Journal List > Korean J Adult Nurs > v.30(4) > 1100187

Lee and Yun: Factors Influencing Resilience in Hospitalized Patients with Stroke

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify the factors influencing resilience of patients with stroke.

Methods

A cross-sectional descriptive research design was used. The subjects of this study were 136 hospitalized patients with stroke in Dankook university hospital in Cheonan, Korea. Data were collected from August 2016 to March 2017 using a structured questionnaire including patient's characteristics, depression, uncertainty, social support, self-efficacy, and resilience. Data were analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 21.0 program for descriptive statistics, using independent t-test, one way analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and multiple regression.

Results

Resilience had a statistically significant relationship with education(t=-2.17, p=.032), duration of diagnosis (F=4.09, p=.019), and mobility(F=4.44, p=.014). Further, depression(r=-.30, p<.001), self-efficacy(r=.44, p<.001), and social support (r=.37, p<.001) were significantly correlated with resilience. In the multiple regression analysis, self-efficacy and social support were statistically significant factors that explained 30.3% of variance of resilience in hospitalized patients with stroke. Depression and uncertainty were not found to be significant.

Conclusion

The results of the study indicate that factors influencing resilience are self-efficacy and social support. Therefore, nursing intervention programs for increasing the resilience should include strategies for improving self-efficacy and social support for hospitalized patients with stroke.

REFERENCES

1. Statistics Korea. Results of medical history survey [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Statistical Information Service;2017. [cited 2017 December 15]. Available from:. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=350&tblId=DT_35007_N042&conn_path=I2. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=350&tblId=DT_35007_N042&conn_path=I2.
2. Mottillo S, Filion KB, Genest J, Joseph L, Pilote L, Poirier P, et al. The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and metaanalysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010; 56(14):1113–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.034.
3. Bernhardt J, Godecke E, Johnson L, Langhorne P. Early rehabilitation after stroke. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2017; 30(1):48–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000404.
crossref
4. Seo MJ, Kang HS, Lim NY, Kim KS, No KH. Integrative rehabilitation nursing. 1st ed. Seoul: Shinkwang;2000. p. 17–27.
5. Park YS, Kim JH. Factors influencing the motivation for rehabilitation in patients with spinal cord injury. Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing. 2003; 17(1):83–95.
6. Imm SJ. The factors influencing the resilience in stroke patients at home [master's thesis]. Seoul: Seoul National University;2013.
7. Choi ES, Lee EN, Cho JL. The mediating effect of resilience on depression and rehabilitation motivation in stroke patients. Journal of Muscle and Joint Health. 2016; 23(1):19–27. https://doi.org/10.5953/JMJH.2016.23.1.19.
crossref
8. Kwak SY, Byeon YS. Factors influencing resilience of patients with hematologic malignancy. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2013; 25(1):95–104. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.1.95.
crossref
9. Yang JH, Kim OS. The structural equation model on resilience of breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2016; 46(3):327–37. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2016.46.3.327.
crossref
10. Jun SY, Ju HJ, Yu JS, Lee JH. A prediction model for the resilience and the quality of life in cancer patients with radiothera-py. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2015; 15(4):228–38. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2015.15.4.228.
crossref
11. Lima RJ, Carvalho Viana LR, Medeiros TM, Rocha Leal NP, Costa TF, Martins KP, et al. Resilience in individuals who suf-fered from stroke: integrative literature review. International Archives of Medicine. 2016; 9(6):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3823/1909.
12. Lee KH, Lee SW. Concept analysis of resilience. The Korean Journal of Stress Research. 2005; 13(1):9–18.
13. Olsson CA, Bond L, Burns JM, Vella-Brodrick DA, Sawyer SM. Adolescent resilience: a concept analysis. Journal of Adoles-cence. 2003; 26(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(02)00118-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(02)00118-5.
crossref
14. Driver S, Warren AM, Reynolds M, Agtarap S, Hamilton R, Trost Z, et al. Identifying predictors of resilience at inpatient and 3-month post-spinal cord injury. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2016; 39(1):77–84. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000270.
crossref
15. Cha KS, Kim KH. Impact of uncertainty on resilience in cancer patients. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2012; 12(2):139–46. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2012.12.2.139.
crossref
16. Cho HM, Yoo EK. The factors influencing the resilience among hemodialysis patients. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2014; 26(6):614–20. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2014.26.6.614.
crossref
17. Beck AT, Steer RA. Internal consistencies of the original and re-vised Beck Depression inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1984; 40(6):1365–7.
crossref
18. Lee JK. A study on construction of exercise prediction model for the low back pain patients [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University;1997.
19. Mishel MH. Uncertainty in illness. Journal of Nursing Scholar-ship. 1988; 20(4):225–32.
crossref
20. Kim EM, Kim KS. A structural model on quality of life for recipients of liver transplants. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2007; 14(3):340–50.
21. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist. 1982; 37(2):122–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.
crossref
22. Kim KS. A correlational study on activities of daily living, self- efficacy, stroke specific quality of life and need for self-help management programs for patients with hemiplegia at home. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2001; 8(1):81–94.
23. Kim HS, Kim YS. A study on the quality of life, self-efficacy and family support of stroke patients in oriental medicine hospitals. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion. 2003; 20(1):111–30.
24. Kim OS. A study on the correlation between perceived social support and the quality of life of hemodialysis patients [master's thesis]. Seoul: Seoul National University;1993.
25. Wagnild G. The Resilience Scale User's guide for the US En-glish version of the Resilience Scale and the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14). Montana: Resilience center;2009.
26. Lee KC. Statistics for health care. 1st ed. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa;2011. p. 152–62.
27. Song YM, Lee CM, Lee GH, Kim JI. Comparison of the clinical course of ischemic stroke depending on the stroke subtypes. Journal of the Korean Neurological Association. 2007; 25(2):143–8.
28. Kim SR, Chung SJ, Shin NM, Shin HW, Kim MS, Lee SJ. Resilience in patients with parkinson's disease. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2010; 22(1):60–9.
29. Kim JI, Byeon YS. A study on the factors affecting resilience in patients with colon cancer. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2013; 13(4):256–64. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2013.13.4.256.
crossref
30. Volz M, Möbus J, Letsch C, Werheid K. The influence of early depressive symptoms, social support and decreasing self-efficacy on depression 6 months post-stroke. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2016; 206:252–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.07.041S.
crossref

