Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to identify the factors influencing resilience of patients with stroke.
Methods
A cross-sectional descriptive research design was used. The subjects of this study were 136 hospitalized patients with stroke in Dankook university hospital in Cheonan, Korea. Data were collected from August 2016 to March 2017 using a structured questionnaire including patient's characteristics, depression, uncertainty, social support, self-efficacy, and resilience. Data were analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 21.0 program for descriptive statistics, using independent t-test, one way analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and multiple regression.
Results
Resilience had a statistically significant relationship with education(t=-2.17, p=.032), duration of diagnosis (F=4.09, p=.019), and mobility(F=4.44, p=.014). Further, depression(r=-.30, p<.001), self-efficacy(r=.44, p<.001), and social support (r=.37, p<.001) were significantly correlated with resilience. In the multiple regression analysis, self-efficacy and social support were statistically significant factors that explained 30.3% of variance of resilience in hospitalized patients with stroke. Depression and uncertainty were not found to be significant.
Conclusion
The results of the study indicate that factors influencing resilience are self-efficacy and social support. Therefore, nursing intervention programs for increasing the resilience should include strategies for improving self-efficacy and social support for hospitalized patients with stroke.
REFERENCES
1. Statistics Korea. Results of medical history survey [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Statistical Information Service;2017. [cited 2017 December 15]. Available from:. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=350&tblId=DT_35007_N042&conn_path=I2. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=350&tblId=DT_35007_N042&conn_path=I2.
2. Mottillo S, Filion KB, Genest J, Joseph L, Pilote L, Poirier P, et al. The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and metaanalysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010; 56(14):1113–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.034.
3. Bernhardt J, Godecke E, Johnson L, Langhorne P. Early rehabilitation after stroke. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2017; 30(1):48–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000404.
4. Seo MJ, Kang HS, Lim NY, Kim KS, No KH. Integrative rehabilitation nursing. 1st ed. Seoul: Shinkwang;2000. p. 17–27.
5. Park YS, Kim JH. Factors influencing the motivation for rehabilitation in patients with spinal cord injury. Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing. 2003; 17(1):83–95.
6. Imm SJ. The factors influencing the resilience in stroke patients at home [master's thesis]. Seoul: Seoul National University;2013.
7. Choi ES, Lee EN, Cho JL. The mediating effect of resilience on depression and rehabilitation motivation in stroke patients. Journal of Muscle and Joint Health. 2016; 23(1):19–27. https://doi.org/10.5953/JMJH.2016.23.1.19.
8. Kwak SY, Byeon YS. Factors influencing resilience of patients with hematologic malignancy. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2013; 25(1):95–104. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.1.95.
9. Yang JH, Kim OS. The structural equation model on resilience of breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2016; 46(3):327–37. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2016.46.3.327.
10. Jun SY, Ju HJ, Yu JS, Lee JH. A prediction model for the resilience and the quality of life in cancer patients with radiothera-py. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2015; 15(4):228–38. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2015.15.4.228.
11. Lima RJ, Carvalho Viana LR, Medeiros TM, Rocha Leal NP, Costa TF, Martins KP, et al. Resilience in individuals who suf-fered from stroke: integrative literature review. International Archives of Medicine. 2016; 9(6):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3823/1909.
12. Lee KH, Lee SW. Concept analysis of resilience. The Korean Journal of Stress Research. 2005; 13(1):9–18.
13. Olsson CA, Bond L, Burns JM, Vella-Brodrick DA, Sawyer SM. Adolescent resilience: a concept analysis. Journal of Adoles-cence. 2003; 26(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(02)00118-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(02)00118-5.
14. Driver S, Warren AM, Reynolds M, Agtarap S, Hamilton R, Trost Z, et al. Identifying predictors of resilience at inpatient and 3-month post-spinal cord injury. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2016; 39(1):77–84. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000270.
15. Cha KS, Kim KH. Impact of uncertainty on resilience in cancer patients. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2012; 12(2):139–46. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2012.12.2.139.
16. Cho HM, Yoo EK. The factors influencing the resilience among hemodialysis patients. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2014; 26(6):614–20. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2014.26.6.614.
17. Beck AT, Steer RA. Internal consistencies of the original and re-vised Beck Depression inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1984; 40(6):1365–7.
18. Lee JK. A study on construction of exercise prediction model for the low back pain patients [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University;1997.
20. Kim EM, Kim KS. A structural model on quality of life for recipients of liver transplants. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2007; 14(3):340–50.
21. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist. 1982; 37(2):122–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.
22. Kim KS. A correlational study on activities of daily living, self- efficacy, stroke specific quality of life and need for self-help management programs for patients with hemiplegia at home. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2001; 8(1):81–94.
