Abstract
Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC) develops as a result of acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, trauma, and postoperation. Although percutaneous drainage, surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Panceatogram are used as conventional treatments in complicated PFC, the clinical course of PFC is unsatisfactory due to its clinical success rate and the risk of procedure-related complications. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transmural drainage of PFC is a safe and effective modality for the management of PFC, particularly in patients with pancreas necrosis. A range of techniques and stents have been introduced and a newly designed metal stent is now available.
References
1. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013; 62:102–111.
2. Shin DH, Shin JH, Kang YW, et al. Management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Korean J Gastroenterol. 1999; 33:831–836.
3. Kwon SB, Kim IY, Bae KS, et al. Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2000; 36:529–535.
4. Rogers BH, Cicurel NJ, Seed RW. Transgastric needle aspiration of pancreatic pseudocyst through an endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 1975; 21:133–134.
5. Grimm H, Binmoeller KF, Soehendra N. Endosonography-guided drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992; 38:170–171.
6. Andrén-Sandberg A, Dervenis C. Pancreatic pseudocysts in the 21st century. Part I: classification, pathophysiology, anatomic considerations and treatment. JOP. 2004; 5:8–24.
7. Baron TH. Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts, pancreatic necrosis, and pancreatic duct leaks. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007; 17:559–579. vii.
8. Kozarek RA. Endoscopic management of pancreatic necrosis: not for the uncommitted. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62:101–104.
9. Levy MJ, Smyrk TC, Reddy RP, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided trucut biopsy of the cyst wall for diagnosing cystic pancreatic tumors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005; 3:974–979.
10. Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Phadnis MA, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: outcomes and predictors of treatment success in 211 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 15:2080–2088.
11. Varadarajulu S, Phadnis MA, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Multiple transluminal gateway technique for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74:74–80.
12. Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Endoscopic placement of permanent indwelling transmural stents in disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: does benefit outweigh the risks? Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74:1408–1412.
13. Melman L, Azar R, Beddow K, et al. Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23:267–271.
14. Navaneethan U, Njei B, Sanaka MR. 734 Endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: multiple plastic stents versus metal stents- a systematic review and metaanalysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 79:AB167–AB168.
15. Sharaiha RZ, DeFilippis EM, Kedia P, et al. Metal versus plastic for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage: clinical outcomes and success. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82:822–827.
16. Yoon SB, Lee IS, Choi MG. Metal versus plastic stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collection: a metaanalysis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018; 6:729–738.
17. Shah RJ, Shah JN, Waxman I, et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing covered self-expanding metal stents. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015; 13:747–752.
18. Smoczyń ski M, Marek I, Dubowik M, et al. Endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis–single center experience of 112 cases. Pancreatology. 2014; 14:137–142.
19. Tyberg A, Karia K, Gabr M, et al. Management of pancreatic fluid collections: a comprehensive review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22:2256–2270.
20. Singhal S, Rotman SR, Gaidhane M, Hahaleh M. Pancreatic fluid collection drainage by endoscopic ultrasound: an update. Clin Endosc. 2013; 46:506–514.
21. Bang JY, Hasan M, Navaneethan U, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage: may not be business as usual. Gut. 2017; 66:2054–2056.
22. Hookey LC, Debroux S, Delhaye M, Arvanitakis M, Le Moine O, Devière J. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collection in 116 patients: a comparison of etiologies, drainage techniques, and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63:635–643.
23. Antillon MR, Shah RJ, Stiegmann G, Chen YK. Single-step EUS-guided transmural drainage of simple and complicated pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63:797–803.
24. Azar RR, Oh YS, Janec EM, Early DS, Jonnalagadda SS, Edmundowicz SA. Wire-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage by using a modified needle knife and therapeutic echoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63:688–692.
25. Lopes CV, Pesenti C, Bories E, Caillol F, Giovannini M. Endoscopic-ultrasound-guided endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and abscesses. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007; 42:524–529.
26. Barthet M, Lamblin G, Gasmi M, Vitton V, Desjeux A, Grimaud JC. Clinical usefulness of a treatment algorithm for pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67:245–252.
27. Talreja JP, Shami VM, Ku J, Morris TD, Ellen K, Kahaleh M. Transenteric drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections with fully covered self-expanding metallic stents (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68:1199–1203.