Table 1.
Differences in Resilience according to Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Stroke (N=136)
Characteristics Categories n (%) M± SD t or F (p)
Gender Men 95 (69.9) 76.86±13.40 1.18
Women 41 (30.1) 73.15±18.08 (.241)
Age (year) 65 70 (51.5) 76.57±14.51 0.66
≥65 66 (48.5) 74.86±15.55 (.510)
Spouse Yes 107 (78.7) 75.07±15.07 -1.00
No 29 (21.3) 78.21±14.71 (.320)
Religion Yes 78 (57.4) 76.60±16.03 0.77
No 58 (42.6) 74.59±13.53 (.440)
Education ≤ Middle school 74 (54.4) 73.23±15.00 -2.17
≥ High school 62 (45.6) 78.74±14.54 (.032)
Economic status High 14 (10.3) 81.71±11.45 2.52
Middle 84 (61.8) 76.49±15.45 (.084)
Low 38 (27.9) 71.89±14.45
Primary caregiver Spouse 65 (47.8) 76.69±14.67 .221
Offspring 25 (18.4) 74.84±14.14 (.926)
Parent or sibling 15 (11.0) 74.13±20.17
Paid caregiver 13 (9.6) 73.38±14.12
None 18 (13.2) 76.61±14.30
Previous stroke No 113 (83.1) 76.26±15.79 0.39
Yes 23 (16.9) 73.26±10.50 (.678)
Type of stroke Infarction 88 (64.7) 76.08±12.48 0.56
Hemorrhage 41 (30.1) 74.90±19.57 (.572)
Both infarction and hemorrhage 7 (5.2) 76.43±15.45
Duration of diagnosis (month) 1 a 80 (58.8) 78.75±13.20 4.09
2 b 23 (16.9) 71.61±18.63 (.019)
≥3 c 33 (24.3) 71.33±14.98 a> b, c
Mobility Move alone a 60 (44.1) 78.03±13.81 4.44
Using assistive devices b 20 (14.7) 80.95±12.85 (.014)
Help of others with assistive devices c 56 (41.2) 71.43±15.99 b> c

Scheffé test.

Table 2.
The Depression, Uncertainty, Self-efficacy, Social Support, and Resilience in Patients with Stroke (N=136)
Variables M± SD Range Min Max
Depression 26.98±8.03 10~50 10 47
Uncertainty 47.99±10.56 16~80 22 75
Self-efficacy 81.44±20.78 10~100 20 100
Social support 74.47±9.55 18~90 49 90
Resilience 75.74±14.99 14~98 21 98
Table 3.
Correlation of Depression, Uncertainty, Self-efficacy, Social Support, and Resilience in Patients with Stroke (N=136)
Variables Depression Uncertainty Self-efficacy Social support
r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p)
Resilience -.30 (<.001) -.16 (.059) .44 (<.001) .37 (<.001)
Table 4.
Factors Influencing Resilience in Patients with Stroke (N=136)
Variables B SE β t p
(Constant) 13.62 12.51 1.09 .278
Education 1 4.03 2.25 .13 1.79 .076
Duration of diagnosis 1 -3.74 3.04 -.09 -1.23 .221
Duration of diagnosis 2 -3.13 2.71 -.09 -1.16 .250
Mobility 1 4.57 3.37 .10 1.36 .177
Mobility 2 0.42 3.01 .01 0.14 .888
Uncertainty 0.02 0.11 .02 0.16 .875
Self-efficacy 0.26 0.07 .37 3.73 .001
Social support 0.52 0.12 .33 4.47 .001
Adj. R2=.303, F=8.31, p<.001

SE=standard error;

Dummy variable : Education (0=≤ middle school, 1=≥ High school), Duration of diagnosis (0=1month, 1=2month, 2=≥3month), Mobility (0=Move alone, 1=Using assistive devices, 2=Help of others with assistive devices).

TOOLS
Similar articles