Journal List > Korean J Women Health Nurs > v.24(2) > 1100171

Kim, Lee, Kim, and Nho: Factors Affecting Psychosocial Adjustment in Patients with Surgical Removal of Benign Breast Tumor

Abstract

Purpose

To identify factors influencing psychosocial adjustment in patients with surgical removal of benign breast tumor.

Methods

With a survey design, data were collected using the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale-Self Report (PAIS-SR), Body Image Scale, Physical Discomfort Scale, and Family Support Scale with patients who had had surgical removal of a benign breast tumor from September to November 2017. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and stepwise multiple regression.

Results

The mean scores for physical discomfort, body image, family support, and psychosocial adjustment were 1.57±0.51, 0.37±0.64, 3.62±0.67, and 4.00±0.45, respectively. Family support, body image, physical discomfort, number of surgical removal of benign breast tumor (twice), and cancer insurance status (yes) were verified as factors influencing psychosocial adjustment. These factors accounted for 57.4% of psychosocial adjustment.

Conclusion

In this study, family support, body image, and physical discomfort were identified as significant predictors of psychosocial adjustment. Therefore, this study can be used as fundamental data to develop nursing intervention strategies in order to increase psychosocial adjustment in patients with surgical removal of a benign breast tumor.

References

1. National Cancer Information Center. Breast cancer [Internet]. Reston: Author;2017. [cited October 16, 2017]. Available from:. https://www.cancer.go.kr/lay1/program/S1T211C217/cancer/view.do?cancer_seq=4757.
2. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. 2016 National health insurance statistical Yearbook [Internet]. Reston: Author;2016. [cited October 20, 2017]. Available from:. http://www.hira.or.kr/bbsDummy.do?pgmid=HIRAA02004. 5020000&brdScnBltNo=4&brdBltNo=2309#none.
3. Korean Breast Cancer Society. 2016 Breast cancer facts & figures [Internet]. Reston: Author;2016. [cited October 20, 2017]. Available from:. http://www.kbcs.or.kr/sub02/sub04.html#none.
4. Yurek D, Farrar W, Anderson BL. Breast cancer surgery: comparing surgical groups and determining individual differences in postoperative sexuality and body change stress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Phycology. 2000; 68(4):697–709. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022–006x.68.4.697.
crossref
5. Jeong KS, Park GJ. Relationships among body image, self-esteem and health promotion behavior in mastectomy patients. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2007; 7(1):36–46.
6. Kim HY, So HS. A structural model for psychosocial adjustment in patients with early breast cancer. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2012; 42(1):105–115. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.1.105.
crossref
7. Jang KM. Body change stress and pshychosocial adjustment of the survivors of postmastectomy breast cacner parients: the moderating & mediation effects of self-esteem. The Korean Journal of Stress Research. 2009; 17(2):121–130.
8. Kim JH, Chung KY, Kim KD, Byun HS. Perceived family support and quality of life in patients with cancer. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2009; 9(1):52–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820–200106000–00007.
9. Derogatis LR. Lopez M. The psycholsocial adjustment to illness sacle: administration, scoring, and procedures manual I. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research;1983.
10. Hopwood P, Fletcher L, Lee A, AI Ghazal S. A body image scale for use with cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer. 2001; 37(2):189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959–8049(00)00353–1.
crossref
11. Kim CY, Choe BM, Park JH. The validation of korean version of body image scale in patients with breast cancer-A preliminary study. Journal of the Korean Society of Biological Therapies in Psychiatry. 2013; 19(1):51–70.
12. Kang HS. Experimental study of the effects of reinforcement education for rehabilitation on hemiplegia patients' self-care activities [master thesis]. Seoul: Yonsei University;1984. p. 125. p.
13. Lee EH. Mediation Effect of hope between fatigue and psycho-soical adjustment in women with breast cancer. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2000; 30(4):257–868. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2000.30.4.857.
crossref
14. Lee KH. Post-operative morbidity, menopause symptoms and quality of life in patients with breast cancer [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University;2006. p. 1–76.
15. Jo TW, Kim YS, Cho HJ, Kim KC. Efficacy after excisional biopsy of breast mass with 3. ultrasound-guided vacuum assisted biopsy device (mammotome). Medical Journal of Chosum University. 2008; 33(3):33–7.
16. Cho IJ, A study about the influences of body image, anxiety, depression on the empowerment in the breast cancer patients [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University;2016. p. 60. p.
17. Jang MY, Kim JY. A structural model for stress, coping, and psychosocial adjustment: A multigroup analysis by stages of survivorship in korean women with breast cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2018; 33:41–48. http://lps3.doi.org.proxy.jbnu.ac.kr/10.1016/j.ejon.2018.01.004.
crossref
18. Kim HY, Ko E. Psychosocial adjustment between younger and older breast cancer survivors. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2012; 2(4):280–288. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2012.12.4.280.
crossref
19. Cho OH, Yoo YS. Psychosocial adjustment, marital intimacy and family support of postmastectomy patients. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2009; 9(2):129–135.
20. Jeon JY, Kim HJ. A Study on body image, spouse support and psychosocial adjustment of patients in mastectomy. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Adult Nursing. 1996; 8(2):394–409.
21. Helena M, Maria CC. A longitudinal study about the body image and psychosocial adjustment of breast cancer patients during the course of the disease. European Journal Of Oncology Nursing. 2010; 14(4):263–270. http://lps3.doi.org.proxy.jbnu.ac.kr/10.1016/j.ejon.2010.04.001.
22. Budin WC. Psychosocial adjustment to breast cancer in unmarried women. Research in Nursing & Health. 1998; 21(2):55–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098–240x(199804)21:2<155::aid-nur6>3.0.co;2-i.
crossref
23. Matthew EE, Cook PF. Relationships among optimism, well-bing, self-transcendence, coping, and social support in women during treatment for breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2009; 18(7):716–726. https://doi.org.proxy.jbnu.ac.kr/10.1002/pon.1461.

