Journal List > J Endocr Surg > v.18(2) > 1097234

Zehra and Parveen: Postoperative Hypocalcaemia Following Open Thyroidectomy for Benign Multinodular Goiters Using FOCUS Harmonic Scalpel Versus Conventional Suture Ligation Technique for Hemostasis: a Prospective, Single-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

초록

Purpose

Vessel hemostasis during thyroidectomy reduces the risk of postoperative hypocalcaemia and is achieved using several techniques. The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of hypocalcaemia 24-48 hours following total thyroidectomy using FOCUS harmonic scalpel (HS) versus conventional suture ligation (CSL).

Methods

A prospective, single-blind, randomized trial in which 76 patients with benign multinodular goiters were randomized into two groups to receive total thyroidectomy using HS (n=38) or CSL (n=38) techniques. Patients were monitored for hypocalcaemia at 24 and 48 hours post- thyroidectomy and their length of postoperative hospital stay was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test using SPSS to detect significant differences between groups.

Results

The incidence of postoperative hypocalcaemia was 15.79% in the HS group, and 36.84%, in the CSL group (p =0.033). The number of in situ parathyroid glands was significantly associated with hypocalcaemia in the CSL group (P=0.019), but not in the HS group (P=0.372). Length of hospital stay was 2.63±0.85 in the CSL group and 1.37±0.67 days in the HS group (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Compared to conventional hemostasis, FOCUS HS reduces the overall risk of hypocalcaemia during thyroidectomy for benign thyroid disease. The conventional suture ligation technique should be replaced with FOCUS HS technique for thyroidectomy.

REFERENCES

1.Ferri E., Armato E., Spinato G., Spinato R. Focus harmonic scalpel compared to conventional haemostasis in open total thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Int J Otolaryngol. 2011. 2011:357195.
crossref
2.Hamberger B. History of thyroid surgery: the Kocher incision. Linos D, Chung WY, editors. Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy. New York (NY): Springer;2012. p. 1–5.
crossref
3.Hannan SA. The magnificent seven: a history of modern thyroid surgery. Int J Surg. 2006. 4:187–91.
crossref
4.Anandaravi BN., Aslam MA., Nair PP. Prospective randomised study using focus harmonic scalpel versus conventional hemostasis for vessel ligation in open thyroid surgery. Int Surg J. 2017. 4:1431–7.
crossref
5.Chang YK., Lang BH. To identify or not to identify parathyroid glands during total thyroidectomy. Gland Surg. 2017. 6:S20–9.
crossref
6.Lorente-Poch L., Sancho JJ., Muñoz-Nova JL., Sánchez-Velázquez P., Sitges-Serra A. Defining the syndromes of parathyroid failure after total thyroidectomy. Gland Surg. 2015. 4:82–90.
7.Abate EG., Clarke BL. Review of hypoparathyroidism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017. 7:172.
crossref
8.Hadker N., Egan J., Sanders J., Lagast H., Clarke B. Understanding the burden of illness associated with hypoparathyroidism reported among patients in the paradox study. Endocr Pract. 2014. 20:671–9.
crossref
9.Brindzjuk M., Krupp G., Kettritz U., Luft FC. Physician-induced hypocalcaemia, nephrocalcinosis, and incomplete distal renal tubular acidosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000. 15:1248–50.
crossref
10.Sheahan P., Mehanna R., Basheeth N., Murphy MS. Is systematic identification of all four parathyroid glands necessary during total thyroidectomy?: a prospective study. Laryngoscope. 2013. 123:2324–8.
crossref
11.Saint Marc O., Cogliandolo A., Piquard A., Famà F., Pidoto RR. LigaSure vs clamp-and-tie technique to achieve hemostasis in total thyroidectomy for benign multinodular goiter: a prospective randomized study. Arch Surg. 2007. 142:150–6.
12.Roye GD., Monchik J., Amaral JF. Endoscopic adrenalectomy using ultrasonic cutting and coagulating. Surg Technol Int. 2000. 9:129–38.
13.Laycock WS., Trus TL., Hunter JG. New technology for the division of short gastric vessels during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 1996. 10:71–3.
crossref
14.Pogorelić Z., Perko Z., Družijanić N., Tomić S., Mrklić I. How to prevent lateral thermal damage to tissue using the harmonic scalpel: experimental study on pig small intestine and abdominal wall. Eur Surg Res. 2009. 43:235–40.
crossref
15.Yener O., Demir M., Yılmaz A., Yıgıtbaşı R., Atak T. Harmonic scalpel compared to conventional hemostasis in thyroid surgery. Indian J Surg. 2014. 76:66–9.
crossref
16.Cheng H., Soleas I., Ferko NC., Clymer JW., Amaral JF. A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic Focus in thyroidectomy compared to conventional techniques. Thyroid Res. 2015. 8:15.
crossref
17.Melck AL., Wiseman SM. Harmonic scalpel compared to conventional hemostasis in thyroid surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Surg Oncol. 2010. 2010:396079.
crossref
18.Graff AT., Miller FR., Roehm CE. Predicting hypocalcemia after total thyroidectomy: parathyroid hormone level vs. serial calcium levels. Ear Nose Throat J. 2010. 89:462–5.
19.Gac P., Cabané P., Amat J., Huidobro F., Rossi R., Rodríguez F, et al. Incidence of hypocalcemia after total thyroidectomy. Rev Med Chil. 2007. 135:26–30.
20.Kang M., Ragan BG., Park JH. Issues in outcomes research: an overview of randomization techniques for clinical trials. J Athl Train. 2008. 43:215–21.
crossref
21.Schulz KF., Altman DG., Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010. 340:C332.
crossref
22.Vassiliou I., Tympa A., Arkadopoulos N., Nikolakopoulos F., Petropoulou T., Smyrniotis V. Total thyroidectomy as the single surgical option for benign and malignant thyroid disease: a surgical challenge. Arch Med Sci. 2013. 9:74–8.
crossref
23.Chindavijak S. Prediction of hypocalcemia in postoperative total thyroidectomy using single measurement of intra-operative parathyroid hormone level. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007. 90:1167–71.
24.Sperlongano P., Sperlongano S., Foroni F., De Lucia FP., Pezzulo C., Manfredi C, et al. Postoperative hypocalcemia: assessment timing. Int J Surg. 2014. 12:S95–7.
crossref
25.Praženica P., O'keeffe L., Holý R. Dissection and identification of parathyroid glands during thyroidectomy: association with hypocalcemia. Head Neck. 2015. 37:393–9.
crossref

