Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) therapy has many benefits to promote neurological and functional recovery in the field of neurorehabilitation after brain injury. VR-assisted neurorehabilitation can be applied in motor, sensori-motor, cognitive, activities of daily living (ADL), and telerehabilitation. Recent reports found that VR therapy appears to be a safe intervention that is effective at improving arm function and ADL function following stroke. Greater improvements were seen at a higher VR therapeutic dose. There has been insufficient evidence that VR therapy improved lower extremity gait speed, balance, and cognitive function after brain injury. As a result, the number of commercially available devices have increased and large-scale controlled trials have reported positive effects recently. Interface devices, various feedback methods, and the advancement of augmented reality technology are quickly developing, therefore, the potential value of VR therapy in neurorehabilitation will be high and its clinical application will be diversified.
References
1. Lam YS, Man DW, Tam SF, Weiss PL. Virtual reality training for stroke rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation. 2006; 21:245–253.
2. Lang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS, Boyd L, Jacobson Kimberley T, Schindler-Ivens SM, et al. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90:1692–1698.
3. Oujamaa L, Relave I, Froger J, Mottet D, Pelissier JY. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009; 52:269–293.
4. Prochnow D, Bermudez i Badia S, Schmidt J, Duff A, Brunheim S, Kleiser R, et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of visuomotor processing in a virtual reality-based paradigm: rehabilitation gaming system. Eur J Neurosci. 2013; 37:1441–1447.
5. Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. CD008349.
6. Laver KE, Lange B, George S, Deutsch JE, Saposnik G, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 11:CD008349.
7. Dos Santos LR, Carregosa AA, Masruha MR, Dos Santos PA, Da Silveira Coelho ML, Ferraz DD, et al. The use of Nintendo Wii in the rehabilitation of poststroke patients: a systematic review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015; 24:2298–2305.
8. Meldrum D, Glennon A, Herdman S, Murray D, McConn-Walsh R. Virtual reality rehabilitation of balance: assessment of the usability of the Nintendo Wii((R)) Fit Plus. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012; 7:205–210.
9. Mhatre PV, Vilares I, Stibb SM, Albert MV, Pickering L, Marciniak CM, et al. Wii Fit balance board playing improves balance and gait in Parkinson disease. PM R. 2013; 5:769–777.
10. Yin C, Hsueh YH, Yeh CY, Lo HC, Lan YT. A virtual reality-cycling training system for lower limb balance improvement. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:9276508.
11. Yang YR, Tsai MP, Chuang TY, Sung WH, Wang RY. Virtual reality-based training improves community ambulation in individuals with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture. 2008; 28:201–206.
12. Fung J, Richards CL, Malouin F, McFadyen BJ, Lamontagne A. A treadmill and motion coupled virtual reality system for gait training post-stroke. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006; 9:157–162.
13. Yavuzer G, Senel A, Atay MB, Stam HJ. “Playstation eyetoy games” improve upper extremity-related motor functioning in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008; 44:237–244.
14. Kwon JS, Park MJ, Yoon IJ, Park SH. Effects of virtual reality on upper extremity function and activities of daily living performance in acute stroke: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012; 31:379–385.
15. Akinwuntan AE, De Weerdt W, Feys H, Pauwels J, Baten G, Arno P, et al. Effect of simulator training on driving after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2005; 65:843–850.
16. Jannink MJ, Erren-Wolters CV, de Kort AC, van der Kooij H. An electric scooter simulation program for training the driving skills of stroke patients with mobility problems: a pilot study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008; 11:751–754.
17. Ku J, Lee JH, Han K, Kim SI, Kang YJ, Park ES. Validity and reliability of cognitive assessment using virtual environment technology in patients with stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 88:702–710.
18. Kim YM, Chun MH, Yun GJ, Song YJ, Young HE. The effect of virtual reality training on unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011; 35:309–315.
19. Kim BR, Chun MH, Kim LS, Park JY. Effect of virtual reality on cognition in stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011; 35:450–459.
20. Man DW, Poon WS, Lam C. The effectiveness of artificial intelligent 3-D virtual reality vocational problem-solving training in enhancing employment opportunities for people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013; 27:1016–1025.
21. Piron L, Turolla A, Agostini M, Zucconi C, Cortese F, Zampolini M, et al. Exercises for paretic upper limb after stroke: a combined virtual-reality and telemedicine approach. J Rehabil Med. 2009; 41:1016–1102.
22. Mirelman A, Bonato P, Deutsch JE. Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke. Stroke. 2009; 40:169–174.
23. Brütsch K, Schuler T, Koenig A, Zimmerli L, Koeneke SM, Lünenburger L, et al. Influence of virtual reality soccer game on walking performance in robotic assisted gait training for children. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010; 7:15.
24. Yeh SC, Lee SH, Chan RC, Wu Y, Zheng LR, Flynn S. The efficacy of a haptic-enhanced virtual reality system for precision grasp acquisition in stroke rehabilitation. J Healthc Eng. 2017; 2017:9840273.
25. Yeh SC, Lee SH, Chan RC, Chen S, Rizzo A. A virtual reality system integrated with robot-assisted haptics to simulate pinch-grip task: motor ingredients for the assessment in chronic stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014; 35:435–449.
26. Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N, Bikson M, Wagner T, Merabet L, et al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul. 2012; 5:175–195.
27. Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008; 1:206–223.
28. Simonetti D, Zollo L, Milighetti S, Miccinilli S, Bravi M, Ranieri F, et al. Literature review on the effects of tDCS coupled with robotic therapy in post stroke upper limb rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017; 11:268.
29. Chieffo R, Comi G, Leocani L. Noninvasive neuromodulation in poststroke gait disorders: rationale, feasibility, and state of the art. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016; 30:71–82.
30. Kim YJ, Ku J, Cho S, Kim HJ, Cho YK, Lim T, et al. Facilitation of corticospinal excitability by virtual reality exercise following anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy volunteers and subacute stroke subjects. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014; 11:124.
31. Lee SJ, Chun MH. Combination transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality therapy for upper extremity training in patients with subacute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95:431–438.
32. Bermudez i Badia S, Garcia Morgade A, Samaha H, Verschure PF. Using a hybrid brain computer interface and virtual reality system to monitor and promote cortical reorganization through motor activity and motor imagery training. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013; 21:174–181.
33. Zeng X, Zhu G, Yue L, Zhang M, Xie S. A feasibility study of ssvep-based passive training on an ankle rehabilitation robot. J Healthc Eng. 2017; 2017:6819056.