Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.59(8) > 1099858

Shin, Suh, and Jin: The Incidence and Risk Factors for Ocular Hypertension in Traumatic Hyphema

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for ocular hypertension (OHT) in traumatic hyphema within 7 days after trauma.

Methods

A retrospective case series study of 265 traumatic hyphema inpatients from 2010–2016. OHT was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) that exceeded 21 mmHg using two consecutive measurements by a Goldmann applanation tonometer within 7 days after trauma. The subjects were divided into two groups (OHT group and non-OHT group). Age, sex, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP, hyphema grade, presence of systemic disease, and past history of glaucoma were compared between the two groups.

Results

Of the 265 patients, 95 (35.8%) developed OHT after traumatic hyphema. Of those 95 patients, 70 (73.7%) developed OHT within 1 day after trauma; 18 (18.9%) developed OHT 2–3 days after trauma; and 7 (7.4%) developed OHT 4–7 days after trauma. Compared to the non-OHT group, the OHT group had a lower visual acuity (p = 0.018) and higher IOP (p < 0.001). In addition. if the hyphema grade was higher the incidence of OHT was significantly higher (p = 0.017). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, the BCVA (p = 0.045) and hyphema grade (p = 0.006) were associated with the incidence of OHT in traumatic hyphema within 7 days after trauma.

Conclusions

The incidence of OHT in traumatic hyphema within 7 days after trauma was 35.8%. The BCVA and hyphema grade were associated with the incidence of OHT within 7 days after trauma.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Incidence of ocular hypertension during hospitalization in traumatic hyphema. 73.7% developed ocular hypertension within 1 day after trauma, 18.9% developed between 2–3 days, and 7.4% developed between 4–7 days.

jkos-59-773-g001
Table 1

Clinical and demographic data of the patients (N = 265)

jkos-59-773-i001

Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

V/A = visual acuity; IOP = intraocular pressure.

Table 2

Comparison between ocular hypertension (OHT) group and non-OHT group

jkos-59-773-i002

Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

V/A = visual acuity; IOP = intraocular pressure.

*Pearson chi-square test. Statistical significance: p < 0.005; Student t-test. Statistical significance: p < 0.005; Linear-by-Linear assosiation. Statistical significance: p < 0.005.

Table 3

Association of incidence of ocular hypertension (OHT) with demographic and ocular variables from multivariate logistic regression analysis

jkos-59-773-i003

OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; V/A = visual acuity; IOP = intraocular pressure.

*Dummy variables for male: 1 = male, 2 = female; Dummy variables for hypertension and diabetes mellitus: 1 = positive, 2 = negative.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

References

1. Ghafari AB, Siamian H, Aligolbandi K, Vahedi M. Hyphema caused by trauma. Med Arch. 2013; 67:354–356.
crossref
2. Arentsen JJ, Green WR. Melanoma of the iris: report of 72 cases treated surgically. Ophthalmic Surg. 1975; 6:23–37.
3. Blanksma LJ, Hooijmans JM. Vascular tufts of the pupillary border causing a spontaneous hyphaema. Ophthalmologica. 1979; 178:297–302.
crossref
4. Kurz GH, Zimmerman LE. Spontaneous hyphema and acute glaucoma as initial signs of recurrent iris melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1963; 69:581–582.
crossref
5. Türkcü FM, Yüksel H, Sahin A, et al. Demographic and etiological characteristics of children with traumatic serious hyphema. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013; 19:357–362.
6. Crouch ER, Williams PB. Trauma: ruptures and bleeding. In : Tasmani W, Jager EM, editors. Duane's Clinical Ophthalmology. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;1993. p. 1–18.
7. Coles WH. Traumatic hyphema: an analysis of 235 cases. South Med J. 1968; 61:813–816.
8. Fong LP. Secondary hemorrhage in traumatic hyphema. Predictive factors for selective prophylaxis. Ophthalmology. 1994; 101:1583–1588.
9. Brodrick JD. Corneal blood staining after hyphaema. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972; 56:589–593.
crossref
10. Read J, Goldberg MF. Comparison of medical treatment for traumatic hyphema. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1974; 78:799.
11. Turalba AV, Shah AS, Andreoli MT, et al. Predictors and outcomes of ocular hypertension after open-globe injury. J Glaucoma. 2014; 23:5–10.
crossref
12. Bojikian KD, Stein AL, Slabaugh MA, Chen PP. Incidence and risk factors for traumatic intraocular pressure elevation and traumatic glaucoma after open-globe injury. Eye (Lond). 2015; 29:1579–1584.
crossref
13. Sihota R, Kumar S, Gupta V, et al. Early predictors of traumatic glaucoma after closed globe injury: trabecular pigmentation, widened angle recess, and higher baseline intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008; 126:921–926.
14. Bansal S, Gunasekeran DV, Ang B, et al. Controversies in the pathophysiology and management of hyphema. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016; 61:297–308.
15. Roth DB, Verma V, Realini T, et al. Long-term incidence and timing of intraocular hypertension after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:455–460.
crossref
16. Rakusin W. Traumatic hyphema. Am J Ophthalmol. 1972; 74:284–292.
crossref
17. Sihota R, Sood NN, Agarwal HC. Traumatic glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1995; 73:252–254.
crossref
18. Girkin CA, McGwin G Jr, Long C, et al. Glaucoma after ocular contusion: a cohort study of the United States Eye Injury Registry. J Glaucoma. 2005; 14:470–473.
19. Canavan YM, Archer DB. Anterior segment consequences of blunt ocular injury. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982; 66:549–555.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles