Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.59(6) > 1096567

Mun, Ha, Jeoung, Park, and Kim: Comparison of Mean Optic Disc Cup Surface Depth between Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Glaucoma-like Disc

Abstract

Purpose

Optic nerve head surface depression in patients with glaucoma has been previously reported. We quantitatively compared the mean optic disc cup surface depth between glaucoma-like disc (GLD) patients with large cup-to-disc ratios and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients.

Methods

A total of 40 eyes of 40 patients with GLD and 40 eyes of 40 patients with POAG were included in this study. All patients had an average cup-to-disc ratio of 0.7–0.8. The optic disc area, mean cup-to-disc ratio, and mean optic disc cup volume were measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus™ HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA). The mean optic disc cup surface depth was calculated using the formula: (mean optic disc cup volume/[optic disc area × mean cup-to-disc ratio2]) − 200 µm.

Results

The mean ages of patients were 61.18 ± 11.83 and 59.65 ± 11.69 years for the GLD and POAG groups, respectively. The average cup-to-disc ratios were 0.74 ± 0.03 and 0.75 ± 0.03 for the GLD and POAG groups, respectively, but no significant difference was observed between the two groups. The mean optic disc cup surface depths were 144.74 ± 82.78 µm and 199.53 ± 90.26 µm for the GLD and POAG groups, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.006, t-test).

Conclusions

POAG patients showed a significantly greater mean optic disc cup surface depth compared to GLD patients with a similar mean cup-to-disc ratio. Based on the results of spectral domain optical coherence tomography, confirming the mean optic disc cup surface depth is expected to provide additional information to distinguish GLD from POAG patients.

Figures and Tables

Table 1

Comparison of demographic and baseline clinical characteristics between glaucoma-like disc and primary open-angle glaucoma patients

jkos-59-556-i001

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

IOP = intraocular pressure; SE = spherical equivalent; CCT = central corneal thickness.

*Student t-test; Chi-square test.

Table 2

Comparison of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography measurements between glaucoma-like disc and primary open-angle glaucoma patients

jkos-59-556-i002

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

RNFL = retinal nerve fiber layer.

*Student t-test.

Notes

This study was presented as an e-poster at the 119th Annual Meeting of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2018.

Conflicts of Interest The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

References

1. Sommer A, Miller NR, Pollack I, et al. The nerve fiber layer in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977; 95:2149–2156.
crossref
2. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982; 100:135–146.
3. Wu Z, Xu G, Weinreb RN, et al. Optic nerve head deformation in glaucoma: a prospective analysis of optic nerve head surface and lamina cribrosa surface displacement. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122:1317–1329.
4. Xu G, Weinreb RN, Leung CK. Optic nerve head deformation in glaucoma: the temporal relationship between optic nerve head surface depression and retinal nerve fiber layer thinning. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121:2362–2370.
5. Kim YK, Ha A, Lee WJ, et al. Measurement of optic disc cup surface depth using Cirrus HD-OCT. J Glaucoma. 2017; 26:1072–1080.
crossref
6. Kim JS, Ishikawa H, Sung KR, et al. Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurement reproducibility improved with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93:1057–1063.
crossref
7. Mwanza JC, Gendy MG, Feuer WJ, et al. Effects of changing operators and instruments on time-domain and spectral-domain OCT measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011; 42:328–337.
crossref
8. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:1257–1263.
9. Yang B, Ye C, Yu M, et al. Optic disc imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: variability and agreement study with Heidelberg retinal tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:1852–1857.
10. Lee EJ, Kim TW, Kim M, Kim H. Influence of lamina cribrosa thickness and depth on the rate of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer thinning. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122:721–729.
crossref
11. Mwanza JC, Oakley JD, Budenz DL, et al. Ability of cirrus HD-OCT optic nerve head parameters to discriminate normal from glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118:241–248.e1.
crossref
12. Furlanetto RL, Park SC, Damle UJ, et al. Posterior displacement of the lamina cribrosa in glaucoma: in vivo interindividual and intereye comparisons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54:4836–4842.
crossref
13. Lee EJ, Kim TW, Weinreb RN. Reversal of lamina cribrosa displacement and thickness after trabeculectomy in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:1359–1366.
crossref
14. Inoue R, Hangai M, Kotera Y, et al. Three-dimensional high-speed optical coherence tomography imaging of lamina cribrosa in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:214–222.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles