Journal List > Yonsei Med J > v.59(6) > 1098162

Suh, Kim, Goh, Jeong, Lee, Jang, Cha, Han, Kim, Kim, and Pak: mRNA Expression of SLC5A5 and SLC2A Family Genes in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: An Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas

Abstract

Purpose

The present study investigated the dynamics and prognostic role of messenger RNA (mRNA) expression responsible for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in FDG positron emission tomography (PET) and radioactive iodine (131I) uptake in whole-body radioactive iodine scans (WBS) in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) patients.

Materials and Methods

The primary and processed data were downloaded from the Genomic Data Commons Data Portal. Expression data for sodium/iodide symporter (solute carrier family 5 member 5, SLC5A5), hexokinase (HK1–3), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), and glucose transporter (solute carrier family 2, SLC2A1–4) mRNA were collected.

Results

Expression of SLC5A5 mRNA were negatively correlated with SLC2A1 mRNA and positively correlated with SLC2A4 mRNA. In PTC with BRAF mutations, expressions of SLC2A1, SLC2A3, HK2, and HK3 mRNA were higher than those in PTC without BRAF mutations. Expression of SLC5A5, SLC2A4, HK1, and G6PD mRNA was lower in PTC without BRAF mutation. PTCs with higher expression of SLC5A5 mRNA had more favorable disease-free survival, but no association with overall survival.

Conclusion

Expression of SLC5A5 mRNA was negatively correlated with SLC2A1 mRNA. This finding provides a molecular basis for the management of PTC with negative WBS using 18F-FDG PET scans. In addition, higher expression of SLC5A5 mRNA was associated with less PTC recurrence, but not with deaths.

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of thyroid cancer continues to increase worldwide, including Korea.12 Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) usually has a favorable prognosis with an excellent survival rate.12 However, a minority of PTC patients develop locoregional recurrence, including cervical lymph node metastases, and some of them may eventually succumb to the cancer.3 Treatment of PTC employs a three-tiered approach, including surgery, radioactive iodine ablation (RAI), and long-term exogenous hormone replacement.3 Following surgery and RAI, neck ultrasonography and whole-body radioactive iodine scan (WBS) are usually employed to detect residual tumors or metastasis.3 Nowadays, positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has become a standard modality for staging, restaging, and monitoring treatment responses in a variety of tumors.4 However, routine use of PET scans as a work-up is not recommended in thyroid cancer. In PTC patients with high thyroglobulin levels and negative WBS, 18F-FDG PET should be considered in order to detect suspected tumor recurrence or metastasis.3
In the field of oncology, messenger RNA (mRNA) has emerged as a major molecular player in cancer genes, because mRNA is a core part of protein synthesis.5 In cancer, mutated DNA is transcribed into complementary mRNA, which is then translated into malfunctioning cancer protein. However, few studies have investigated the role of mRNA as a prognostic predictor.5 Recently, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network Initiative provided a detailed description of the genomic landscape of 509 PTC cases, named the “Integrated Genomic Characterization of PTC.”6
18F-FDG, a glucose analog, is transported to tumor cells via glucose transporter (GLUT) proteins and then phosphorylated by hexokinase (HK).7 123I or 131I are radiopharmaceuticals that are applied in WBS and transported transcellularly to thyrocytes by the sodium/iodide symporter (NIS).8 Therefore, we investigated mRNA expression of these genes, which are connected with FDG PET and WBS, to discern potential prognostic roles of mRNA using PTC data from TCGA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data acquisition and characteristics

The primary and processed data were downloaded from the Genomic Data Commons Data Portal (https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/) in August 2016. All TCGA data were available without restrictions on publications or presentations according to TCGA publication guidelines. We downloaded data regarding somatic mutations, mRNA expression [normalized by RNAseq by the Expectation-Maximization (RSEM) method], and clinical information, which were last updated in May 2016. This process was performed using the ‘cgdsr’ package in R statistical software (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016). Of the 509 PTC cases, 118 patients in the PTC cohort were excluded. The reason for exclusion were 1) samples from metastatic tissues, 2) patients with not available or - infinite gene expression, and 3) patients with insufficient clinical information (age, sex, stage, BRAF mutation, and RAS mutation). mRNA expression data for NIS (solute carrier family 5 member 5, SLC5A5), hexokinase (HK1–3), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), and glucose transporter (solute carrier family 2, SLC2A1–4) were collected.

