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role as a human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004; 17:697–728.
30. Nadal D, Bossart W, Zucol F, Steiner F, Berger C, Lips U, et al. Communi-ty-acquired pneumonia in children due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae: diagnostic performance of a seminested 16S rDNA-PCR. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001; 39:15–9.
31. Honda J, Yano T, Kusaba M, Yonemitsu J, Kitajima H, Masuoka M, et al. Clinical use of capillary PCR to diagnose Mycoplasma pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38:1382–4.
32. Kakuya F, Kinebuchi T, Okubo H, Matsuo K. Comparison of oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swab specimens for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children with lower respiratory tract infection. J Pediatr. 2017; 189:218–21.
33. Reznikov M, Blackmore TK, Finlay-Jones JJ, Gordon DL. Comparison of nasopharyngeal aspirates and throat swab specimens in a polymerase chain reaction-based test for Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995; 14:58–61.
34. Hsieh SC, Kuo YT, Chern MS, Chen CY, Chan WP, Yu C. Mycoplasma pneumonia: clinical and radiographic features in 39 children. Pediatr Int. 2007; 49:363–7.
crossref
35. Wy HH, Min DH, Kim DS, Park MS, Shim JW, Jung HL, et al. Clinical characteristics of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in Korean children during the recent 3 epidemics. Allergy Asthma Respir Dis. 2017; 5:8–14.
36. Gao J, Yue B, Li H, Chen R, Wu C, Xiao M. Epidemiology and clinical features of segmental/lobar pattern Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: a ten-year retrospective clinical study. Exp Ther Med. 2015; 10:2337–44.
crossref
37. Waris ME, Toikka P, Saarinen T, Nikkari S, Meurman O, Vainionpää R, et al. Diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 36:3155–9.
38. Thurman KA, Walter ND, Schwartz SB, Mitchell SL, Dillon MT, Baugh-man AL, et al. Comparison of laboratory diagnostic procedures for detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in community outbreaks. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48:1244–9.

Fig. 1.
Correlation of the fever duration before admission with serum Mycoplasma pneumoniae IgM index in all patients (Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.438, P<0.001).
aard-6-248f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Receiver operating characteristic curve for serum M. pneumoniae (MP) IgM index in the diagnosis of MP pneumonia. The optimal cutoff values for serum MP IgM index were 1.05 (area under the curve, 0.892; sensitivity 83.9%, specificity 85.7%; P<0.001).
aard-6-248f2.tif
Table 1.
Demographic and clinical features and laboratory findings of study subjects
Variable A All patients (n=90) M. pneumoniae PCR
P-value M. pneumoniae IgM
P-value
Positive (n=62) Negative (n=28) Positive (n=58) Negative (n=32)
Age (yr) 5.7±3.7 6.4±3.6 4.2±3.5 0.080 6.0±3.5 5.1±4.0 0.261
Male sex 37 (41.1) 25 (67.6) 12 (32.4) 0.172 22 (37.9) 15 (46.9) 0.503
Hospital days 5.5±4.0 6.0±4.7 4.5±1.3 0.137 6.2±4.9 4.2±1.0 0.003
Symptoms              
 Fever before admission (day) 4.9±2.3 5.6±2.1 3.4±2.1 <0.001 5.5±2.2 3.8±2.1 0.001
 Fever after admission (day) 1.9±2.7 2.2±3.1 1.4±1.3 0.068 2.3±3.2 1.3±1.1 0.082
 Total fever duration (day) 6.9±3.7 7.7±3.7 4.7±2.5 <0.001 7.8±3.8 5.1±2.6 0.001
 Cough before admission (day) 5.4±3.0 5.9±2.7 4.3±3.3 0.001 5.9±2.8 4.6±3.2 0.046
 Peak temperature (° C) 38.6±0.8 38.7±0.7 38.5±1.0 0.413 38.5±1.5 38.6±0.9 0.413
Lobar/segmental pneumonia 46 (51.1) 36 (58.1) 10 (35.7) 0.048 33 (56.9) 13 (40.6) 0.139
Unilateral infiltration 47 (52.2) 37 (59.7) 10 (35.7) 0.038 33 (56.9) 14 (43.8) 0.232
Extrapulmonary symptoms 13 (14.4) 12 (19.4) 1 (3.6) 0.049 2 (6.3) 11 (19) 0.100
Pleural effusion 11 (12.2) 9 (14.5) 2 (7.1) 0.492 9 (15.5) 2 (6.3) 0.199
Steroid use 61 (67.8) 47 (75.8) 14 (50.0) 0.015 46 (79.3) 15 (46.9) 0.002
O2 need 12 (13.3) 5 (8.1) 7 (25.0) 0.029 6 (10.3) 6 (18.8) 0.262
Positive RV PCR 36 (40.0) 19 (30.6) 17 (60.7) 0.013 21 (36.2) 15 (46.9) 0.248
Laboratory findings              
 WBC (10/μL) 9.5±4.9 9.8±5.3 9.0±4.0 0.788 10.1±5.3 8.6±4.1 0.179
 Neutrophils (%) 64.1±14.4 66.6±12.5 58.5±17.0 0.056 66.3±12.8 60.0±16.5 0.047
 Lymphocyte (%) 25.4±12.1 23.0±9.6 30.8±15.1 0.027 23.4±10.2 29.0±14.4 0.058
 Monocyte (%) 8.4±3.2 7.9±3.0 9.6±3.4 0.052 8.0±2.9 9.3±3.6 0.068
 Eosinophil (%) 2.0±3.7 2.4±4.2 0.9±1.5 0.003 2.6±4.4 0.7±1.1 0.002
 ESR (mm/hr) 37.9±19.2 39.1±20.3 35.3±16.5 0.599 39.4±20.7 35.3±16.3 0.333
 CRP (mg/dL) 4.5±4.9 4.8±5.2 3.9±4.1 0.705 4.7±5.2 4.2±4.2 0.664
 AST (IU/L) 36.2±17.7 35.8±19.4 37.1±13.6 0.621 36.8±19.7 35.0±13.5 0.644
 ALT (IU/L) 26.9±34.7 25.0±25.7 31.1±49.5 0.960 26.3±26.6 28.0±46.5 0.826
Serum MP IgM (index) 2.9±3.0 3.9±3.0 0.8±1.3 <0.001 4.3±2.8 0.4±0.2 <0.001