28. Berzosa M, Maheshwari S, Patel KK, Shaib YH. Single-step endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections with a single self-expandable metal stent and standard linear echoendoscope. Endoscopy. 2012; 44:543–547.
29. Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Cennamo V, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage of infected pancreatic fluid collections with placement of covered self-expanding metal stents: a case series. Endoscopy. 2012; 44:429–433.
30. Penn DE, Draganov PV, Wagh MS, Forsmark CE, Gupte AR, Chauhan SS. Prospective evaluation of the use of fully covered self-expanding metal stents for EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76:679–684.
31. Itoi T, Binmoeller KF, Shah J, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endosonography-guided pancreatic pseudocyst and gallbladder drainage (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75:870–876.
32. Weilert F, Binmoeller KF, Shah JN, Bhat YM, Kane S. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with indeterminate adherence using temporary covered metal stents. Endoscopy. 2012; 44:780–783.
33. Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2013; 145:583–590.
34. Sarkaria S, Sethi A, Rondon C, et al. Pancreatic necrosectomy using covered esophageal stents: a novel approach. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014; 48:145–152.
35. Shah RJ, Shah JN, Waxman I, et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing covered self-expanding metal stents. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015; 13:747–752.
36. Walter D, Will U, Sanchez-Yague A, et al. A novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a prospective cohort study. Endoscopy. 2015; 47:63–67.
37. Mukai S, Itoi T, Sofuni A, Tsuchiya T, Gotoda T, Moriyasu F. Clinical evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage using a novel flared-type biflanged metal stent for pancreatic fluid collection. Endosc Ultrasound. 2015; 4:120–125.
38. Rinninella E, Kunda R, Dollhopf M, et al. EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections using a novel lumen-apposing metal stent on an electrocautery-enhanced delivery system: a large retrospective study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82:1039–1046.
39. Seewald S, Groth S, Omar S, et al. Aggressive endoscopic therapy for pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess: a new safe and effective treatment algorithm (videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62:92–100.
40. Charnley RM, Lochan R, Gray H, O'Sullivan CB, Scott J, Oppong KE. Endoscopic necrosectomy as primary therapy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis. Endoscopy. 2006; 38:925–928.
41. Voermans RP, Veldkamp MC, Rauws EA, Bruno MJ, Fockens P. Endoscopic transmural debridement of symptomatic organized pancreatic necrosis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66:909–916.
42. Papachristou GI, Takahashi N, Chahal P, Sarr MG, Baron TH. Peroral endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Ann Surg. 2007; 245:943–951.
43. Escourrou J, Shehab H, Buscail L, et al. Peroral transgastric/transduodenal necrosectomy: success in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis. Ann Surg. 2008; 248:1074–1080.
44. Seifert H, Biermer M, Schmitt W, et al. Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD study). Gut. 2009; 58:1260–1266.
45. Gardner TB, Chahal P, Papachristou GI, et al. A comparison of direct endoscopic necrosectomy with transmural endoscopic drainage for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69:1085–1094.
Table 1.
