Journal List > Korean J Healthc Assoc Infect Control Prev > v.22(2) > 1098370

An, Park, Ko, and Bang: Steady Inflow of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci from Outside a Hospital

Abstract

Background

Cross-transmission within hospitals has been considered a major source of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) acquisition. Inflow of VRE from outside hospitals may also be an important factor in South Korea.

Methods

An active-point surveillance for VRE colonization was performed in one medical ward of a 767-bed hospital using single rectal swabs or stool samples. The proportion of VRE detected within 48 h of admission was sought. Risk factors for VRE acquisition were analyzed. To confirm the persistence of VRE inflow outside a single point, the degree of yearly VRE inflow was assessed by passive surveillance of clinical specimens over 2 years in the hospital, each one year before and after the active surveillance.

Results

The active-point surveillance of 9 days resulted in 28 (28/72, 38.9%) VRE-positive patients, of whom nine (9/72, 12.5%) were patients were estimated to originate from outside the hospital. The duration of hospitalization and the use of antibiotics were significant risk factors for VRE colonization after admission, and the number of days from admission to first VRE positivity was a median of 8.5 (interquartile range, 2.7–15.0). During the 2 years, 213 patients were identified to be VRE-positive per clinical specimens with 95.5% of concurrent stool VRE, and 12.6% (27/213) were estimated to have acquired the infection from outside the hospital. This confirmed that the VRE inflow was continuous, but not transient or resembling an outbreak on one point.

Conclusion

The inflow of VRE was steady in a tertiary hospital with an average infection control policy in South Korea and should be a further target for VRE control.

REFERENCES

1. Weiner LM, Webb AK, Limbago B, Dudeck MA, Patel J, Kallen AJ, et al. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcareassociated infections: summary of data reported to the national healthcare safety network at the centers for disease control and prevention, 2011-2014. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016; 37:1288–1301.
crossref
2. Omotola AM, Li Y, Martin ET, Alshabani K, Yadav D, Sarkar M, et al. Risk factors for and epidemiology of community-onset vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis in southeast Michigan. Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41:1244–1248.
crossref
3. Elizaga ML, Weinstein RA, Hayden MK. Patients in long-term care facilities: a reservoir for vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis. 2002; 34:441–446.
crossref
4. Byun SJ, Kang J. Risk factors and clinical outcomes for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus colonization on intensive care unit admission. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013; 43:287–295.
crossref
5. Hong HK, Lee KS, Park SC, Chung EK, Park MR, Kim SC. Effects of infection control strategies & analysis of risk factors for vancomycin resistant enterococci. Qual Improv Health Care. 2013; 19:30–42.
6. Kwak YG, Choi JY, Yoo HM, Lee SO, Kim HB, Han SH, et al. Korean nosocomial infections surveillance system, intensive care unit module report: summary of data from July 2013 through June 2014. Korean J Nosocomial Infect Control. 2015; 20:49–60.
crossref
7. Monteserin N, Larson E. Temporal trends and risk factors for healthcare-associated vancomycin-resistant enterococci in adults. J Hosp Infect. 2016; 94:236–241.
crossref
8. Ford CD, Lopansri BK, Haydoura S, Snow G, Dascomb KK, Asch J, et al. Frequency, risk factors, and outcomes of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus colonization and infection in patients with newly diagnosed acute leukemia: different patterns in patients with acute myelogenous and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015; 36:47–53.
crossref
9. Lee D, Park ES, Yong D, Choi JY, Lee K, Jee SH. Risk factors for prolonged carriage and reacquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Korean J Nosocomial Infect Control. 2015; 20:19–28.
crossref
10. Yoon YK, Lee SE, Lee J, Kim HJ, Kim JY, Park DW, et al. Risk factors for prolonged carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium among patients in intensive care units: a case-control study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011; 66:1831–1838.
crossref
11. Kaki R, Yu Y, O\'Neill C, Lee C, Mertz D. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) transmission and risk factors in contacts of VRE carriers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014; 35:876–879.
crossref
12. Karki S, Houston L, Land G, Bass P, Kehoe R, Borrell S, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for VRE colonisation in a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia: a cross sectional study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2012; 1:31.
crossref
13. Muto CA, Giannetta ET, Durbin LJ, Simonton BM, Farr BM. Cost-effectiveness of perirectal surveillance cultures for controlling vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002; 23:429–435.
14. Perencevich EN, Fisman DN, Lipsitch M, Harris AD, Morris JG Jr, Smith DL. Projected benefits of active surveillance for vancomycin-resistant enterococci in intensive care units. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 38:1108–1115.
crossref
15. Korea CDC. Management guidelines for healthcare associated infections. [Accessed on 9 July 2017]. http://cdc.go.kr/CDC/cms/cmsFileDownload.jsp?fid=136&cid=21224&field Name=attachGrp&index=13.
16. Abad C, Fearday A, Safdar N. Adverse effects of isolation in hospitalised patients: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2010; 76:97–102.
crossref
17. Kirkland KB, Weinstein JM. Adverse effects of contact isolation. Lancet. 1999; 354:1177–1178.
crossref
18. Weber SG, Huang SS, Oriola S, Huskins WC, Noskin GA, Harriman K, et al. Legislative mandates for use of active surveillance cultures to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: Position statement from the Joint SHEA and APIC Task Force. Am J Infect Control. 2007; 35:73–85.
crossref
19. Karki S, Leder K, Cheng AC. Should we continue to isolate patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci in hospitals? Med J Aust. 2015; 202:234–236.
crossref