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

MP, Mycoplasma pneumoniae; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RV, respiratory virus; WBC, white blood cells; ESR, erthyrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.

Table 2.
Relationship between serum Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) PCR and IgM antibodies of all study subjects (n=90, P<0.01)
MP IgM antibodies MP PCR Total
Positive Negative
Positive 53 (58.9) 5 (5.6) 58 (64.4)
Negative 9 (10.0) 23 (25.6) 32 (35.6)
Total (n=90) 62 (68.9) 28 (31.1) 90 (100)

Values are presented as number (%).

PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Table 3.
Diagnostic values of serum Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) IgM ant bodies with a MP PCR as the gold standard
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) PLR
MP IgM antibodies 85.5 82.1 91.4 71.9 4.79

PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predic tive value; PLR, positive likely hood ratio.

Table 4.
Propensity score matching and multivariable Analysis of clinical features and laboratory findings of Mycoplasma pneumoniae PCR positive pneumonia
Characteristic Adjusted odds rattio 95% CI P-value
Crude analysis      
 IgM positivity 27.09 8.80–99.34 <0.001
Matched analysis      
 IgM positivity 13.50 3.69–60.68 <0.001
Multivariable analysis      
 Fever duration before admission 1.60 1.11–2.31 0.013
 Unilateral infiltration 3.50 0.90–13.57 0.070
 Extrapulmonary symptoms 11.40 1.07–121.10 0.044
 O2 need 0.12 0.01–1.12 0.062
 Eosinophil (%) 1.25 0.93–1.67 0.140
 IgM titer (index) 2.61 1.44–4.73 0.002

PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CI, confidence interval.

Matched on age, fever before admission, cough before admission, lobar/segmental pneumonia, unilateral infiltration, O2 need, extrapulmonary symptoms, Lymphocyte, eosinophil.

Adjusted for fever before admission, cough before admission, lo-barsegmental pneumonia, unilateral infiltration, O2 need, extrapulmonary symptoms, Lymphocyte, eosinophil.

TOOLS
Similar articles