Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.72(2) > 1100096

Jeong: Ascites

Abstract

Ascites is the most common cause of decompensation in cirrhosis, and 5% to 10% of patients with compensated cirrhosis develop ascites each year. The main factor of ascites formation is renal sodium retention due to activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and sympathetic nervous system by the reduced effective volume secondary to splanchnic arterial vasodilation. Diagnostic paracentesis is indicated in all patients with a new onset of grade 2 or 3 ascites and in those admitted to hospital for any complication of cirrhosis. A serum-ascites albumin gradient of ≥1.1 g/dL indicates portal hypertension with an accuracy of approximately 97%. Sodium restriction, diuretics, and large volume paracentesis are the mainstay of treatment in grade 1 to 3 ascites. The refractoriness of ascites is associated with a poor prognosis with a median survival of approximately six months. Repeated large volume paracentesis plus albumin is the first line treatment, and liver transplantation is recommended in patients with refractory ascites. A careful selection of patients is also important to obtain the beneficial effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in refractory ascites. This review details the recent diagnosis and treatment of cirrhotic ascites.

References

1. Ginés P, Quintero E, Arroyo V, et al. Compensated cirrhosis: natural history and prognostic factors. Hepatology. 1987; 7:122–128.
crossref
2. D'Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. 2006; 44:217–231.
3. Schrier RW, Arroyo V, Bernardi M, Epstein M, Henriksen JH, Rodés J. Peripheral arterial vasodilation hypothesis: a proposal for the initiation of renal sodium and water retention in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1988; 8:1151–1157.
crossref
4. Runyon BA. Care of patients with ascites. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330:337–342.
crossref
5. Borzio M, Salerno F, Piantoni L, et al. Bacterial infection in patients with advanced cirrhosis: a multicentre prospective study. Dig Liver Dis. 2001; 33:41–48.
crossref
6. Runyon BA, Montano AA, Akriviadis EA, Antillon MR, Irving MA, McHutchison JG. The serum-ascites albumin gradient is superior to the exudate-transudate concept in the differential diagnosis of ascites. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 117:215–220.
crossref
7. European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu; European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018; 69:406–460.
8. Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL). 2017 clinical practice guidelines for liver cirrhosis: ascites and related complications. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2018 Jul 9. [Epub ahead of print].
9. Akriviadis EA, Runyon BA. Utility of an algorithm in differentiating spontaneous from secondary bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterology. 1990; 98:127–133.
crossref
10. Wu SS, Lin OS, Chen YY, Hwang KL, Soon MS, Keeffe EB. Ascitic fluid carcinoembryonic antigen and alkaline phosphatase levels for the differentiation of primary from secondary bacterial peritonitis with intestinal perforation. J Hepatol. 2001; 34:215–221.
crossref
11. Woo JJ, Koh YY, Kim HJ, Chung JW, Chang KS, Hong SP. N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide and the evaluation of cardiac dysfunction and severity of disease in cirrhotic patients. Yonsei Med J. 2008; 49:625–631.
crossref
12. Trautwein C, Friedman SL, Schuppan D, Pinzani M. Hepatic fibrosis: concept to treatment. J Hepatol. 2015; 62:S15–S24.
crossref
13. Bernardi M, Laffi G, Salvagnini M, et al. Efficacy and safety of the stepped care medical treatment of ascites in liver cirrhosis: a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two diets with different sodium content. Liver. 1993; 13:156–162.
crossref
14. Reynolds TB, Lieberman FL, Goodman AR. Advantages of treatment of ascites without sodium restriction and without complete removal of excess fluid. Gut. 1978; 19:549–553.
crossref
15. Morando F, Rosi S, Gola E, et al. Adherence to a moderate sodium restriction diet in outpatients with cirrhosis and ascites: a re-al-life cross-sectional study. Liver Int. 2015; 35:1508–1515.
crossref
16. Pockros PJ, Reynolds TB. Rapid diuresis in patients with ascites from chronic liver disease: the importance of peripheral edema. Gastroenterology. 1986; 90:1827–1833.
crossref
17. Bernardi M, Trevisani F, Gasbarrini A, Gasbarrini G. Hepatorenal disorders: role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Semin Liver Dis. 1994; 14:23–34.
crossref
18. Bernardi M, Servadei D, Trevisani F, Rusticali AG, Gasbarrini G. Importance of plasma aldosterone concentration on the natriuretic effect of spironolactone in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites. Digestion. 1985; 31:189–193.
crossref
19. Angeli P, Dalla Pria M, De Bei E, et al. Randomized clinical study of the efficacy of amiloride and potassium canrenoate in non-azotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites. Hepatology. 1994; 19:72–79.
crossref
20. Angeli P, Fasolato S, Mazza E, et al. Combined versus sequential diuretic treatment of ascites in non-azotaemic patients with cirrhosis: results of an open randomised clinical trial. Gut. 2010; 59:98–104.
crossref
21. Santos J, Planas R, Pardo A, et al. Spironolactone alone or in combination with furosemide in the treatment of moderate ascites in nonazotemic cirrhosis. A randomized comparative study of efficacy and safety. J Hepatol. 2003; 39:187–192.
crossref
22. Perez-Ayuso RM, Arroyo V, Planas R, et al. Randomized comparative study of efficacy of furosemide versus spironolactone in nonazotemic cirrhosis with ascites. Relationship between the diuretic response and the activity of the renin-aldosterone system. Gastroenterology. 1983; 84(5 Pt 1):961–968.
23. Elfert AA, Abo Ali L, Soliman S, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled study of baclofen in the treatment of muscle cramps in patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 28:1280–1284.