23. Kim HS, Kim YS. A study on the quality of life, self-efficacy and family support of stroke patients in oriental medicine hospitals. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion. 2003; 20(1):111–30.
24. Kim OS. A study on the correlation between perceived social support and the quality of life of hemodialysis patients [master's thesis]. Seoul: Seoul National University;1993.
25. Wagnild G. The Resilience Scale User's guide for the US En-glish version of the Resilience Scale and the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14). Montana: Resilience center;2009.
26. Lee KC. Statistics for health care. 1st ed. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa;2011. p. 152–62.
27. Song YM, Lee CM, Lee GH, Kim JI. Comparison of the clinical course of ischemic stroke depending on the stroke subtypes. Journal of the Korean Neurological Association. 2007; 25(2):143–8.
28. Kim SR, Chung SJ, Shin NM, Shin HW, Kim MS, Lee SJ. Resilience in patients with parkinson's disease. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2010; 22(1):60–9.
Table 1.
Characteristics | Categories | n (%) | M± SD | t or F (p) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Men | 95 (69.9) | 76.86±13.40 | 1.18 |
Women | 41 (30.1) | 73.15±18.08 | (.241) | |
Age (year) | 65 | 70 (51.5) | 76.57±14.51 | 0.66 |
≥65 | 66 (48.5) | 74.86±15.55 | (.510) | |
Spouse | Yes | 107 (78.7) | 75.07±15.07 | -1.00 |
No | 29 (21.3) | 78.21±14.71 | (.320) | |
Religion | Yes | 78 (57.4) | 76.60±16.03 | 0.77 |
No | 58 (42.6) | 74.59±13.53 | (.440) | |
Education | ≤ Middle school | 74 (54.4) | 73.23±15.00 | -2.17 |
≥ High school | 62 (45.6) | 78.74±14.54 | (.032) | |
Economic status | High | 14 (10.3) | 81.71±11.45 | 2.52 |
Middle | 84 (61.8) | 76.49±15.45 | (.084) | |
Low | 38 (27.9) | 71.89±14.45 | ||
Primary caregiver | Spouse | 65 (47.8) | 76.69±14.67 | .221 |
Offspring | 25 (18.4) | 74.84±14.14 | (.926) | |
Parent or sibling | 15 (11.0) | 74.13±20.17 | ||
Paid caregiver | 13 (9.6) | 73.38±14.12 | ||
None | 18 (13.2) | 76.61±14.30 | ||
Previous stroke | No | 113 (83.1) | 76.26±15.79 | 0.39 |
Yes | 23 (16.9) | 73.26±10.50 | (.678) | |
Type of stroke | Infarction | 88 (64.7) | 76.08±12.48 | 0.56 |
Hemorrhage | 41 (30.1) | 74.90±19.57 | (.572) | |
Both infarction and hemorrhage | 7 (5.2) | 76.43±15.45 | ||
Duration of diagnosis (month) | 1 a | 80 (58.8) | 78.75±13.20 | 4.09 |
2 b | 23 (16.9) | 71.61±18.63 | (.019) | |
≥3 c | 33 (24.3) | 71.33±14.98 | a> b, c† | |
Mobility | Move alone a | 60 (44.1) | 78.03±13.81 | 4.44 |
Using assistive devices b | 20 (14.7) | 80.95±12.85 | (.014) | |
Help of others with assistive devices c | 56 (41.2) | 71.43±15.99 | b> c† |
Table 2.
Table 3.
Variables | Depression | Uncertainty | Self-efficacy | Social support |
---|---|---|---|---|
r (p) | r (p) | r (p) | r (p) | |
Resilience | -.30 (<.001) | -.16 (.059) | .44 (<.001) | .37 (<.001) |
Table 4.
Variables | B | SE | β | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Constant) | 13.62 | 12.51 | 1.09 | .278 | |
Education 1† | 4.03 | 2.25 | .13 | 1.79 | .076 |
Duration of diagnosis 1† | -3.74 | 3.04 | -.09 | -1.23 | .221 |
Duration of diagnosis 2† | -3.13 | 2.71 | -.09 | -1.16 | .250 |
Mobility 1† | 4.57 | 3.37 | .10 | 1.36 | .177 |
Mobility 2† | 0.42 | 3.01 | .01 | 0.14 | .888 |
Uncertainty | 0.02 | 0.11 | .02 | 0.16 | .875 |
Self-efficacy | 0.26 | 0.07 | .37 | 3.73 | .001 |
Social support | 0.52 | 0.12 | .33 | 4.47 | .001 |
Adj. R2=.303, F=8.31, p<.001 |