Fig. 1.
CONSORT Flow Diagram for enrollment, allocation, follow-up, and analysis of patient participants. CONSORT = CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; CSL = conventional suture ligation; HS = harmonic scalpel.
jes-18-132f1.tif
Table 1.
Baseline and pre-operative characteristics of the included patients
Baseline characteristic CSL (n=38) HS (n=38) P value
Gender     0.033
 Male 13 (34.21) 12 (31.58)  
 Female 25 (65.79) 26 (68.42)  
Age (yr)      
 Mean±SD 31.92±6.48 32.71±5.78 0.577
 18–33 20 (52.63) 20 (52.63) >0.999
 34–40 18 (47.37) 18 (47.37)  
 Diagnosis     >0.999
 Multinodular goitre 38 (100) 38 (100)  

Values are presented as number (%).

CSL = conventional suture ligation; HS = harmonic scalpel; SD = standard deviation; ANOVA = analysis of variance.

Statistically significant at 5% level of significance

P values are based on χ2 test for proportions and ANOVA for mean.

Table 2.
Postoperative hypocalcaemia and length of hospital stay by surgical technique
Postoperative hypocalcaemia by surgical technique CSL (n=38) HS (n=38) P value
Calcium (mg/dL)      
 At 24 hr 8.00±1.05 8.56±0.96 0.018
 At 48 hr 8.28±1.04 8.09±1.03 0.013
Postoperative hypocalcaemia     0.033
 Yes 14 (36.84) 6 (15.79)  
 No 24 (63.16) 32 (84.21)  
Length of stay (day) 2.63±0.85 1.37±0.67 <0.001

Values are presented as mean±SD or number (%).

CSL = conventional suture ligation; HS = harmonic scalpel

Statistically significant at 5% level of significance. P values are based on χ2 test for proportions and ANOVA for mean.

Table 3.
Association of parathyroid identification with postoperative hypocalcaemia in both techniques
Method Hypocalcaemia Parathyroid not identified Parathyroid identified Fisher's exact test P value
CSL Yes 6 (75) 8 (26.67) 0.019
  No 2 (25) 22 (73.33)  
HS Yes 2 (25) 4 (13.33) 0.372
  No 6 (75) 26 (86.67)  

CSL = conventional suture ligation; HS = harmonic scalpel.

Statistically significant at 5% level of significance.

Table 4.
Association of gender with postoperative hypocalcaemia in both techniques
Method Hypocalcaemia Male Female Fisher's exact test P value
CSL Yes 65 (38.46) 9 (36) 0.577
  No 8 (61.54) 16 (64)  
HS Yes 1 (8.33) 5 (19.23) 0.369
  No 11 (91.67) 21 (80.77)  

CSL = conventional suture ligation; HS = harmonic scalpel.

Table 5.
Association of age group with postoperative hypocalcaemia in both techniques
Method Hypocalcaemia 18–33 yr 34–40 yr Fisher's exact test P value
CSL Yes 8 (40) 6 (33.33) 0.465
  No 12 (60) 12 (66.67)  
HS Yes 2 (10) 4 (22.22) 0.279
  No 18 (90) 14 (77.78)  

CSL = conventional suture ligation; HS = harmonic scalpel.

TOOLS
Similar articles