crossref
24. Ginès P, Titó L, Arroyo V, et al. Randomized comparative study of therapeutic paracentesis with and without intravenous albumin in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 1988; 94:1493–1502.
crossref
25. Bernardi M, Caraceni P, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM. Albumin infusion in patients undergoing large-volume paracentesis: a metaanalysis of randomized trials. Hepatology. 2012; 55:1172–1181.
crossref
26. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2010; 53:397–417.
27. Moreau R, Valla DC, Durand-Zaleski I, et al. Comparison of outcome in patients with cirrhosis and ascites following treatment with albumin or a synthetic colloid: a randomised controlled pilot trail. Liver Int. 2006; 26:46–54.
28. Arroyo V, Ginès P, Gerbes AL, et al. Definition and diagnostic criteria of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. International Ascites Club. Hepatology. 1996; 23:164–176.
29. Moore KP, Wong F, Gines P, et al. The management of ascites in cirrhosis: report on the consensus conference of the International Ascites Club. Hepatology. 2003; 38:258–266.
crossref
30. Runyon BA, Canawati HN, Akriviadis EA. Optimization of ascitic fluid culture technique. Gastroenterology. 1988; 95:1351–1355.
crossref
31. Choi CH, Ahn SH, Kim DY, et al. Long‐ term clinical outcome of large volume paracentesis with intravenous albumin in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a randomized prospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005; 20:1215–1222.
32. Huonker M, Schumacher YO, Ochs A, Sorichter S, Keul J, Rössle M. Cardiac function and haemodynamics in alcoholic cirrhosis and effects of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt. Gut. 1999; 44:743–748.
crossref
33. Sanyal AJ, Freedman AM, Luketic VA, et al. The natural history of portal hypertension after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Gastroenterology. 1997; 112:889–898.
crossref
34. Wong F, Sniderman K, Liu P, Blendis L. The mechanism of the initial natriuresis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Gastroenterology. 1997; 112:899–907.
crossref
35. Gerbes AL, Gülberg V, Waggershauser T, Holl J, Reiser M. Renal effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhosis: comparison of patients with ascites, with refractory ascites, or without ascites. Hepatology. 1998; 28:683–688.
crossref
36. Casado M, Bosch J, García-Pagán JC, et al. Clinical events after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: correlation with hemodynamic findings. Gastroenterology. 1998; 114:1296–1303.
crossref
37. Riggio O, Angeloni S, Salvatori FM, et al. Incidence, natural history, and risk factors of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with polytetrafluoro-ethylene-covered stent grafts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103:2738–2746.
crossref
38. Sauerbruch T, Mengel M, Dollinger M, et al. Prevention of rebleeding from esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis receiving small-diameter stents versus hemodynamically controlled medical therapy. Gastroenterology. 2015; 149:660–668.e1.
crossref
39. Wang Q, Lv Y, Bai M, et al. Eight millimetre covered TIPS does not compromise shunt function but reduces hepatic encephalopathy in preventing variceal rebleeding. J Hepatol. 2017; 67:508–516.
crossref
40. Lebrec D, Giuily N, Hadengue A, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: comparison with paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites: a randomized trial. French Group of Clinicians and a Group of Biologists. J Hepatol. 1996; 25:135–144.
41. Salerno F, Borroni G, Moser P, et al. Survival and prognostic factors of cirrhotic patients with ascites: a study of 134 outpatients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993; 88:514–519.
42. Guardiola J, Baliellas C, Xiol X, et al. External validation of a prognostic model for predicting survival of cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97:2374–2378.
crossref
43. Durand F, Valla D. Assessment of prognosis of cirrhosis. Semin Liver Dis. 2008; 28:110–122.
crossref
44. Luca A, Angermayr B, Bertolini G, et al. An integrated MELD model including serum sodium and age improves the prediction of early mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Transpl. 2007; 13:1174–1180.
crossref
45. Solà E, Sanchez-Cabús S, Rodriguez E, et al. Effects of alfapump™ system on kidney and circulatory function in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. Liver Transpl. 2017; 23:583–593.
crossref
46. Caldwell J, Edriss H, Nugent K. Chronic peritoneal indwelling catheters for the management of malignant and nonmalignant ascites. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2018; 31:297–302.
crossref
47. Zaak D, Paquet KJ, Kuhn R. Prospective study comparing human albumin vs. reinfusion of ultrafiltrate-ascitic fluid after total paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites. Z Gastroenterol. 2001; 39:5–10.
crossref
48. Graziotto A, Rossaro L, Inturri P, Salvagnini M. Reinfusion of Concentrated Ascitic Fluid versus Total Paracentesis. A randomized prospective trial. Dig Dis Sci. 1997; 42:1708–1714.
49. Elia C, Graupera I, Barreto R, et al. Severe acute kidney injury associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in cirrhosis: a case-control study. J Hepatol. 2015; 63:593–600.
crossref
50. Claria J, Kent JD, López-Parra M, et al. Effects of celecoxib and naproxen on renal function in nonazotemic patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Hepatology. 2005; 41:579–587.
crossref
51. Hayes PC, Davis JM, Lewis JA, Bouchier IA. Meta-analysis of value of propranolol in prevention of variceal haemorrhage. Lancet. 1990; 336:153–156.
crossref
52. Serste T, Francoz C, Durand F, et al. Beta-blockers cause paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites: a crossover study. J Hepatol. 2011; 55:794–799.
53. Kurt M. Deleterious effects of beta‐ blockers on survival in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. Hepatology. 2011; 53:1411–1412.