Statistical analysis

Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with a logrank test after being divided into two groups with a median mRNA expression value and generation of Kaplan-Meier survival plots. After log2 transformation, Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to determine the association between mRNA expression patterns, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare mRNA expression patterns in PTC patients with or without genetic mutations (BRAF and RAS). Thyroid differentiation score was calculated by averaging the log2 transformed fold change of 16 genes (deiodinase, iodothyronine, type I; deiodinase, iodothyronine, type II; dual oxidase 1; dual oxidase 2; forkhead box E1; GLIS family zinc finger 3; NK2 homeobox 1; paired box 8; SLC26A4; SLC5A5; SLC5A8; thyroglobulin; thyroid hormone receptor, alpha; thyroid hormone receptor, beta; thyroid peroxidase; and thyroid stimulating hormone receptor).9 Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7 for Mac OS X (GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, CA, USA).

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

A total of 391 PTC cases were included in this study (111 males and 280 females; age: 47.2±15.8 years). According to histological PTC types, 273 cases were included in the classical type, 85 in the follicular type, 29 in the tall cell variant, and four in others. Extrathyroidal extension was observed in 114 patients. Median follow-up duration was 30.1 months. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Correlation of mRNA expression of SLC5A5 with other assessed genes

mRNA expression patterns according to thyroid differentiation are described in a heatmap plot of 391 PTC patients (Fig. 1). Among the SLC2 family genes, expression of SLC5A5 mRNA was negatively correlated with that of SLC2A1 (r=−0.2187, p<0.0001) and positively with that of SLC2A4 (r=0.1483, p=0.0033). Among HK family genes, expression of SLC5A5 mRNA was positively correlated with that of HK1 (r=0.4326, p<0.0001) and negatively with that of HK2 (r=−0.2268, p<0.0001) (Table 2, Fig. 2).

mRNA expression according to genetic mutation status

Most mRNA expression patterns were significantly associated with either BRAF or RAS mutation. In PTC patients with BRAF mutation, expression of SLC2A1 (p<0.0001), SLC2A3 (p<0.0001), HK2 (p=0.0018), and HK3 (p<0.0001) mRNA was significantly higher than in PTC patients without BRAF mutations. However, expression of SLC5A5 (p<0.0001), SLC2A4 (p<0.0001), HK1 (p<0.0001), and G6PD (p<0.0001) mRNA was lower in PTC patients with BRAF mutations (Fig. 3). In PTC patients with RAS mutations, expression of SLC2A4 (p<0.0001) and HK1 (p<0.0001) mRNA was higher, and SLC2A1 (p<0.0001), SLC2A3 (p<0.0001), and HK3 (p<0.0001) mRNA expression was lower than in PTC patients without RAS mutations (Table 3, Fig. 4).

Survival analysis

PTC cases with higher expression of SLC5A5 mRNA had a favorable prognosis regarding DFS (hazard ratio 0.3319, p=0.004); however, there was no association with OS (Fig. 5). In addition, SLC2A2 and SLC2A3 mRNA had unfavorable prognosis regarding OS. Among the HK family genes, higher expression of HK1 mRNA was associated with a better prognosis concerning DFS (0.4055, p=0.013), although PTC patients with higher expression of HK3 mRNA showed a worse prognosis in DFS (2.299, p=0.0227) (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