Study number | Drainage procedure used | Drain used | Clinical success | Technical success | Complication | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hookey et al. (2006)22 | 116 | Conventional | Stents | 88% | 88% | 11% complication rate |
Antillon et al. (2006)23 | 33 | EUS-guided | Double-pigtail stent | 94% | 82% | 2 major complications, 3 minor complications |
Azar et al. (2006)24 | 23 | EUS-guided | Double-pigtail stent | 91% | 91% | |
Lopes et al. (2007)25 | 51 | EUS-guided | Straight/double-pigtail stent | 94% | 94% | 17.7% stent migration/obstruction |
Barthet et al. (2008)26 | 50 | EUS-guided | Double-pigtail stent/straight polyethylene | 90% | 98% | 18% morbidity, 5 superinfections |
Talreja et al. (2008)27 | 18 | EUS-guided | FCSEMS | 95% | 78% | 5 superinfection, 2 bleeding, 1 and inner migration |
Berzosa et al. (2012)28 | 7 | EUS-guided | FCSEMS | 100% | 83% | |
Fabbri et al. (2012)29 | 22 | EUS-guided | FCSEMS | 77% | 77% | |
Penn et al. (2012)30 | 20 | EUS-guided | FCSEMS | 70% | 70% | 2 pseudocyst infection, 1 post transmural drainage fever and post-ERCP pancreatitis |
Itoi et al. (2012)31 | 15 | EUS-guided | Axios stent®a | 100% | 100% | |
Weilert et al. (2012)32 | 18 | EUS-guided | FCSEMS | 78% | 78% | |
Varadarajulu et al. (2013)33 | 20 | Endoscopic | Plastic stents | 95% | 90% | |
cystogastrostomy | ||||||
Sarkaria et al. (2014)34 | 17 | EUS-guided | esophageal-FCSEMS | 88% | 88% | 1 perforation during tract dilation |
Shah et al. (2015)35 | 33 | EUS-guided | Axios stent®a | 91% | 93% | |
Walter et al. (2015)36 | 61 | EUS-guided | Axios stent®a | 93% | 98% | 3 abdominal pain, spontaneous stent migration, 1 back pain, 1 access-site infection, and stent dislodgement, 3 stent migration, 3 stent dislodgement during necrosectomy, 2 stent removal during surgery, or 1 refusal by the patient |
Mukai et al. (2015)37 | 21 | EUS-guided/ DEN | Nagi stent®b | 100% | 100% | 1 psuedocyst recurrence in cystogramy |
Rinninella et al. (2015)38 | 18 | EUS-guided | Axios stent®a | 100% | ||
Sharaiha et al. (2015)15 | 230 | EUS-guided | 118 plastic stents/112 FCSEMS | 75–90% | <90% |
Table 2.
Study number | Drainage procedure used | Drain used | Clinical success | Technical success | Complication | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seewald et al. (2005)39 | 13 | DEN | Double-pigtail stent | 91% | 91% | 4 minor bleeding after balloon dilation, necrosectomy |
Charnley et al. (2006)40 | 13 | DEN | Double-pigtail stents | 92.3% | 92.3% | |
Voermans et al. (2007)41 | 25 | DEN | Double-pigtail stents | 93% | 93% | 2 surgery, 1 hemorrhage, 1 perforation of cyst wall |
Papachristou et al. (2007)42 | 53 | DEN | Double-pigtail stents | 81% | 81% | 12 required operation after initial endoscopic drainage/debridement, due to 3 persistence of WOPN, 2 recurrence of a PFCs, 2 cutaneous fistula formation, or 1 technical failure, persistence of pancreatic pain, colonic obstruction, perforation, and flank abscess |
Escourrou et al. (2008)43 | 13 | DEN | Double-pigtail stents | 100% | 100% | 3 bleeding, 3 transient aggravation of sepsis |
Seifert et al. (2009)44 | 93 | DEN | Multiple stents | 80% | 80% | |
Gardner et al. (2009)45 | 45 | DEN and EUS-guided drainage | Multiple stents | 45% | DEN 88%, standard endoscopy | 13 bleeding, 5 perforations of the necrosis, 2 fistular formation, 2 air embolism, 2 complications at ohter organs |
drainage 45% | ||||||
Gardner et al. (2011)46 | 104 | DEN | Multiple stents | 91% | 91% | 14%; included 5 retrogastric perforations/pneumoperitoneum |
Attam et al. (2014)47 | 10 | DEN and transmural drain | Novel large-bore esophageal FCSEMS | 90% | 100% | |
Smoczyń ski et al. (2014)18 | 112 | Endoscopic drainage | Multiple stents | 84% | 93% | 19 stoma bleeding, 4 GI perforation, 2 collection perforation, 1 sepsis, 3 stent migration |
Sarkaria et al. (2014)34 | 17 | EUS-guided | Esohageal FCSEMS | 83% | 83% | |
Mukai et al. (2015)37 | 8 | DEN | Nagi stent®a | 100% | 100% | |
Rinninella et al. (2015)38 | 52 | EUS guided | Axios stent®b | 90.4% | 100% | 3 surgery due to infection, 1 perforated wall |
Walter et al. (2015)36 | 46 | EUS guided | Axios stent®b | 81% | 81% | 9% |