Table 1.
Ascitic Fluid Analysis8
  Analysis Diagnosis
Routine Cell count and differential Ascites differential diagnosis, spontaneous bacterial
  Albumin peritonitis
  Total protein  
Optional Gram stain Bacterial infection
  Culture in blood culture bottle  
  Cytology Malignant ascites
  Acid-fast bacilli smear and culture Tuberculous peritonitis
  Adenosine deaminase  
  Lactate dehydrogenase Secondary bacterial peritonitis
  Glucose  
  Carcinoembryonic antigen  
  Alkaline phosphatase  
  Amylase Pancreatic ascites
  Triglyceride Chylous ascites
  Bilirubin Biliary tract perforation
  Urea, creatinine Urinary ascites
Table 2.
Grading of Ascites and Suggested Treatment8
  Grade 1 a Grade 2 b Grade 3 c
Sodium intake restriction
Diuretics  
Paracentesis    
First-line treatment Treating underlying disease    
  Nutritional treatment and education Discontinue NSAIDs, ACE inhibitors, or angiotensin receptor blockers  

NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme.

a Mild ascites only detectable by ultrasound

b Moderate ascites evident by moderate symmetrical distension of the abdomen

c Large or gross ascites with marked abdominal distension.

Table 3.
Definition and Diagnostic Criteria for Refractory Ascites in Cirrhosis29
Diuretic-resistant ascites Ascites that cannot be mobilized or the early recurrence of which cannot be prevented because of a lack of response to sodium restriction and diuretic treatment
Diuretic-intractable ascites Ascites that cannot be mobilized or the early recurrence of which cannot be prevented because of the development of diuretic-induced complications that preclude the use of an effective diuretic dosage
Requisites  
   Treatment duration Intensive diuretic therapy (spironolactone 400 mg/day and furosemide 160 mg/day) for at least 1 week and on a salt-restricted diet of less than 5 g/day
   Response of therapy Mean weight loss of <800 g over 4 days and urinary sodium output less than the sodium intake
   Early ascites recurrence Recurrence of grade 2–3 ascites within 4 weeks of initial mobilization
   Diuretic-induced complications Hepatic encephalopathy: development of encephalopathy in the absence of any other precipitating factor
     Renal impairment: >0.3 mg/dL increase of sCr within 48 hours of baseline or 1.5-fold increase within 1 week Hyponatremia: decrease of serum sodium by >10 mEq/L to serum sodium of <125 mEq/L
     Hypo- or hyperkalemia: change in serum potassium to <3 mmol/L or >6 mmol/L
TOOLS
Similar articles