In this study, expression of SLC5A5 mRNA was negatively correlated with that of SLC2A1 and HK2 and was positively correlated with SLC2A4 and HK1. During the natural evolution of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), either before diagnosis or over the course of treatment and follow-up, there is some loss of the ability to take up iodine owing to diminished SLC5A5 expression. A defective iodide-trapping mechanism due to reduced SLC5A5 expression appears to be an early and consistent feature of the oncogenic transformation of thyroid cells, and is associated with neoplastic transformation.10 This phenomenon is often seen as DTC progresses to the later stages of cancer development, and explains why advanced, high-risk DTC patients have a poorer response to RAI than early-stage DTC patients.11
Among the 14 SLC2A subtypes, SLC2A1 has been most widely investigated in various cancer types, including thyroid cancer, wherein some studies have found increased SLC2A1 expression.1213 Furthermore, adverse effects of SLC2A overexpression on survival outcomes in PTC patients have been implied for associations between SLC2A1 overexpression and tumor aggressiveness or dedifferentiation.1415 The expression of SLC5A5 and SLC2A1 mRNA is related to the accumulation of radioactive iodine (123I or 131I) and 18F-FDG in thyroid cancer cells,16 and the expression of these genes provides a molecular basis for the image modalities of gamma cameras and PET with these radiopharmaceuticals. High glucose uptake measured by FDG PET is associated with low SLC5A5 expression, which indicates dedifferentiation in thyroid cancer.17 This finding is a known phenomenon called “flip-flop” in FDG PET and WBS, which explains the mechanism of how FDG PET detects recurrent or metastatic cancer in patients, but WBS fails to detect tumors,18 consistent with guidelines from the American Thyroid Association.3 As a whole, our findings suggest that SLC2A1 and HK2 expression may be related to BRAF mutation and 18F-FDG uptake of PTC, which leads to cancer aggressiveness or dedifferentiation. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship among 18F-FDG uptake, the expression of variable glucose transporters, HK2, and BRAF mutations.
Most mRNA expression patterns in this study were significantly associated with PTC genetic mutations. Findings from a previous PTC TCGA showed that BRAF and RAS-like classes of PTC are significantly distinct in regards to differentiation state, and BRAF-like tumors exhibit a gene expression profile associated with a less differentiated state.9 Morari, et al.19 found that 230 DTC patients with a BRAF mutation had reduced SLC5A5 mRNA abundance. In this study, expressions of SLC2A1, SLC2A3, HK2, and HK3 mRNA were higher in PTC patients with BRAF mutations, which might reflect excessive glucose influx required for cancer cell proliferation facilitated by SLC2A,20 a well-known prognostic marker of DTC.21 This study is the first to show an association between mRNA and genetic mutation-prognosis. Our data suggest that mRNA expression helps to characterize a patient's risk and to identify individuals with a poor response to therapy. A larger number of patients with long-term follow-up may also confirm the clinical use of mRNA expression, reinforcing the predictive value of clinicopathological outcomes/markers, such as age and tumor size, as well as molecular markers, such as BRAF mutations.
