Journal List > Investig Magn Reson Imaging > v.22(2) > 1098682

Park and Ahn: Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced T2 FLAIR and 3D T1 Black-Blood Fast Spin-Echo for Detection of Leptomeningeal Metastases

Abstract

Purpose

Imaging plays a significant role in diagnosing leptomeningeal metastases. However, the most appropriate sequence for the detection of leptomeningeal metastases has yet to be determined. This study compares the efficacies of contrast-enhanced T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced 3D T1 black-blood fast spin echo (FSE) imaging for the detection of leptomeningeal metastases.

Materials and Methods

Tube phantoms containing varying concentrations of gadobutrol solution were scanned using T2 FLAIR and 3D T1 black-blood FSE. Additionally, 30 patients with leptomeningeal metastases were retrospectively evaluated to compare conspicuous lesions and the extent of leptomeningeal metastases detected by T2 FLAIR and 3D T1 black-blood FSE.

Results

The signal intensities of low-concentration gadobutrol solutions (< 0.5 mmol/L) on T2 FLAIR images were higher than in 3D T1 black-blood FSE. The T2 FLAIR sequences exhibited significantly greater visual conspicuity scores than the 3D T1 black-blood sequence in leptomeningeal metastases of the pial membrane of cistern (P = 0.014). T2 FLAIR images exhibited a greater or equal extent (96.7%) of leptomeningeal metastases than 3D T1 black-blood FSE images.

Conclusion

Because of its high sensitivity even at low gadolinium concentrations, contrast-enhanced T2 FLAIR images delineated leptomeningeal metastases in a wider territory than 3D T1 black-blood FSE.