Table 1.
Differences in Psychosocial Adjustment according to Participants' Characteristics (N=183)
Variables Categories n (%) or M±SD Psychosocial adjustment
M±SD t or F (p) Scheffé
Age (year) <40 40∼49 24 (13.1) 105 (57.4) 4.13±0.31 3.98±0.46 1.11 (.333)  
  >49 54 (29.5) 46.47±6.70 3.99±0.44    
Married state Married Single 162 (88.5) 3 (1.6) 4.02±0.43 3.86±0.23 1.55 (.215)  
  Etc 18 (9.8) 3.84±0.56    
Educational level <High schoola High schoolb 8 (4.4) 99 (54.1) 3.44±0.72 3.96±0.41 10.77 (<.001) a<b<c
  ≥Collegec 76 (41.5) 4.12±0.39    
Occupation Yes No 132 (72.1) 51 (27.9) 4.02±0.43 3.96±0.44 –0.71 (.479)  
Monthly income (10,000 won) <300 30 (15.8) 3.91±0.46 2.64  
  300∼499 56 (30.9) 3.94±0.49 (.072)  
  ≥500 95 (52.5) 4.01±0.39    
Number of surgical removal of benign breast tumor 1a 2b 109 (59.9) 64 (35.2) 3.93±0.45 4.13±0.41 4.95 (.008) a<b
  ≥3c 9 (4.9) 3.98±0.30    
Experience of surgical removal of benign breast tumor in family Yes No 47 (25.7) 136 (74.3) 4.04±0.44 3.99±0.44 –0.65 (.515)  
Mammography cycle 1 113 (62.4) 4.06±0.40 3.25 d<a
(every year) 2 46 (25.4) 3.93±0.38 (.023)  
  ≥3 6 (3.3) 3.96±0.66    
  None 16 (8.8) 3.72±0.66    
Breast ultrasonography cycle (every year) 1 2 117 (65.7) 36 (20.2) 4.09±0.37 3.91±0.40 6.92 (.001) d<a
  ≥3 None 10 (5.6) 15 (8.4) 3.84±0.22 3.61±0.67    
Cancer insurance status Yes No 179 (97.8) 4 (2.2) 3.45±0.50 4.01±0.43 –2.55 (.012)  
Menstruation Regulara Irregularb Menopausec 99 (54.1) 45 (24.6) 39 (21.3) 4.10±0.42 3.82±0.48 3.96±0.37 6.62 (.002) a>b, c
Body Mass Index (kg/m2) <18.5 6 (3.4) 4.14±0.27 2.35  
  18.5∼22.9 23.0∼24.9 122 (68.2) 30 (16.8) 3.94±0.47 4.12±0.38 (.074)  
  ≥25 21 (11.7) 22.06±2.59 4.14±0.36    
Health status 1∼3 2 (1.1) 3.87±0.24 0.94  
  4∼6 85 (46.4) 3.96±0.38 (.394)  
  >6 96 (52.5) 4.04±0.49    
    6.53±1.64      
Table 2.
Levels of Physical Discomfort, Body Image, Family Support, and Psychosocial Adjustment (N=183)
Variables M±SD Possible range
Physical discomfort 1.57±0.51 1∼5
Postoperative pain 2.06±0.85 1∼5
Postoperative contusion 2.00±0.94  
Breast lump 1.68±0.91  
Frozen shoulder 1.67±0.92  
Postoperative edema 1.58±0.79  
Postoperative retraction 1.42±0.83  
General weakness 1.42±0.72  
Postoperative skin heating 1.39±0.66  
Fever sign 1.24±0.56  
Surgical incision site inflammation 1.23±0.58  
Body image 0.37±0.64 0∼3
Family support 3.62±0.67 1∼5
Psychosocial adjustment 4.00±0.45 1∼5
Table 3.
Relationships among Research Variables (N=183)
Variables Body image Physical discomfort Family support
r (p) r (p) r (p)
Physical discomfort     –.22 (.003)
Body image   .37 (<.001) –.42 (<.001)
Psychosocial adjustment –.68 (<.001) –.39 (<.001) .61 (<.001)
Table 4.
Influencing Factors on Psychosocial Adjustment (N=183)
Variables B SE β t p
(Constant) 2.99 0.20   14.85 <.001
Family support 0.27 0.04 .41 7.59 <.001
Body image –0.20 0.03 –.35 –6.22 <.001
Physical discomfort –0.16 0.05 –.19 –3.57 <.001
Number of surgical removal of benign breast tumor (1=2) 0.14 0.05 .15 3.09 .002
Cancer insurance status (1=yes) 0.34 0.15 .12 2.30 .023

R2=.59, Adj. R2=.574, F=48.16, p<.001

SE=standard errors; Unstandardized coefficients; Dummy variable: Cancer insurance status (1=yes 0=no).

Number of surgical removal of benign breast tumor (1=2, 0=1, 0=≥3),

TOOLS
Similar articles