We demonstrated that the expression of SLC5, SLC2, and HK genes (associated with survival) was associated with BRAF and RAS mutations, a well-known, adverse prognostic factor in PTC.21 The BRAF gene encodes a serine/threonine kinase that belongs to the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK-MAP kinase pathway, whose biological role is to mediate cellular responses to growth factors.12 Furthermore, we demonstrated that expression of SLC5A5, HK1, and HK3 mRNA was associated with PTC recurrence. Extranodal extension is also associated with poor prognosis in thyroid cancer.22 Our study is the first to show an association between mRNA expression and genetic mutation in cancer prognosis. Our data suggests that mRNA expression may help to determine patient risk and individuals with a poor response to therapy. Ward, et al.23 identified that patients with PTC who experienced early recurrence or metastasis show low expression levels of SLC5A5 mRNA in primary tumors. As expected, SLC2A2 and SLC2A3 mRNA, which are known to be associated with BRAF and RAS mutations, had unfavorable prognosis regarding OS. As lower mRNA expression of SLC5A5 reflects a poorer response to radioactive iodine therapy, it is reasonable that this population of patients have favorable prognosis in DFS. However, mRNA expression of SLC5A5 did not affect OS, as PTC is perceived to have a high survival rate, with a minority of patients showing recurrence or metastasis.24 A larger number of patients with long-term follow-up may also confirm the clinical use of mRNA expression, reinforcing the predictive value of well-recognized clinical and pathological predictors of outcome.
Despite a vast amount of genetic and epigenetic information, the absence of solid prospective studies on thyroid cancer and information on the relationships among clinical, pathological, and genetic factors makes it difficult to discern the prognostic role played by genetic mutations.5 The molecular characterization of thyroid cancer has begun to influence its diagnosis and treatment landscape. Gene expression analysis might also be clinically useful in the near future. In this study, we found evidence for the genetic basis of 18F-FDG PET in PTC patients with negative WBS with RAI and the prognostic value of SLC5A5 in PTC. Additionally, there is a demand for new drugs for PTC refractory to standard treatment with RAI, as the impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on survival is not satisfactory and their side effects are often fatal.12 In addition to prognosis, the aforementioned mutations and respective molecular pathways, as well as genetic and epigenetic alterations recently identified by TCGA,9 may serve as likely targets and areas of focus for personalized therapy. Furthermore, drugs inhibiting SLC2A-family genes might have great therapeutic potential by inducing starvation of tumor cells.25 In addition, SLC5A5 expression can be augmented by upregulation of both transcriptional and post-translational pathways. Some isoform-specific signal transduction pathways may play critical roles in tissue-specific SLC5A5 regulation. Delineation of such signaling pathways may lead to methods that will further enhance functional SLC5A5 expression in DTC, thus expanding the application of RAI to RAI-refractory PTC.26 We could not analyze the other important genes related to iodine metabolism due to lack of data. In addition, we could only analyze expressions of mRNAs, not those of proteins. Further studies are needed to investigate the expression levels of proteins between SLC2A family and SLC5A5.
In conclusion, expression of SLC5A5 mRNA was negatively correlated with SLC2A1. This finding provides a molecular basis for the management of PTC patients with negative WBS using 18F-FDG PET scans. In addition, higher SLC5A5 mRNA expression was associated with less frequent recurrence or metastasis, but not with deaths. Moreover, PTC patients with BRAF mutations had reduced SLC5A5 mRNA expression and higher expression of HK2 and HK3 mRNA, which might reflect a less-differentiated state of PTC.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by a Dong-A University research fund grant and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (2017R1D1A1B03029352/2017R1D1A1B03033235). The funding source had no role in the collection of the data or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Notes