Figure 1.
(A) Results of active surveillance for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) by length of stay (LOS) and VRE-positivity. (B) Distributions of location before admission of the patients with VRE. LTCF, long-term care facility.
kjhaicp-2017-22-2-63f1.tif
Table 1.
Characteristics of patients in a point VRE surveillance in one medical ward (N=72)
Variable VRE-negative (n=44) VRE-positive (n=28) P value
Gender, male, n (%) 26 (59.1) 17 (60.7) 0.545
Age, years (mean±SD) 65.4±16.4 64.7±11.9 0.847
Underlying diseases, n (%)
Diabetes mellitus 21 (47.7) 10 (35.7) 0.224
Hypertension 32 (72.7) 17 (60.7) 0.209
Chronic kidney disease 14 (31.8) 7 (25.0) 0.365
Chronic liver disease 2 (4.5) 4 (14.3) 0.154
COPD 3 (6.8) 0 (0) 0.222
Solid tumor 4 (9.1) 5 (17.9) 0.230
Hematologic malignancy 0 (0) 1 (3.6) 0.389
Other* 13 (29.5) 12 (42.9) 0.183
No comorbidity 3 (6.8) 1 (3.6) 0.492
Duration of hospitalization, mean days (IQR) 3.3 (1.0-4.0) 13.7 (2.7-15.0) 0.022
≤48 h, n (%) 27 (61.4) 9 (32.1) 0.016
>48 h, n (%) 17 (38.6) 19 (67.9) -
Route of admission, n (%)
Transfer from LTCF 4 (9.1) 4 (14.3) 0.703
Transfer from other hospitals 3 (6.8) 3 (10.7) 0.672
Admission from community 37 (84.1) 21 (75.0) 0.197
New admission 3 (6.8) 6 (21.4) 0.140
In-hospital use of antibiotics 18 (40.9) 21 (75.0) 0.005
Duration, mean days (IQR) 1.2 (0-1.7) 8.6 (0.2-10.7) 0.008

* Other includes a small number of variouscomorbidities such as septic arthritis, extrapulmonary tuberculosis, lung abscess, and dermatomyositis.

Abbreviations: VRE, vancomycin-resistant enterococci; SD, standard deviation; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IQR, interquartile range; LTCF, long-term care facility.

Table 2.
VRE-positive patients in clinical specimens during two years, one year each ‘before’ and ‘after’ the point surveillance
Variables Before, N=104 (2014.12-2015.11) After, N=109 (2016.2-2017.1) P value
Gender, female:male (%) 48:56 (53.8) 49:60 (55.0) 0.860
Age, years (mean±SD) 68.0±16.2 69.7±14.0 0.430
Admission to first VRE-positive (median days, IQR) 20.0 (10.0-36.0) 17.0 (8.0-34.0) 0.238
Route of admission, n (%) 0.564
LTCF 13 (12.5) 18 (16.5)
Other hospitals 19 (18.3) 16 (14.7)
Community (admission Hx ≤3 m) 23 (22.1) 30 (27.5)
Community (no admission Hx ≤3 m) 49 (47.1) 45 (41.3)
Organism: Enterococcus faecium, n (%) 98 (94.2) 108 (99.1) 0.061
Specimen-stool cultures concordance 85/88 (99.6) 88/93 (94.6) 0.721
VRE+ within 48 h of admission 13 (12.5) 14 (12.8) 0.940

Abbreviations: VRE, vancomycin resistant enterococci; SD, standard deviation; LTCF, long-term care facility; Hx, history.

TOOLS
Similar articles