References

1. Grossman SA, Krabak MJ. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Rev. 1999; 25:103–119.
crossref
2. Wasserstrom WR, Glass JP, Posner JB. Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: experience with 90 patients. Cancer. 1982; 49:759–772.
crossref
3. Kremer S, Abu Eid M, Bierry G, et al. Accuracy of delayed postcontrast FLAIR MR imaging for the diagnosis of leptomeningeal infectious or tumoral diseases. J Neuroradiol. 2006; 33:285–291.
crossref
4. Misaki K, Nakada M, Hayashi Y, et al. Contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI is useful to detect the CSF dissemination of glioblastoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001; 25:953–956.
crossref
5. Mathews VP, Caldemeyer KS, Lowe MJ, Greenspan SL, Weber DM, Ulmer JL. Brain: gadolinium-enhanced fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR imaging. Radiology. 1999; 211:257–263.
crossref
6. Terae S, Yoshida D, Kudo K, Tha KK, Fujino M, Miyasaka K. Contrast-enhanced FLAIR imaging in combination with pre- and postcontrast magnetization transfer T1-weighted imaging: usefulness in the evaluation of brain metastases. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25:479–487.
crossref
7. Fukuoka H, Hirai T, Okuda T, et al. Comparison of the added value of contrast-enhanced 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo sequences in relation to conventional postcontrast T1-weighted images for the evaluation of leptomeningeal diseases at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; 31:868–873.
crossref
8. Tomura N, Narita K, Takahashi S, et al. Contrast-enhanced multi-shot echoplanar FLAIR in the depiction of metastatic tumors of the brain: comparison with contrast-enhanced spin-echo T1-weighted imaging. Acta Radiol. 2007; 48:1032–1037.
crossref
9. Jackson EF, Hayman LA. Meningeal enhancement on fast FLAIR images. Radiology. 2000; 215:922–924.
crossref
10. Park J, Kim J, Yoo E, Lee H, Chang JH, Kim EY. Detection of small metastatic brain tumors: comparison of 3D contrast-enhanced whole-brain black-blood imaging and MP-RAGE imaging. Invest Radiol. 2012; 47:136–141.
11. Kammer NN, Coppenrath E, Treitl KM, Kooijman H, Dietrich O, Saam T. Comparison of contrast-enhanced modified T1-weighted 3D TSE black-blood and 3D MP-RAGE sequences for the detection of cerebral metastases and brain tumours. Eur Radiol. 2016; 26:1818–1825.
crossref
12. Park J, Kim EY. Contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional, whole-brain, black-blood imaging: application to small brain metastases. Magn Reson Med. 2010; 63:553–561.
crossref
13. Korosec FR, Grist TM, Polzin JA, Weber DM, Mistretta CA. MR angiography using velocity-selective preparation pulses and segmented gradient-echo acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 1993; 30:704–714.
crossref
14. Norris DG, Schwarzbauer C. Velocity selective radiofrequency pulse trains. J Magn Reson. 1999; 137:231–236.
crossref
15. Nagao E, Yoshiura T, Hiwatashi A, et al. 3D turbo spin-echo sequence with motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium preparation for detection of brain metastases on 3T MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32:664–670.
crossref
16. Busse RF, Brau AC, Vu A, et al. Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo. Magn Reson Med. 2008; 60:640–649.
crossref
17. Takemoto K, Takano K, Abe H, et al. The new MRI modalities "BPAS and VISTA" for the diagnosis of VA dissection. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011; 112:59–65.
crossref
18. Kato Y, Higano S, Tamura H, et al. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions in detection of small brain metastasis at 3T MR imaging: comparison with magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30:923–929.
crossref
19. Collie DA, Brush JP, Lammie GA, et al. Imaging features of leptomeningeal metastases. Clin Radiol. 1999; 54:765–771.
crossref
20. Freilich RJ, Krol G, DeAngelis LM. Neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid cytology in the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis. Ann Neurol. 1995; 38:51–57.
crossref
21. Straathof CS, de Bruin HG, Dippel DW, Vecht CJ. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid cytology in leptomeningeal metastasis. J Neurol. 1999; 246:810–814.
crossref
22. Ahn SJ, Suh SH, Lee KY, Kim JH, Seo KD, Lee S. Hyperintense vessels on T2-PROPELLER-FLAIR in patients with acute MCA stroke: prediction of arterial stenosis and perfusion abnormality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 36:2042–2047.
crossref
23. Ahn SJ, Lee KY, Ahn SS, Suh H, Kim BS, Lee SK. Can FLAIR hyperintense vessel (FHV) signs be influenced by varying MR parameters and flow velocities? A flow phantom analysis. Acta Radiol. 2016; 57:580–586.
crossref
24. Ahn SJ, Chung TS, Chang JH, Lee SK. The added value of double dose gadolinium enhanced 3D T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery for evaluating small brain metastases. Yonsei Med J. 2014; 55:1231–1237.
crossref
25. Jeong HK, Oh SW, Kim J, Lee SK, Ahn SJ. Reduction of oxygen-induced CSF hyperintensity on FLAIR MR images in sedated children: usefulness of magnetization-prepared FLAIR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016; 37:1549–1555.
crossref
26. Siegal T, Sandbank U, Gabizon A, et al. Alteration of blood-brain-CSF barrier in experimental meningeal carcinomatosis. A morphologic and adriamycin-penetration study. J Neurooncol. 1987; 4:233–242.
27. Ludemann L, Grieger W, Wurm R, Wust P, Zimmer C. Quantitative measurement of leakage volume and permeability in gliomas, meningiomas and brain metastases with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2005; 23:833–841.
28. Pintaske J, Martirosian P, Graf H, et al. Relaxivity of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadobutrol (Gadovist), and Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2006; 41:213–221.
crossref
29. van der Molen AJ, Bellin MF. Extracellular gadolinium-based contrast media: differences in diagnostic efficacy. Eur J Radiol. 2008; 66:168–174.
crossref
30. Ruff RL, Dougherty JH Jr. Complications of lumbar puncture followed by anticoagulation. Stroke. 1981; 12:879–881.
crossref
31. Clarke JL, Perez HR, Jacks LM, Panageas KS, Deangelis LM. Leptomeningeal metastases in the MRI era. Neurology. 2010; 74:1449–1454.
crossref
32. Glass JP, Melamed M, Chernik NL, Posner JB. Malignant cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): the meaning of a positive CSF cytology. Neurology. 1979; 29:1369–1375.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Relative signal intensities of gadolinium solution based on gadolinium concentration at various pulse sequences: The signal intensities of low-concentration gadobutrol solutions (< 0.5 mmol/ L) relative to normal saline on T2 FLAIR images are higher than in 3D T1 BB FSE images. 3D = three dimensional; BB = black blood; FLAIR = fluid attenuated inversion recovery; FSE = fast spin echo; FSPGR = fast spoiled gradient echo
imri-22-86f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Images of phantom tubes containing low concentrations of gadobutrol solution (0.0125–0.9 mmol/L) acquired by T2 FLAIR and 3D T1 BB FSE MRI. 3D = three-dimensional; BB = black blood; FLAIR = fluid attenuated inversion recovery; FSE = fast spin echo; FSPGR = fast spoiled gradient echo
imri-22-86f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Images of a 73-year-old female patient with primary lung cancer acquired using the contrast-enhanced T2 FLAIR (a-c) and T1 BB-FSE (d-f) sequences. In T2 FLAIR images, leptomeningeal enhancement is clearly visualized in the pial membrane of the cistern and the cranial nerve (arrows; visual conspicuity score: 2). In 3D T1 BB-FSE images, leptomeningeal enhancement is not clearly demarcated in the pial membrane of the cistern (arrow; visual conspicuity score: 0) but suspected in the cranial nerve (conspicuity score: 1). 3D = three-dimensional; BB = black blood; FLAIR = fluid attenuated inversion recovery; FSE = fast spin echo
imri-22-86f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Images of a 50-year-old female patient acquired using the T2 FLAIR (a) and 3D T1 BB-FSE (b) sequences. The extent of leptomeningeal seeding in the T2 FLAIR image is greater than in the 3D T1 BB-FSE image (white arrows). 3D = three-dimensional; BB = black blood; FLAIR = fluid attenuated inversion recovery; FSE = fast spin echo
imri-22-86f4.tif
Table 1.
Imaging Parameters for the T2 FLAIR and 3D T1 BB FSE Sequences
  T2 FLAIR 3D BB T1 FSE
FOV (mm) 210 220
TR (ms) 12000 500
TE (ms) 144.46 24.511
Inversion time (ms) 2517  
Matrix (RO/PE) 352 × 224 256 × 224
Slice thickness (mm) 4 1
ETL 30 24
Flip angle 111 Variable
Scan FOV (cm) 21 22
Scan time (min) 3 min 12 sec 4 min 54 sec

