초록
Purpose
Vessel hemostasis during thyroidectomy reduces the risk of postoperative hypocalcaemia and is achieved using several techniques. The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of hypocalcaemia 24-48 hours following total thyroidectomy using FOCUS harmonic scalpel (HS) versus conventional suture ligation (CSL).
Methods
A prospective, single-blind, randomized trial in which 76 patients with benign multinodular goiters were randomized into two groups to receive total thyroidectomy using HS (n=38) or CSL (n=38) techniques. Patients were monitored for hypocalcaemia at 24 and 48 hours post- thyroidectomy and their length of postoperative hospital stay was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test using SPSS to detect significant differences between groups.
Results
The incidence of postoperative hypocalcaemia was 15.79% in the HS group, and 36.84%, in the CSL group (p =0.033). The number of in situ parathyroid glands was significantly associated with hypocalcaemia in the CSL group (P=0.019), but not in the HS group (P=0.372). Length of hospital stay was 2.63±0.85 in the CSL group and 1.37±0.67 days in the HS group (P<0.001).
REFERENCES
1.Ferri E., Armato E., Spinato G., Spinato R. Focus harmonic scalpel compared to conventional haemostasis in open total thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Int J Otolaryngol. 2011. 2011:357195.
2.Hamberger B. History of thyroid surgery: the Kocher incision. Linos D, Chung WY, editors. Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy. New York (NY): Springer;2012. p. 1–5.
3.Hannan SA. The magnificent seven: a history of modern thyroid surgery. Int J Surg. 2006. 4:187–91.
4.Anandaravi BN., Aslam MA., Nair PP. Prospective randomised study using focus harmonic scalpel versus conventional hemostasis for vessel ligation in open thyroid surgery. Int Surg J. 2017. 4:1431–7.
5.Chang YK., Lang BH. To identify or not to identify parathyroid glands during total thyroidectomy. Gland Surg. 2017. 6:S20–9.
6.Lorente-Poch L., Sancho JJ., Muñoz-Nova JL., Sánchez-Velázquez P., Sitges-Serra A. Defining the syndromes of parathyroid failure after total thyroidectomy. Gland Surg. 2015. 4:82–90.
8.Hadker N., Egan J., Sanders J., Lagast H., Clarke B. Understanding the burden of illness associated with hypoparathyroidism reported among patients in the paradox study. Endocr Pract. 2014. 20:671–9.
9.Brindzjuk M., Krupp G., Kettritz U., Luft FC. Physician-induced hypocalcaemia, nephrocalcinosis, and incomplete distal renal tubular acidosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000. 15:1248–50.
10.Sheahan P., Mehanna R., Basheeth N., Murphy MS. Is systematic identification of all four parathyroid glands necessary during total thyroidectomy?: a prospective study. Laryngoscope. 2013. 123:2324–8.
11.Saint Marc O., Cogliandolo A., Piquard A., Famà F., Pidoto RR. LigaSure vs clamp-and-tie technique to achieve hemostasis in total thyroidectomy for benign multinodular goiter: a prospective randomized study. Arch Surg. 2007. 142:150–6.
12.Roye GD., Monchik J., Amaral JF. Endoscopic adrenalectomy using ultrasonic cutting and coagulating. Surg Technol Int. 2000. 9:129–38.
13.Laycock WS., Trus TL., Hunter JG. New technology for the division of short gastric vessels during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 1996. 10:71–3.
14.Pogorelić Z., Perko Z., Družijanić N., Tomić S., Mrklić I. How to prevent lateral thermal damage to tissue using the harmonic scalpel: experimental study on pig small intestine and abdominal wall. Eur Surg Res. 2009. 43:235–40.
15.Yener O., Demir M., Yılmaz A., Yıgıtbaşı R., Atak T. Harmonic scalpel compared to conventional hemostasis in thyroid surgery. Indian J Surg. 2014. 76:66–9.
16.Cheng H., Soleas I., Ferko NC., Clymer JW., Amaral JF. A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic Focus in thyroidectomy compared to conventional techniques. Thyroid Res. 2015. 8:15.
17.Melck AL., Wiseman SM. Harmonic scalpel compared to conventional hemostasis in thyroid surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Surg Oncol. 2010. 2010:396079.
18.Graff AT., Miller FR., Roehm CE. Predicting hypocalcemia after total thyroidectomy: parathyroid hormone level vs. serial calcium levels. Ear Nose Throat J. 2010. 89:462–5.
19.Gac P., Cabané P., Amat J., Huidobro F., Rossi R., Rodríguez F, et al. Incidence of hypocalcemia after total thyroidectomy. Rev Med Chil. 2007. 135:26–30.
20.Kang M., Ragan BG., Park JH. Issues in outcomes research: an overview of randomization techniques for clinical trials. J Athl Train. 2008. 43:215–21.
21.Schulz KF., Altman DG., Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010. 340:C332.
22.Vassiliou I., Tympa A., Arkadopoulos N., Nikolakopoulos F., Petropoulou T., Smyrniotis V. Total thyroidectomy as the single surgical option for benign and malignant thyroid disease: a surgical challenge. Arch Med Sci. 2013. 9:74–8.
23.Chindavijak S. Prediction of hypocalcemia in postoperative total thyroidectomy using single measurement of intra-operative parathyroid hormone level. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007. 90:1167–71.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristic | CSL (n=38) | HS (n=38) | P value† |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | 0.033∗ | ||
Male | 13 (34.21) | 12 (31.58) | |
Female | 25 (65.79) | 26 (68.42) | |
Age (yr) | |||
Mean±SD | 31.92±6.48 | 32.71±5.78 | 0.577 |
18–33 | 20 (52.63) | 20 (52.63) | >0.999 |
34–40 | 18 (47.37) | 18 (47.37) | |
Diagnosis | >0.999 | ||
Multinodular goitre | 38 (100) | 38 (100) |
Table 2.
Postoperative hypocalcaemia by surgical technique | CSL (n=38) | HS (n=38) | P value† |
---|---|---|---|
Calcium (mg/dL) | |||
At 24 hr | 8.00±1.05 | 8.56±0.96 | 0.018∗ |
At 48 hr | 8.28±1.04 | 8.09±1.03 | 0.013∗ |
Postoperative hypocalcaemia | 0.033∗ | ||
Yes | 14 (36.84) | 6 (15.79) | |
No | 24 (63.16) | 32 (84.21) | |
Length of stay (day) | 2.63±0.85 | 1.37±0.67 | <0.001∗ |
Table 3.
Method | Hypocalcaemia | Parathyroid not identified | Parathyroid identified | Fisher's exact test P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
CSL | Yes | 6 (75) | 8 (26.67) | 0.019∗ |
No | 2 (25) | 22 (73.33) | ||
HS | Yes | 2 (25) | 4 (13.33) | 0.372 |
No | 6 (75) | 26 (86.67) |