Introduction

Materials and Methods
Table 2
Assessment of methodological quality of systematic using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews items

*1: Was an ‘a priori’ design provided?
†2: Was there duplicate study selection and data extraction?
‡3: Was a comprehensive literature search performed?
§4: Was the status of publication (e.g., grey literature) used as an inclusion criterion?
‖5: Was a list of studies (included and excluded) provided?
¶6: Were the characteristics of the included studies provided?
**7: Was the scientific quality of the included studies assessed and documented?
††8: Was the scientific quality of the included studies used appropriately in formulating conclusions?
‡‡9: Were the methods used to combine the findings of the studies appropriate?
§§10: Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed?
‖‖11: Was the conflict of interest stated?
AMSTAR: Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews
Table 3
Assessment of methodological quality of systematic according to Center for Evidence-Based Management

*1: Did the study address a clearly focused question?
†2: Was a comprehensive literature search conducted using relevant research databases (e.g., ABI/INFORM, Business Source Premier, PsycINFO, Web of Science, etc.)
‡3: Is the search systematic and reproducible (e.g., were searched information sources listed, were search terms provided)?
§4: Has publication bias been prevented as far as possible (e.g., were attempts made at collecting unpublished data)?
‖5: Are the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly defined (e.g., population, outcomes of interest, study design)?
¶6: Was the methodological quality of each study assessed using predetermined quality criteria?
**7: Are the key features (population, sample size, study design, outcome measures, effect sizes, limitations) of the included studies described?
††8: Has the meta-analysis been conducted correctly?
‡‡9: Were the results similar from study to study?
§§10: Is the effect size practical relevant?
‖‖11: How precise is the estimate of the effect? Were confidence intervals given?
¶¶12: Can the results be applied to your organization?
AMSTAR: Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews

Results
1. The effect of isoflavones on the cognitive functions among menopausal women
2. The effect of phytoestrogens on the cognitive functions in men and women
3. The effect of soy on cognitive functions in men and women
4. The effect of red clover on the cognitive functions
5. The effect of Gingko and ginseng on the cognitive functions
6. The effect of black cohosh on the cognitive functions

Discussion

Conclusion