3D = three dimensional; BB = black blood; ETL = echo train length; FLAIR = fluid attenuated inversion recovery; FOV = field of view; FSE = fast spin echo; FSPGR = fast spoiled gradient-echo; PE = phase encoding; RO = readout; TE = echo time;

Table 2.
Visual Conspicuity Scores of Each Sequence for Detection of Leptomeningeal Metastases
    T2 FLAIR T1 BB FSE P value
Sulci of cerebral hemisphere or folia of cerebellum (n = 29) R 1 1.90 ± 0.41 1.69 ± 0.60 0.124
  R 2 1.86 ± 0.52 1.72 ± 0.59 0.056
Cranial nerve (n = 16) R 1 1.56 ± 0.63 1.13 ± 0.89 0.068
  R 2 1.63 ± 0.62 1.19 ± 0.91 0.053
Subependymal line (n = 1) R 1 2 2 NA
  R 2 1 2 NA
Pial membrane in cistern (n = 10) R 1 1.60 ± 0.70 0.70 ± 0.82 0.014*
  R 2 1.50 ± 0.85 0.70 ± 0.82 0.023*

Visual conspicuity scores for leptomeningeal metastases: 0, negative; 1, suspicious of leptomeningeal metastases, but not clearly distinguished from adjacent structures; and 2, certain leptomeningeal metastases, clearly distinguished from adjacent structures. *P < 0.05 BB = black blood; FLAIR = fluid attenuated inversion recovery; FSE = fast spin echo; NA = not applicable; R1 = Reviewer 1; R2 = Reviewer 2

Table 3.
Extent of Leptomeningeal Seeding
  Reviewer 1 Reviewer 2
T2 FLAIR > 3D T1 BB FSE 13/30 (43.3) 10/30 (33.3)
T2 FLAIR = 3D T1 BB FSE 16/30 (53.3) 19/30 (63.4)
T2 FLAIR < 3D T1 BB FSE 1/30 (3.3) 1/30 (3.3)

Data are presented as numbers of patients/total patients (%). BB = black blood; FLAIR = fluid attenuated inversion recovery; FSE = fast spin echo

TOOLS
Similar articles