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

References

1. Cabanillas ME, McFadden DG, Durante C. Thyroid cancer. Lancet. 2016; 388:2783–2795. PMID: 27240885.
crossref
2. Ahn HS, Welch HG. South Korea's thyroid-cancer “Epidemic”--turning the tide. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373:2389–2390. PMID: 26650173.
3. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016; 26:1–133. PMID: 26462967.
crossref
4. Pak K, Cheon GJ, Nam HY, Kim SJ, Kang KW, Chung JK, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nucl Med. 2014; 55:884–890. PMID: 24752671.
crossref
5. Tavares C, Melo M, Cameselle-Teijeiro JM, Soares P, Sobrinho-Simöes M. ENDOCRINE TUMOURS: Genetic predictors of thyroid cancer outcome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016; 174:R117–R126. PMID: 26510840.
crossref
6. Chai YJ, Yi JW, Oh SW, Kim YA, Yi KH, Kim JH, et al. Upregulation of SLC2 (GLUT) family genes is related to poor survival outcomes in papillary thyroid carcinoma: analysis of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Surgery. 2017; 161:188–194. PMID: 27842912.
crossref
7. Smith TA. FDG uptake, tumour characteristics and response to therapy: a review. Nucl Med Commun. 1998; 19:97–105. PMID: 9548192.
8. Filetti S, Bidart JM, Arturi F, Caillou B, Russo D, Schlumberger M. Sodium/iodide symporter: a key transport system in thyroid cancer cell metabolism. Eur J Endocrinol. 1999; 141:443–457. PMID: 10576759.
crossref
9. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cell. 2014; 159:676–690. PMID: 25417114.
10. Ros P, Rossi DL, Acebrón A, Santisteban P. Thyroid-specific gene expression in the multi-step process of thyroid carcinogenesis. Biochimie. 1999; 81:389–396. PMID: 10401674.
crossref
11. Winter J, Winter M, Krohn T, Heinzel A, Behrendt FF, Tuttle RM, et al. Patients with high-risk differentiated thyroid cancer have a lower I-131 ablation success rate than low-risk ones in spite of a high ablation activity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2016; 85:926–931. PMID: 27256714.
crossref
12. Ravazoula P, Batistatou A, Aletra C, Ladopoulos J, Kourounis G, Tzigounis B. Immunohistochemical expression of glucose transporter Glut1 and cyclin D1 in breast carcinomas with negative lymph nodes. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003; 24:544–546. PMID: 14658600.
13. Haber RS, Weiser KR, Pritsker A, Reder I, Burstein DE. GLUT1 glucose transporter expression in benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 1997; 7:363–367. PMID: 9226204.
crossref
14. Józ´wiak P, Krzes´lak A, Pomorski L, Lipin´ ska A. Expression of hypoxia-related glucose transporters GLUT1 and GLUT3 in benign, malignant and non-neoplastic thyroid lesions. Mol Med Rep. 2012; 6:601–606. PMID: 22752218.
15. Kim S, Chung JK, Min HS, Kang JH, Park DJ, Jeong JM, et al. Expression patterns of glucose transporter-1 gene and thyroid specific genes in human papillary thyroid carcinoma. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014; 48:91–97. PMID: 24900148.
crossref
16. Chung JK. Sodium iodide symporter: its role in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2002; 43:1188–1200. PMID: 12215558.
17. Moon SH, Oh YL, Choi JY, Baek CH, Son YI, Jeong HS, et al. Comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with the expressions of glucose transporter type 1 and Na+/I− symporter in patients with untreated papillary thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Res. 2013; 38:77–84. PMID: 22888973.
18. Chung JK, So Y, Lee JS, Choi CW, Lim SM, Lee DS, et al. Value of FDG PET in papillary thyroid carcinoma with negative 131I whole-body scan. J Nucl Med. 1999; 40:986–992. PMID: 10452315.
19. Morari EC, Marcello MA, Guilhen AC, Cunha LL, Latuff P, Soares FA, et al. Use of sodium iodide symporter expression in differentiated thyroid carcinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011; 75:247–254. PMID: 21521301.
crossref
20. Yamamoto T, Seino Y, Fukumoto H, Koh G, Yano H, Inagaki N, et al. Over-expression of facilitative glucose transporter genes in human cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990; 170:223–230. PMID: 2372287.
crossref
21. Pak K, Suh S, Kim SJ, Kim IJ. Prognostic value of genetic mutations in thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2015; 25:63–70. PMID: 25244593.
crossref
22. Suh S, Pak K, Seok JW, Kim IJ. Prognostic value of extranodal extension in thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis. Yonsei Med J. 2016; 57:1324–1328. PMID: 27593858.
crossref
23. Ward LS, Santarosa PL, Granja F, da AssumpÇão LV, Savoldi M, Goldman GH. Low expression of sodium iodide symporter identifies aggressive thyroid tumors. Cancer Lett. 2003; 200:85–91. PMID: 14550956.
crossref
24. Schlumberger MJ. Papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338:297–306. PMID: 9445411.
crossref
25. Ulanovskaya OA, Cui J, Kron SJ, Kozmin SA. A pairwise chemical genetic screen identifies new inhibitors of glucose transport. Chem Biol. 2011; 18:222–230. PMID: 21338919.
crossref
26. Kogai T, Brent GA. The sodium iodide symporter (NIS): regulation and approaches to targeting for cancer therapeutics. Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 135:355–370. PMID: 22750642.
crossref
Fig. 1

Heatmap of mRNA expression according to thyroid differentiation score. Genes assessed were SLC5A5, SLC2A1, SLC2A2, SLC2A3, SLC2A4, HK1, HK2, HK3, and G6PD.

ymj-59-746-g001
Fig. 2

Correlation of mRNA expression of SLC5A5 with the other genes.

ymj-59-746-g002
Fig. 3

mRNA expression dynamics according to BRAF mutation status. (A) SLC5A5, (B) SLC2A1, (C) SLC2A2, (D) SLC2A3, (E) SLC2A4, (F) HK1, (G) HK2, (H) HK3, and (I) G6PD.

ymj-59-746-g003
Fig. 4

mRNA expression patterns according to RAS mutation status. (A) SLC5A5, (B) SLC2A1, (C) SLC2A2, (D) SLC2A3, (E) SLC2A4, (F) HK1, (G) HK2, (H) HK3, and (I) G6PD.

ymj-59-746-g004
Fig. 5

Survival curves in the context of SLC5A5 mRNA abundance. (A) Disease-free survival and (B) overall survival.

ymj-59-746-g005
Table 1

Patient Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

ymj-59-746-i001
Characteristic n (%)
Age
 ≥45 212 (54.2)
 <45 179 (45.8)
Sex
 Male 111 (28.3)
 Female 280 (71.6)
Histological type of PTC
 Classical 273 (69.8)
 Follicular 85 (21.8)
 Tall cell 29 (7.4)
 Others 4 (1.0)
Extrathyroidal extension
 Yes 114 (29.2)
  Minimal 102 (26.1)
  Moderate 11 (2.8)
  Very advanced 1 (0.2)
 No 265 (67.8)
 NA 12 (3.0)
Lymph node metastasis
 Yes 161 (41.2)
 No 222 (56.8)
 NA 8 (2.0)
Distant metastasis
 Yes 9 (2.3)
 No 382 (97.7)
TNM (The American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th)
 I/II 266 (68.0)
 III/IV 125 (32.0)
BRAF mutation
 Yes 234 (59.8)
 No 157 (40.2)
RAS mutation
 Yes 52 (13.3)
 No 339 (86.7)

PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; NA, not assessed.

Table 2

Correlation between mRNA Expression of SLC5A5 and Other Genes Assessed in this Study

ymj-59-746-i002
Protein mRNA Spearman r 95% CI p value
Glucose transporter SLC2A1 −0.219 −0.314 to −0.119 <0.001
SLC2A2 −0.010 −0.112 to 0.092 0.844
SLC2A3 −0.015 −0.117 to 0.087 0.768
SLC2A4 0.148 0.047 to 0.247 0.003
Hexokinase HK1 0.433 0.346 to 0.512 <0.001
HK2 −0.227 −0.322 to −0.128 <0.001
HK3 0.034 −0.069 to 0.135 0.506
Glucose 6 phosphatase G6PD 0.036 −0.067 to 0.137 0.483

CI, confidence interval.

Table 3

Median mRNA Expression according to BRAF or RAS Mutation Status

ymj-59-746-i003
Protein mRNA BRAF RAS
(+), n=234 (−), n=157 p value (+), n=52 (−), n=339 p value
Sodium-iodide symporter SLC5A5 1.19 4.03 <0.001 2.96 1.87 0.335
Glucose transporter SLC2A1 10.02 9.45 <0.001 9.462 9.887 <0.001
SLC2A2 −3.32 −3.32 0.329 −3.32 −3.32 0.432
SLC2A3 10.50 9.21 <0.001 8.81 10.26 <0.001
SLC2A4 4.80 6.55 <0.001 7.19 5.29 <0.001
Hexokinase HK1 11.36 11.93 <0.001 11.91 11.47 <0.001
HK2 11.14 10.92 0.002 11.05 11.03 0.898
HK3 6.29 4.38 <0.001 3.76 5.87 <0.001
Glucose 6 phosphatase G6PD 10.70 10.89 <0.001 10.82 10.75 0.244

The median of log2 transformation of mRNA expression is indicated.

Table 4

Survival Analysis according to mRNA Expression

ymj-59-746-i004
Protein mRNA Disease-free survival Overall survival
Hazard ratio 95% CI p value Hazard ratio 95% CI p value
Sodium-iodide symporter SLC5A5 0.332 0.169–0.650 0.004 1.660 0.550–5.007 0.354
Glucose transporter SLC2A1 1.499 0.765–2.938 0.247 2.402 0.798–7.228 0.166
SLC2A2 1.612 0.823–3.157 0.171 4.351 1.456–13 0.035
SLC2A3 1.294 0.660–2.536 0.457 3.432 1.123–10.490 0.082
SLC2A4 0.513 0.262–1.004 0.063 0.593 0.198–1.780 0.377
Hexokinase HK1 0.406 0.207–0.794 0.013 1.339 0.450–3.983 0.596
HK2 1.406 0.718–2.753 0.326 0.820 0.276–2.432 0.720
HK3 2.299 1.174–4.504 0.023 1.806 0.605–5.392 0.317
Glucose 6 phosphatase G6PD 0.809 0.413–1.585 0.538 1.099 0.367–3.287 0.864

CI, confidence interval.

TOOLS
Similar articles